Bulletin 1508 Training 2009 Revision Spring/Summer 2009 Part 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of Indianas Special Education Rules Professor Daniel J. Abbott ED 242 Fall 2009.
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
RtI Response to Intervention
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Understanding Each Child’s Exceptionality and their Accommodations
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
The IEP Process Dana Cunningham, Ph.D. Coordinator Prince George’s School Mental Health Initiative.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
State of Connecticut Department of Education Department of Developmental Services PPT 101: Understanding the Basics of the Planning and Placement Team.
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Parent Academy Topic: Special Education Basics 1.
Evaluation & Eligibility Special Education Laws Made Simple November 2013 – Austin, Texas National Business Institute Presented by Sarah S. Flournoy, J.D.,
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
“Special Education 101” Dr. Kaye Tindell Special Education Director.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Spring 2007 Special Education Criteria Linda Thews Julie Toshner.
ASSESSMENT Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February.
Los Angeles Unified School District
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
Assessment of Mental Retardation & Giftedness: Two End of the Normal Curve Lecture 12/1/04.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
East Grand Rapids Public Schools Special Services Educating and inspiring each student to navigate successfully in a global community.
Eligibility Requirements Special Education Disability Categories.
Special Education: The Basics Rachel J. Valleley, Ph.D. Munroe Meyer Institute.
WALKING THROUGH CHILD STUDY. What is the Child Study Committee? A committee that enables school personnel, and non school personnel, as appropriate, to.
Evaluation ARC Chairperson Training KAR 1:300 Section 4 (1) An LEA shall ensure that a full and individual evaluation is conducted for each child.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Bulletin 1508 Training 2009 Revision Spring/Summer 2009.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1  Two Major Types  Language disorders include formulating and comprehending spoken messages. ▪ Categories:
Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
The Special Education Process By Christine Shaw.  Anyone can make a referral (ages ).  Referral received in writing.  School has 15 days to “dispose”
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Expert Topic Presentation By Chris Coombe March 9, 2009.
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Introduction to Special Education
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

Bulletin 1508 Training 2009 Revision Spring/Summer 2009 Part 2

§ 701. Autism Definition – (Autism Spectrum Disorders) – Asperger’s, PDD-NOS, etc. “…may be considered for classification…” Criteria for Eligibility – …disturbances may be characterized by delays, deviances, arrests – Bold text for emphasis – Expansion/elaboration of terms

§ 701. Autism (cont’d.) Screening for sensory processing difficulties – Now in Screening Activities, § 305. Additional Procedures for Evaluation – Systematic observations – Audiological when hearing screening not definitive – Augmentative/alternative communication assessment – Review and analysis of response to research- based interventions

§ 701. Autism (cont’d.) – Occupational therapy assessment Sensory processing issues – Visual – Auditory – Tactile – Vestibular – Olfactory/gustatory – Proprioceptive – Motor planning – Attention/arousal Motor difficulties

§ 703. Deaf-Blindness Definition – When student has deafness and blindness, must classify as having deaf-blindness – Continue to notify State Deaf-Blind Census Criteria for Eligibility – Hearing Impairment now Deafness

§ 703. Deaf-Blindness (cont’d.) Additional Procedures for Evaluation – Speech and language assessment includes Receptive language Expressive language Determination of language level and communication skills – Examiner Is fluent in student’s primary communication mode If not fluent, certified interpreter/transliterator used

§ 705. Developmental Delay Definition – Must categorically classify Deafness Blindness – May categorically classify When meet criteria for other disabilities – Classify as DD or other categorical disability When delays in addition to Speech/Language evident – When student has deafness and blindness, must classify as having deaf-blindness

§ 705. Developmental Delay (cont’d.) Criteria for Eligibility – Language only Additional Procedures for Evaluation – “…assistance with daily living due to health concerns…” – Educational assessment Review and analysis of RTI Documented by progress monitoring – Occupational Therapy assessment

§ 705. Developmental Delay (cont’d.) Procedures for Reevaluation – Triennial waiver Student not approaching 9 th birthday No other disability is suspected Student continues to have disability and need services

§ 707. Emotional Disturbance Definition – Federal definition adopted – 2004 definition moved to Criteria Criteria for Eligibility – Educational performance description expanded – Two different settings – Functional Disability Now 1 rather than 2 of the functional disability criteria must be met Omitted “conduct…secondary to an emotional disorder…”

§ 707. Emotional Disturbance (cont’d.) – Duration No revisions – Educational Performance Behaviors exist after research-based interventions Interventions include – Operationally defined target behaviors – Systematic measurement – Baseline – Monitoring of response to intervention – Graphing/charting of intervention results – Description of length and any changes Interventions did not significantly modify behaviors

§ 707. Emotional Disturbance (cont’d.) Additional Procedures for Evaluation – Screening for out-of-home/school placement – Need for multi-agency services – Review of FBA Target behavior intensity, duration and frequency Antecedents and consequences Across settings Multiple informants Determination of function(s) of target behavior(s)

§ 707. Emotional Disturbance (cont’d.) – Review of intervention Scientifically research-based interventions Implemented with fidelity Did not significantly modify problem behavior Appropriateness and effectiveness – Recommendation for provision of related services Counseling, school psychological or school social work If decision not to provide, must document and justify in report

§ 709. Hearing Impairment 2004 Definition Hearing Impairment – Permanent or fluctuating – Impaired in processing linguistic information through hearing – Adversely affects educational performance – Includes Deafness – Limits use of auditory channel Hard of hearing – Permanent/fluctuating loss – Unilateral loss – High frequency loss 2009 Definition Hearing Impairment – Permanent or fluctuating – Adversely affects educational performance – Includes Deafness – impaired in processing linguistic information through hearing Hard of hearing – Permanent/fluctuating loss – Unilateral loss » Localize sound – High Frequency loss

§ 709. Hearing Impairment (cont’d.) Criteria for Eligibility 2004 Audiological evidence – Deaf – Hard of hearing – Unilateral hearing loss – High frequency hearing loss Consistent with definition 2009 Audiological evidence – Deaf – Hard of hearing Consistent with definition

§ 709. Hearing Impairment (cont’d.) Additional Procedures for Evaluation – Deafness Impact of impairment on ability to process linguistic information Reevaluation must be conducted when – Student has not been considered for Usher Syndrome – Student is “at risk” for Syndrome “At-risk” indicators – Unable to walk by 13 months

§ 711. Mental Disability Definition – Changed to federal definition – Related limitations in life skill areas removed – Degree of impairment section under Criteria Criteria for Eligibility – Evidence-based interventions – Intervention fidelity – Progress monitoring at reasonable intervals – Inadequate rate of progress relative to peers

§ 711. Mental Disability (cont’d.) – Interventions required for mild degree of impairment – Profound degree of impairment eliminated Additional Procedures for Evaluation – Educational assessment Informal and formal assessments Review and analysis of assessment results Student’s response to intervention documented by progress monitoring data

§ 711. Mental Disability (cont’d.) – Adaptive behavior assessment includes information from Parent Teacher If only one informant, must explain in report – Psychological assessment Appraisal of classroom observation information removed Appraisal of emotional or cultural/linguistic factors

§ 711. Mental Disability (cont’d.) – Assessment of language development and/or communication skills Augmentative/alternative communication assessment

§ 713. Multiple Disabilities Definition – Federal definition – Deafness + blindness ≠ multiple disabilities – Deafness + blindness ≠ developmental delay Criteria for Eligibility – No changes Additional Procedures for Evaluation – No substantive changes – Moderate to severe degree

§ 715. Orthopedic Impairment Definition – No changes Criteria for Eligibility – No changes Additional procedures for evaluation – Educational assessment Review/analysis of RTI Documented by progress monitoring data

§ 717. Other Health Impairment Definition – Changed to current federal – Tuberculosis removed – Tourette syndrome added Criteria for Eligibility – When condition responds to behavioral interventions, evidence that Scientifically research-based interventions Implemented with fidelity Did not significantly modify problem behavior

§ 717. Other Health Impairment (cont’d.) Additional Procedures for Evaluation – When condition responds to behavioral interventions Review of FBA – Target behavior intensity, duration and frequency – Antecedents and consequences – Across settings – Multiple informants – Determination of function of target behavior(s)

§ 717. Other Health Impairment (cont’d.) Additional Procedures for Evaluation Review of intervention – Scientifically research-based interventions – Implemented with fidelity – Did not significantly modify problem behavior – Appropriateness and effectiveness Intervention includes – Operationally defined target behaviors – Systematic measurement – Baseline – Monitoring of response to intervention – Graphing/charting of intervention results – Description of length and any changes

§ 719. Specific Learning Disability Definition – Changed to match federal Criteria for Eligibility – Not primarily result of Visual, hearing, motor disability Mental disability Emotional disturbance Cultural factors Environmental/economic disadvantage Limited English proficiency

§ 719. Specific Learning Disability (cont’d.) –Review of interventions Interventions –Appropriate to age and skill deficits –Address SBLC area(s) of concern –Sufficient data to determine if progress is adequate –Graphing/charting of intervention results –Description of intervention length and any changes Evidence-based interventions Conducted with fidelity For length of time necessary to determine effectiveness

§ 719. Specific Learning Disability (cont’d.) Intervention results Progress adequate: ► No disability suspected Progress inadequate: ► Further assessment Sustained/substantial effort: ► Further assessment

§ 719. Specific Learning Disability (cont’d.) – Student does not achieve adequately For age Grade level standards In one of the following – Oral expression – Listening comprehension – Written expression – Basic reading skills – Reading fluency skills – Reading comprehension – Mathematics calculation – Mathematics problem solving

§ 719. Specific Learning Disability (cont’d.) – Assurances documented Appropriate instruction in math – Delivered by qualified personnel Explicit and systematic instruction in reading including – Phonics – Phoneme awareness – Fluency – Comprehension – Vocabulary » Delivered by qualified personnel

§ 719. Specific Learning Disability (cont’d.) Parents provided with – Data-based documentation – Repeated assessments – Reasonable intervals – Formal assessment of student progress during instruction – Evidence of pattern of strengths and low achievement Standard deviation requirements remain same Severe discrepancy requirement removed Kindergarten removed

§ 719. Specific Learning Disability (cont’d.) – Clear strengths and weaknesses not evident Preponderance of data supports disability Explain and justify in evaluation report

§ 721. Speech or Language Impairment Definition – No changes Criteria for Eligibility – Articulation “……characterized by consistent addition, omission, or incorrect…” – Language “…developmental functioning levels…” omitted – Interventions for K and above – Intervention data documented

§ 721. Speech or Language Impairment (cont’d.) – Articulation, fluency, voice conducted by speech-language pathologist speech-language pathology assistant – Language conducted by Speech-language pathologist Other appropriate personnel

§ 721. Speech or Language Impairment (cont’d.) – Interventions must document Based on student’s rate of learning Skill acquisition unlikely Within reasonable period of time – Articulation: Acquire correct use of targeted phonemes – Fluency: Attain normal fluency – Voice:Attain normal voice quality – LanguageAcquire targeted language skills – Interventions may be conducted through support services

§ 721. Speech or Language Impairment (cont’d.) Additional Procedures for Evaluation – Assessment of language processing – Review and analysis of intervention data for Students in grades K or above Children aged 3-5, when appropriate – Educational assessment conducted by Classroom teacher – articulation, fluency or voice Educational diagnostician or other qualified PA member – language

§ 723. Traumatic Brain Injury Definition and Criteria for Eligibility – No changes Additional Procedures for Evaluation – No changes Procedures for Reevlauation – If notable changes Do not use waiver process Conduct triennial

§ 725. Visual Impairment Definition – Deafness + blindness → Deaf-blindness Criteria for Eligibility – No changes Additional Procedures for Evaluation – Orientation and Mobility assessment only when screening results indicate need Procedures for Reevaluation – Conduct triennial if condition progressive or unstable

§ 901. Gifted Definition – No changes Procedures for Screening – If student Meets screening criteria, must refer for evaluation Does not meet screening criteria, enhance skills and increase knowledge Criteria for Eligibility – No changes

§ 901. Gifted Procedures for Evaluation – Grades 1-12 Scores obtained from screening instrument shall not be used in Standard Matrix Omitted requirements for – Review of educational performance – Observation on structured test – Standard deviation ranges adjusted on Matrix

§ 903. Talented Definition – No changes Procedures for Screening – Each LEA must screen for visual arts, music, and/or theatre – State approved screening form – If passes screening, must refer for evaluation Criteria for Eligibility – No rounding – Score of on theatre interview scale

§ 903. Talented Procedures for Evaluation – LEA provides transportation, when necessary

§ Reevaluations When is reevaluation required? – Educational or related service needs warrant – Teacher or parent request – Significant change to more restrictive < 40% of day in regular class < 40% in regular early childhood program – No longer suspected of exceptionality including those with only a speech or language impairment

§ Reevaluations (cont’d.) Not required – Graduation with regular high school diploma – Age eligibility for FAPE exceeded Must occur at least once every three years unless parent and LEA agree unnecessary May be necessary – When data not adequate – For students with Developmental delay Hearing impairment Traumatic brain injury Visual impairments

§ Reevaluations (cont’d.) For gifted/talented only – May be accomplished through IEP – Discussion documented on IEP – Informed parental consent sent prior to meeting – Copy sent to pupil appraisal

§ Reevaluation Procedures When parent does not consent to triennial waiver – Conduct review (§ A. 1-9, B. 1-4) May be conducted without meeting – No additional data needed, parent notified of » Determination and reasons » Right to request an assessment » Written notification documents that reevaluation occurred

§ Reevaluation Procedures (cont’d.) – Additional data needed » Conduct review (§ A. 1-9) » Collect data to determine (§ B. 1-4) » Incorporate those data with requirements in § F. & G. into reevaluation report » Use self-review form in Appendix B

Triennial Reevaluation Waiver Sufficient evidence that student – Is making adequate progress – Continues to have disability – Continues to need services – Is making progress in meeting goals – Is participating in the general curriculum No additional data needed Date of consent for waiver may not occur earlier than 6 months before evaluation expiration date

§ Special Services Overview –Some reorganization –No substantive changes

§ Adapted Physical Education Definition – Reorganized – No substantial changes Criteria for Eligibility – Ages 3 through 5 (LAMAP) Student meets 69 percent or less of motor skills – Mild motor deficits: 45-69% of skills – Moderate motor deficits:20-44% of skills – Severe motor deficits:19% or less

§ Adapted Physical Education (cont’d.) – Ages 6 through 21 (CTAPE) Student meets 69 percent or less of competencies – Mild motor deficits: 45-69% of competencies – Moderate motor deficits:20-44% of competencies – Severe motor deficits:19% or less – Students not able to participate due to disability Autism added

§ Adapted Physical Education (cont’d.) Procedures for screening – Moved to screening section Procedures for evaluation – Ages 3-5: LAMAP – Ages 6-21:CTAPE For students with Autism – Written documentation verifying reduced performance – Provision and continuation of services

§ Assistive Technology Definition and Criteria – No changes Procedures for Screening – Moved to screening section Procedures for Evaluation – Assistive technology personnel added

§ Related Services Overview – Eligibility criteria now included for School psychological services School social work services

§ Occupational Therapy Definition – No changes Criteria for Eligibility – No changes Procedures for Evaluation – Conducted by licensed OT – Provision and continuation of services

§ Orientation and Mobility Definition and Criteria – No changes Procedures for Screening – Found in Visual Impairment Procedures for Evaluation – No changes

§ Physical Therapy Definition, Criteria and Procedures – No substantive changes – Provision and continuation of services

§ School Health and School Nurse Services Definition – Includes School Nurse services Criteria – No changes Procedures for Evaluation

§ School Psychological Services Definition – Federal definition Administering tests and other procedures Interpreting assessment results Interpreting information about behavior and learning Consulting to plan school programs Planning and managing psychological services Assisting in developing positive behavioral interventions

§ School Psychological Services (cont’d.) Criteria for Eligibility – Student classified and eligible for services – Evidence that services are necessary for benefit Documented Observable Measurable

§ School Psychological Services (cont’d.) Procedures for Evaluation – Assessment conducted by certified school psychologist Determination of appropriateness of evidence Systematic observation Any additional procedures Provide recommendations for interventions, strategies and services Provision and continuation of services

§ School Social Work Services Definition – Federal definition Preparing social or developmental history Providing group and individual counseling Addressing difficulties that affect school adjustment Mobilizing school and community resources Assisting in developing positive behavioral intervention strategies

§ School Social Work Services (cont’d.) Criteria for Eligibility – Student classified and eligible for services – Evidence that services are necessary for benefit Documented Observable Measurable

§ School Social Work Services (cont’d.) Procedures for Evaluation – Assessment conducted by qualified school social worker includes Documentation of psycho-social stressors Determination of appropriateness of evidence Family interview Student interview Interview with student’s teacher Review of mental health and/or health records Recommendations for interventions/strategies/services Provision and continuation of services

§ Speech-Language Pathology Services Definition, Criteria, Procedures – No substantive changes – Provision and continuation of services