Allowing for Uncertainty in Site Response Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PREDICTION OF RESPONSE SPECTRAL PARAMETERS FOR BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (26TH JANUARY 2001) USING COMPONENT ATTENUATION MODELLING TECHNIQUE By DR. SAROSH.H. LODI.
Advertisements

Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.
Fawad S. Niazi Geosystems Engineering Division Civil & Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology April 27, 2010 Spatial Variability of.
SPATIAL CORRELATION OF SPECTRAL ACCELERATIONS Paolo Bazzurro, Jaesung Park and Nimal Jayaram 1.
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps - Inputs and Status Choi Yoon Seok Jennifer S. Haase Robert L. Nowack Purdue University.
GoldSim 2006 User Conference Slide 1 Vancouver, B.C. The Submodel Element.
Reliability Prediction of a Return Thermal Expansion Joint O. Habahbeh*, D. Aidun**, P. Marzocca** * Mechatronics Engineering Dept., University of Jordan,
Ground motion simulations and site effect estimation for Istanbul, Turkey Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Sylvette Bonnefoy-Claudet 3, Kuvvet.
Characterization of Glacial Materials Using Seismic Refraction and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves Glenn Larsen Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
Seismic Waves Types of Wave Propagation. Body Waves P & S Waves P and S waves are often called body waves because they propagate outward in all directions.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
Aerosol radiative effects from satellites Gareth Thomas Nicky Chalmers, Caroline Poulsen, Ellie Highwood, Don Grainger Gareth Thomas - NCEO/CEOI-ST Joint.
University of Minho School of Engineering Territory, Environment and Construction Centre (C-TAC), DEC Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola.
PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.
Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Gail M. Atkinson, UWO David M. Boore, USGS (BSSA, 2006)
Further Development of Site Response in NGA Models PEER Lifelines Program NGA-West2 Project Topic #8 Working Group Meeting Meeting #2October 26, 2010.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
First a digression The POC Ranking the Methods Jennie Watson-Lamprey October 29, 2007.
Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes… G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech.
Ground Motion Parameters Measured by triaxial accelerographs 2 orthogonal horizontal components 1 vertical component Digitized to time step of
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF DEEP FOUNDATION WEEK 9 FRICTION AND END BEARING PILES BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF PILES USING EMPIRICAL AND DYNAMIC FORMULAE.
Literature Review on Compatible Soil Structure Yielding by Weian Liu
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module k – Uncertainty in LCA.
Sensitivity Evaluation of Subspace-based Damage Detection Technique Saeid Allahdadian Dr. Carlos Ventura PhD Student, The University of British Columbia,
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Time-dependent vulnerability assessment of RC buildings considering
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER THE SENSITIVITY OF A 3D STREET CANYON CFD MODEL TO UNCERTAINTIES IN INPUT PARAMETERS James Benson*, Nick Dixon, Tilo.
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
Quantifying the dynamics of Binary Search Trees under combined insertions and deletions BACKGROUND The complexity of many operations on Binary Search Trees.
Probabilistic Mechanism Analysis. Outline Uncertainty in mechanisms Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Probabilistic mechanism analysis Examples.
FORUM FOR THE PROMOTION OF SOIL DYNAMICS IN INDIA H.R.WASON, Emeritus Fellow, IIT Roorkee & President, Indian Society of Earthquake Technology 21 December,
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
Measurements of raindrop-size distributions from dual-polarization spectral observations Dmitri Moisseev and V. Chandrasekar Colorado State University.
Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 13. Wave Propagation 2
Next Generation Attenuation Models for Central & Eastern US (NGA-East) Stakeholder Workshop: Introduction March 7, 2008 Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER.
Predicting Site Response. Based on theoretical calculations –1-D equivalent linear, non-linear –2-D and 3-D non-linear Needs geotechnical site properties.
Local site effects in Istanbul: Microtremor study in Ataköy area Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1 Caglar Yalciner 2 and Kuvvet Atakan 1 1 Department of Earth.
Hierarchical Control Framework for Hybrid Simulation Dorian Tung Research Supervisor: Dr. Tony T.Y. Yang Co-authors: Yuanjie (YJ) Li & Jian Yuan (Jason)
GoldSim Technology Group LLC, 2006 Slide 1 Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization in GoldSim.
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,
GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY: COMPARISON OF SURFACE AND DOWNHOLE GROUND MOTIONS Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Washington State University, USA Fabrice Cotton, LGIT,
1J. Baker Jack Baker Civil & Environmental Engineering Stanford University Use of elastic & inelastic response spectra properties to validate simulated.
Department of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University National Taiwan University Generation of Uniform Hazard Accelerogram Representing from “Dominant.
Site Specific Response Analyses and Design Spectra for Soft Soil Sites Steven F. Bartlett, Ph.D., P.E. I-15 NATIONAL TEST BED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM.
RECORD EVALUATION OF A BRIDGE UNDER THE NAPA EARTHQUAKE RECORD EVALUATION OF A BRIDGE UNDER THE NAPA EARTHQUAKE Omar Alcazar Pastrana [Dr. Carlos E. Ventura]
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering Taipei, Taiwan October 12-13, 2006 Site-specific Prediction of Seismic Ground Motion with Bayesian.
Ground Motions and Liquefaction – The Loading Part of the Equation
Dynamics of Binary Search Trees under batch insertions and deletions with duplicates ╛ BACKGROUND The complexity of many operations on Binary Search Trees.
6/11/20161 Process Optimisation For Micro Laser Welding in Fibre Optics Asif Malik Supervisors: Prof. Chris Bailey & Dr. Stoyan Stoyanov 14 May 2008.
Recent CSMIP/Caltrans Downhole Array Data and their Application in Site Specific Analysis H. Haddadi 1, V. Graizer 1, A. Shakal 1, P. Hipley 2 1 – California.
1 Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module k – Uncertainty in LCA.
Earthquake Site Characterization in Metropolitan Vancouver Frederick Jackson Supervisor – Dr. Sheri Molnar.
Mapping of lateral spread Displacement hazard, Weber County, Utah
Seismic monitoring of a unique CO2 injection site at Sleipner
Lead discusser: Yu Wang
Yelena Kropivnitskaya, Kristy F. Tiampo,
Dept. of Civil Engineering
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
Creating a Conference Poster
METREAU part II Analysis Division March 10,
Arnim B. Haase and Robert R. Stewart
Discussers (alphabetical order):
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Role of Statistics in Climate Sciences
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Allowing for Uncertainty in Site Response Analysis The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing Earthquake Challenges Together” May 4-8 2015, Tongji University Shanghai, China Allowing for Uncertainty in Site Response Analysis Dr Jason Dowling Dept of Civil Engineering The University of British Columbia

Overview Site Information & Motivation for the Study Geotechnical Data May 4th, 2015 Overview Site Information & Motivation for the Study Geotechnical Data Variation of Input Properties Site Response Analysis Allowing For Uncertainty Analysis Results

Site Response Analysis May 4th, 2015 Site Response Analysis The propagation of seismic waves as they travel through the local soil stratigraphy to the surface The key components: Input Motions and Soil Properties

Site Information Three schools sites in Richmond, BC British Columbia May 4th, 2015 Site Information Three schools sites in Richmond, BC British Columbia

May 4th, 2015 Site Information Three schools sites in Richmond, BC

Site Information The geological formation of the Fraser Delta May 4th, 2015 Site Information The geological formation of the Fraser Delta As a result, there can be a considerable depth to bedrock in areas of the delta Source: Clague et al. (1998)

May 4th, 2015 Site Information Geological cross-section from Burrard Inlet, BC to Bellingham, WN

May 4th, 2015 Site Information Geological cross-section from Burrard Inlet, BC to Bellingham, WN

May 4th, 2015 Site Information Geological cross-section from Burrard Inlet, BC to Bellingham, WN Source: Clague et al. (1998)

Geotechnical Data Example of data available >300m Borehole May 4th, 2015 Geotechnical Data Example of data available >300m Borehole from Richmond Source: Clague et al. (1998)

May 4th, 2015 Geotechnical Data Vs data, 300m Borehole from Richmond

Geotechnical Data Richmond Vs data Vs (to depths of 3.5km) May 4th, 2015 Geotechnical Data Richmond Vs data Vs (to depths of 3.5km) derived from seismic reflection data Source: Clague et al. (1998)

Geotechnical Data Richmond Vs data Empirical relationship May 4th, 2015 Geotechnical Data Richmond Vs data Empirical relationship Source: Clague et al. (1998)

May 4th, 2015 Geotechnical Data Borings were performed at the three school sites, giving Vs profiles (top 30m only)

May 4th, 2015 Geotechnical Data Combining the Measured Vs profiles and Empirical Vs-depth relationship

Variation of Input Properties May 4th, 2015 Variation of Input Properties Monte Carlo Distributions

Site Response Analysis Allowing For Uncertainty May 4th, 2015 Site Response Analysis Allowing For Uncertainty 1,000’s of randomly simulated sets of soil properties are analysed subject to the same input motions

May 4th, 2015 Analysis Results Example 1: to demonstrate the influence of the uncertainty in a critical parameter, Vs Input Variables to Monte Carlo Material property Mean value Standard Deviation Vs (above 30m) Varies (from SCPT data) 25m/s or 75m/s Vs (below 30m) Varies (Empirical equation) Nkt 14 2 φ 38° 2° γ 19kN/m3 0.5kN/m3

May 4th, 2015 Analysis Results Example 1: to demonstrate the influence of the uncertainty in a critical parameter, Vs The standard deviation used in the input in 25m/s here

May 4th, 2015 Analysis Results Example 1: to demonstrate the influence of the uncertainty in a critical parameter, Vs Spread of Input parameters, Vs (standard deviation = 25m/s)

May 4th, 2015 Analysis Results Example 1: to demonstrate the influence of the uncertainty in a critical parameter, Vs The standard deviation is increased to 75m/s here

May 4th, 2015 Analysis Results Example 1: to demonstrate the influence of the uncertainty in a critical parameter, Vs Comparing the 25m/s and 75m/s standard deviation results

May 4th, 2015 Analysis Results Full Stochastic Analysis: 30 input motions, 150 variations of soil properties for each motion, 4,500 simulations in total

May 4th, 2015 Analysis Results Full Stochastic Analysis: 30 input motions, 150 variations of soil properties for each motion, 4,500 simulations in total

May 4th, 2015 Analysis Results Full Stochastic Analysis: 30 input motions, 150 variations of soil properties for each motion, 4,500 simulations in total

May 4th, 2015 Conclusions Stochastic Monte Carlo simulation was used in the site response analyses of three deep (300m) school sites located in Richmond, BC to estimate amplification factors for seismic retrofit designs It was found to be an effective method of coping with the effects of uncertainty in the soil properties used in nonlinear 1D site response analyses The simulations resulted in stable mean values of spectral accelerations The mean spectral response in the period range of interest for retrofit design of 1-2seconds, increased by 15% as the standard deviation in Vs went from 25m/s to 75m/s

We would like to express our gratitude to some organisations and industry partners who contributed to our travel expenses