10/2009 1 Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Differential Response and Data American Humane 2007 Conference on Differential Response in Child Welfare Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Child Abuse & Neglect Work Group Meeting December 17, 2014.
Department of Children and Families D edicated to supporting C hildren and strengthening F amilies STRATEGIC PLAN for STRENGTHENING THE DCF SAFETY NET.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Presentation to: Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council Presenter: Jo Ann Lamm, MSW Date: August 5,
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Getting Started With Intake & CPS Process. Developmental Competencies SW Understands the roles and tasks of the intake process SW Understands.
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
Common Ground One Approach, Many Adaptations Juanita Blount-Clark August, 2011.
A New Practice Model for Child Welfare
Successful Solutions Professional Development LLC A Basic Approach to Child Safety Chapter 4 Mandated Reporting Law.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative Update Meeting September 23, 2004 Bridgeport Holiday Inn.
Addressing Disproportionality in Texas A Committed Community Collaboration Presented by: Carolyne Rodriguez, Director of Texas State Strategy, Casey Family.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
Child Protection Transformation Overview October 18, 2012.
Orientation Core 100_OR_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1. Module 1: Introduction to the Child Welfare Pre-Service Training OBJECTIVES : Identify Child Welfare Pre-Service.
Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Law: Module 4: Reporting and the Role of the Child Welfare Professional Transfer of Learning The Pennsylvania Child.
MASH Understanding Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs 1.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Lynn H. Kosanovich, HFA Regional Director Introduction to the Model.
Child Protection Conferences Caroline Alexander Service Coordinator for Child Protection.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
Reforms for Justice for Children: A Case Study of Belize Legal and Institutional Reform in Belize: Strengthening Child Protection Systems Presented by.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Multidisciplinary Approaches to Learning Disabilities Lorraine Petersen.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
Enhanced Case Management: Moving Beyond Service Brokering to Care Collaboration Unit I.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Community Partnerships to Protect Children: Challenges and Opportunities Deborah Daro.
Engagement. Ask yourself the hard questions…  How can we better involve families, youth and caregivers in case planning?  How can we better empower.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
533: Building a Trauma-Informed Culture in Child Welfare.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Integrating Substance Abuse Competency Within A Child Welfare System Kim Bishop-Stevens LICSW Loretta Butehorn PhD Jan-Feb 2007.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
ENHANCING POSITIVE WORKER INTERVENTIONS WITH CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES IN PROTECTION SERVICES: BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIRED SKILLS.
Making Small but Significant Changes. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this module participants will be able to: Understand how protective factors.
A NEW APPROACH TO CHILD PROTECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE SYSTEMS DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE SYSTEMS.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Where are you from? (office and role) 3. What do you hope.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
SunCoast Region Transformation Implementation Team November 2, 2012.
Signs of Safety Webinar Series UC Davis Extension Center for Human Services Northern Training Academy Overview of Signs of Safety Implementation.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Child Safe Standards How effective is your leadership team in promoting a child safe culture in your organisation? 2 June 2016.
Dudley Children’s Services Multi-Agency Briefing Stefan Chapleo Helen Ellis 1.
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Commit to Agency Mission and Values
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Role & Responsibilities: Surrey Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB)
Presentation transcript:

10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009

10/ What is a Casework Practice Model?  Defines what we do, how we do it, and why we do it the way we do.  Establishes how DCF works internally and partners with families, service providers, and other stakeholders to focus on Safety, Permanency, and Well-being.  Links agency values and priorities to daily practice with families.  Provides clear, written explanation in agency regulations, policies, and procedures of how services should be provided.  Defines effective casework practice, while allowing for appropriate flexibility and professional discretion.  Defines the structures, processes and content of casework.

10/ Why are we implementing the ICPM? Expected Outcomes  To improve outcomes for children  Stabilize families so that children can safely remain at home  Reduce repeat maltreatment of children  Promote permanency by stabilizing and strengthening families  To improve outcomes for families  Strengthen parenting capacities  Strengthen engagement and empowerment of families  Help families make connections to their communities  Effectively target DCF resources  Focus on highest risk families  Improve timeliness of access to DCF interventions and supports

10/ How Did We Get Here? External Influences on the ICPM  Findings of the 2007 Federal Child and Family Services Review and included in the resulting Program Improvement Plan (PIP).  MA Legislation, July 2008: An Act Protecting Children in the Care of the Commonwealth.  Findings of the External Review conducted by the Center for the Support of Families completed December  Nationally Recognized Innovations in Child Welfare Practice.  Support from Casey Family Programs.

10/ How Did We Get Here? ICPM Based on Prior DCF Planning Community Connections & Patch Sites Working With Families Right From The Start Development / Field Testing Safety & Risk Tools Family Engagement Model “Teaming” Pilot Sites Breakthrough Series LESSONS LEARNED DCF INTEGRATED CASEWORK PRACTICE MODEL Family Group Decision-making: (e.g., FGC & Family Team Meetings) Family Networks DCF Strategic Planning

10/  Child-Driven  Family Centered  Strength-Based  Community Connected  Committed to Cultural Competence & Diversity  Committed To Continuous Learning & Quality Improvement ICPM Reflects DCF Core Values

10/ ICPM Casework Pathways ICPC requests will continue to be processed as usual Screening Differential Response Change Tracks Possible Access Pathways No Services Needed Community Referral CBHI Screen-In Screen-Out Voluntary Not Accepted CPS INVESTIGATION RESPONSE Initial Assessment Comprehensive Assessment Ongoing Case Mgmt. CPS ASSESSMENT RESPONSE CLOSE* CLOSE: No service needed; Community Referral, CBHI* 51A Probate Custody CHINS Voluntary SCREENING CLOSE* Safe Haven Accept for Voluntary

10/ ICPM: Key Features 1.Extended timeframes for Screening and Investigations to allow greater opportunity to gather information from collaterals and determine how best to target DCF resources. 2.Differential Response to enable DCF to respond to allegations of child abuse and/or neglect based on the unique circumstances of a case and the individual needs/strengths of a family. This includes two tracks: Investigation or Assessment, depending on the severity of the allegation.

10/ ICPM: Key Features (cont.) 3.Use of new research based assessment and planning tools to support consistent clinical practice in assessing danger, safety and risk, and to focus on what families need to keep children safe. 4.Enhanced family and community engagement to provide opportunities for children, families and their support systems to be actively engaged and empowered in decision-making.

10/ What happens when DCF receives a Report of Abuse and/or Neglect (“51A)? 1.The report is screened to determine if the allegation meets the criteria for suspected abuse and/or neglect, if there is immediate danger to the child, and whether DCF involvement is warranted. Families may also be referred for appropriate community services, as needed. 2.If “screened-in,” the report is assigned for either a Child Protective Services (CPS) Investigation or Assessment Response (“51B). 3.A determination is made about whether the child can safely remain at home and whether the family would benefit from continued DCF involvement.

10/ INVESTIGATION Purpose: Detection of Maltreatment Focus: Determine validity of allegation Authority: MGL Chapter 51B Introduce DCF involvement as Investigation Conclusion Includes: Identification of victim Identification of perpetrator Determination of fault Support / unsupport of allegation Listing of perpetrator on Central Registry INITIAL ASSESSMENT Purpose: Engagement & Helping Focus: Determine what (if any) supports and services family needs Authority: MGL Chapter 51B Introduce DCF Involvement as Assessment of Safety and Family Needs Conclusion Includes: Identification of which family members need services or support No identification of perpetrator No determination of fault Decision as to whether there are concerns of safety or risk that warrant DCF services or no concern or minimal risk of future abuse/neglect No alleged perpetrator discoverable on BRC for employment Determine Whether There Are Danger Factors Impacting Safety of Child What is the difference between an Investigation and an Assessment?

10/ ICPM: What is Not Changing?  Focus on Safety, Permanency, and Well-being  Timeframes for initiating emergency investigations  DCF’s legal authority to investigate reports of abuse and/or neglect  Responsibility of Mandated Reporters  Respectful engagement of families

10/ “We are following well established state and national trends in moving away from a one size fits all approach to child welfare. Our new Model allows us to focus on the unique needs and strengths of each family, while targeting our resources in the most effective way to keep kids safe and families together.” -- Angelo McClain, Commissioner MA Department of Children and Families