High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Mathematical Tasks*
Advertisements

Alabama College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Increasing the cognitive demand in the classroom Rachel Linney Aoife Kelly.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
WARM UP PROBLEM A copy of the problem appears on the blue handout.
1 Learning to Do the Mathematical Work of Teaching Deborah Loewenberg Ball Hyman Bass, Tim Boerst, Yaa Cole, Judith Jacobs, Yeon Kim, Jennifer Lewis, Laurie.
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
Extending High Expectations to ALL Students Glenda Anthony Massey University.
Designing quality open- ended tasks in mathematics Louise Hodgson May 2012.
THE INSTRUCTION Highly Effective Services, Inc
Strengthening Mathematics Instruction Cognitive Complexity and Instructional Strategies Dr. Vicki Jim
Teach a Same Lesson: Teach a Same Lesson: A Professional Development Strategy in China Jun Li Deakin University
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
Our Learning Journey Continues Shelly R. Rider.
Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013.
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Strategies to Promote Motivation in the Mathematics Classroom
Student Engagement through the use of High-Level Tasks Presented by: Raven Hawes iZone Mathematics.
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Grade Band Team Members Vickie Inge, University of Virginia Patricia Robertson, Arlington Public Schools, retired.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
Grades 3, 4 and 5 Number and Operations - Fractions Common Core Standards Mathematics Grade 3 Develop understanding of fractions as numbers Develop understanding.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Day Three. What standards were addressed yesterday? MELT wiki: melt-institute-resources.wikispaces.commelt-institute-resources.wikispaces.com.
More Rigorous SOL = More Cognitively Demanding Teaching and Assessing Dr. Margie Mason The College of William and Mary Adapted from
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
Providing All Students with Access to High Quality Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Tasks in Achieving Equity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh February 15, 2007
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
SHIFTING FROM MATHEMATICAL WORKSHEETS TO MEANINGFUL TASKS FACILITATED BY: CYNTHIA BELL NUMERACY SPECIALIST LITERACY ASSISTANCE CENTER.
Allegheny Valley Curriculum Writing
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
CAAT Follow Up Meeting #1 Clay County High School Clay County Middle School.
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
Classroom Interactions in Science and Math # 02: Tasks in Interaction.
Our Learning Journey Continues Shelly R. Rider. The Overarching Habits of Mind of a Productive Mathematical Thinker.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Debbie Delozier, Stafford County Public Schools Fanya Morton, Stafford County Public Schools Kathryn Munson, Chesterfield.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Problem Based Learning 102 How can we ensure maintenance of a high level of cognitive demand from our students?
Moving beyond “Fidelity of Implementation” Some Thoughts about Mathematics Curriculum and Teacher Professional Development Moving beyond “Fidelity of Implementation”:
Materials l Ppt slides (5) as handout Tasks books for principals Form for data collection Form for additional input Outcomes for project by session (Eoline)
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Thinking about the ways students encounter mathematics.
5 Practices for Leading Productive Math Discussions in Class Peg Smith and Mary Kay Stein University of Pittsburgh.
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
3-5 Math Best Practices workshop 2018
Mathematical Tasks, Cognitive Demand and Higher Level Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1

An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2

Read an excerpt from the article:

Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks Solve Two Tasks: Martha’s Carpeting Task The Fencing Task 4

How are Martha’s Carpeting Task and the Fencing Task the same and how are they different? Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks 5

Similarities and Differences Similarities Both are “area” problems Both require prior knowledge of area Differences The amount of thinking and reasoning required The number of ways the problem can be solved Way in which the area formula is used The need to generalize The range of ways to enter the problem 6

Do the differences between the Fencing Task and Martha’s Carpeting Task matter? Why or Why not? Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks 7

Does Maintaining Cognitive Demand Matter? YES

Criteria for low cognitive demand tasks Recall Memorization Low on Bloom’s Taxonomy

Developing Mathematical Practices Review each of the “higher demand” tasks: What mathematical practices do they engage students in using ?

Criteria for high cognitive demand tasks Requires generalizations Requires creativity Requires multiple representations Requires explanations (must be “worth explaining”)

Lower-Level Tasks Memorization What are the decimal equivalents for the fractions ½ and ¼? Procedures without connections Convert the fraction 3/8 to a decimal

Higher-Level Tasks Doing mathematics 1. Shade 6 small squares in a 4 X 10 rectangle. Using the rectangle, explain how to determine: A. The decimal part of area that is that is shaded; B. The fractional part of area that is shaded

Higher-Level Tasks  Procedures with connections Using a 10 x 10 grid, identify the decimal and percent equivalents of 3/5.

What causes high- level cognitive demand tasks to decline?

Stein & Lane, 2012 A. B. C. High Low HighLow Moderate High Low Task Set UpTask ImplementationStudent Learning Patterns of Set up, Implementation, and Student Learning 17

Factors Associated with the Maintenance and Decline of High-Level Cognitive Demands Routinizing problematic aspects of the task Shifting the emphasis from meaning, concepts, or understanding to the correctness or completeness of the answer Providing insufficient time to wrestle with the demanding aspects of the task or so much time that students drift into off- task behavior Engaging in high-level cognitive activities is prevented due to classroom management problems Selecting a task that is inappropriate for a given group of students Failing to hold students accountable for high-level products or processes (Stein, Grover & Henningsen, 2012) 18

Scaffolding of student thinking and reasoning Providing a means by which students can monitor their own progress Modeling of high-level performance by teacher or capable students Pressing for justifications, explanations, and/or meaning through questioning, comments, and/or feedback Selecting tasks that build on students’ prior knowledge Drawing frequent conceptual connections Providing sufficient time to explore (Stein, Grover & Henningsen, 2012) Factors Associated with the Maintenance and Decline of High-Level Cognitive Demands 19

“Not all tasks are created equal, and different tasks will provoke different levels and kinds of student thinking.” (Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2011) “The level and kind of thinking in which students engage determines what they will learn.” (Hiebert et al., 2011)

Characteristics of good questions  Require more than remembering a fact or reproducing a skill  Students can learn from answering the questions; teachers can learn about the students  May have several acceptable answers Sullivan and Lilburn

Making questions open ended  Method 1: Working backwards Identify a mathematical topic or concept. Think of a closed question and write down the answer. Make up a new question that includes (or addresses) the answer. 22

Method 1: Working backwards What is the product of 90 and 4? can become …. Two numbers multiply to make 360. One of them has a zero on the end. What might the two numbers be? 23

Making questions open ended  Method 2: Adapting a standard question Identify a mathematical topic or concept. Think of a standard question Adapt it to make an open ended question. 24

Method 2: Adapting a standard question I bought a notebook that cost $1.65. How much change did I receive from $2.00? Can become… I bought an item at a shop and got 35 cents change. What did I buy and how much did it cost? 25