DoDAF v2.0 – Where are we Now? What are we doing with this version?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction NAME 24 Sep 2009 Mr. Michael Wayson
Advertisements

ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORKS IN COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS SIMPLIFYING THE MYSTERY OF I.T. SYSTEMS IN SMALL AND LARGE ENTERPRISES JOHN HODGSON, I.T. ARCHITECT.
Human Views for MODAF Dr Anne Bruseberg Systems Engineering & Assessment Ltd, UK on behalf of the Human Factors Integration Defence Technology Centre.
Scope of TOGAF ADM The scope of the four architecture domains of TOGAF align very well with the first four rows of the Zachman Framework, as shown in the.
DoDAF V2.0 Community Update Overview
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
® DODAF CADM/AP233 Interoperability Project David Price OSJTF March 2006.
Software Quality Assurance Plan
SEP1 - 1 Introduction to Software Engineering Processes SWENET SEP1 Module Developed with support from the National Science Foundation.
DoD Architecture Framework Overview
Principles of Quality Architecture and Moving Forward Towards a Unified Common Approach 5 January 2012 Walt Okon Senior Architect Engineer Architecture.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
MIS 385/MBA 664 Systems Implementation with DBMS/ Database Management Dave Salisbury ( )
Reference Models مدل های مرجع معماری.
1 Samples The following slides are provided as samples and references for the Quarterly Reviews Additional slides will be added.
Business Driven Enterprise Architecture Assessment Methodology Josh Arceneaux August 16, 2011.
The Use of Zachman Framework Primitives for Enterprise Modeling
IIBA Denver | may 20, 2015 | Kym Byron , MBA, CBAP, PMP, CSM, CSPO
System Engineering Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao. System Engineering Jerry Gao, Ph.D. Jan System Engineering Hierarchy - System Modeling - Information.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
The database development process
PM Summit Overview Daniel Vitek MBA, PMP – Consultant to CDC.
Enterprise Architecture
OMG UML Profile for the DoD and MoD Architecture Frameworks (UPDM) Dwayne Hardy American Systems Jan 30, 2007.
Technical Integrity Assurance For Product Development W. Henson Graves Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Russ Campbell.
1 Lecture 1.1: Course Overview Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Developing Enterprise Architecture
An Introduction to the new features in TOGAF® 9
Overview of DoDAF (based on Deskbook)
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
1 Fit For Purpose Example Capability AoA 11 May 2010 Architecture, Standards & Interoperability Directorate Office of the DoD Deputy Chief Information.
Architectural Framework
SOFTWARE DESIGN (SWD) Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Design Approach for usda.gov April 2003.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Identification and Selection of Development Projects.
Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Outline Information Systems Architecture Information System Architecture components Information Engineering Phases.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Enterprise Architectures Course Code : CPIS-352 King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Enterprise Architectures. Core Concepts Key Learning Points: This chapter will help you to answer the following questions: What are the ADM phase names.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.0
Update on the Architecture CAT
DoD CIO Architecture and Interoperability Directorate December 2014
IC Conceptual Data Model (CDM)
DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.0 Illustrative View Examples
DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Version Dec 08
US Kickoff brief to Frameworks Convergence Meeting
NDIA Architecture Analysis for System-of-System (SoS) Interoperability Assessment Karen L. Lauro, Ph.D Oct 21, 2003.
Brief to Extraordinary NATO A-CAT Mr. Walt Okon January 2013
Brief to Extraordinary NATO A-CAT Mr. Walt Okon January 2013
Architecture Tool Vendor’s Day
Workshop for ACT – IAC, EA-SIG Mr. David McDaniel (ctr) 20 July 2012
Agenda All-Monday 15 Sep 0800 Welcome - Opening remarks
Introduction DoDAF 2.0 Meta Model (DM2) TBS dd mon 2009 VERSION 15
Introduction DoDAF 2.0 Meta Model (DM2) TBS dd mon 2009 VERSION 15
CV-1: Vision The overall vision for transformational endeavors, which provides a strategic context for the capabilities described and a high-level scope.
Version 3 April 21, 2006 Takahiro Yamada (JAXA/ISAS)
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.0 Illustrative View Examples
DoD Architecture Framework Overview
Metadata The metadata contains
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Systems Architecture & Design Lecture 3 Architecture Frameworks
CORE Name: CORE® Description:
US Kickoff brief to Frameworks Convergence Meeting
Presentation transcript:

A Preview of DoDAF V2.0 The DoDAF Development Team Supporting OASD(NII) Architecture Directorate John V. Tieso Tieso_john@bah.com Booz Allen Hamilton Standard Colors Colors should be used in the color pairs whenever possible. Do not mix and match colors, use pairs together as shown. Black, White and Gray can be used with any of the other colors. This document contains pre-decisional materials that has been authorized for use in limited public presentations by the Director, OASD(NII), Architecture Directorate. This information is otherwise intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed. Purple Pantone 2765 R 12 G 4 B 79 Green Pantone 357 R 15 G 67 B 24 Blue Pantone 2 88 R 11 G 31 B 101 Pantone Cool Gray 6 R 158 G 158 B 158 Black Red Pantone 485 R 252 G 5 B 14 Yellow Pantone 3965 R 232 G 244 B 4 Aqua Pantone 319 R 126 G 204 B 189 White

DoDAF v2.0 – Where are we Now? What are we doing with this version? Table Of Contents DoDAF v2.0 – Where are we Now? What are we doing with this version? Organization Perspectives Meta Model Groups Views Models Filename/RPS Number

DoDAF v2.0 is emerging from the Development Cycle Spirals I - III Volume 1 & 2 Reviewed and comments adjudicated Updated Draft out o/a 10 Dec Spiral IV Physical Exchange Specification Draft, 29 Dec Community review and comment, 24 Jan – 4 Feb Adjudicate comments, 5 Feb – 26 Feb Send to DCIO for Approval Filename/RPS Number

This version is a major change from previous versions Data-centric vs. product-centric Wider range of example models (New name for old ‘products’) “Fit-for-Purpose” Development Guidance Better linkage to major departmental programs (e.g. JCIDS, DAS, PfM, SE, etc.) and the Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework Integrated Data Model (Conceptual, Logical, and Physical Exchange Specification) Backward compatibility with DoDAF 1.0, and DoDAF 1.5 Extended capability to support international and coalition partners Filename/RPS Number

DoDAF Version 2 has an entirely new Organization Structure Three Volumes: Volume 1 – For Managers & Leaders Volume 2 – For Architects Volume 3 – For Data Engineers and Toolset Vendors DoDAF Journal – On online reference in Wiki format to share information The Defense Architecture Registry System (DARS) – Register Architectures here for sharing through Federation The Defense Metadata Registry – For registration/discovery of reusable data Filename/RPS Number

DoDAF Metamodel Groups Filename/RPS Number

DoDAF Metamodel Groups Performer Resource Flow Data & Information Doctrine Training/Skill/ Education Capability Services Project Goals Rules Measures Location Activity Filename/RPS Number

Metadata Groups to ……. Filename/RPS Number

DoDAF 2.0 has an extensive set of Views Capability View Articulate the capability requirement, delivery timing, and deployed capability Operational View Articulate operational scenarios, processes, activities & requirements System Engineering View Articulate activities to design and implement solution based on operational and capability requirements Overarching aspects of architecture context that relate to all views All View Articulate the data relationships and alignment structures in the architecture content Data and Information View Articulate applicable Operational, Business, Technical, and Industry policy, standards, guidance, constraints, and forecasts Standards View Describes the relationships between operational and capability requirements and the various projects being implemented; Details dependencies between capability management and the Defense Acquisition System process. Project View Services View Articulate the performers, activities, services, and their exchanges providing for, or supporting, DoD functions Systems View Articulate the legacy systems, their composition, interconnectivity, and context providing for, or supporting, DoD functions 8 Filename/RPS Number

DoDAF V2.0 DoDAF Metamodel (DM2) Fit For Purpose Presentation Dashboards Graphical Depictions Reference Models Fusion Products Composite DoDAF V2.0 DoDAF V1.5 Standards View Operational Rest of OVs All TVs All All AVs Systems View All “Systems” Versions of SV Products Data & Information View OV-7 Services SV-11 All “Service” Versions of SV Products DoDAF Metamodel (DM2) Capability View Project System Engineering New Updated Moved Filename/RPS Number

Questions? Filename/RPS Number

Backup Slides Filename/RPS Number

Organization of Volume 1 Section 1: Introduction Section 2: DoDAF and Journal Overview Section 3: Enterprise Architecture Section 4: Scoping Architecture to be “fit for purpose” Section 5: Customer Requirements Section 6: Methodologies Section 7: Architecture Presentations Section 8: DoDAF Metamodel Section 9: Architecture Planning Section 10: Architecture Based Analytics Section 11: Configuration Management of the DoD Architecture Framework Section 12: Relationships to Other Frameworks Filename/RPS Number

Organization of Volume 2 Section 1: Introduction to this Volume, including ‘What’s New” and “How-to”. Section 2: Meta Model Data Groups Section 3: ”Views” of DoDAF 2.0. Appendix A: Acronyms Appendix B: Glossary Appendix C: DoDAF Meta Model Appendix D: DoDAF Meta Model Data Dictionary Appendix E: References Appendix F: DoDAF V2.0 Presentation Development Filename/RPS Number

Operational Models Model Description OV-1: High Level Operational Concept Graphic High-level graphical/textual description of operational concept OV-2: Operational Connectivity Description Operational connectivity and information exchange needlines OV-3: Operational Information Exchange Matrix Information exchanged and the relevant attributes of that exchange OV-4: Organizational Relationships Chart Organizational, role, or other relationships among Organizations OV-5: Operational Activity Model Capabilities, operational activities, relationships among activities, inputs, and outputs; overlays can show cost, performers or other pertinent information OV-6a: Operational Rules Model One of three models used to describe operational activity - identifies business rules that constrain operation OV-6b: State Transition Description One of three models used to describe operational activity - identifies business process responses to events OV-6c: Event-Trace Description One of three models used to describe operational activity - traces actions in a scenario or sequence of events Filename/RPS Number

Capability Models Model Description CV-1: Vision Overall vision for transformational endeavors, provides a strategic context for the capabilities described, and provides a high-level scope. CV-2: Capability Taxonomy A hierarchy of capabilities, specifies all the capabilities that are referenced throughout one or more architectures. CV-3: Capability Phasing Planned achievement of capability at different points in time or during specific periods of time. CV-4: Capability Dependencies Dependencies between planned capabilities and defines logical groupings of capabilities. CV-5: Capability to Organizational Development Mapping The fulfillment of capability requirements, shows the planned capability deployment and interconnection for a particular Capability Phase. CV-6: Capability to Operational Activities Mapping Mapping between the capabilities required and the operational activities that those capabilities support. CV-7: Capability to Services Mapping Mapping between capabilities and the services that these capabilities enable. Filename/RPS Number

Project Models Models Descriptions PV-1: Project Portfolio Relationships Organizational structures needed to manage a portfolio of projects and shows dependency relationships between the organizations and projects. PV-2: Project Timelines A timeline perspective on programs or projects, with the key milestones and interdependencies PV-3: Project to Capability Mapping Mapping of programs and projects to capabilities to show how the specific projects and program elements help to achieve a capability Filename/RPS Number

Service Models Models Descriptions SvcV-1 Services Interface Description Identification of services and service items and their interconnections SvcV-2 Services Communications Description Services and service items and their related communications laydowns SvcV-3a Systems-Services Matrix SvcV-3b Services-Services Matrix Relationships among services in a given architecture; can be designed to show relationships of interest, e.g., service-type interfaces, planned vs. existing interfaces, etc. SvcV-4 Services Functionality Description Functions performed by services and the service data flows among service functions SvcV-5 Operational Activity to Services Traceability Matrix Mapping of services back to operational activities SvcV-6 Services Data Exchange Matrix Provides details of system or service data elements being exchanged between services and the attributes of that exchange SvcV-7 Services Performance Parameters Matrix Performance characteristics of Services View elements for the appropriate time frame(s) Filename/RPS Number

Service Models (Cont.) Models Descriptions SvcV-8 Services Evolution Description Planned incremental steps toward migrating a suite of systems to a more efficient suite, or toward evolving a current services to a future implementation. SvcV-9 Services Technology Forecast Emerging technologies and software/hardware products that are expected to be available in a given set of time frames and that will affect future development of the architecture SvcV-10a Services Rules Model One of three models used to describe service functionality - identifies constraints that are imposed on systems functionality due to some aspect of systems design or implementation SvcV-10b Services State Transition Description One of three models used to describe service functionality - identifies responses of a services to events SvcV-10c Services Event-Trace Description One of three models used to describe service functionality - identifies service-specific refinements of critical sequences of events described in the Operational Model Filename/RPS Number

System Models Models Descriptions SysV-1 Systems Interface Description Identification of systems and system items and their interconnections SysV-2 Systems Communications Description Systems and system items and their related communications laydowns SysV-3 Systems-Systems Matrix Relationships among systems in a given architecture; can be designed to show relationships of interest, e.g., system-type interfaces, planned vs. existing interfaces, etc. SysV-4a Systems Functionality Description Functions performed by systems and the system data flows among system functions SysV-5a Operational Activity to Systems Function Traceability Matrix Mapping of system functions back to operational activities SysV-5b Operational Activity to Systems Traceability Matrix Mapping of systems back to capabilities or operational activities SysV-6 Systems Data Exchange Matrix Provides details of system data elements being exchanged between systems and the attributes of that exchange Filename/RPS Number

System Models (Cont.) Models Descriptions SysV-7 Systems Performance Parameters Matrix Performance characteristics of Systems Model elements for the appropriate time frame(s) SysV-8 Systems Evolution Description Planned incremental steps toward migrating a suite of systems to a more efficient suite, or toward evolving a current system to a future implementation. SysV-9 Systems Technology Forecast Emerging technologies and software/hardware products that are expected to be available in a given set of time frames and that will affect future development of the architecture SysV-10a Systems Rules Model One of three models used to describe system functionality—identifies constraints that are imposed on systems functionality due to some aspect of systems design or implementation SysV-10b Systems State Transition Description One of three models used to describe system functionality—identifies responses of a system to events SysV-10c Systems Event-Trace Description One of three models used to describe system functionality—identifies system-specific refinements of critical sequences of events described in the Operational View Filename/RPS Number

Standards Models Models Descriptions Standards View-1 Standards Profile (StdV-1) Listing of standards that apply to solution elements in a given architecture Standards View-2 Standards Forecast (StdV-2) Description of emerging standards and potential impact on current solution elements, within a set of time frames Filename/RPS Number

Data and Information Models Descriptions DIV-1:Conceptual Data Model Required High level data concepts and their relationships DIV-2: Logical Data Model Documentation of the data requirements and structural business process rules DIV-3: Physical Data Model Physical implementation of the Logical Data Model entities, e.g., message formats, file structures, physical schema Filename/RPS Number

All View Models Models Descriptions AV-1 Overview and Summary Information Describes a Project's Visions, Goals, Objectives, Plans, Activities, Events, Conditions, Measures, Effects (Outcomes), and produced objects. AV-2 Integrated Dictionary Architecture data repository with definitions of all terms used throughout the architecture data and presentations. Filename/RPS Number

Speaker’s Bio John Tieso Booz Allen Hamilton John Tieso has had a long and distinguished record of achievement in assisting clients to effect desired change and improvement in their organizations. Prior to retirement from the Federal Government in 1997, Mr. Tieso was Deputy Director, Functional Process Improvement in the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence) and was a principal in the development of the methodology and techniques for C4ISR Architecture. He was an active member of the teams that created the DoD Architecture Framework, Version 1.0, and subsequently served as the Configuration Control manager for changes to that document. He has been an active member of the DoDAF 2.0 revisions, and is the principal author for Volume I, the Decision-makers volume. Mr. Tieso is well known for his efforts toward defining Business Process Reengineering (BPR), and was the project manager for development of the first BPR Practitioner’s Program within the DoD community. Since retirement, Mr. Tieso has been Vice President and Director, Process Innovation at the D. Appleton Company in Fairfax VA., a principal engineer at Silver Bullet Solutions Inc., in Arlington, VA., and is now employed with Booz Allen Hamilton in support of the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Network Information and Integration). Mr. Tieso was honored by the IT community as a member of the Federal 100 Class of 1995, and has received a Life Achievement Award from the Industry Advisory Council for his work on Business Reengineering. He has also received awards from the Smithsonian Institution, The Computerworld Awards Program, Government Computer News, the Information Technology Association of America, and a number of other national and international groups. John Tieso’s most recent work, Avoiding False Mirrors: Some Thoughts on Process Management Change in Innovative Organizations is in publication for release on November 1st, 2008. Filename/RPS Number