Determine Facility Ratings, SOLs and Transfer Capabilities Paul Johnson Chair of the Determine Facility Ratings Standard Drafting Team An Overview of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
WECC Standards Committee Joint Session
POTF Status update.
Reliability Subcommittee Report Vishal C. Patel Chair – Reliability Subcommittee March 2014.
North American Electric Reliability Council 1 Coordinate Operations Standard Jason Shaver Standard Drafting Team Chair September 29, 2005.
NERC New Approved Standards
PER
1 PER-005 Update Impact on Operators System Operator Conference April and May 1-3, 2012 Columbia, SC Margaret Stambach Manager, Training Services.
Allan Wick, CFE, CPP, PSP, PCI, CBCP Chief Security Officer WECC Joint Meeting October 8, 2014.
Recent NERC Standards Activities RSC – Jan. 5, 2011 NSRS Update Date Meeting Title (optional)
1 Reliability Coordination (IRO Standards) 2011 System Operator Conferences #3 and #4 September & 20-22, 2011 Nashville/Franklin TN Rocky Williamson.
1 INTRODUCTION 1.The Bulk Power Supply 2.Reliability criteria The 2 components Security assessment from operators view Requirements of a reliable electric.
1. 11/26/2012: NERC Board of Trustees adopted CIP v5 CIP thru CIP CIP and CIP Version 5 Filing FERC requested filing by 3/31/2013.
System Operator Conference NERC Standards Review for: Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS.
1 If I were to give grades today… > 80A A B B B C C C D D D-1
GOP and QSE Relationship Jeff Whitmer Manager, Compliance Assessments Talk with Texas RE June 25, 2012.
FRCC Seasonal Transmission Assessment & Operational Seasonal Study Winter 2012.
ERCOT SOL Methodology for the Planning and Operations Horizons Stephen Solis 2014 OTS 1.
Applying the Distribution System in Grid Restoration/NERC CIP-014 Risk Assessment Srijib Mukherjee, Ph.D., P.E. UC Synergetic.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards TPL Discussion – PCC Steering Committee March 25, 2014.
March 2003 Operations Summary Bill Blevins Manager Operations Engineering.
December 7, 2012 ERCOT Planning Horizon SOL Methodology Update Jeff Billo RPG.
APPA RELIABILITY STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE SYMPOSIUM Case Study: City Utilities of Springfield, MO January 11, 2007.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force Preliminary Conclusions and Actions.
Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.
POWER SYSTEM PLANNING CHARTER AND PROCESSES Presentation to TAC 10/09/2003 KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning Transmission Services
Project Definition of Bulk Electric System Presenter: Peter Heidrich – Drafting Team Chair Date: March 1, 2011.
Actions Affecting ERCOT Resulting From The Northeast Blackout ERCOT Board Of Directors Meeting April 20, 2004 Sam Jones, COO.
Standards Subject to Enforcement Currently Or Standards Subject to Future Enforcement TSS Meeting #169 May 6-8, 2015 By: Lesley Kayser-Sprouse.
1 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW NETWORK OPERATING COMMITTEE April 17, 2007 New Mexico Transmission System Overview.
Reliability Requirements Bill Blevins Manager of Operations Support ERCOT.
Project System Protection Coordination Requirement revisions to PRC (ii) Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee.
Project (COM-001-3) Interpersonal Communications Capabilities Michael Cruz-Montes, CenterPoint Energy Senior Consultant, Policy & Compliance, SDT.
Bill Lewis, Compliance Team Lead NERC Reliability Working Group May 16, 2013 Texas RE Update Talk with Texas RE April 25, 2013.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ RTP: Cascade Analysis April 21, 2015.
Project Cyber Security Order 706 Version 5 CIP Standards Potential to Adversely Impact ERCOT Black Start Capability.
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call August 17, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call April 20, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
CIP Version 4 The Basics. CIP Version 4- Background Centers around expanded criteria for Critical Assets – FERC thought Risk Based Methodologies used.
Managing of Limits during Loss of Analysis Tools/ EMS April 23, 2014.
Grid Reliability Metrics by Jim Dyer Electric Power Group, LLC January 29, 2004 Washington, DC Transmission Reliability Research Review.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
Projects System Protection Coordination Draft 2 of TOP Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee November 2, 2015.
1 Power System Restoration. 2 Not Active 3 4 Compliance Audit Process APPA E&O Technical Conference – Atlanta April 16, 2007.
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards TPL Discussion – PCC Steering Committee March 25, 2014.
Current Operational Challenges Computing the West – North Limits Potential IROLs Local Voltage & Thermal issue (OOME) High Voltage Outages.
WECC-0100 Scope, Content & Status Update Rikin Shah, PAC Orlando Ciniglio, IPC WECC TSS Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT January ,
Impacts and Actions Resulting from the August 14, 2003 Blackout Minnesota Power Systems Conference November 2, 2003.
POWER SYSTEM PLANNING CHARTER AND PROCESSES Presentation to TAC May 6, 2004 Transmission Services Ken Donohoo, Manager of System Planning Dan Woodfin,
Restoration Concepts PEAK RC Training Classification: Confidential Version No.: 1.5 Date of Document: Document Owner/Author: B Pederson Classification:
Reliability Subcommittee Report Vishal C. Patel (RS Chair) PCC Meeting La Jolla, CA- March 22, 2015 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Path Operator Implementation Task Force Vic Howell, Vice Chair Report to OC March 22, 2016.
1 NPCC – A-2 Dr. Mayer Sasson Transmission Planning Consolidated Edison of New York June 1, 2006 Presented to the NYSRC-RRS.
Project WECC-0100 Standards Briefing WECC-0100 SDT April 7, 2016 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Bert Peters Chair, Path Operator Task Force
Path Operator Implementation Task Force
Updates to the Path Rating Process for Approval by the PCC
Grid Integration of Intermittent Resources
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Phil O’Donnell, Manager Operations and Planning Audits
NERC TPL Standard Overview
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Determine Facility Ratings, SOLs and Transfer Capabilities
Coordinate Operations Standard
Phil O’Donnell, Manager Operations and Planning Audits
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Peak Reliability IRO Webinar
Bert Peters Chair, Path Operator Task Force
Presentation transcript:

Determine Facility Ratings, SOLs and Transfer Capabilities Paul Johnson Chair of the Determine Facility Ratings Standard Drafting Team An Overview of the Set of Proposed Standards

Presentation Overview Proposed Standards Highlights of Standards Key Requirements & Functions Responsible Challenging Definitions Controversial Issues V0 Retirements Effective Dates Questions

6 Standards 1.Document Facility Rating Methodology 2.Develop and Communicate Facility Ratings 3.Document SOL Methodology 4.Develop and Communicate SOLs 5.Document Transfer Capability Methodology 6.Document and Communicate Transfer Capabilities

Facility Ratings Methodology Respects most limiting equipment rating Identify method of determining rating Consideration of: Manufacturer’s ratings Design criteria Ambient conditions Operating limitations Other assumptions V0 only requires normal & emergency ratings & doesn’t identify generators End users need a ‘range’ of limits, only some of which are ‘normal’ and ‘emergency’ V0 only requires normal & emergency ratings & doesn’t identify generators End users need a ‘range’ of limits, only some of which are ‘normal’ and ‘emergency’

System Operating Limits Methodology Cannot exceed Facility Rating How to identify IROLs In pre and post contingency state SOLs provide: BES system stable (transient, dynamic, voltage) Facilities within Facility Ratings Facilities within thermal, voltage & stability limits Cascading outages & uncontrolled separation shall not occur V0 has no criteria for developing SOLs used in operations horizon

Which SOLs are Also IROLs? Some IROLs can be identified in advance – some can only be identified in real-time An IROL is an SOL that, if violated under certain conditions, could lead to one or more of the following: Cascading outages Uncontrolled separation Instability V0 doesn’t require documenting methodology for determining IROLs

Transfer Capabilities Methodology Respect all SOLs Consideration of: Transmission system topology System demand Generation dispatch Current and projected transmission uses V0 has no criteria for developing Transfer Capabilities

MethodologyWho Has or Develops? Who Sees or Receives? Facility RatingsGen Owners Trans Owners PAs TPs RCs TOPs System Operating Limits PAs RCs PAs TPs RCs TOPs TSPs Transfer Capabilities PAs RCs RROs PAs TPs RCs TOPs TSPs Key Requirements & Responsible Functions

ProductWho Develops? Who Receives? Facility RatingsGen Owners Trans Owners PAs TPs RCs TOPs System Operating Limits PAs, TPs RCs, TOPs PAs TPs RCs TOPs TSPs Transfer Capabilities PAs RCs RROs PAs TPs RCs TOPs TSPs Key Requirements & Responsible Functions

Proposed Changes to V0 Definitions Cascading Outages Contingency Interconnection Reliability Operating Limit (IROL)

Cascading Outages V0: The uncontrolled successive failure of system elements triggered by an incident at any location within the Interconnection. Cascading results in widespread electric service interruption that cannot be restrained from sequentially spreading beyond an area predetermined by studies. New: The uncontrolled successive loss of BES Facilities triggered by an incident (or condition) at any location resulting in the interruption of electric service that cannot be restrained from spreading beyond a pre-determined area.

Contingency V0: The failure, with little or no warning, of one or more elements of the transmission system. This includes, but is not limited to, generator, transmission line, transformer, and circuit breaker failures or misoperations. New: The unexpected loss of one or more BES Facilities caused by a single initiating event.

Interconnection Reliability Operating Limit (IROL) V0: The value (such as MW, MVar, Amperes, Frequency or Volts) derived from, or a subset of the System Operating Limits, which if exceeded, could expose a widespread area of the Bulk Electric System to instability, uncontrolled separation(s) or cascading outages. New: A System Operating Limit that, if violated, could lead to instability, uncontrolled separation, or Cascading Outages that adversely impact the reliability of the Bulk Electric System.

Controversial Issues Flexible planning & operating horizons Peer review Schedules for delivery set by recipients Table 1 Category C Events and SOLs Partial retirement of V0 Standards

Planning & Operating Horizons Planning Horizon Real Time 1 Year Ahead 4 Years Ahead 3 Years Ahead 2 Years Ahead Operating Horizon Standard requires no gaps in times covered

Planning & Operating Horizons Defaults: Operating Horizon = real-time up to 1 yr Planning Horizon = 1 yr and beyond Operating Horizon Planning Horizon Real Time 1 Year Ahead 4 Years Ahead 3 Years Ahead 2 Years Ahead

Peer Review Goal is to find a fair balance Owners rights versus impact on others ‘Allow’ but don’t ‘require’ peer review Challenges must be documented & acknowledged Threat of liability is motivator Idea from Blackout Recommendations

Schedules for Delivery to those entities that have a reliability-related need for such … and make a written request that includes a schedule for delivery of such … If you need to send limits to several different entities - deliver to all entities according to the most limiting schedule

Table 1 - Category C Events Category C – (Loss of 2 or more Elements) applicable to planning studies with all facilities in service In most real-time operations, one or more facilities already out of service - operate to protect the system from a 2 nd (or 3 rd or 4 th …) contingency SOLs established considering ‘Category C’ events would probably result in overly restrictive SOLs

Partial Retirement of V0 Standards V1 Standards started before V0 Standards No 1-to-1 relationship between V0 and V1 Does partial retirement lead to confusion?

Retirement of V0 Requirements TOP-004 – Transmission Security Retire two requirements FAC-004 – Methodologies for Determining Electrical Facility Ratings Retire entire standard FAC-005 – Electrical Facility Ratings for System Modeling Retire entire standard

R6. TOPs, individually and jointly with other TOPs, shall develop, maintain, and implement formal policies and procedures to provide for transmission reliability. These policies and procedures shall address the execution and coordination of activities that impact inter- and intra-Regional reliability, including: R 6.1. Equipment ratings. R 6.2. Monitoring and controlling voltage levels and real and reactive power flows. R 6.3. Switching transmission elements. R 6.4. Planned outages of transmission elements. R 6.5. Development of IROLs and SOLs. R.6.6. Responding to IROL and SOL violations.

Effective Dates – (Compliance) Assumes BOT Adopts November 1, 2005 Methodologies 6 months after BOT adoption - May 1, 2006 Ratings, Limits and Transfer Capabilities 2 months after methodologies – July 1, 2006

Questions