FASEP Presents Is FASEP a 6-sensors or an 8-sensors type Measuring Device?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Steering axis inclination
Advertisements

Building a Conceptual Understanding of Algebra with Algebra Tiles
ALGEBRA TILES Jim Rahn LL Teach, Inc.
Getting started with LEGO NXT Mindstorms software This is intended to be a short introduction to the LEGO Mindstorms software and programming the LEGO.
P4 Explaining motion IP4.12 Walking graphs. P4 Explaining motion IP4.12 You will be shown a series of graphs. You have to walk along a line, so that your.
Wheel Alignment CASTER.
FASEP Presents How Toe is measured on the FASEP wheel alignment system.
With Lenses Created by Derek J. Wells. Under the expressed written consent of Derek J. Wells in accordance with the rules and by-laws of Derek J. Wells.
Why do cars need Alignment
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals
AIR NAVIGATION Part 3 The 1 in 60 rule.
Navigating the BOE-BOT
AIR NAVIGATION Part 3 The 1 in 60 rule.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 6 The Standard Deviation as a Ruler and the Normal Model.
AIR NAVIGATION Part 5 The 1 in 60 Rule.
 Any time you half press the shutter button, the light meter activates.  As we know, it measures the light in your scene, and calculates a shutter speed.
1-1 Copyright © 2015, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 18, Slide 1 Chapter 18 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
CONTOUR LINES.
Relationships Among Variables
ECE 2300 Circuit Analysis Dr. Dave Shattuck Associate Professor, ECE Dept. Lecture Set #25 Complex Power W326-D3.
Ch 8.1 Numerical Methods: The Euler or Tangent Line Method
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals Chapter 60 Page 875.
Integrals 5.
The Node Voltage Method
CORRELATION & REGRESSION
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 The Standard Deviation as a Ruler and the Normal Model.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 10 Inferences Involving Two Populations.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 Normal Probability Distributions 6-1 Review and Preview 6-2 The Standard Normal.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 7 Rational Functions.
Slide 6-1 Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 The Standard Deviation as a Ruler and the Normal Model.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 6 The Standard Deviation as a Ruler and the Normal Model.
1 Chapter 18 Sampling Distribution Models. 2 Suppose we had a barrel of jelly beans … this barrel has 75% red jelly beans and 25% blue jelly beans.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 7 Rational Functions.
1 Psych 5500/6500 Introduction to the F Statistic (Segue to ANOVA) Fall, 2008.
Design Studies 20 ‘Show Off’ Project How to make a computer monitor In Google Sketchup By: Liam Jack.
Solution of. Linear Differential Equations The first special case of first order differential equations that we will look is the linear first order differential.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 19 Confidence Intervals for Proportions.
Math 3680 Lecture #13 Hypothesis Testing: The z Test.
Adding and Subtracting Decimals © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved next #8 Taking the Fear out of Math 8.25 – 3.5.
Multiplication of Common Fractions © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved next #6 Taking the Fear out of Math 1 3 ×1 3 Applying.
EV3 Software EV3 Robot Workshop
ROBOTC Software EV3 Robot Workshop
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 6 The Standard Deviation as a Ruler and the Normal Model.
Chapter 9: Introduction to the t statistic. The t Statistic The t statistic allows researchers to use sample data to test hypotheses about an unknown.
The inference and accuracy We learned how to estimate the probability that the percentage of some subjects in the sample would be in a given interval by.
Chapter 25 Wheel Alignment. Objectives Define the term “wheel alignment” Inspect tires, steering, and suspension systems before alignment Check and adjust.
LAUNCH X improvements. LAUNCH ©Auto Testing Division Content Sensor headProgrammeTarget dataClampsCabinetTurn table, Side slip.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc t LEARNING GOAL Understand when it is appropriate to use the Student t distribution rather than the normal.
Dynamic Presentation of Key Concepts Module 2 – Part 1 Series, Parallel, and other Resistance Equivalent Circuits Filename: DPKC_Mod02_Part01.ppt.
Place Value Identifying place value of a number is important.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide 6- 1.
Reflections in Plane Mirrors
Stringing your car to determine wheel alignment is decidedly old school, but it's also effective, efficient and cheap. Begin by placing your car in a level.
The Lease Squares Line Finite 1.3.
Kinematics Introduction to Motion
How Many Ways Can 945 Be Written as the Difference of Squares?
The Standard Deviation as a Ruler and the Normal Model
Confidence Intervals for Proportions
PERSPECTIVES & ELEVATIONS
Driving in City Traffic
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals
An Introduction to VEX IQ Programming with Modkit
T. J. Okamoto (NAOJ/Kyoto Univ.)
Chapter 47 Wheel Alignment.
WARM-UP 8 in. Perimeter = _____ 7 in. Area = _____ 12 in. 4 cm
Mean Deviation Standard Deviation Variance.
Review 1+3= 4 7+3= = 5 7+4= = = 6 7+6= = = 7+7+7=
Steering Geometry Terms Used.
Chapter 7 Lecture 3 Section: 7.5.
Presentation transcript:

FASEP Presents Is FASEP a 6-sensors or an 8-sensors type Measuring Device?

FASEP is a unique 4-wheels alignment system. More accurate then any 6/8 sensors system. To make it simple, Think of the FASEP like that of a 3D systems. FASEP alignment system measure angles "along" the car, instead of measuring "across" the car.

1. The easy case: To understand, we better go back to the basics. So, let's make a simple example with a simple measuring system. In the picture on the below, the wheel alignment system is a simple 2-wheel alignment. In the picture you can see a simple case: wheels have 0 degrees toe (red), that is the wheels are "straight", and the value measured by the system is also 0 (light blue) for both left and right wheel.

2. A little more complicated: wheels are "shifted". If wheels are shifted (that is the left wheel is not aligned horizontally with the right wheel), the problems start coming. Note: The shift between wheels is evidenced by letter A in the picture. It is normally referred to as "set back". Please keep in mind that left and right wheel might be shifted due to several reasons (difference in caster adjustment, manufacturer's design, collision, apparent shift ). Apparent shift is the shift due to the wheel aligner's measuring / clamping system and not to the actual wheel position.

2 Cont.. Let's consider the picture. Wheels are still "straight", that is both have 0 degrees toe (red), but sensors are measuring 1 degrees toe (light blue) with symmetric sign left and right (+/-). Real Total Toe is = 0+0 = 0 (red). Measured Total Toe = (+1) + (-1) = 0 (light blue). In other words: Total Toe is measured correct (0) so that tire wear will be correct. Instead, by the measuring system depicted, Single Toe (left and right) is measured wrong (+/- 1 degree instead of 0) so that steering wheel will not be "straight". Conclusion: measuring toe "across" the car can lead to wrong measurement when you have set-back.

3. The easy case, measured with the FASEP system Let's see the example 1. again with FASEP system. FASEP system measures "along" the car. So reference is taken "front-to-rear" and not "left-to-right". To make it easy, rear wheel angles are yet not considered, but the rear wheels are simply taken as a reference. In the picture left you can see: - wheels have 0 degrees toe (red) that is the wheels are "straight" - value measured by the system is also 0 (light blue) for both left and right wheel.

4. Wheel are "shifted", and measured with the FASEP system. Let's now shift the left and right front wheels, just like in example 2 Wheels are still "straight", that is both have 0 degrees toe (red). FASEP sensors, however, measuring "along" the car, are still measuring 0 degrees toe (light blue). No error. With FASEP, Total Toe AND Single Toe are measured correctly, even in cases where the wheels are shifted. This is the first point to see how FASEP can be more accurate then 6/8 sensors systems.

5. A more complete overview Let's now consider a more complete case. To make it simple, wheel are still "straight", that is all wheels have 0 degree toe. In the picture, an 8-sensors system is shown and angles measurements are shown in light blue (to consider a 6- sensors system just remove the green line marked with B).

5. Cont. With an 8-sensors system, customers are often convinced that they can get also: - wheel base left (E) and right (F) - setback = E-F = (see also point A in figure 2) - front track (C) - rear track (D) - offset = front track (C) - rear track (D)

5. Cont. For Setback please remember consideration made in point 2: Setback MUST be measured in someway when you have an "across-the-car" type of wheel alignment system just like a 6 or 8 sensors type, to avoid wrong measurements (for partial toe).

6. Wider tracks (larger car), same angles. Just see how it is absolutely impossible to get also Front and Rear Tracks measured with a 6 or 8 -sensors system where ONLY angles are measured. In picture 7, you see a wider car, still all angles have 0 degree, like in picture 5. So same angles, but different front and rear tracks. How can you measure tracks with an 8-sensors system with only angles measured? Just you cannot measure tracks.

6 Cont. You can just estimate tracks, assuming wheelbase is correct (is the one specified by the manufacturer). Another assumption, not a measure. So what? To measure wheelbase you assume tracks are correct. To measure tracks, you assume wheelbase is correct. Just too much. Did you pay for a measuring system or for an "assuming" system?

6 Cont. Conclusion: when you measure only angles, you have many different cars (longer/shorter or wider/narrower chassis) that can "fit" with the same angles. So you really can not know what are your car's physical dimensions

6. Cont. FASEP system: angles AND distances to make exact measures. The FASEP system not only measure "along" the car, as explained in point 3 and 4. FASEP system is also based on two physical dimension (distances) of the car. Two REAL measures (front track G and rear track H) that, once entered in the computer, allow all calculations to be EXACT for that specific car, with no possibility of wrong results due to wrong assumptions that all cars are the same.

6. Cont. FASEP system is based on ANGLES (measured) and DISTANCES (G and H). Only one car can be the right solution. So everything is perfectly measured and identified. No wrong assumptions.

That concludes our presentation on 6 & 8 sensor systems as compared to the FASEP measurement system Thank You