Status of the WET Program William Telliard Director, Analytical Methods USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION & DATA QUALITY MICHAEL W. MILLER, Ph.D. NJ-DEP Office of Quality Assurance
Advertisements

1 Stormwater Program Videoconference April 23, 2013 Bill Cole, Water Quality Standards Unit.
Practical Quantitation Limit Guidance Presentation to WQ Forum November 20, 2006.
BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS ADOPTION HEARING Item 2 Water Board Meeting of April 9, 2014 Chuck Curtis and Robert Larsen Lahontan Water Board.
Whole Effluent Toxicity NPDES Program
Clean Water Act Section 402 Issues Facing Kentucky Kentucky Professional Engineers in Mining Seminar September 6, 2013 Lloyd Cress, Kentucky Coal Association.
Office of Water PittCon 2001 Status of EPA Method 1631 for the Determination of Low-Level Mercury Maria Gomez-Taylor Analytical Methods Staff U.S.
Clean Water Act Permitting and Operational Discharges from Vessels An Overview February 2007.
©Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C. Presented by: LAUREN KALISEK (512) Congress Avenue Suite 1900 Austin, Texas.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
Florida Pilot Initiative for the Performance Approach to Measurement Systems Stephen Arms Florida Department of Health.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Looking Ahead.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permitting and Pesticides Jeff Fischer Permits Section Water Resources Division
CAFO Rule Update and Region 4 CAFO NPDES Program Implementation by Wayne J. Aronson Chief, PGTA Branch Ag Meeting December 06, 2005.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Using the Directives Process to Track EMS Requirements Department of Energy EMS Training Workshop Columbus, OH March 7-8, 2005 Daniel L. McCollum, Quality.
Clean Water Act Section 316(b) Proposal Regulations for Cooling Water Intake Structures at Existing Facilities April 6, 2011.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Present Development of a Regional Guidance Document for Dredged Material Evaluation Christopher McArthur, P.E. (US Environmental.
City of Puyallup Planning Commission Presentation February 8, 2012.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics December 12, 2006.
PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
EPA REGION VI MINIMUM QUANTIFICATION LEVELS (MQLs) WHAT THE “L” IS GOING ON? 25 th EPA Annual Pretreatment Workshop Addison, TX 8/5/09 Allen Gilliam ADEQ.
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
SWAMP Statewide Monitoring Programs Statewide Monitoring Programs Regional Monitoring Programs Regional Monitoring Programs Infrastructure & Tools Infrastructure.
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM HISTORY Presented by Rodney Compo- City of West Palm Beach Written by Holly McGrath- City of West Palm Beach, FL and Jennifer Dodd-TN.
Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.
MIG 2 - Water Quality and Quantity Study Plan Review April 2, 2008.
Clark County’s Municipal Stormwater Permit Stormwater Manual and Code Update National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System & State Waste Discharge General.
William Telliard U.S. EPA Office of Science and Technology
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
1 Emissions Measurement and Monitoring Projects Update Robin Segall Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Measurement.
SCAP Special “All-Committees” Meeting Water Committee Update Al Javier Environmental Services Manager November 5,
EPA’s WET Interlaboratory Variability Study Findings Marion Kelly USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water.
Water quality challenges in the Bay Delta Estuary.
1 Public Meeting Regarding US Steel’s Gary Work NPDES Permit Renewal September 26, 2007 IN Department of Environmental Management.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
Revisions to: The Procedures to Implement the Surface Water Quality Standards Mrs. Brittany M. Lee Standards Implementation Team Phone:
 40 CFR § (d)(1)(v) “(W)hen the permitting authority determines, using the procedures in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, toxicity testing.
1 Water Quality Standards - CWA and Porter-Cologne An Overview.
Municipal Code Title 16 Update: Liquid and Industrial Waste Disposal Board of Water Commissioners November 10, 2014 Item 5.
Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC ) Rulemaking: Bacteria, Ammonia, Human Health and Aquatic Life Criteria.
James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: May 3, 2016 Chesapeake Bay Stakeholder Advisory Group John Kennedy, DEQ Office of Ecology.
Guidance Development Merton V. Smith, Ph.D., J.D. Director International Programs and Product Standards Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA.
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
Clean Water Act Methods Overview of EPA’s CWA Method Activities
Status of EPA Method 1631 for the Determination of Low-Level Mercury
Overview of EPA Method 1631, Revision E By Roy W
Clean Water Act Regulatory Session
EPA Method Equivalency
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) CAFO Rule and the Proposed Idaho NPDES CAFO General.
Addition of Analytical Methods to California’s Accreditation Program
EPA Region 10 Alternate Test Procedures and Method Update Rule
Background First ERP written in 1991 Revised in 1998
Report of Proceedings Surface Water Quality Standards Triennial Review Environmental Management Commission November 13, 2014 Steve Tedder – EMC Hearing.
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
Water & Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association March 22, 2017
National Environmental Monitoring Conference
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Clean Water Act/NPDES Regulatory Updates
2019 AWOP National Meeting Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
EPA/OAQPS Pollutant Emissions Measurement Update 2019
Presentation transcript:

Status of the WET Program William Telliard Director, Analytical Methods USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water

What is WET? — Whole effluent toxicity (or WET) is defined as the combined toxic effect of an effluent measured directly by an aquatic toxicity test — WET is one of three components of EPA’s integrated approach to water quality-based toxics control — 17 WET test procedures using plants, fish, and invertebrates are promulgated at 40 CFR Part 136

Office of Water Background — WET Methods Rule Promulgated - Whole effluent toxicity (WET) test methods were promulgated at 40 CFR Part 136 on 10/26/95 for use in monitoring water quality, controlling toxic discharges, and protecting aquatic life in receiving waters (60 FR 53529) — WET Methods Rule Challenged - 6 different litigants sued EPA in 5 different courts of appeal — Resulted in Settlement Agreements - Law suits were settled by 3 different settlement agreements United Water Florida, City of Washington, City of San Bernadino Lone Star Steel Edison Electric Institute, Western Coalition of Arid States, et al. (EEI/WestCAS)

Office of Water Settlement Agreement Requirements — In a 7/24/98 settlement agreement with Edison Electric Institute, et al., EPA agreed to:  Publish technical correction notice (completed 2/99)  Publish analytical variability guidance (completed 6/00)  Publish method guidance document (completed 7/00)  Conduct WET Interlaboratory Variability Study (the WET Study) (completed 4/00)  Publish table of method variability measurements (CVs) (completed 9/01)  Propose method changes (proposed 9/01; final rule to be completed by 11/08/02)  Propose to ratify or withdraw methods (proposed 9/01; final rule to be completed by 11/08/02)

Office of Water Technical Correction Notice — Errata for the Effluent and Receiving Water Toxicity Testing Manuals - EPA 600/R-98/182 — Corrects technical errors and omissions in WET method manuals — Available at: http// — This errata will soon be unnecessary, when EPA publishes new method manual editions in November

Office of Water Guidance Documents — Method Guidance Document Method Guidance and Recommendations for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing (40 CFR Part 136) – EPA 821/B-00/004 — Provides Guidance on: Nominal error rates Confidence intervals Concentration-response relationships Dilution series selection Dilution waters — Available at: http//

Office of Water Guidance Documents — Variability Guidance Document Understanding and Accounting for Method Variability in Whole Effluent Toxicity Applications Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program – EPA 833/R-00/003 — Provides guidance to regulatory authorities, permittees, and testing labs on how to understand and account for measurement variability in WET testing — Available at: http//

Office of Water September 28, 2001 Proposed Rule — On September 28, 2001, EPA published a proposed rule to revise and ratify WET test methods — Proposed rule fulfills requirements of two WET settlement agreements — Summary of proposed rule Method revisions - incorporates revisions to address specific stakeholder concerns Interlaboratory Variability Study - summarizes results from EPA’s WET Interlaboratory Variability Study Ratification/withdrawal - ratifies or withdraws WET test methods based on results from the WET Interlaboratory Variability Study

Office of Water Method Revisions — Correct minor technical errors — Update methods with newly collected method precision data — Address specific stakeholder concerns blocking by known parentage pH drift concentration-response relationships dilution series dilution waters pathogen interference

Office of Water WET Interlaboratory Variability Study — Largest most comprehensive study of whole effluent toxicity test methods to date Test methods -12 of the 17 approved WET test methods evaluated in the study Laboratories - 56 different laboratories involved, each in an average of 3 methods Samples - over 700 samples analyzed Sample types - effluents, receiving waters, blanks, and reference toxicants — Study data summarized in proposed rule to support ratification of WET methods

Office of Water Ratification/Withdrawal — 11 of 12 methods evaluated in the WET Study were proposed for ratification Ratification means that EPA reaffirms its previous approval of these methods for use in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) monitoring and compliance — 1 method (Holmesimysis costata acute method) was proposed for withdrawal and reproposal WET Study results revealed that this test procedure, which was designed for a related species (Mysidopsis bahia), is inadequate for the Holmesimysis costata test species

Office of Water Current Status — EPA received public comment on the proposed rule through January 11, 2002 EPA received 38 comment packages from the following groups: – Laboratories; POTWs; Regulatory authorities; Industries; Industry or trade associations; Environmental companies representing POTWs or industry — EPA plans to take final action on the proposed rule by November 2002 — New editions of each of the 3 WET method manuals are expected by November 2002