Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Common Core Standards (What this means in computer class)
Agenda For Today! Welcome/Housekeeping
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
New Mexico Teachscape Reflect for Teachers Collaborative Norms Equity of voice Active listening Safety to share different perspectives Commitment.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 1: Introduction to Student Growth Measures and SLOs.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING October 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Kindergarten- Module.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Summer 2014 Evaluation Training Day One The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from the Department of Education. However,
Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Teaching and Learning Elementary Math November 27, :30 am – 12:30 pm.
Improvement That Talks Back: Design, Monitor and Measure Continuous Improvement Efforts Dr. Stephan Knobloch Director of Research Loudoun County Public.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
RI Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting October 25, 2010.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Rhode Island Model Educator Performance and Support System Training.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Building Administrators Day 1.
Rhode Island Model Teacher Evaluation & Support System Preparing for your End-of-Year Conference.
Summer 2013 Workshop For Personnel Evaluating Building Administrators The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from the.
Session Materials  Wiki
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
KVEC Presents PGES Observation Calibration Are You On Target?
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day 1: Professional Practice.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Citywide Expectations for
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
TCRP TEACHER TRAINING TCRP Overview. Agenda Objective By the end of the session all teachers will be able to: TCRP Pverview Agenda and Objectives 2 1.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Superintendents’ Network: Orientation for New Superintendent’s
Deep dive into pacing guide, lesson plans and history labs
Deep dive into pacing guide, lesson plans and history labs
Georgia Department of Education
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Presentation transcript:

Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice

Academy Agenda Day One 1. Framing Work & Introduction to Professional Practice Rubric 2. Introduction to Online Observer Training (FFTPS) 3. Component 2A Training 4. Professional Practice Evidence Collection Day Two 1. Understanding SLOs 2. Writing Objective Statements 3. Using Baseline Data/Info 4. Deepening Assessment Literacy 5. Setting Targets Day Three 1. Practice observation calibration protocol 2. Calculating a Final Effectiveness Rating Day Four 1. Understanding the Support Professional Model 2. RIDE Data Systems

3 Norms Equity of voice Active listening Confidentiality Usage of parking lot Respectful/ appropriate use of technology Safety to share different perspectives RIDE website: Evaluation

4 Icebreakers WHY?

What did you draw?

Introductions Introduce yourself to someone at your table, share your drawing with them and have them describe your drawing in three words or less.

Day One Agenda Session One Framing the Work and Introduction to the Professional Practice Rubric Session Two Introduction to the Online Observer Training (FFTPS) Session Three Component 2A Training

Rhode Island Evaluation Implementation

Session Objectives After completing this session, you should be able to:

ElementMinimum Requirements Evaluation Conferences  Three evaluation conferences between the teacher and the evaluator (Beginning, Middle, and End-of-Year) Classroom Observations  At least three, including one announced and two unannounced  All observations must be at least 20 minutes each  Each of the eight Professional Practice components will be scored after each observation  Written feedback is required after each observation Professional Growth Goals  At least one set at the beginning of the year Student Learning Objectives  At least two per teacher (no more than four) RI Growth Model Rating  Included this school year for educators of Grade 3-7 in ELA and math and contributing educators as defined by districts Rhode Island Model at a Glance

 Professional Growth Plan  Evaluation Conferences  Ongoing reflection and planning Rhode Island Model Evaluation & Support System

Final Effectiveness Rating Professional Practice (8 Observable Classroom Components) Professional Responsibilities Student Learning Evaluation Criteria Research-based Observation rubric Scored after each observation Rhode Island Model Professional Practice

Architecture of the Rhode Island Model Rubric Component Domain Elements

Component Title Component Description Elements Indicators Domain Architecture of the Rhode Island Model Rubric

Levels of Performance Critical Attributes Possible Examples Architecture of the Rubric

Review component independently Discuss and chart your analysis Share with the larger group With a partner(s), you will analyze one component of the full rubric, and be prepared to report out on the following to the whole group: 1. The title of the component 2. What is valued in this component as explained in the description 3. The elements of this component that differentiate it from other components 4. Critical attributes – type of evidence that will be noted for this component 5. Possible examples – what are some specific things that may be noted 15 min.20 min. Analysis of One Component

GATHER evidence during observation SORT evidence to appropriate component INTERPRET evidence and assign score based on rubric description of levels of performance Prioritize and DEVELOP FEEDBACK (using language from rubric, critical attributes and noted evidence) Thinking Behind the Rating

19 What does the Professional Practice Rubric tell you about the most important aspects of effective teaching?

Ensure you are gathering objective evidence. Make yourself aware of the differences between evidence, interpretation, and bias.  When you make judgments based on a teacher’s or student’s age, race, gender, appearance, perceived economic status, or accent.  Personal or professional preferences about teaching styles, materials, or classroom setup may also influence judgments.  Bias occurs whenever there is variability in an observer’s application of the rubric based on deep-seated beliefs, stereotypes, or professional preferences. FFTPS Minimizing Bias Module GATHER evidence during observation The Importance of Minimizing Bias

After completing this session, are you able to: Understand the overall architecture of the Professional Practice rubric? Recognize key terms of the Professional Practice rubric? Identify the difference among statements of evidence, interpretation and bias? Session Check-In

Session One Framing the Work and Introduction to the Professional Practice Rubric Session Two Introduction to the Online Observer Training (FFTPS) Session Three Component 2A Training Day One Agenda

After completing this session, you should be able to: Session Objectives

Teachscape Home Page Training Scoring practice Proficiency assessment

A Closer Look at Observer Training

A Closer Look at a Single Component

Benchmark Videos and Rationales for Scores

Rangefinders

Video Examples

Observer Training: Exercise Example

Log In: Step 1: Get online Step 2: Open your link from FFTPS Step 3: Working with your partner, complete the FFTPS Scavenger Hunt (10 min.) Session 2 Log In & Closure

Session Objectives After completing this session, are you able to:

Session One Framing the Work and Introduction to the Professional Practice Rubric Session Two Introduction to the Online Observer Training (FFTPS ) Session Three- Component 2A Training Day One Agenda

STEP 1: Review the overview, elements, and indicators for this component. Note your responses to the “Identifying Relevant Evidence” exercise, then review answers and discuss with your partner. STEP 2: Together, work through the rubric exercises for recognizing level descriptions and distinguishing between levels. Note important learning to share with your group. STEP 3: Note your response to each of the following questions and post them on the chart. Over lunch, view other’s posted comments. What is one thing you learned about relevant evidence for this component? What is one caution you learned about potential biases? Partnered 2A Component Training Structure – Part One

STEP 1: Work through all critical attributes and video examples (benchmarks and rangefinders) for Levels 3 and 2. Stop at this point and discuss with your partner. Note any important learning to share about distinctions between 3s and 2s. STEP 2: Work through critical attributes and video examples for Level 1 and Level 4. Note any important learning to share about evidence, interpretation, and bias statements. STEP 3: Complete “Practice Gathering Evidence” exercise by each taking notes independently (on computers or paper). Share with your partner and compare to expert evidence. Complete “Assign a Level” exercise independently, then check answers together. STEP 4: Post notes on charts and circulate to view other’s comments. What is one thing you learned about what distinguishes a 3 from a 2 for this component? What is one thing you learned about evidence, interpretation, and bias? Partnered 2A Component Training Structure – Part Two

Observing Training – opportunity to apply new skills Scoring Practice – grade band-specific videos for scoring Proficiency Assessment – grade band-specific skill check Teacher Orientation Module (TOM) – informational resource for teacher communication, downloadable and adaptable for local circumstances Additional Components of the System

Video-Based Scoring Practice

Scoring Practice Feedback Report

Teacher Orientation Module

Session Check-In After completing this session, are you able to:

Lightning Round What are your key takeaways from the video training? List as many as you can and then you will share one with the group. Session 3 Closure

Session Closure Jot down 3 ideas Find someone at another table and give them one idea and get one idea Find a new partner – give one, get one Guiding question: How will you work with your teachers to better understand the RI Model and the Edition II Professional Practice Rubric? NOTE: Exchange no more than one idea with any given partner.

Follow Our Summer Training 43 #RISummerTraining

Day One Closure Day One Reflection & Feedback: On Post-Its, please list:  One thing that worked today  One suggestion for improving the training Resources RIDE website: Evaluation RIDE staff members will respond to your context-specific questions.