MITCASESTUDY. Video About MIT OCW (2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Building for Repositories Dr. Helena Asamoah-Hassan University Librarian, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana at BioMed Open Access Africa Conference held at.
Advertisements

When Students Can’t Read…
DSpace: the MIT Libraries Institutional Repository MacKenzie Smith, MIT EDUCAUSE 2003, November 5 th Copyright MacKenzie Smith, This work is the.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Open Educational Resources Sample Communications Slides for Educators and Administrators CC BYCC BY Achieve 2015.
Open Educational Resources / production workshop / february 2009 Except where otherwise noted, this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution.
1 Unlocking Knowledge, Empowering Minds Unlocking Knowledge, Empowering Minds. 30 September 2009Stephen Carson –
Utilizing Open Education Resources in Blended Learning for Higher Education Blended learning forum Mais Fatayer, PhD candidate SCEM, University of Western.
Introduction to Open Educational Resources (OER) Michael Paskevicius March 29, 2012 Presentation to: EDN6099F: ICT in Education - Issues & Debates.
JISC CETIS, Institute Educational Cybernetics, University of Bolton
- Travel Well Criteria.
March 24, 2008Open Sharing, Global Benefits Universities working together to advance education and empower people worldwide through opencourseware. March.
McWeadon Education, USA
Universities working together to advance education and empower people worldwide through opencourseware. Open Sharing, Global Benefits (making the case.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
National Secondary School Computer Fund (NSSCF)
1 DR. BADRUL HUDA KHAN MCWEADON EDUCATION, USA DR. BADRUL HUDA KHAN
IStream and NROC: Bringing Innovative Tools to your Desktop Wendy Neil, iStream Membership Director The League for Innovation Terri Rowenhorst, NROC Membership.
Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric III: Utility of Materials Designed to Support Teaching CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.
Technology Leadership
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
+ What DL Support Services are available for Minnesota ABE? Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
How Do We Educate…
AVU International Conference, Nairobi, Kenya, Nov. 20, 2013 James Glapa-Grossklag, College of the Canyons Kathleen Ludewig Omollo, University of Michigan.
Student as Producer and OER enhancing learning through digital scholarship Sue Watling: Centre for Educational Research and Development Student as Producer.
1 Koalicja Otwartej Edukacji OER conference Warsaw, 23 April 2009 Open Educational Resources: Building a Culture of Sharing Susan D’Antoni UNESCO.
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Poll Everywhere
Opening the World to Knowledge and Education Opening Doors to Knowledge and Education Community College Consortium for Open Educational Resources Catherine.
NCDPI Observation Calibration Training Pilot: Introduction & Demo November 2014.
Contextual framework for research. Purpose of contextual framework To provide a shared language to underpin the PHEA E-learning proposals, initiatives.
Open Educational Resources Miley Grandjean & Jed Duggan Online Course Improvement Program Feb. 7, 2014.
Open Educational Resources: A Remix Jim Julius SDSU Course Design Institute May 27,
EDUCAUSE 2005 Annual Conference October 19, 2005.
DScribe student-centric open educational resource (OER) publishing system at the University of Michigan SI 521 Jan 29, 2009 Kathleen Ludewig.
Content Analysis of OpenCourseWare Initiatives within the Scope of Digital Literacy Skills Turkish OpenCourseWare Consortium Case Tolga ÇAKMAK – Jan 04,
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Author(s): Beata M. Canby, David Hutchful, Pieter Kleymeer, Brandon Ngo, 2007 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Making educational practices more open with OER Professor Andy Lane, Senior Fellow, Support Centre for Open Resources in Education.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Education Transform Resources
Affordable Teaching and Learning Redefining What's Possible Erin Walker Learning Technology Consultant.
Sarah Beaubien Grand Valley State University MLA Academic, May 2013.
+ Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and Health Toolkit for the UN Global Conference RIO + 20 Welcome to PAHO/WHO Sustainable Development and.
Sarah Beaubien Scholarly Communications Outreach Coordinator Grand Valley State University Libraries Open Education Materials: Collecting,
Dr. Michael Mills, Vice President of E- Learning, Innovation, and Teaching Excellence, Montgomery College Professor Samantha Streamer Veneruso, Professor.
Open Education Resources in Africa. Introduction | OER Africa OER Africa is an initiative of South African Institute for Distance Education (Saide) –
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
World OER Congress 20 – 22 June 2012 What are Open Educational Resources? Ms Zeynep Varoglu, UNESCO Ms Trudi van Wyk, Commonwealth of Learning Mr Neil.
1. Question & Research Task
Institutional Analysis workshop
Mona El-Ayoubi Director Learning, Innovation & Strategy
Education Transform Resources
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Collaborative Leadership
The OER Landscape and the Context for Open Textbooks: The Flyover Catherine M. Casserly, Ph.D. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation January 15, 2008.
OER Courses and Degrees – Benefits and challenges
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Tapping the Potential of Accessible OERs: Examining the Job-Driven, Workforce-Related SkillsCommons Library Prepared for: TechAccessOK 2019 Oklahoma City,
Neil Butcher, OER Africa
Implications of openly licenced resources for librarians
The Annual Copyright License User Guide
Quality Assurance in Blended Learning Standards and Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

MITCASESTUDY

Video About MIT OCW (2007)

What is MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW)? MIT OpenCourseWare is a free publication of MIT course materials that reflects almost all the undergraduate and graduate subjects taught at MIT. IMPORTANTLY  OCW is NOT an MIT education.  OCW DOES NOT grant degrees or certificates.  OCW DOES NOT provide access to MIT faculty.  Materials MAY NOT reflect entire content of the course. Source:

MIT OCW Stats courses published. 146 million visits by 104 million visitors. 1 million visits each month (Translations: 500,000 more). Translations receive 500,000 more. * Updated 09/11/2012

MIT OCW Audience MIT OCW audience is divided among: Source (accessed 19/04/2012):

MIT OCW Uses MIT OpenCourseWare is being used for a wide range of purposes. Source (accessed 19/04/2012):  80% rate OCW's impact as extremely positive or positive.  91% expect that level of future impact.  96% of educators say the site has/will help improve courses.  96% of visitors would recommend the site.

MIT OCW Development An average of 100 hours effort to produce one course. MIT faculty devote 5-10 hours for each course. 12 publication staff work directly with the faculty. 2 intellectual property staff. 4 production staff support the publication team. 5 outreach and administrative staff manage communications, media relations, outreach, program evaluation, and OCW's sustainability.

MIT OCW Cost The total annual cost is about $ 3.5 million. Cost per Non-video-based course: $10,000–$15,000 Cost per Video-based course: $30,000 For each course MIT OCW publish, they must: Compile course materials from faculty; Ensure proper licensing for open sharing; Format materials for global distribution; Sustain technical infrastructure (software/hardware network); and Provide and support local mirror sites in bandwidth constrained regions. Article: MIT site:

Revenue Cost

Projected that OCW reserves will run out in FY2014 without significant changes in their current funding model. Challenge is to offset the loss of grant funds with substantial increases in revenues such as: Donations Endowments Corporate sponsorships, and; Alternative sources of revenue. MIT OCW Future Sorry, Just invested $1.5 Million in Khan Academy!

More Case Studies? Image source:

CREATINGOER2

Image:

Infographic:

Infographic:

STRATEGIES

When Creating OER We Need to Consider… Usability Durability Durability Accessibility Accessibility Effectiveness Effectiveness

Do you have an OER (Development) Policy? Collection of institutions with OER policy: OER Guidelines:

OER Policy Development Toolkit Designed to help you review your own institutional policy environment and where necessary institute policy changes that will facilitate collaboration and the development and sharing of OER.

LOCAL EXAMPLE? Source (Slide 13):

4 Main Policy Issues! Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Copyright Human Resource (HR) Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Materials Development and Quality Assurance Source (Page 4):

Assemble an OER Team Source (Slide 23):

Creating OER and Combining Licenses

When IP isn’t clear… Source (Slide 20):

Source (Page 178): Framework Guiding Selection and Use of OERs and Non- OERs Prof. Dr. John Arul Phillips

Sharing, Remixing & Repurposing OER Source:

OER Development Life Cycle The OER LIFE CYCLE begins with a desire or need to learn or teach something. The following sequence of steps illustrates a typical development process: NoStepsDescription 1.Find Search and find OERs using variety of OER search engines and look for existing resource lists made available online by experts. 2.Create With a collection of resources at your disposal, start fusing them together to form a learning resource. When creating OERs take into account usability, durability, accessibility and effectiveness, especially regarding format (output). 3.Localize Making a resource more useful to a particular situation (contextualizing). This may involve minor corrections and improvements, remixing components, localization and even complete rework for use in diverse contexts. 4.Remix Remixing is the act of taking two (or more) OER materials and merging them to form a new OER. 5.License Select the appropriate Creative Commons license for your OER project. 6.Use This covers the actual use of OER for your context. 7.Share Once an OER is finished, make it available for the open education community to re-use and begin the life cycle again. Before finding and remixing OERs, set the course/module/topic aims and objectives (and course outline if possible). It might change as you develop, but it is good to have a starting destination (or map). Adapted from : &

OER Evaluation Tool? To help you determine the aspects of quality of OERs, Achieve has developed eight rubrics in collaboration with leaders from the OER community: 1.Degree of Alignment to Standards 2.Quality of Explanation of the Subject Matter 3.Utility of Materials Designed to Support Teaching 4.Quality of Assessment 5.Quality of Technological Interactivity 6.Quality of Instructional Tasks and Practice Exercises 7.Opportunities for Deeper Learning 8.Assurance of Accessibility Simplify your OWN! Simplify your OWN!