Property Tax & Referendum Adams/Franklin Ernest W. Werstler, Jr. Business Manager/Board Secretary Exeter Township School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The unpopularity of property taxes and the simplicity and perceived fairness of sales taxes have made the Local Option Sales Tax for Education a popular.
Advertisements

Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials Taking care of the business of schools…everyday. Act 1 and Multi-County School District Issues Thursday,
2014 Election Ballot Mill Levy Override #3A For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
1 School Funding Discussion November 15, 2007 Brighton Area Schools.
Thornton Township High School District 205 Presentation of Final Levy December 22, 2014.
DEBT SERVICE EXTENSION BASE REFERENDUM Hartsburg-Emden District #21.
Spring Cove School District 2014/15 Budget Workshop April 28, 2014.
Mattoon Community Unit School District #2 MCUSD# Tax Levy Presentation Presented: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 Board Action: Tuesday, November 13, 2007.
School Finance 101 by Ben Irwin Business Manager Parkview School District.
Forest Lake Area Schools Truth in Taxation Hearing for Taxes Payable in 2010 December 3, 2009 Presented by: Larry Martini Director of Business Services.
TABOR Rebates: Just the Facts. What are TABOR Rebates? When state revenues (Fiscal Year Spending) exceed a voter approved cap (rate of change in CPI plus.
Property Taxes Did you ever notice that when you put the words "The" and "IRS" together, it spells "THEIRS?" ~Author Unknown.
On Local Government Indiana’s Property Tax, 2008 Larry DeBoer Purdue University February 1, 2008.
Wisconsin Public Schools Revenue Limits. History 1949 –State adopted a system to address property- wealth differences among districts, which provided.
SETTING THE PROPERTY TAX RATE Micki Rundell, CFO City of Georgetown TML Presentation June 5, 2015.
Maner Costerisan  There are 882 Public School Districts within the State of Michigan as of ◦ Intermediate School Districts – 56 ◦ Local Education.
Budgets and Mill Levies How they work together…. Make this YOUR session! Stop me and ask specific questions at any time during the presentation. Help.
For the South Central Assembly Feb. 20, 2013 David W. Davare, Ph.D.
Orange County Property Tax Reform Summary June 26, 2007 Board of County Commissioners.
FULTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT DRAFT BUDGET.
GOVERNOR BROWN’S BUDGET PROPOSAL January 19, 2012 RAMONA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Association of Indiana Counties Tax Caps Tax caps are a good policy but is 3, 2, 1 a good policy? Tax caps are a good policy but is 3, 2, 1 a good policy?
Wakulla County 2 nd Budget Workshop for FY2009/2010.
Public Hearing on the Budget and Proposed 2013 Property Taxes [Put Your School District Name Here] December 2012 Information on changes to school.
New Local Optional Revenue, Implications and Recommendation Marshall ISD #413 School Board Work Session 1 August 4, 2014.
Gateway School District General Fund Budget Final Summary Budget Information for the Fiscal Year As of June 30, 2014.
Woodland Hills School District Tax Study Commission School Board Recommendation.
Sometimes referred to as the “16 line statement” Requires greatest scrutiny Shows financial condition for an 18 month period Provides estimated levy &
1 FY2008 Capital Budget Workshop July 10, 2007 Board of County Commissioners.
On the November 6, 2012 Ballot, Cherokee County voters will be asked to consider a HOST, an additional penny sales tax, which will be used to reduce property.
Act 72 Issues and Decisions for Pennsylvania School Districts presented by: David Sallack, Managing Director Public Financial Management, Inc. Harrisburg,
Association of Indiana Counties Regional Public Forum on Declining Revenues: Challenges for Local Government Terre Haute, Indiana May 12, 2010.
Understanding Your Property Tax Bill Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 6:00pm Thornton Room T-107 Thornton Township High School District 205.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FY11 Budget Workshop May 18, 2010.
Fridley Public Schools ISD #14 Public Hearing for Taxes Payable in 2012.
2011 Tax Levy Hearing Board of Education Meeting December 19,
Real Estate Principles and Practices Chapter 16 Investment and Tax Aspects of Ownership © 2014 OnCourse Learning.
1 Implications for taxpayers, school boards and students Tim Allwein, PA School Boards Association and Jay Himes PA Association of School Business Officials.
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Special Session 2007-B Overview Presentation to the Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission June 26, 2007.
Solanco School District July 24 th 2001 A Hearing for Act 24 of 2001 Occupational Tax / Earned Income Tax Resolution & Referendum Questions.
City Budget and Tax Levy 27 Jan 2014 This Power Point Presentation is a working draft. It may contain information that upon further revue and research.
The Voter’s Choice: Proposed Land Transfer Tax Chatham County Ballot Referendum November 6, 2007.
2008 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVY INFORMATION.
Spring-Ford Area School District June 2013/14 Budget 1.
Budget Presentation January 14, 2015 Agenda Review Estimated Actual Results Review Budget Timeline Review Preliminary Budget.
Special Library Levy November 18, 2004 State Library of Iowa and Iowa Library Service Areas.
Purpose The purpose of tonight’s meeting is to present the Proposed Final 2015/2016 Budget, following the required Act 1 timeline. SFASD must receive.
1 Spring Ford Area School District Montgomery & Chester Counties Act 1- Pennsylvania Taxpayer Relief Act Financial Advisory Presentation to the Tax Study.
Proposed Final Budget Presentation (May 13, 2013) Selinsgrove Area School District.
Ad Valorem – Everything you always wanted to know!
Budget Forum 6:30 P.M., May 25, 2017.
Ad Valorem Tax Issues Cheree Brown, Itawamba County School District
Excellence In Education
Overview of property tax levies for Idaho Schools
Solanco School District General Fund Budget
Tax Budget – Putting the puzzle pieces together
Consideration to Adopt the Final Budget
School Funding History
Octorara Area School District
The Budget Under Act 1 – Amended by Act 25 of 2011
Budget Presentation Budget Preparation
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Spring-Ford Area School District 2012/2013 Proposed Preliminary Budget
Octorara Area School District
Tollgate crossing metro district No
Property Tax Millage Rates (52.72 voted/29.9 collected)
SPRING-FORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Octorara Area School District
Spring-Ford Area School District Final 2015/2016 Budget
K-W Public Schools Revoke & Replace Operating Levy November 5, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Property Tax & Referendum Adams/Franklin Ernest W. Werstler, Jr. Business Manager/Board Secretary Exeter Township School District

the Good, the Bad and the Ugly Perspectives for May Decision Making

What’s It All About, Alfie?

Factors Leading to Act 72  Growing and disproportionate reliance on local real estate tax.  Options for school districts to raise local revenue limited by statute.  Perception that real estate tax is not fair.  Perception that school districts are not conservative financially.

Building Blocks of Act 72 Expansion of gaming – Slots Tax shift – Property to Income Tax Control – Limits on tax increases

Opting into Act 72  School boards must pass a resolution by May 30, 2005, to participate in property tax relief  If no action by May 30, 2005, school district will not be part of property tax relief  No second chance, no possible voter opt in by referendum

Method 1 to Opt into Act 72  Board resolution to enact a.1% Local Earned Income tax (EIT)  Local EIT will take effect once state-funded property tax relief begins  All revenue from this.1% to be used for local property tax relief

Method 2 to Opt into Act 72  Board resolution to put a question on November 2005 ballot  Voters can decide to go even further than 0.1% EIT (or switch to PIT) – all new revenue for property tax relief  If referendum does not pass, board must levy a.1% EIT and is in Act 72

Method 3 to Opt into Act 72  Available only to districts that do not currently have an EIT  Board resolution to put a question on the November 2007 ballot  Proposed EIT rate plus state funding must provide for at least 50% of maximum amount allowed.  If referendum does not pass, board must levy a.1% EIT and is in Act 72

If In... WHAT???  Budget restrictions unlike any other governmental unit in Pennsylvania.  Future tax rate increases higher than index, must obtain an exception or voter approval.  Early budget preparation.  Property tax reduction for approved Homestead properties.  Higher local income tax rates.

To opt in or not to opt in that is the question: THE GOOD  Provide property tax relief to residential property owners  Provides an new tax source to school districts

To opt in or not to opt in that is the question:  IF IN (the bad?)  Budget restrictions apply for fiscal year.  If property tax rate increase is over the index will have to apply for exception or voter approval at primary election.

Information for Boards:  History Repeats Have your tax increases been above the index??? What If Act 72 had been in force:  PASBO has index for last 7 years

Average SchoolSAWWECSAWW YearIndexIndex & ECI %2.1%3.0% %2.2%3.2% %2.8%3.8% %3.4%3.5% %3.0%3.5% %3.1%2.9% %4.2%3.3%

But wait there’s more:  Act 72 may force boards to increase taxes every year.  The index is an annual cap on spending increases,  Therefore: If you don’t use it, you lose it; cap is not cumulative.

However, if tax increase was always to max allowed:

Information for Boards:  ACT 72: What does it mean? How much of a reduction? Who are the winners or losers? Switch to PIT, does that help or hurt?

PASBO Act 72 Worksheet PASBO web site, click on Act 72 Information, click on Act 72 Worksheet. Template to calculate key information required to address Act 72 Templates (2 distinct templates) –School Districts WITH an EIT –School Districts WITHOUT an EIT Easy to use; Input 11 items for input table

Act 72 Worksheet With an EIT Input Table 11 Values required to be input 9 Tables self-calculate Allows input values to be manipulated Input Table Line Data ItemValue 1 Current EIT Revenue $ 1,000, Current EIT Rate (district share of Act 511 levy)0.50% 3 Estimated Act 72 EIT Rate Collection % (Full Collection Minus Lag)75.00% 4 Median Assessed Value $ 100, Total Homestead Eligible Properties1,000 6 Total Farmstead Eligible Properties1 7 Estimated State Gaming Money (See PDE Table by SD) $ 200,000 8 Estimated Sterling Act Credit Dollars $ 2,000 9 Current Real Estate Millage Rate (mills) Taxable Compensation + Net Profit (Earned Income Tax Base) $ 200,000, Taxable Personal Income Base $ 230,000,000

Data Sources  Current EIT Revenue – Budget or AFR  Estimated Act 72 EIT Collection % - Drag, remember the Drag, Cash Flow  Median Assessed Value – Median is not average. Median is the value in an ordered set of values below and above which there is an equal number of values or if no one middle number is the arithmetic mean of the two middle numbers.

Data Sources  Total homestead (Farmstead) eligible properties – Number approved by your county assessment office.  Estimated State Gaming Money – PDE table, new $500M & $1B  Estimated Sterling Tax Credits – EIT tax returns Or Sterling Act wage Data File on PDE web site

Data Sources  Current Real Estate Millage Rate – mills xx.xx  Taxable compensation + Net Profits – EIT Base for line 1  Taxable Personal Income Base – PA Dept of Revenue 2002 Personal income Statistics by School District

0.1% EIT raises how much?  Table 1, Estimate of EI/NP from.1% line 6 will show the estimated increase in EIT collection 1 st year.

How much of a reduction?  Table 5 Homestead/Farmstead Exclusion Line 3 = Dollar tax Bill reduction per eligible property Line 5 = Homestead/Farmstead exclusion (assessment deduction)

What is the maximum & minimum assessment exclusion?  Table 3, Median Assessed Value – Maximum and Minimum Exclusion Line 3 – the maximum allowable assessed value exclusion Line 6 – the minimum allowable assessed value exclusion

Actual property tax reduction per property if go to max or min  Table 6 Line 3 - the maximum dollar value of exclusion per eligible property Line 6 – the minimum dollar value of exclusion per eligible property

EIT Rate to support min or max?  Table 7 – EIT rate for maximum Line 5 – the additional rate for max Line 6 – the total EIT rate to fund max  Table 8 – EIT rate for minimum Line 5 – the additional rate for minimum Line 6 – the total EIT rate to fund minimum

Well, if we convert to a PIT what would the rate be?  Table 9 – Estimates of Conversion to PIT Line 4 – The total PIT rate to fund maximum exclusion Line 5 – The total PIT rate to fund minimum exclusion

November 2007  If opt in, Section 322 (c) (1) requires a November 2007 referendum asking the voters if they would like more property tax reduction by approving a larger EIT or converting to a PIT  Worksheet gives you the numbers your need for the wording.

Act 72 Worksheet  Recap: Provides numbers to address the basics information of Act 72 Ability to change input values (ease in calculating what if...)  Median Assessed Value  Total Eligible Homestead/Farmstead Properties  State Gaming & Sterling Credit Dollars  Additional EIT collection %

What is the impact on the community? Renters Higher earned income tax, no tax relief Owners with income Higher earned income tax, reduction in property tax Owners without incomeNo income tax increase, reduction in property tax Changes if personal income tax is enacted Owners without ExclusionsHigher income tax, no reduction in property tax Employees/Business OwnersCalculation of EIT for personnel from different municipalities, no property tax relief at all GamblersWins, losses and rehabilitation costs

Who wins and who loses?  PASBO web site, click on Act 72, click on January 2005 workshop handouts and click on Individual taxpayer analysis  Format for who will win and who will lose, you can set income level and information can be obtained from worksheets.

And the last word: DEBT  Moody’s March 2005 statement: debt issued by PA school districts under Act 72 Property tax constraints will be treated as LIMITED TAX DEBT.  Debt will be rated one notch lower that debt secured by an unlimited tax pledge.