The Regulatory Assistance Project 110 B Water St. Hallowell, Maine USA 04347 Tel: 207.623.8393 Fax: 207.623.8369 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

National Town Meeting on Demand Response Focus on Pepcos Washington, DC Residential Smart Meter Pilot Program Presented By Steve Sunderhauf July 14, 2009.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 177 Water St. Gardiner, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
Dynamic Pricing - Potential and Issues Joe Wharton and Ahmad Faruqui Kansas Corporation Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency March 25, 2008.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
January 20, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter Sanjoy Chatterjee – Principal, Chatterjee.
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
Climate and Energy in California David W. Pierce Tim P. Barnett Eric Alfaro Alexander Gershunov Climate Research Division Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 110 B Water St. Hallowell, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
The ESKOM Pilot Testing and Findings of the Residential Time-of-Use Tariff (Homeflex) Project by Vashna Singh and Marcus Dekenah 17 October 2006.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Valuing Load Reduction in Restructured Markets Supply Cost Curve Regressions Market Price vs. Value of Load Reduction Photovoltaic Case Study William B.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 177 Water St. Gardiner, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Real-time Pricing for Illinois Consumers Anthony Star Community Energy Cooperative Demand Response Coordinating Committee Webinar December 15, 2006.
Time-Varying Retail Electricity Prices: Theory and Practice by Severin Borenstein.
1 City Light Rate Design- Review Presentation to Review Panel January 2013.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Copyright © 2009 The Brattle Group, Inc. Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual.
BRINGING DYNAMIC PRICING TO THE MASS MARKET Ahmad Faruqui, Ph. D. NARUC Winter Meetings Washington, D.C. February 19, 2007.
1 Consumer Questions Regarding the “Smart Grid”: Which technology components can be cost effectively deployed to help residential customers save money.
+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Residential Real-Time Pricing: Bringing Home the Potential Kathryn Tholin Assessing the Potential for Demand Response Programs The Institute for Regulatory.
Options to Manage Electricity Demand and Increase Capacity in Santa Delano County Jon Cook Jeff Kessler Gabriel Lade Geoff Morrison Lin’s Lackeys.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
March 25, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Smart Grid: What’s In It for the Customer? Wharton Energy Conference 2010 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing & Regulatory Services.
EEI Energy Efficiency Initiative Eric Ackerman ( Senior Manager, Regulatory Policy April 23, 2007.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
2010 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting NASUCA 2010 Mid-Year Conference Presented by: Lee Smith Senior Economist and Managing Consultant Presented to: June ,
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
More Than Smart – A Distribution System Vision © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Dave Geier – VP Electric.
1 Proposed Policies to Increase the level of Demand Response Energy Action Plan Update April 24 th, 2006, Sacramento, CA Mike Messenger, CEC.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Overview of Energy Policy Act of 2005 A Review of Implementation issues in New Hampshire.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Tariff Structure Statements – Energex and Ergon Energy AER public forum.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 177 Water St. Gardiner, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Commissioner Anne C. George
Presentation transcript:

The Regulatory Assistance Project 110 B Water St. Hallowell, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont USA Tel: Fax: Penny Lane Cedar Crest, New Mexico USA Tel: E-Fax: Website: Pricing: Static to Dynamic A Brief Framework Pacific Northwest Demand Response Program Rick Weston 5 December 2008

Outline  Overview of pricing  Survey of current mass market price structures  Some questions

Moving along the Continuum from Static to Dynamic Customers’ Perspective  Benefits –Bill savings –Recruitment or participation incentives –Enhanced awareness about energy usage –Better control of energy costs –Improved air quality –Faster power restoration after an outage  Costs –Cost of metering –Loss of privacy System’s Perspective  Benefits –Lower energy and capacity costs –Reduced air emissions –Align marginal rates with long-run marginal costs –Promotes efficient fuel choices –Elasticity effect produces energy savings –Tailblock price improves cost- effectiveness of energy efficiency, encourages participation in DSM programs  Costs –AMI hardware and software costs –Customer recruitment and maintenance costs

Example: Residential Inverted Block Rate  Tail block usage is space-conditioning and / or discretionary.  Set initial block at low enough level so most customers see tail block.  Inverted only in seasons of peak demands.

Examples of Inverted Rates  Pacific Power, Washington  Customer Charge: $6.00  First 600 kWh:$  Over 600 kWh: $ Schedule 16, Oct. 9, 2008  Arizona Public Service Company, Arizona  Customer Charge: $7.59  Summer –First 400 kWh$ –Next 400 kWh$ –Over 800 kWh $  Winter –All kWh$ Schedule E-12, July 1, 2007

Cost Bases of Inverted Rates Load-Factor Based  Different end-uses have different load factors: Resource-Cost Based  Different resources have different fully- allocated costs Older Baseload:$0.04 Newer Baseload:$0.08 Peakers:$0.12

Example: Critical Peak Time-of-Use Pricing  Flat or TOU rate during all “normal” hours.  Defined or Market price effective when market price exceeds defined threshold.  Customers get notice when Critical Peak rate is in effect.

Residential Response with Automation: Participation Incentive vs. Critical Peak Rate kW Noon2:307:30 Critical Peak Rate Participation Incentive Control Group Midnight CPP Event CA Pilot: Residential Load Impacts (Incentives) Hot Day, August 15, 2003, Average Peak Temperature Source: Levy Associates, October 2005

Example: Real-Time Pricing Options for Large C&I Customers  Georgia Power: Baseline- referenced RTP; customers see market price at margin.  PSE&G: Customers see market price for all consumption.  If both offered, customer chooses.

Current Residential Rate Structures: Selected Utilities

PacifiCorp  Residential Service, Oregon Distribution Basic Charge$7.50 per month 3-Phase Demand Charge$2.20/kW Distribution Energy Charge$ /kWh Transmission Transmission & Ancillary Services$ /kWh Energy Charges kWh$ / kWh kWh$ /kWh >1000 kWh$ /kWh

Idaho Power  Residential Service, Idaho SummerNon-Summer Service Charge$4.00 per month Energy Charges kWh$ /kWh >300 kWh$ /kWh$ /kWh Note 1: May be subject to additional charges (e.g., fixed cost adjustment, power cost adjustment, energy efficiency fees, municipal franchise fees, and residential and small farm credits) Note 2: In the Emmett Valley, there is an optional residential seasonally-differentiated TOD service for customers whose usage exceeds 300 kWh/month. The Energy Watch CPP option is also available to such customers in the Emmett Valley.

Idaho Power  Res. CPP Service, Emmett Valley, Idaho SummerNon-Summer Service Charge$4.00 per month Energy Charges Energy Watch Event Hours$ /kWhNa All other hours$ /kWh Note1: May be subject to additional charges (e.g., fixed cost adjustment, power cost adjustment, energy efficiency fees, municipal franchise fees, and residential and small farm credits)

Avista Power  Residential Service, Idaho Service Charge$4.60 per month Energy Charges kWh$0.0719/kWh >300 kWh$0.0805/kWh Note: May be subject to additional charges (e.g., fixed cost adjustment, power cost adjustment, energy efficiency fees, and residential and small farm adjustments)

Avista Power  Residential Service, Washington Service Charge$5.50 per month Energy Charges kWh$ /kWh kWh$ /kWh >1300$ /kWh Note: May be subject to additional charges (e.g., fixed cost adjustment, power cost adjustment, energy efficiency fees, and residential and small farm adjustments)

Tuscon Electric Power  Residential Service, Arizona Customer Charge $4.90/month Energy Charges Summer $0.0909/kWh Winter $0.0790/kWh

Southern California Edison  Residential Service, California Customer Charge$0.87/day Baseline Usage$0.1165/kWh 101% - 130% of Baseline$0.1366/kWh 131% - 200% of Baseline$0.2152/kWh 201% - 300% of Baseline$0.2515/kWh Over 300% of Baseline$0.2879/kWh

San Diego Gas and Electric  Residential Service, California SummerWinter Customer ChargeNone Baseline Usage$0.1256$0.1256/kWh 101% - 130% of Baseline$0.1468$0.1468/kWh 131% - 200% of Baseline$0.2594$0.2434/kWh Over 200% of Baseline$0.2794$0.2634/kWh Minimum Bill$5.10/month

Alliant  Residential Service, Iowa WinterSummer Service Charge$0.3547/meter/day ($10.79 per month) $0.3547/meter/month ($10.79 per month) Energy Charges First kWh/day or first 500 kWh/month $ /kWh$ /kWh Next kWh/day or next 700 kWh/month $ /kWh$ /kWh Over kWh/day or over 1,200 kWh/month $ /kWh$ /kWh Note: Subject to an energy adjustment clause.

Xcel Energy  Residential Service, Minnesota Standard Electric Space Heating Customer ChargeOverhead$6.00/month8.00/month Underground$8.00/month$10.00/month Energy Charge Summer$ /kWh Winter$ /kWh$ /kWh Note: Subject to a fuel adjustment clause and other adjustments

Xcel Energy  Optional TOU Res. Service, Minnesota Standard Electric Space Heating Customer ChargeOverhead$6.00/month8.00/month Underground$8.00/month$10.00/month Energy Charge Summer Peak$ /kWh Winter Peak$ /kWh$ /kWh Summer Off-Peak$ /kWh Winter Off-Peak$ /kWh Note: Subject to a fuel adjustment clause and other adjustments. Peak hours are weekdays from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm

Rate design determines who’s bearing price volatility risk  From one extreme –Flat $/kWh price in all hours Volatility of wholesale price in the short run is borne by the supplier; presumably a premium for holding that risk (i.e., hedging it for the consumer) is included in the price  To the other –Real-time price in all hours The wholesale price is passed through to the customer in every hour; the customer bears the risk entirely  And everything in between –Seasonally differentiated, time-of-use, critical peak, and other pricing The volatility risk is shared in varying degrees by customer and supplier

Questions  What is the size of the demand-response resource associated with TOU, CPP, and other more dynamic pricing options?  What actions should be taken to answer this question? Rate design dockets Pilots such at the California critical peak pricing pilot –Are the lessons from other jurisdictions applicable here?  What effect does implementation of CPP and other time- sensitive pricing have on the procurement and provision of default service?

Policy Issues  Overall cost-effectiveness and AMI cost-recovery  Addressing multiple perspectives –Equity: There will be winners and losers; the program may look attractive for some and unattractive for others Are economically more efficient rates in fact more equitable? –Impacts on low-income customers Ability to respond to price signals, regulatory protections? –Revenue neutrality under the new rate designs Default service: adjustments for changed load profiles of responding customers Distribution service: impacts of conservation differ from those of load-shifting  Deciding on deployment strategy –Voluntary Opt-in or opt-out –Mandatory  Customer concerns about rate hikes and price instability  Relationship to energy efficiency and other clean energy programs –Dynamic pricing complements energy efficiency, but isn’t a substitute for it –How to allocate scarce investment dollars between efficiency and smart grid infrastructure?