1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical basics Marian Scott Dept of Statistics, University of Glasgow August 2008.
Advertisements

Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Developing Null and.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS DEPT Esimating Population Value with Hypothesis Testing.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 22 – April 10, 2008.
1/55 EF 507 QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FALL 2008 Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing.
8 Statistical Intervals for a Single Sample CHAPTER OUTLINE
Characterizing Baseline Water Body Conditions. What? Confirm impairments and identify problems Statistical summary Spatial analysis Temporal analysis.
Chapter Sampling Distributions and Hypothesis Testing.
Inferences About Process Quality
8-1 Introduction In the previous chapter we illustrated how a parameter can be estimated from sample data. However, it is important to understand how.
DQOs and the Development of MQOs Carl V. Gogolak USDOE Environmental Measurements Lab.
Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
Evaluation of Florida C&D Debris Groundwater Monitoring Data Presentation discusses: Results of analysis of groundwater monitoring data Results of groundwater.
1 of 39 DQO Implementation Process: Flow Chart and Wall Charts 30 minutes DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 8 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing
Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing - II
1 of 23 From Qualitative Concept to Practical Implementation Evolution of the Data Quality Objectives Concept DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 1 15 minutes.
● Midterm exam next Monday in class ● Bring your own blue books ● Closed book. One page cheat sheet and calculators allowed. ● Exam emphasizes understanding.
1 of 55 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 1 - State the Problem Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 60 minutes DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 9.
 EPA’s soil sampling objectives  Technical approach  Technical assistance to DTSC/DOE  Next Steps and Schedule.
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 4.
INTRODUCTION TO THE DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES PROCESS
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
1 of 63 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 1 – Problem Statement DQO Case Study Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 45 minutes DQO Training Course Day 3 Module 18.
Statistical Decision Making. Almost all problems in statistics can be formulated as a problem of making a decision. That is given some data observed from.
The aim / learning outcome of this module is to understand how to gather and use data effectively to plan the development of recycling and composting.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
1 of 21 Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 7 (30 minutes) Steps Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
1 of 52 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (60 minutes) (15 minute Afternoon Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
1 of 39 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 7 - Optimize Sample Design DQO Case Study 45 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 3 Module.
1 of 49 Key Concepts Underlying DQOs and VSP DQO Training Course Day 1 Module minutes (75 minute lunch break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
1 of 45 How Many Samples do I Need? Part 1 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 60 minutes (15 minute 1st Afternoon Break) DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 4.
1 of 40 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 - Identify the Decisions Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (30 minutes) DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 12.
1 of 37 Key Concepts Underlying DQOs and VSP DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 4 (60 minutes) (75 minute lunch break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
1 of 50 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 7 - Optimize Sample Design 60 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 3 Module 16.
TEKS (6.10) Probability and statistics. The student uses statistical representations to analyze data. The student is expected to: (B) identify mean (using.
1 of 39 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 3 - Identify Inputs (45 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3.
BPS - 3rd Ed. Chapter 131 Confidence Intervals: The Basics.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing.
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 – Identify the Decision Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 15 minutes (75 minute Lunch break) DQO Training Course Day.
Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
South Australia’s Environment Protection Authority Articulating aesthetics Monday 24 August 2015 Andrew Pruszinski.
Sampling distributions rule of thumb…. Some important points about sample distributions… If we obtain a sample that meets the rules of thumb, then…
Chap 8-1 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
Framework of Preferred Evaluation Methodologies for TAACCCT Impact/Outcomes Analysis Random Assignment (Experimental Design) preferred – High proportion.
1 of 10 Introduction to Visual Sample Plan & Applications DQO Training Course Day 3 Module 21 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (60 minutes)
Summarizing Risk Analysis Results To quantify the risk of an output variable, 3 properties must be estimated: A measure of central tendency (e.g. µ ) A.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill 2004
Various Topics of Interest to the Inquiring Orthopedist Richard Gerkin, MD, MS BGSMC GME Research.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
1 of 19 Managing Uncertainty with Systematic Planning for Environmental Decision-Making 3-Day DQO Training Day 2.
1 of 27 How Many Samples do I Need? Part 2 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (60 minutes) (5 minute “stretch” break) DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 5.
1 of 31 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 60 minutes (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015.
Parameter Estimation. Statistics Probability specified inferred Steam engine pump “prediction” “estimation”
1 of 48 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course.
Spatial Distribution of Arsenic in Ohio Soils Nate Wanner, CPG Cox-Colvin & Associates, Inc. Ohio Brownfield Conference 2016 Columbus, Ohio April 6, 2016.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 2 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Decision Errors and Power
Chapter 7: Introduction to Sampling Distributions
Understanding Data Choices, Characteristics, Limitations
Presentation transcript:

1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14

2 of 25 Step Objective: n This step combines Steps to produce the following major elements to form decision rules: –Parameter of interest –Unit of decision making –Action level –Alternative actions Step 5: Define Decision Rules Step 4: Specify Boundaries Step 2: Identify Decisions Step 3: Identify Inputs Step 1: State the Problem Step 5: Define Decision Rules Step 6 : Specify Error Tolerances Step 7 : Optimize Sample Design

3 of 25 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Step 5- Define Decision Rules Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4

4 of 25 Decision Rule n General Format If the [parameter of interest (4 elements)] within the [unit of decision (3 elements)] is > the [action level], then take [alternative action A]; if not [alternative action B].

5 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Population Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter (ALWAYS UNKNOWN) –Sample Statistic (Used to represent the Population Parameter) –Environmental Variable Chemical/physical attribute in the population Levels measured (quantity) n Unit of Decision Making (Step 4) –Population (lives with Decision Unit) –Geographic Area/Volume (Population Spatial Boundary) –Timeframe (Population Temporal Boundary) n Action Level (Step 3) n Alternative Actions (Step 2) Step 5 Background

6 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Step 5 Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) A descriptive measure (such as a true mean, true median, or true proportion) that specifies the characteristic or attribute that the decision maker would like to know about the population. By definition, this will always remain unknown. Note: The purpose of any data collection design is to produce environmental data that can be used as a reasonable estimate of this Population Parameter.

7 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Step 5 Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The sample statistic, e.g., the sample mean, which is obtained from the sampling data, is used to estimate the Population Parameter. It is often a specified upper confidence limit about the sample mean.

8 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Step 5 Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The variable is both the COPC (chemical and physical) and the level measured. Examples of the level are concentration or activity or result.

9 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Step 5 Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The smallest, most appropriate subset (sub-population) for which separate decisions will be made.

10 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Step 5 Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) Spatial Boundary Temporal Boundary

11 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Step 5 Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The total number of objects (samples of soil or sludge or sediment or air, etc.), that are contained within the spatial unit to be studied

12 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Step 5 Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) A measurement threshold value of the Population Parameter (e.g., true mean) that provides the criterion for choosing among alternative actions.

13 of 25 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Step 5 Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The actions that the decision maker would take depending on the value of the sample statistic which is an estimate of the Population Parameter (e.g., true mean).

14 of 25 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4 The purpose of the data collection design is to produce environmental data that can be used as a reasonable estimate of the Population (true) Parameter. Step 5- Define Decision Rules

15 of 25 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4 If not done in Step 3, specify the numerical value that would cause a person to choose between alternative actions. Confirm that the action level is greater than the detection/ quantitation limits for the potential measurement methods identified in Step 3. Step 5- Define Decision Rules

16 of 25 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4 Develop a decision rule as an “if…then…” statement that incorporates the parameter of interest, the unit of decision making, the action level, and the action(s) that would result from resolution of the decision. Step 5- Define Decision Rules

17 of 25 If the [true mean (as estimated by the 95% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of cadmium] within [the concrete rubble within the perimeter of the site] is [80 mg/Kg], then [the rubble requires remediation]; if not [the rubble will be left in place]. If the [true mean (as estimated by the 95% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of cadmium] within [the concrete rubble within the perimeter of the site] is > [80 mg/Kg], then [the rubble requires remediation]; if not [the rubble will be left in place]. Remedial Action Decision Rule Example

18 of 25 If the [true mean (as estimated by the 90% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of cadmium] within [the concrete rubble in a container truck] is [1 mg/L TCLP], then [the waste rubble will be considered hazardous waste and will be disposed of in a TSD facility]; if not [the waste rubble will be disposed of in a municipal landfill]. If the [true mean (as estimated by the 90% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of cadmium] within [the concrete rubble in a container truck] is > [1 mg/L TCLP], then [the waste rubble will be considered hazardous waste and will be disposed of in a TSD facility]; if not [the waste rubble will be disposed of in a municipal landfill]. Waste Designation Decision Rule Example

19 of 25 Decision Rule Example If the [ true mean (as estimated by the 95% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of U-238] in the [3”x 3” x 6” samples of surface soil within the perimeter of the backyard to a depth of 6 inches] is > [20 pCi/g], then [dispose of soil in a radiological landfill]; if not, [leave the soil in place].

20 of 25 [the metals turnings will be considered hazardous waste and will be disposed of in a TSD facility]; if not [the metals turnings will be disposed of in a municipal landfill]. If the [true mean (as estimated by the one sided 90% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of cadmium] in [the metal turnings within a 55 gallon drum] is > [1 mg/L TLCP], then [the metals turnings will be considered hazardous waste and will be disposed of in a TSD facility]; if not [the metals turnings will be disposed of in a municipal landfill]. Decision Rule Example

21 of 25 “Typical” Decision Rules n If the 95% UCL is greater than 10 mg/kg, evaluate what to do next. n If the lead concentration is greater than 10 mg/kg, then dispose of the lead.

22 of 25 n If the vadose zone soil moisture content, contaminant concentration profiles, and soil physical properties from the 1454 site exceed or deviate significantly from the conceptual model, an additional evaluation will be performed to assess priority of performing further analysis. n The data gathered from the characterization boring located at the 1454 site combined with historical process data and geophysical logging (high resolution spectral gamma-ray and neutron logging) of existing wells located in the vicinity of the 1455 site can be used to create an analogous model for the 1455 site. If the data collected from characterization of the 1454 site and the geophysical logging data from the existing wells located near the 1455 site support the conceptual model, the analogous unit approach is valid for the 1455 site. “Typical” Decision Rules

23 of 25 Step 5 - Summary n After data are obtained and undergo Data Quality Assessment, decision rules are used to make the decisions n The decision rules encompass the logic used and include inputs from Steps 1-4 and 6 n One may need to perform Step 6 and then update Step 5 to include the statistical decision criteria

24 of 25 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4 Step 5- Define Decision Rules

25 of 25 End of Module 14 Thank you Questions?