Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection 3.1.1 MPS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of Detector Solenoid Effect to the Beam Effect on Beam Orbit Effect on Beam Size S.Kuroda(KEK)
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Overview of Beam Delivery System Final Focus Optics Collimator Final Doublet Extraction/Dump Others S.Kuroda ( KEK ) MDI meeting at SLAC 1/6/2005.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System & Machine Detector Interface Andrei Seryi, SLAC Annual DOE HEP Program Review June 11-14, 2007.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
BDS GDE context LC-ABD2 : WP4 - Beam Line Design 12 th April 2007, LC-ABD Plenary, RHUL Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, The Cockcroft Institute.
November 2005M. Woodley1 ILC Beam Delivery System layout with end-of-linac undulator.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
A.Seryi, Oct. 26, BDS comparison and positron source A.Seryi October 26, 2005 Discussion of BDS and positron source is given in [1] “Comment on.
European Design Study Towards a TeV Linear Collider WP 2 : Beam Delivery System Co-ordinator: Deepa Angal-Kalinin CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
1 ATF2 Tuning and its application to ILC and CLIC FFS/IR region ASTeC and MAN : working together on tuning methods for the ATF2 and ILC IR/extraction design.
ILC Beam Delivery System Layout and Lattice Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Cockcroft Institute Cockcroft Institute SAC th November 2006.
November 07, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beam Delivery System updates BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Andrei Seryi Valencia GDE.
Overview of Extraction Line Designs and Issues
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Interim Working Assumption” 2006e Release European LC Workshop, January , Daresbury.
Ijaz Ahmed Ijaz Ahmed Helmut Burkhardt Andrea Latina Beam-Halo Generation Study in CLIC CLIC Beam Dynamics Meeting, CERN: 13/02/08.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Interaction Region Issues and Beam Delivery R&D Issues & IR Design Status R&D Plans T. Markiewicz Klaisner Review 4/15/1999.
ILC Beam Delivery System and ATF2 design Andrei Seryi SLAC for BDS design team May 25-30, 2008, Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
GDE questions, including one or two IRs Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei Seryi for WG4 Snowmass, CO, August 25, 2005 Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei.
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
11-13th October 2007 BDS KOM, SLAC 1 Accelerator and detector requirements specification and optimisation on example of interaction Region Deepa Angal-Kalinin.
October 20, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ILC Interaction regions : The GDE perspective Talk based on several talks presented by BDS area leaders Andrei.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
2 nd EuroTeV Annual Meeting, Daresbury 9 th January 2007 WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
Task Lists of ATF2 commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi ATF2 Project Meeting 12 / 17 / 2008.
COMPENSATION OF DETECTOR SOLENOID FIELD WITH L*=4.1M Glen White, SLAC April 20, 2015 ALCW2015, KEK, Japan.
Beam Delivery (wg4) update since Snowmass Andrei Seryi for WG4 GDE meeting December 8, 2005 Snowmass 2005 GDE Meeting at INFN-LNF.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
BDS/MDI Deepa Angal-Kalinin Andrei Seryi AD&I Meeting, DESY, May 29, 2009.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Accelerator WG 5 summary Interaction region, ATF2 and MDI Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Lau Gatignon, Andrei Seryi, Rogelio Tomas IWLC
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Grahame Blair, Tomoyuki Sanuki, Andrei Seryi
Near IR FF design including FD and longer L* issues
BDIR/MDI Summary ECFA Final Plenary
Beam Delivery update Andrei Seryi December 12, 2005
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Accelerator and detector requirements specification and optimisation on example of interaction Region BDS Design Team 11-13th October 2007 BDS KOM, SLAC.
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
NEW DESIGN OF THE TESLA INTERACTION REGION WITH l* = 5 m
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
Beam Delivery System Schedule at ILC2010
S.Kuroda ( KEK ) Final Focus Optics Collimeter Final Doublet
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Presentation transcript:

Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS collimation Skew correction Emittance diagnostcs Polarimeter and energy diagnostics Tune-up and emergency extraction system 3.2 Collimation system Muon suppression Halo power handling Tail-folding octupoles 3.3 Final focus 3.4 IR design and integration to detector 3.5 Extraction line 4.Accelerator components 4.1 Crab cavity system 4.2 Feedback system and stability Train-by-train feedback Intra-train IP position and angle feedback Luminosity feedback BDS entrance feedback( ‘train-straightener’) Hardware implementation for intra-train feedbacks 4.3 Energy, luminosity and polarization measurements Energy measurements Luminosity measurements Polarization measurements 4.4 Beam dumps and collimators 4.5 BDS magnets BDS magnets: tail-folding octupoles 4.6 Vacuum system Wakes in vacuum system Beam-gas scattering Vacuum system design 4.7 IR arrangements for two detectors 4.8 Diagnostic and correction devices RDR contents S.Kuroda

1.Overview Single IP(14mrad) and push-pull detector measure the linac beam and match it into the final focus; protect the beamline and detector against mis-steered beams from the main linacs; remove any large amplitude particles (beam-halo) from the linac to minimize background in the detectors; measure and monitor the key physics parameters such as energy and polarization before and after the collisions; Squeeze beam at IP to  x=639nm,  y=6.7nm RDR

IR 14 mrad 14 mrad ILC FF9 hybrid (x 2) 14 mrad (L* = 5.5 m) dump lines detector pit: 25 m (Z) × 110 m (X) e-e+ hybrid “BSY” (x 2) 2226 m ΔZ ~ -650 m w.r.t. ILC2006c M.Woodley

2.Beam Parameters RDR

3.System Description polarimeter skew correction / emittance diagnostic MPS coll betatron collimation fast sweepers tuneup dump septa fast kickers energy collimation β-match energy spectrometer final transformer final doublet IP energy spectrometer polarimeter fast sweepers primary dump Main Linac ILC2006e electron BDS schematic energy collimation M.Woodley

3.1 Diagnostic, Tune-up Dump, Machine protection polarimeter skew correction / emittance diagnostic MPS coll β-match Main Linac betatron collimation extraction angle = mrad L B =2.4 m (×3) ΔL BB = 0.3 m Compton IP 250 GeV x = 20 mm 76.9 m MPS Ecoll ±10% 8 m 3 m laserwire detector 16.1 m 35 GeV 25 GeV Cerenkov detector 2 m 12.3 cm 18.0 cm ΔE/E BPM  optics Polarimeter chicane  M.Woodley

3.2 Collimation System To remove Halo particles( BG of detector ) SR which hits detector Betatron Collimator Spoiler/Absorber pair at high beta points Energy Collimator Single spoiler at high dispersion point Collimation depth 8-10  x,  y Muon suppression 5m long magnetized iron filled in tunnel Tail-folding octupole Non-linear focusing of halo particles Core part of the beam unaffected

3.3 Final Focus RDR Local chromaticity correction Correction of geometric aberration, 2nd order dispersion and higher order aberration

3.4 IR Design and Integration to Detector FD: compact superconducting magnet inside detector First cryostat is attached to detector Solenoid effect to beam anti-solenoid, DID, anti-DID RDR

3.5 Extraction Line RDR Transport beam to dump Diagnostics Energy measurement at 1st v-chicane Polarimetry at 2nd IP( R22=-0.5 )

4. Accelerator Components 4.1 Crab Cavity System To make head-on collision Two 3.9GHz SC 9-cell cavities Crab cavity prototype(RDR)

4.2 Intra-train Feedback Measurement of beam-beam deflection  stripline kicker FONT4: R&D with digital board processor Test is on-going at ATF. Goal latency is 140ns P.Burrows et al 4.3 Polarization Measurement RDR ILC physics requires  Polarization measurement with 0.25% accuracy

4.4 IR Arrangements for two detectors RDR Detector Hall surface assembly Detector self-shield/shielding wall between detectors  maintenance when off beam-line

5. Solenoid Effect Orbit change at IP( in y )  Accuracy in polarization measurement For correction, Detector Integrated Dipole(DID) At higher energy, back-scattered e+e- pair  huge BG for detector DID with reversed polarity( anti-DID ) which align orbit to out-going beam line DID/anti-DID A.Seryi, B.Parker

Anti-Solenoid Overlapping of solenoid field with FD produces huge beam size blow-up. Anti-solenoid can correct the beam size growth excellently. The effect is independent on x-ing angle. With antisolenoids and linear knobs,  y = 0.9%  Y. Nosochkov, A. Seryi

6. Beam Tuning Beam tuning method is being studied by computer simulation BBA, Luminosity(beam size) tuning,… Example. BBA+Luminosity tuning with traditional method; Linear knob of SX mover + higher order knob Errors dx/dy for magnets=200um, roll=300urad, field error-1e-4, …….. Disp, Waist,, tilt dK Luminosity G.White

7. Issues for further Study Hardware Crab cavity system Feedback system SC magnets Monitors( LW,…) ……. Study of beam tuning, beam dynamics, BG,… Alternative design e.g. small x-ing angle/head-on collision including ES separator, large bore magnets for EXT Test facility ESA, ATF/ATF2,…..