STUDY PLANNING & DESIGN TO ENHANCE TRANSLATION OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR RESEARCH Lisa Klesges, Russell Glasgow, Paul Estabrooks, David Dzewaltowski, Sheana Bull.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For Classroom Use Only © 2003 University of Texas Houston Health Science Center L. Kay Bartholomew, Guy S. Parcel, Gerjo Kok, and Nell H. Gottlieb Intervention.
Advertisements

Using RE-AIM as a tool for Program Evaluation From Research to Practice.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
WORKING TOGETHER TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHY AGING PROGRAMS: PUBLIC HEALTH, AGING, AND UNIVERSITY COMMUNITIES Lucinda L. Bryant PhD MSHA MBA, University.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Studying treatment of suicidal ideation & attempts: Designs, Statistical Analysis, and Methodological Considerations Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Eric R. Johnson Hillsborough County, (Tampa) FL
1 Simon Bradstreet: SRN Allison Alexander: NHS Education for Scotland/SRN Scottish Recovery Indicator.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion
Reporting and Using Evaluation Results Presented on 6/18/15.
Selecting an Evidence-based Approach (EBA) with the Best Fit Image courtesy of Naypong at FreeDigitalPhotos.net.
Evaluation in Health Promotion Presentation by Irving Rootman to SFU Class on Principles and Practices of Health Promotion November 1, 2010.
Evaluating Dissemination of AHRQ CER Products Darren Mays, PhD, MPH Department of Oncology Georgetown University Medical Center Lombardi Comprehensive.
Increasing CRC Screening among Filipino Americans (Maxwell, Bastani, Danao, Crespi, UCLA. ACS ) Recruitment of subjects in 45 CBOs and churches.
RE-AIM Plus To Evaluate Effective Dissemination of AHRQ CER Products Michele Heisler, MD, MPA September, 2011.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 15 Community As Client: Applying the Nursing Process.
Barbara Resnick, PhD, CRNP, FAAN, FAANP
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
What Can Different Types of Evaluation Add to Individual-Focused Behavior Change Interventions? Margaret Handley, PhD MPH Center for Vulnerable Populations.
Evidence-Based Public Health Selecting Evidence-Based Interventions Joanne Rinker 1.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Getting There from Here: Creating an Evidence- Based Culture Within Special Education Ronnie Detrich Randy Keyworth Jack States.
CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Securing External Federal Funding Janice F. Almasi, Ph.D. Carol Lee Robertson Endowed Professor of Literacy University of Kentucky
An Expanded Model of Evidence-based Practice in Special Education Randy Keyworth Jack States Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
Dr. Aidah Abu Elsoud Alkaissi An-Najah National University Employ evidence-based practice: key elements.
Health Care and Promotion Fund Project Expo 2006: Beginning with dissemination in mind: Characteristics of successful health promotion programs Dr. Charles.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Stages of Research and Development
Overview of Intervention Mapping
Translating Research Into Practice: Pragmatic Research Approaches
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: Breakfast with Andy
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Expanded CONSORT Figure for Planning and Reporting D & I Research
Evidence-based Practice v. Practice-based Evidence
Strategies to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Infection Control Robin Oliver, M.D., CPE.
Design and Critique of Grants for Implementation Research
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
14 Cultural Competence Training, Assessment, and Evaluation of Cultural Competence, and Evidence-Based Practices in Culturally Competent Agencies.
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Chapter 15 Community As Client: Applying the Nursing Process
Program Planning: Models and Theories
Some Further Considerations in Combining Single Case and Group Designs
Presentation transcript:

STUDY PLANNING & DESIGN TO ENHANCE TRANSLATION OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR RESEARCH Lisa Klesges, Russell Glasgow, Paul Estabrooks, David Dzewaltowski, Sheana Bull (

Learning Objectives 1.To understand the need to design health promotion studies to enhance their generalizability and potential for translation to practice-based settings 2.To understand the elements of an evaluation and study planning framework 3.To become familiar with methods to design health behavior change intervention studies to enhance their translation to practice settings

Performance Objectives 1. Be able to identify elements of RE-AIM evaluation framework designed to enhance the translation of behavior change research to practice. 2. Understand methods to design studies that enhances their translation from research to practice settings. 3. Demonstrate ability to evaluate each dimension in a variety of situations.

WHO WE ARE Workgroup to Evaluate and Enhance the Reach & Dissemination of Health Promotion Interventions Behavior Change Consortium Members Russ Glasgow (Kaiser Permanente Colorado) Lisa Klesges (University of Tennessee Health Science Center) Robin Mockenhaupt (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) Sheana Bull (Kaiser Permanente Colorado) David Dzewaltowski (Kansas State University) Paul Estabrooks (Kansas State University)

MISSION STATEMENT To implement a framework to 1) evaluate intervention impact in its broadest sense (e.g., develop a policy relevant criterion for success, gauge evidence for prevention effectiveness, assess translatability); 2) aid the design of interventions that take fidelity, reach, adoption, and sustainability into consideration; and 3) emphasize elements of both internal and external validity ( (

Problem with Research Translation Existing research evidence identifies numerous behavioral risk factors related to morbidity and mortality Behavioral interventions to modify lifestyle practices have been studied but few are translated to practice settings Need exists for generalizable, effective & sustainable behavioral interventions

Improving Translation of Research Consider study designs and features to enhance the generalizability of research Reporting of the dissemination potential and generalizability of study results Conduct more effectiveness studies of successful behavioral interventions Address needs and questions of interest to practitioners and decision-makers

Framework Needed to Guide Translation of Research Tool to evaluate both the internal & external validity of health behavior change research results Allow recommendations to enhance translation potential of behavior change studies in their design phase

RE-AIM Framework Dimensions Important to Planning & Translating Behavioral Change Interventions Recruitment/Reach Efficacy/Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance for more detailed definitions see

RE-AIM DIMENSIONS DIMENSIONDEFINITION REACH 1.Participation rate among eligible individuals 2.Representativeness of participants EFFICACY/ EFFECTIVENESS 1.Effects on primary outcome of interest 2.Impact on quality of life & negative outcomes Individual Level

RE-AIM DIMENSIONS (cont.) DIMENSIONDEFINITIION ADOPTION 1.Participation rate among possible settings 2.Representativeness of settingsparticipating IMPLEMENTATION 1.Extent that intervention was delivered as intended 2.Time and costs of intervention Setting Level Both

RE-AIM DIMENSIONS (cont.) DIMENSIONDEFINITIION MAINTENANCE 1.(Individual) Long-term intervention effects ( > 6 mo) 2.(Individual) Impact of attrition on outcomes 3.(Setting) Continuation or modification of treatment Individual &Setting Level

RECRUITMENT/REACH Conduct population-based interventions and assessments or purposefully sample from diverse groups (e.g. low-income, older adults, racially-diverse) to enhance generalizability Use recruiting methods and intervention features that enhance the reach within underserved populations and settings Review your criteria for study eligibility - consider implications of exclusions on generalizability and translation of results

Plan to calculate the absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are willing to participate in your research study Links to information and data sources for these estimations can be found at RECRUITMENT/REACH

EFFICACY/EFFECTIVENESS Include multiple outcome measures to triangulate intervention effects Specify a theoretical framework that might explain change in behavior Measure relevant theoretical constructs to assess mediational relationships between the intervention and outcomes

Record adverse outcomes & assess quality of life to judge unintended consequences of your intervention Conduct intent-to-treat analyses or use imputation to better estimate study effects for both individuals and settings EFFICACY/EFFECTIVENESS

ADOPTION Prepare intervention and training materials to be easily replicated or disseminated to a practice setting Consider “modular” interventions that can be adapted or customized for various settings Based on available literature & formative evaluation, anticipate and reduce primary barriers to participation in your program for settings and for intervention agents

IMPLEMENTATION Conduct formative evaluation to assess how your intervention will interface with potential adopters of the program Record extent to which organizational settings complete or make use of components of your intervention Track costs of all aspects of intervention e.g., intervention materials, equipment, personnel, time, and space requirements

Record the extent to which participants complete or make use of the different components of your intervention Measure the extent to which different agents deliver the intervention as stated in the protocol (e.g., % of scheduled visits made) IMPLEMENTATION

MAINTENANCE Plan long-term follow-up ( > 6 mos to 1 yr) following your last intervention contact Plan continued contact with participating settings who wish to continue the intervention after your study has ended Debrief intervention agents & decision makers in organizations about continuing and modifying the intervention

Design behavioral interventions to: Reach majority of target population Be widely adopted by different settings Be consistently implemented by program staff with moderate levels of training and content expertise Produce replicable and long-lasting effects (and minimal negative impacts) at reasonable cost Goals of RE-AIM Planning

Summary Achievement of goals will… Lead to more comprehensive studies and an evidence base that gives attention to both internal and external validity, that is relevant to the translation of research to practice, and is helpful to researchers, practitioners, decision-makers, and society