Copyright © 2005 SRI International The NanoSense Project Challenges and opportunities Patti Schank, Tina Stanford, Anders Rosenquist, Alyssa Wise SRI International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Programs of the Intel® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel. Copyright © 2007, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel,
Advertisements

Programs of the Intel® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel. Copyright © 2007, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel,
Willing to spend the time! Self motivated! Self responsibility! (If you need something Ask For IT!!!!!) Ability to communicate! (Vocabulary) Write,
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Renewed Outcomes-based Curriculum 6-9. Purpose for Renewal Teacher feedback –Provide concise & coherent curriculum –Time allocations have not changed.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Model Curriculum Maps 2012 Curriculum Summit November 13 – 14, 2012 Julia Phelps and Karen White Raising the Rigor of Teaching and Learning.
SRI International Patricia Schank Anders Rosenquist Vera Michalchik Tina Stanford Reina Fujii Patty Kreikemeier Robert Kozma Tools for Investigating, Visualizing,
Birzeit University Experience in Designing, Developing and Delivering e-enabled Courses Palestine December,2005 Dr. Osama Mimi, Birzeit University.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism The American Physiological Society Transform a Cookbook Lab Moving Toward More Student-Centered.
Curriculum Transformation Moving towards the Reality.
Using Climate Change to Address the NGSS in Classroom Teaching: How TERC can Help Tamara Shapiro Ledley TERC and CLEAN Presentation for the Council of.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Problem Based Learning (PBL) David W. Dillard Arcadia Valley CTC.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
COETC Grant May 17, 2012 Facilitators: Ruth Brancard and Elaine Baker.
“Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” - Henry Ford -
 1. Which is not one of the six principles that address crucial issues fundamental to all school math programs? A. Curriculum B. Assessment C. Measurement.
By: Kayla Ford, Jessica Hogue, and Shelby Spalding TEACHING AND LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE.
Copyright © 2005 SRI International The NanoSense Project Project overview Patti Schank, Tina Stanford, Anders Rosenquist, Alyssa Wise SRI International.
A p r i l 1 8,  Interactive Web-based magazine about Earth system science & the use of satellite remote sensors.
Week 4 – Getting Ready for Online Survey or School ‘snapshot’
 Build National Capacity in NSEE  Developing CurriculaNew Learning StandardsNSEE Knowledge Base   Learning and Teaching through Inquiry and Design.
What is STEM? What is STEM?
Australian National Curriculum General Capability Literacy.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
West Virginia University Academic Innovation Next Generation Mathematics Communities of Practice Greg Strimel.
© 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. Planning for Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum Chapter 3.
Chapter 11 – Teaching and Learning with Technology in Mathematics and Science Instruction Cullen Byrne and Abby Harnack.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Tina Willis and Adrienne Walker YEARLONG CURRICULUM MAPS & UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Constructing Ideas in Physical Science Joan Abdallah, AAAS Darcy Hampton, DCPS Davina Pruitt-Mentle, University of Maryland CIPS Workshop for Middle School.
Learning Streams: A Case Study in Curriculum Integration Mani Mina, Arun Somani, Akhilesh Tyagi, Diane Rover, Matthew Feldmann, and Mack Shelley Iowa State.
Gases Kelly Hwang. Unit Plan Summary Using project-based learning method, students will understand different variables that affect the properties and.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Lecture # 32 SCIENCE 1 ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN EDUCATION Professional Standards for Teaching Science.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
 Use nanotechnology as a tool to excite students’ interest in science and technology  Utilize “Teach the Teacher” programs to reach large numbers of.
The Basics About NGSS
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Nakatani Teaching and Learning Center (NTLC) supports research & faculty development through... NTLC Year-long Research.... Infusing Diversity across the.
NETA Power Point Slides to accompany: Prepared by Luigi Iannacci Trent University Copyright © 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
AP Biology Revised Framework MSTA 2012 Tina Wagner.
Engineering is Elementary Inservice PD Program Christine M. Cunningham Museum of Science, Boston.
Chemistry teacher education for future Chemistry teacher education for future.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
Science is…. Introduction Science in the early childhood classroom should be hands-on, experimental, exciting and fun (Bredekamp & Copple, 1997) Science.
 Continue to develop a common understanding of what STEM education is/could/should be here at Killip.
1 Using DLESE: Finding Resources to Enhance Teaching Shelley Olds Holly Devaul 11 July 2004.
Supplemental Math Digital Tool: Dreambox
Curricular Design and Academic Expectations
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Computational Reasoning in High School Science and Math
Intro to GETSI-Field Development Model & Guiding Principles
Adapted from Nanosense
Concord High School Science Department.
How Shall we prepare teachers for deeper community partnerships?
Unique Properties at the Nanoscale
Barbara Young, Science Specialist
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2005 SRI International The NanoSense Project Challenges and opportunities Patti Schank, Tina Stanford, Anders Rosenquist, Alyssa Wise SRI International

2 Team Patti Schank (PI) Vera Michalchik (internal eval) Anders Rosenquist (learning scientist) Tina Stanford (Co-PI, chem) Nora Sabelli (advisor, workshop) Alyssa Wise (intern) Ellen Mandinach (external eval) Maureen Scharberg (chem, SJSU)

3 Goals Work with scientists and educators to create and disseminate high school units that – Promote learning of basic science concepts that account for nanoscale phenomena – Help students visualize underlying principles that govern the behavior of particles on the nanoscale Situated in single discipline (chemistry) – Making explicit ties to other disciplines Mapped to core concepts and standards

4 Timeline Develop, test, refine materials ( ) – Define learning goals and core concepts – Gather, validate, organize content – Design and generate assessments, activities – Classroom test and refine materials Disseminate widely ( ) – Teacher workshops at San Jose State University, conferences – Online

5 Curricular Units Introduction to Nanoscience (tested, available) – 1-2 weeks, 1 day; Size and scale, unique properties, tools of the nanosciences, applications Clear sunscreen (in development/testing) – 1 week, 1 day; How light interacts with matter Nanofiltration (in development/testing) – 1 day; How size, charge, and shape become important factors in filtration Planned for development in – Quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, clean energy

6 “Traditional” ZnO sunscreen is white Zinc oxide nanoparticles Nanoscale ZnO sunscreen is clear Sources: powders.com/images/zno/im_zinc_oxide_particles.jpg Clear Sunscreen Large ZnO particles – Block UV light – Scatter visible light – Appear white Nanosized ZnO particles – Block UV light – So small compared to the wavelength of visible light that they don’t scatter it – Appear clear

7 Design Challenges Three main challenges we faced: 1.Defining the curriculum for a new and evolving area of scientific study 2.Situating an interdisciplinary science within a classroom that focuses on one discipline 3.Developing support materials for content that is novel for teachers (and often not fully understood by scientists)

8 Challenge 1: Defining the Curriculum Identifying core concepts and finding accessible topics and applications to illustrate them – Many (e.g., quantum mechanics) are difficult Finding reliable, verifiable information – 9 contradictory explanations about ZnO sunscreens – Different fields use different terminology or same terminology in different ways How to organize materials – Underlying themes? Topically based on applications? Based on traditional science disciplines?

9 Addressing Challenge 1 Identify and develop units based on nanoscience topics that focus on: – Readily available deep scientific expertise from scientists and engineers working in the particular area – Defined gaps in conventional instructional materials/core science or technology concepts – Specific applications that are highly engaging/interesting to students – Opportunities for innovative instructional materials/educational technology

10 Example Clear Suncreen –Addresses clear gaps Solid state interactions w/light not taught in chemistry Unified EM spectrum not taught in physics –Engaging topic for students –Opportunity for animations of scattering mechanism –Expertise evolving

11 Challenge 2: Situating the Science Fit into a classroom that focuses on 1 discipline – What other science concepts have students been exposed to? In what other courses will they see the same or related concepts? Our partner teachers want to use the curricular materials in many different classes – AP chemistry, regular chemistry, biology, physics, and interdisciplinary science – All these disciplines use different terminologies and focus on different aspects of phenomena How to help teachers figure out where the curricula fits with what they currently teach

12 Addressing Challenge 2 Explicitly connect to standards and core science topics in traditional science disciplines – E.g., atomic energy levels, scattering of light by matter Provide teachers with many ways to use the materials – E.g., provide alignment charts that show how they are related to standards and standard topics in different subject areas Provide many options to incorporate materials – E.g., incorporate into regularly taught units (as a real life example), 1-day or multi-day modules

13 Challenge 3: Prof. Development Nanoscience is a multidisciplinary field – Draws on concepts from fields outside of teachers’ primary area of expertise The novelty of the content combined with its newness as a field raised pedagogical demands – Teachers were not able to know all the answers to student (and their own) questions – Traditional chemistry and physics concepts are not always applicable at the nanoscale level – Some questions may go beyond the boundary of our current understanding as a scientific community

14 Addressing Challenge 3 Support teachers by providing more and deeper background content Help teachers move from an expert “content- delivery” mode to model the scientist in action – Recast teaching challenges as opportunities to model the scientific process and provided concrete strategies for how to do so – Our materials include explicit reference to: The development of “nanoscience” as a field The advantages and limitations of models to explain scientific phenomena

15 Answering the Framing Questions What nano topics should guide the development of classroom materials? Example: Clear Suncreen –Expertise evolving –Solid state interactions w/light not taught in chemistry, unified EM spectrum not taught in physics –Engaging, authentic application –Animation of scattering mechanism

16 Framing Questions (Cont.) What learning goals should guide the development of classroom materials? –Connect to core science topics they know about –Deal with deep science, not superficial overview –Deal with process of science explicitly What areas of secondary (grades 7-12) science support the integration of nano concepts? –Big question! Physical science, physics, integrated science, chemistry, biology…. –Advancing Nanoscience Education Workshop participants from diverse areas identified core nanoscience concepts

17 Framing Questions (Cont.) 8 core nanoscience concepts identified in the Advancing Nanoscience Education workshop: – Scale – Energy – Quantum principles and probability – Relation between structure and properties – Surface phenomena – Unique properties at the nanoscale – Self-assembly – Control of fabrication

18 Framing Questions (Cont.) How can instructional technology enrich nano classroom resources? – Expert and student-generated animations Clear Sunscreen: scattering mechanism Energy: mechanism of breaking water down in an energy- efficient way (nano-enhanced hydrogen production) – Multiscale modeling (“GenScope” for nanoscience) Show how properties change as the size scale changes Help students move between models, embrace complexity – Probeware Clear Sunscreen: colorimeter to test percent absorption or transmission Energy: conductivity testing