Option Values of Alternative Completion and Production Strategies in Shale Gas Plays Janie M Chermak, University of New Mexico James Crafton, Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Predicting Future Gas Lift Performance in a Mature Water Flooded Field
Advertisements

Valuation of Natural Gas in Salt Cavern Storage Facilities
Possible Effects of Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Gas Development in Durham County Zheng Lu.
Remaining Oil & Natural Gas Resources of New Mexico Ron Broadhead New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources A division of New Mexico Tech.
A Compelling Case. A Focused Vision. October 2006 Unconventional Natural Gas TSX VENTURE: SPI.
Application of Advanced Exploration Technologies for the Development of Mancos Formation Oil Reservoirs, Jicarilla Apache Indian Nation, San Juan Basin,
USGS Oil and Gas Resource Assessments and Hydraulic Fracturing Brenda Pierce, U.S. Geological Survey June 8, 2012.
Cost Benefit Analysis of proposed reforms to water access for Petroleum & Gas Projects Qwater Conference 7-8 November 2014.
Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling: What Does it Mean for Economic Development? Preliminary Findings February 2011 Sean O’Leary Ted Boettner West Virginia Center.
Supported / Created by IOGA WV Provide factual information Debunk false information In-depth look into the natural gas industry.
Chih-Yuan Chang, Eric Faust, Xiangting Hou, Dr. Kuo-Jen Liao Department of Environmental Engineering October 28, 2014 Investigating Ambient Ozone Formation.
Hydraulic fracturing or “Fracking” Truth about Fracking, Chris Mooney, Scientific American, November 2011.
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CO2 FLOOD UTILIZING ADVANCED RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION AND HORIZONTAL INJECTION WELLS IN A SHALLOW SHELF CARBONATE APPROACHING.
WISCONSIN FREIGHT RAIL DAY 2013 OCTOBER 9 TH MADISON, WI Capitalizing on a “Once in a Lifetime Opportunity” Richard J. Shearer President & CEO Superior.
Oil Shale Development Economics October 17, 2007 Khosrow Biglarbigi Hitesh Mohan INTEK, INC. INTEK 27 th Oil Shale Symposium The Colorado Energy Research.
Tight Gas Reservoirs Low Permeability Reservoirs The main contributor of unconventional gas in the US.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis APEC Energy Working Group Workshop on Unconventional Gas Vancouver,
James M. Kendell Energy Information Administration The Aspen Institute June 28, 2008 Aspen, Colorado Global Gas Outlook.
Unconventional Gas: Shale Gas Shale Gas  Unconventional gas (hydrocarbons) found in subsurface shale formations  Replacement to coal, oil, and natural.
John C. Felmy Chief Economist American Petroleum Institute
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis US Extractive Industry Overview: Oil, Gas, and Coal United States.
Potential Job Creation, Economic Benefits and Revenue Sharing from Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Production in the Mid-Atlantic Region Virginia Governor’s.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis Outlook for shale gas and tight oil development in the U.S. For Council.
Muhlenkamp & Company, Inc. Intelligent Investment Management Natural Gas: An Energy Game Changer Ron Muhlenkamp © All rights reserved.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis EIA Drilling Productivity Report For Center on Global Energy Policy,
National Iranian Oil Company
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis Federal Forecasters Conference – The Value of Government Forecasts.
Long Term World Oil Supply (A Resource Base/Production Path Analysis)
By: Cory Drexel And Nate Costello. Marcellus Basic Facts The Marcellus Shale formation is located in Eastern North America. The Geological formation gets.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis Status and outlook for shale gas and tight oil development in the.
Williston Basin Petroleum Conference Advances in Technology Panel Efficient Fracture Stimulation Rick Ross – Whiting Petroleum Corporation 1.
SHALE GAS WHAT WE KNOW WHAT WE KNOW WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT DO WE NOT KNOW WE DO NOT KNOW Supratik Banerji Regional Technology Center (RTC) – Unconventional.
International Shale Development Optimization
Reserve Evaluation for Enhance Oil Recovery Purposes Using Dynamic Reserve Evaluation Model Woodside Research Facility GPO Box U 1987 Perth West Australia.
Improved Recovery Demonstration for Williston Basin Carbonates DE-FC22-93BC14984 Luff Exploration Company Mark Sippel, Consulting Engineer.
Canada’s Energy Futures 2011: Shifting Trends Preview of Key Results & Comparison with Past Projections Abha Bhargava Matthew Hansen Bryce VanSluys 30.
Bruce B. Henning Vice President, Energy Regulatory and Market Analysis The New Energy Reality: Implications for Natural Gas and Oil Pipeline.
Hydraulic Fracturing or “Fracking”. Natural Gas: Clean Energy? Natural gas power plants produce: half as much CO 2 (greenhouse gas) less than a third.
Frank J. Macchiarola Executive Vice President May 6, 2015 Conference of Western Attorneys General The LNG Export Opportunity.
New Decline Curve Tool for GOM 3 /GOMsmart & “Forgotten Oil & Gas Study” 2012 GOM 3 User Conference at Anadarko John D. Grace, Ph.D. Earth Science Associates.
OIL AND GOVERNANCE State-owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply GEMBA 11.
April 12, 2012 Shale Gas Extraction.
MARCELLUS SHALE Natural Gas in Pennyslvania. Where is Marcellus Shale in PA?  Marcellus Shale  The contour lines tell thickness of the shale. Pink =
Washington Coal Club May 14, 2008 Carl O. Bauer, Director Coping with Competing Energy Strategy Directions Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology.
© 2012 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. All rights reserved. Sustainable Development of Natural Gas from Shale Gregory Hild Chevron U.S. Marcellus Operations APEC Workshop.
RANGE Resources Range Resources Company Presentation | September 30, 2009 | 1 IPAA’s 7th Annual Oil and Gas Investment Symposium Shale Gas Economics RANGE.
Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations — Montney Shale Case Histories Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum.
Robert Bryce.  George Mitchell: Texas energy baron  1997 discovered hydraulic fracturing ▪ Hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” (a drilling process.
Susan Pool Ray Boswell J. Eric Lewis Jonathan P. Mathews WVGES USDOE/NETL WVGES Penn State.
FRACKING, FLOCCING, AND FRACK-SAND MINING Kelvin S. Rodolfo, Professor Emeritus Department of Earth & Environmental Science University of Illinois at Chicago.
Tom Beebe Project Manager
Hydraulic Fracturing. 60 Years of Hydraulic Fracturing 1949 to 2010 On March 17, 1949, a team comprised of Stanolind Oil Company and Halliburton personnel.
The State of Renewable Energy In the United States as of Third Quarter 2011.
Shale Gas in the United States: Recent Developments and Outlook.
Direct Economic Impact of a Marcellus Shale Well Bill Hefley, Ph.D. 33 rd USAEE/IAEE North American Conference 26 October 2015.
TRANSFORMING AND DISRUPTING SHALE GAS AND OIL IN U.S. ENERGY SUPPLY RICHARD NEHRING SHALE PLAYS IN THE MOUNTAIN WEST DENVER, NOVEMBER 12, 2010.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis Outlook for shale gas and tight oil development in the U.S. For American.
Source: Energy Information Administration
Peaks, Plans and (Persnickety) Prices Gas Storage: Finance, Investment, and Strategy Summit October 19, 2010 Houston, Texas James M. Kendell, Director.
Understanding the SWD Market in the Bakken Shale Play, North Dakota Authors: J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., SPEC; Bobbi Lorengo, EIT; Alex Zyskin.
PAWNEE RESERVOIR SIMULATION STUDY Pioneer Natural Resources Co. Performed By Gemini Solutions, Inc. January 2001.
KIOGA Oil & Natural Gas Production in Kansas Today Edward P. Cross, P.G., M.B.A. President Kansas Independent Oil & Gas Association Oil & Gas Small Business.
Trends in Energy Conference Gifford Briggs Louisiana Oil & Gas Association.
Developing U.S. Shale Gas and Oil Resources: Problems and Prospects for the Next Decade Peter D. Blair, Executive Director NRC Division on Engineering.
Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking)
SPE What Factors Control Shale Gas Production Decline Trend: A Comprehensive Analysis and Investigation HanYi Wang, The University of Texas at Austin.
Challenges and Opportunities for Natural Gas: Lessons From This Winter Stan Horton Chairman & CEO Enron Gas Pipeline Group Natural Gas Roundtable Washington,
Janie M. Chermak - University of New Mexico
Shale Play Development – A New Paradigm
SPEGC Northside Study Group “Unconventional Reservoir Horizontal, Multi-Stage Completion Design Optimization” Presented by Stephen Schubarth President.
Presentation transcript:

Option Values of Alternative Completion and Production Strategies in Shale Gas Plays Janie M Chermak, University of New Mexico James Crafton, Performance Science Inc., Robert Patrick Rutgers University 30th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference Washington, DC October 12, 2011

Shale Gas Plays

“These wells are depleting so quickly that the operators are in an expensive game of catch-up” Aubrey McClendon, 11/2009

Shale Gas Plays PRODUCTION : 2.02 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) : 3.11 Tcf RESERVES Tcf, with 410 Tcf from Marcellus (EIA AEO 2011) - 84 Tcf from Marcellus (USGS Aug 2011)

Shale Gas Plays Impact of shale gas on the natural gas industry depends on: - actual production meeting forecasts - ultimate recovery

Research Actual production - reservoir characteristics - well characteristics - capital choices (completion and re-completion) - production choices Ultimate recovery may depend on - all of the above and - early management production decisions

Model Develop a theoretical dynamic optimization model that allows for periodic capital investment over the life of the well. Based on the necessary conditions we develop an econometrically estimable cumulative production function: X is a vector or reservoir characteristics and Z is a vector of completion and production choices. Included in Z are characteristics of the completion job, including the fracture half-length, F i.

Model The fracture sub-production function is also a function of reservoir characteristics and completion choices:

Model We estimate this simultaneous system of equations using 3SLS and a log-log specification.

Data 120 shale gas wells located in the US - 39 horizontal wells - 81 vertical wells all wells began production since 2007 have between 30 and 720 days of production data production data reservoir characteristics completion and production choices

Well Characteristics - permeability thickness - Initial Reservoir Pressure - Perforated Interval Completion Choices - Gallons of fracture fluid - Pound of proppant - Barrels per minute - PSIG - Stages - Micro-emulsion concentration Mesh Equivalent Mesh - Winter Fracture - Time between completion start and first production Completion Outcome - Fracture Half-length: final and early - Fracture Conductivity Cumulative Production - 10, 30, 60, 90, 1870, 360, 720 days - Ratio: Production Days to Calendar Days

Results The fracture resulting from the completion job is significant and positive for early period production Fracture conductivity significant and positive for vertical wells Micro-emulsion concentration has a positive and significant impact The completion job is significant. For horizontal wells it is how the job is performed (rate and pressure); for vertical wells it is the volumes and how the job is performed.

Results Stages are significant and positive for horizontal wells, but not for vertical wells Delay between beginning completion and production significant and negative Ratio is significant and negative Winter completion job negatively impacts vertical well production Decline (all else equal) different. Early period decline 7% larger for horizontal wells

Conclusions Shale Gas Plays impacting the US natural gas industry May not be as well understood as we first believed Initial choices may impact well potential Initial choices may impact ultimate recoverable gas Preliminary results suggest vertical and horizontal well productivity are impacted by reservoir characteristics, completion and production choices, but not necessarily in the same manner.