Toolkit to Promote the Use of the CIFOR Guidelines Jeanette Stehr-Green, MD CSTE Consultant June 13, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Approach for Agency Access to the Sandbox Environment Background: The MyFloridaMarketPlace project recognizes the need for users to access the MyFloridaMarketPlace.
Advertisements

2010 Food Safety Epidemiology Capacity Assessment CSTE Annual Conference June 13, 2011 Lauren Rosenberg, MPA Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.
Rethinking Public Health Surveillance for the Future Perry F. Smith CSTE Annual Conference Pittsburgh, PA June 13, 2011.
Identifying and Selecting Projects
Screen 1 of 24 Reporting Food Security Information Understanding the User’s Information Needs At the end of this lesson you will be able to: define the.
DR. CHRISTINA RUNDI MINISTRY OF HEALTH, MALAYSIA.
Begin with the End in Mind
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Instructional Design Dr. Lam TECM 5180.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 3-1.
1 University of the State of New York State Education Department Differentiated Accountability School Quality Review (SQR)
I.S.O.T.U.R.E. A Model for Volunteer Management Success Improving Lives. Improving Texas.
Leaders Manage Meetings
 Planning provides the foundation for conservation district programs and operations.  The planning process broadly defines the vision of the future.
WHO guidelines for investigation and control of Foodborne Diseases outbreak Dr. Christina Rundi Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Kirk Smith MN, Carina Blackmore FL, John Dunn TN, Alicia Cronquist CO, Bill Keene OR Dale Morse & Don Sharp CDC CSTE Annual Meeting June 12, 2013 National.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Inspections.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
1. IASC Operational Guidance on Coordinated Assessments (session 05) Information in Disasters Workshop Tanoa Plaza Hotel, Suva, Fiji June
Introduction to electronic resources management Workshop introduction and overview.
ISO Sampling Agreement Requirements and National Sampling Plan Guy F. Delius CSO FDA Tim McGrath Acting Deputy Director ORS-FDA March 10, :15-1:45.
InWEnt | Qualified to shape the future1 Internet based Human Resource Development Management Platform Human Resource Development Programme in Natural Disaster.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
State trainings to improve outbreak response using the CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response CSTE Annual Conference June 5, 2012 Lauren.
The Interactive Model Of Program Planning
Evaluation Proposal Defense Observations and Suggestions Yibeltal Kiflie August 2009.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
The HMO Research Network (HMORN) is a well established alliance of 18 research departments in the United States and Israel. Since 1994, the HMORN has conducted.
Designing a Training Program RATIONALE OF THE TRAINING Background or introduction of what the training is all about –Developments in the field/discipline/area.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
School of Health Sciences Week 8! AHIMA Practice Briefs Healthcare Delivery & Information Management HI 125 Instructor: Alisa Hayes, MSA, RHIA, CCRC.
CIFOR Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response CIFOR Guidelines and CIFOR Toolkit Donald J. Sharp, MD, DTM&H Food Safety Office National Center for.
1 Developed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) January 2014 Setting up a Sustainable National GHG Inventory Management System.
Chapter Fourteen Communicating the Research Results and Managing Marketing Research Chapter Fourteen.
Preparing a Written Report Prepared by: R Bortolussi MD FRCPC and Noni MacDonald MD FRCPC.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Preparedness for Biological Emergencies 27 April 2004 Jeffrey S. Duchin, M.D. Chief, Communicable Disease.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Revised OSDV Tools and Processes LFA PSM expert workshop 28-30January 2014.
WORKSHOP ON DEVELOPING TRAINING SYSTEM FOR PHYTOSANITARY INSPECTORS Edit Tóthné Lippai Preparation of training program - when changing of legislation -
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview New York Integrated Center of Food Safety Center of Excellence.
Support National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) CARD/SPCU 1.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 7: Epidemiology Investigation New York Integrated Center of.
Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (CIFOR) Update
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 5: Pathogen-Specific Surveillance New York Integrated Center.
CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview of Focus Area 2 – Necessary Resources
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Proposal Development
(Public Sector Linkage Programme)
CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview of Focus Area 2 – Necessary Resources
The Community as a Client: Assessment and Diagnosis
[Region name] Region Conference 2016
Energy Statistics Compilers Manual
Response Teams – Planning and Preparation
CIFOR Toolkit Focus Area 11: Food Recall
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 6: Initial Steps of an Investigation New York Integrated Center.
Presentation transcript:

Toolkit to Promote the Use of the CIFOR Guidelines Jeanette Stehr-Green, MD CSTE Consultant June 13, 2011

CIFOR Guidelines Comprehensive description of the overall approach to outbreaks of foodborne diseases Allow agencies to –Compare to existing procedures –Fill in gaps, create procedures, update procedures –Train staff Challenges in use –Lengthy document with overlap between chapters –Range of recommended practices –Implementation depends on host of factors

CIFOR Guidelines Toolkit 1.Better understand their current foodborne disease outbreak response activities, 2.Become more familiar with the CIFOR Guidelines and recommended practices, 3.Identify specific CIFOR recommendations appropriate to the agency, and 4.Make plans to implement those recommendations. A process and set of supporting materials which help agencies:

Document 0 Toolkit Contents Document A Toolkit Overview Document B Toolkit User Instructions Document C Toolkit User Instructions (Cheat sheet for Facilitators) Document D Preliminaries Worksheet Document E Selecting Focus Areas Worksheet Documents F1-F12- Individual Focus Area Worksheets Focus Area 1 Worksheet Relationships with relevant agencies and organizations Focus Area 2 Worksheet Necessary resources Focus Area 3 Worksheet Communications Focus Area 4 Worksheet Notification/complaint systems Focus Area 5 Worksheet Pathogen-specific surveillance Focus Area 6 Worksheet Initial steps of an investigation Focus Area 7 Worksheet Epidemiology investigation Focus Area 8 Worksheet Environmental health investigation Focus Area 9 Worksheet Laboratory investigation Focus Area 10 Worksheet Control of source at implicated facility Focus Area 11 Worksheet Food recall Focus Area 12 Worksheet Control of secondary spread Document G Sample Focus Area Worksheet Document H Crosswalks among National Initiatives and CIFOR Toolkit Document I Toolkit Tips for Facilitators Document J Participant Evaluation Form CIFOR Toolkit Documents

Understanding the Toolkit Multi-step process designed to use time efficiently 1.Preparation/preliminaries 2.Selection of areas of focus 3.Examination of priority areas individually Easy-to-use worksheets −Clearly labeled documents (with electronic versions) −Step-by-step approach with embedded instructions −Space to record discussion highlights/decisions Repackaging of CIFOR recommendations −Removal of supporting text (with hyperlinks) −Bringing together relevant recommendations −Organized for easier review

Step 1: Preliminaries Undertaken by lead person or key decision-makers Purpose: –Identify program/agency/jurisdiction for which decisions will be made. –Brief decision-makers. –Identify who should be involved. –Identify support staff. –Collect relevant background materials. –Decide on time frame. Needed time: <1 hour (plus time to arrange and prepare for follow-up meetings) Timing: before other steps; revisited periodically

Preliminaries

Step 2: Select Priority Focus Areas Undertaken by key staff with knowledge, expertise, and practical experience in local outbreak response Purpose –Determine if critical outbreak response activities, relationships, and resources are already in place. –Consider priorities of other projects or problem areas in past outbreak response experiences. –Prioritize areas of outbreak response that are most critical to agency and in need of improvement. Needed time: 1-2 hours Timing: immediately following preliminaries or at a later time

Planning and preparation Surveillance and Outbreak Detection Investigation of Clusters and Outbreaks Control Measures Relationships Resources Communications Notification/ complaint systems Pathogen-specific surveillance Initial steps Epidemiology investigation Environmental health investigation Laboratory investigation Control of source Food recall Control of secondary spread Focus Areas Critical aspects of outbreak response broken into “bite-sized” chunks that allow users to systematically examine current activities and focus on the areas most critical to their agency.

Select Priority Focus Areas one-page for each Focus Area

Step 3: Examine Priority Focus Areas Undertaken by larger group with broader areas of expertise and a wider range of experience Purpose –Describe current activities/procedures in Focus Area and identify targets for improvement. –Prioritize CIFOR recommendations to address targets. –Outline steps to implement high priority CIFOR recommendations. Needed time: 2-3 hours per Focus Area Timing: schedule highest priority Focus Areas first; consider separating efforts on different Focus Areas

Examine Priority Focus Areas set of pages for each Focus Area

Examine Priority Focus Areas

 ●

Target Audience Staff from public health, environmental health, and food regulatory agencies and public health laboratories Local and state (and even federal) level Persons likely to be involved in a foodborne outbreak response who have subject matter expertise and knowledge of local procedures, resources, and politics Interdisciplinary groups vs. single program, agency, or person

Settings Meetings held specifically to address improving foodborne outbreak response locally As part of an after-action review of an outbreak response During planning meetings with other programs and agencies to define working relationships, communication processes, data sharing, etc. As part of local capacity development efforts (e.g., Public Health Performance Standards) As adjunct to trainings and professional meetings

Final Tips for Using the Toolkit Don’t get distracted by the volume. Involve the right people. Be clear on the process so as not to get lost. Keep moving. Don’t get caught up in too much detail. Record highlights of discussions and decisions. Focus on a few realistic changes as opposed to detailed expansive plans. End with specific action plans including a time frame and assigned responsibilities.

Toolkit Use So Far 250 hard copies of Toolkit distributed Many more copies downloaded from website Informal feedback positive 19 state and large urban areas funded to conduct trainings using the toolkit Thanks to Jeff Duchin and Public Health Seattle-King County for piloting the Toolkit!

CIFOR Toolkit documents are available at For more information, please contact: Lauren Rosenberg CSTE or