1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January 2014 2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
Advertisements

April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
OKLAHOMA SIG SCHOOLS State Profile – Cohort 1 Tier I SIG Schools: 8 – Cohort 2 Tier I and II SIG Schools: 3 Total SIG Schools: 11 Total Funding Awards.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
LADDERS OF OPPORTUNITY. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION DECK  This slide deck has been created by the U.S. Department of Education as a resource tool for.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
FY 2016 BUDGET INVESTING IN AMERICA’S FUTURE. “America thrived in the 20th century because we made high school free, sent a generation of GIs to college,
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
School Improvement Grants. Over 13,000 schools are currently under some form of improvement status schools = 5% of schools in some form of restructuring.
TURNAROUND SCHOOLS. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION DECK  This slide deck has been created by the U.S. Department of Education as a resource tool for the.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Funding Opportunities for Newly Identified Priority Schools ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
MEASURES OF COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS AND SUCCESS July 16, 2013.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
Eric W. Waldo U.S. Department of Education Deputy Chief of Staff July 2012 U.S. Department of Education Policy Overview.
An America Built to Last Martha Kanter, Under Secretary Illinois Board of Higher Education February 5, 2013.
Presenters: Martin J. Blank, Martin J. Blank, President, Institute for Educational Leadership; Director, Coalition for Community Schools S. Kwesi Rollins.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
Choosing a Reform Model District Wide Stakeholder Meeting 1.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 We Can Do Better: Becca Walawender, Deputy Division Director,
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
ICN, December 18, 2009 Agenda  DE Updates  January Workshops  AEA Snapshots  Sustaining and Increasing Capacity  Next Steps.
TTIPS Model Overview.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
School Improvement Grants
Presentation transcript:

1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training

Content  The Charge: Turnaround  School Improvement Grants (SIG) Overview  Models  Guidelines  This Opportunity  The Need  The Goals 2

Part 1: The Charge 3

The U.S. ranks 16th in the world in college attainment 4 4 Percentage of 25- to 34-year-olds who completed an associate's or higher degree (2009) “By 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” – President Obama, February 2009

5 Fewer than 15% of high schools produce half of the nation’s 1.2 million dropouts. “It’s time for all of us, no matter what our backgrounds, to come together and solve this epidemic. Stemming the tide of dropouts will require turning around our low-performing schools. Just 2,000 high schools in cities like Detroit, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia produce over 50% of America’s dropouts…Let us all make turning around our schools our collective responsibility as Americans.” - President Obama, March 2009 Source: Robert Balfanz and Nettie Legters, Locating the Dropout Crisis (2004)

6

Part 2: SIG Overview 7

Guiding Principles  Students who attend a State’s persistently lowest-achieving schools deserve better options and can’t afford to wait  Not quantity, but quality  Need to build capacity and supports at all levels  Not a one-year activity 8

9 Outcomes Increased student achievement Increased graduation rates Redesigned SIG Four rigorous intervention models States required to competitively award grants to districts Elements of Reform Effective leaders and teachers Supportive and safe school environment Operational flexibilities and capacity building Strong, aligned, and responsive instruction Resources Historic investment – over $4.5B since 2009 Up to $2M per school The redesigned SIG program requires rigorous interventions and dramatically increases resources for the lowest-performing schools Increased time for teaching and collaboration Family and community engagement

Distribution of SIG Funds  U.S. Department of Education (ED) to State educational agencies (SEAs):  Formula grants based on each State’s share of funds under Title I, Parts A, C, and D  SEAs to local educational agencies (LEAs):  Competitive grants  LEAs to schools: $50,000 - $2M per school 10

LEA Responsibilities Eligible SchoolsApplies to serve all or subset of eligible schools in the LEA Review CriteriaDevelops a needs assessment to determine which of the four required intervention models fits best with the needs of each Tier I, Tier II or Priority school 4 modelsApplies to implement one of the four required intervention models in eligible Tier I, Tier II or Priority schools. LEA selects model after an analysis of local data, resources, and capacity. PrioritizationMust serve Tier I schools it has the capacity to serve. May not apply to serve any Tier III school if it has not served at least one of its Tier I or II schools OR Must serve Priority schools it has capacity to serve that apply for and are awarded SIG funding BudgetSubmits three-year budget for each school it applies to serve ($50K-$2M per year) GoalsProposes achievement goals for each Tier I, II, and III or Priority school 11

Four SIG School Intervention Models TransformationTurnaround RestartClosure 12

Transformation Model Overview Teachers and Leaders Replace principal Implement new evaluation system Developed with staff Uses student growth as a significant factor Identify and reward staff who are increasing student outcomes; support and then remove those who are not Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain staff Instructional and Support Strategies Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs Provide job- embedded professional development designed to build capacity and support staff Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction Time and Support Provide increased learning time Staff and students Provide ongoing mechanism for community and family engagement Partner to provide social-emotional and community- oriented services and supports Governance Provide sufficient operating flexibility to implement reform Ensure ongoing technical assistance 13

Turnaround Model Overview Teachers and Leaders Replace principal Use locally adopted “turnaround” competencies to review and select staff for school (rehire no more than 50% of existing staff) Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain staff Instructional and Support Strategies Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs Provide job- embedded PD designed to build capacity and support staff Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction Time and Support Provide increased learning time Staff and students Social-emotional and community- oriented services and supports Governance New governance structure Grant operating flexibility to school leader 14

Restart Model Overview  A restart model must enroll, within the grades it serves, any former student who wishes to attend the school.  A rigorous review process could take such things into consideration as an applicant’s team, track record, instructional program, model’s theory of action, sustainability.  As part of this model, the SEA must review the process the LEA will use/has used to select the partner 15

Part 3: This Opportunity 16

The Need for Tier 1 Education  Throughout the early stages of SIG implementation, States and districts have repeatedly expressed, or demonstrated through department monitoring, a need for capacity building in five primary areas:  Addressing specific school-type challenges (especially small/rural schools and middle schools);  Addressing specific intervention challenges (especially increased learning time, turnaround leadership, students’ nonacademic needs, and community/family engagement);  Building and making transparent turnaround data, knowledge, and evidence;  Sustaining effective interventions in successful turnaround schools;  Developing a comprehensive turnaround approach for schools implementing SIG interventions, turnaround principles under Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) flexibility, and reform strategies through Race-to-the-Top. 17

The Goals for Tier 1 Education  To leverage AmeriCorps’s existing national service infrastructure and national and community partnerships to concentrate AmeriCorps members in schools undertaking turnaround efforts promoted by ED through SIG and/or ESEA flexibility;  To scale up existing AmeriCorps efforts in turnaround schools;  To introduce AmeriCorps members to schools and areas that have difficulty gaining access to AmeriCorps members;  To provide resources to address implementation challenges relating to increased learning time and social-emotional supports; and  To inspire a wide range of local and national partners, including philanthropic organizations, to take on the challenge of school turnaround. 18

Evidence for Aligned and Rigorous Interventions  In addition to exclusively funding turnaround interventions in low- performing schools, Tier 1 Education AmeriCorps grantees must implement interventions that have at least a preliminary evidence basis.  Tier 1 Education AmeriCorps grantees will serve exclusively in low- performing schools where their efforts are needed most, and where there is already a turnaround plan in place through a state’s implementation of its ESEA flexibility plan or a SIG.  Applicants must submit a letter of commitment signed by district and school leaders. Furthermore, applicants must demonstrate how the proposed intervention is aligned with existing district and school turnaround plans. 19

Six Strategies of Focus in the Notice  AmeriCorps members in these schools will work to:  Provide ongoing mechanisms for family and community engagement;  Establish a school culture and environment that improve school safety, attendance, and discipline and address other non-academic factors that impact student achievement, such as students’ social, emotional, and health needs;  Accelerate students’ acquisition of reading and mathematics knowledge and skills;  Increase graduation rates through strategies such as early warning systems, credit-recovery programs, and re-engagement strategies;  Increase college enrollment rates through college preparation counseling to include completing the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) and college applications, and educating students and their families on financial literacy for college; or  Support school implementation of increased learning time. 20

Questions? 21 Please contact using the subject Tier 1 Education Orientation