2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Findings Review of S&P 500 Proxies Spencer Stuart William B. Reeves Managing Director, Atlanta.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Corporate Governance Central Bank of Bahrain (Presented By Isa Al Motawaj) Director of Wholesale Banking Supervision 25th May /25/2017.
Advertisements

BOARD EFFICIENCY: The Agenda Setting Role and Information Needs of the Supervisory Board Holly J. Gregory Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.
W. Richard Frederick Governance Consultant. 1. Is the board effective, passive, or dysfunctional? 2. Is the board composition good?  Skills, experience,
1 ACI Annual Audit Committee Survey - Global M A R K E T I N G & C O M M U N I C A T I O N S R E S E A R C H Charles Garbowski Research February 21, 2006.
Corporate Governance Chapter 2.
Selection, Compensation, and Removal
1 Governance 1. Board Size and Composition 2. Board Committee Structure 3. Board Membership and Recruitment 4. Director Compensation and Ownership 5. Senior.
Corporate Governance: Recent Developments and Regional Practices
By: Jaime Alejandres & Alberto Alejandres. Brief Background on Brazilian Firms Brazilian companies generally have a weak corporative governance, a small.
ELECTION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORS Robert D. Strahota, Assistant Director * SEC Office of International Affairs Prepared for the panel on Improving.
Is Corporate Governance only a Fad…Fashionable…or a bore!! Ayla Majid CEO CAMCO (Pvt) Limited (Corporate Member of Islamabad Stock Exchange)
1 20-May-15 ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS IN ENFORCING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN FIRMS Yezdi Malegam Goa.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Stockholder Rights and Corporate Governance Stockholders Corporate Governance Executive Compensation: A Special Issue Shareholder Activism Government.
Are CEOs Paid Too Much? CEO Salary Year Compared to Blue-Collar Worker Avg times times times Source: Business Week.
CHAPTER 2 Corporate Governance
Trinidad & Tobago Corporate Governance Code 2013
Corporate Governance Best Practices: Implications for Commercial Underwriters Dr. Gail S. Russ Dr. Meredith Downes Associate Professors of Management Illinois.
1 The Code of Best Practices and the Board of Directors Professor Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes Yale University School of Management International Institute.
The Importance of Transparency and Disclosure Presented by Brian S. Brown Seoul, Korea - March 1999 OECD Conference: Corporate Governance in Asia.
1 Charles Garbowski Senior Director Research March 16, 2007 R E S E A R C H K P M G L L P ACI Second Annual Global Audit Committee Survey.
©2008 Pearl Meyer & Partners NECC Executive Compensation Forum Trends in Long-Term Incentives March 6, 2008 Melissa Means Vice President Pearl Meyer &
Presented by:William B. Reeves, Atlanta September, 2007 The Changing Profile of Directors and Trends in Corporate Governance.
1 Committees of a Board. 2 Why Committees? To get impartial and professional input To get impartial and professional input Reduce work load for directors.
Copyright © 2008 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd.1 Chapter Twelve Corporate Governance Canadian Business and Society: Ethics & Responsibilities.
1 Practical Issues in Corporate Governance Robin Louis Ventures West March 20, 2002.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Corporate governance: Asia Pacific. JAPAN  The Japan corporate governance committee published its revised code in The Code had six chapters, which.
Elements of Code of Corporate Governance: East Asia Perspective Prof. Stephen Y.L. Cheung Department of Economics & Finance City University of Hong Kong.
Prentice Hall, Inc. © STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS POLICY 11 TH EDITION THOMAS L. WHEELEN J. DAVID HUNGER CHAPTER 2 Corporate Governance.
1 GFNORTE Corporate Governance. 2  DIVIDEND POLICY In the Ordinary General Stockholders Assembly held on April 29, 2003, a dividend policy with a minimum.
Role of the Board of Directors
Issues in Corporate Governance: Board Structures and Functions Based on a Student Presentation by Joshua Shullaw and Matthew Domeyer.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLP 1 New Rules for Proxy Statement Disclosures Presentation to The National Association of Stock Plan Professionals, Boston Chapter.
Environment Characteristics of a Commons: –Free –Finite –Costs go to community, Benefits to Individual Carrying Capacity: The ability of a system to sustain.
To Sir Tahir Mahmood Presented by: Abdul khaliq khan Hamid Mahmood Aamir Maalik Waqar Younas.
Rating Compliance & Corporate Responsibility Presentation to 5 th Annual Pharmaceutical Regulatory & Compliance Congress By: Andrea M. Esposito Managing.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
1 Functioning of Boards of Directors in Romania Prepared by Angela Ionita Vice President - EFM / A company of HKK Partners Senior Investment Officer -
Presented By: John Mestepey Managing Director Edward W Kelley & Partners Charles Herington President Avon Latin America NACD Florida Chapter March 1, 2007.
Major legal rights of stockholders To receive dividends, if declared To vote on: Members of board of directors Major mergers and acquisitions Charter and.
ECON 308 Week 15 Corporate Governance Chapter 18 1.
Chapter 4 Corporate Governance: Foundational Issues © 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning 1.
THE MYSTIQUE OF BOARD MEETINGS Topic 5. INTRODUCTION Corporate board to outsiders is seen as some sort of omnipotent body making profound decisions that.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/ Irwin 14-1 Business and Society POST, LAWRENCE, WEBER Stockholders and Corporate.
CHAPTER 2 Corporate Governance
Week 7 Directors: A Background Faisal AlSager MGT Corporate Governance.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS POLICY 10 TH EDITION THOMAS L. WHEELEN J. DAVID HUNGER Corporate Governance.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF TOP MANAGEMENT 1 - FULFILLS KEY ROLES (MINTZBERG, 73) INTERPERSONAL ROLES –FIGUREHEAD –LEADER –:LIAISON INFORMATIONAL ROLES –MONITOR.
Main Board Issues in Chile Ricardo Escobar C. Carey Cía. Ltda.
Corporate Governance Prentice Hall 2006.
Getting Back to Business Investors Who Move the Market and the 2003 Proxy Season: Hold Onto Your Hats! Lyle Ganske, Head of M&A Practice Rich Koppes, Of.
Governance, Risk and Ethics. 2 Section A: Governance and responsibility Section B: Internal control and review Section C: Identifying and assessing risk.
CLOSING THE GENDER GAP VISION 2020 Roberta D. Liebenberg Vision 2020, National Leadership Circle Former Chair, ABA Commission on Women in the Profession.
Chapter 5 ASX Guidelines for Listed Companies
THE DYNAMICS OF GETTING ON A PUBLIC CORPORATE BOARD
Governance of High-Tech Startups
Corporate Governance Corporate governance is the set of processes that provides an assurance of a fair return to outside investors. Resolve the conflict.
Interpreting the Value of Corporate Governance
Mutual Fund Boards vs. Corporate Boards
Corporate Governance Corporate Governance also plays an important role in maintaining corporate integrity and managing the risk of corporate fraud, combating.
Corporate Governance for Mutuals
Board of Directors Roles and Responsibilities
What is corporate governance?
Singapore Code of Corporate Governance 2012
Recruiting and developing the board of directors
Dr. Gail S. Russ Dr. Meredith Downes
CHAPTER 10 Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance – The cornerstone
Presentation transcript:

2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Findings Review of S&P 500 Proxies Spencer Stuart William B. Reeves Managing Director, Atlanta

2 Changing Director Profile >Board independence a reality and trend toward more independent board leadership 81% of directors are independent On 43% of boards, CEO is the only insider, up from 31% in % of boards separate the Chair and CEO roles, up from 25% in ’02 13% of Chairs are truly independent, up from 10% last year 94% of boards have lead/presiding director (up from 36% in ’03) >Profile of new directors continues to shift (329 in 2007) Fewer active CEOs – 33%; down from 41% in ’02 and 53% in ’00 More active and retired other corporate executives (e.g., division managers and functional unit leaders) – 21% vs. 7% in ’02 33% are first-time public company directors Slight increase in women – 19% vs. 16% in ’02 More bankers and investors -10% vs. 5% in ’02 Fewer lawyers, consultants and accountants - 5% vs. 16% in ’02

3 Changing Director Profile, cont’d >CEO increasingly likely to be sole inside director and less likely to serve on any outside boards CEO sole insider on 43% of boards, up from 31% in ’02 and 23% in ’98 S&P 500 CEOs serve on 0.8 outside boards, down from 1.2 in ’02 and 2.0 in ’98 >Women directors and women CEOs at all-time high 91% of boards have at least 1 woman director, up from 82% in ’02 55% of boards have 2 or more women directors and 15% have 3 or more women 15 women serve as CEOs, up from 7 in ’02 >Minority representation not growing For the largest 200 S&P 500 companies, minorities (including African-Americans, Hispanics and Asians) account for nearly 14% of directors, down slightly from ‘05 85% of these boards have at least one minority director >More companies appoint international directors Half of the top 200 S&P 500 companies have at least one director from outside the U.S., up from 45% in ’05

4 Trends in Governance Practices >Board size and number of meetings relatively stable 10.8 directors on average 8.3 board meetings/year on average, up from 7.5 in ‘02 >Mandatory retirement age more prevalent and older More boards have a retirement age: 79% vs. 55% in ’02 But older: 67% have age 72+ vs. 35% in ’02 >One-year board terms becoming more common 62% of boards now have a one-year term, compared to 40% in ’02

5 Trends in Governance Practices, cont’d >Greater disclosure of director recommendation sources Information on sources of new director recommendations was disclosed for 57% of new appointees. Director recommendations came from the following sources: -61% from executive search firms -19% from insiders (e.g., CEO, controlling shareholders) -18% from non-management directors >More disclosure of limits on other corporate directorships 55% of boards disclose limits on other corporate board service by their directors, up from 27% in ‘06 18% of boards limit other audit committee memberships for their own audit committee members, with the maximum typically set at 2 or 3. This is up from 5% in ’06

6 Committee Trends >Committees meeting more Boards with 11+ audit cmte mtgs: 35% vs. 1% in ‘02 Average number of audit committee meetings is 9.5 vs. 5.0 in ’02 Compensation committees met on average 6 times, up from 5.8 in ’05 Nominating committees met on average 5 times, up from 4.4 in ’05 >Audit chairs less likely to be CEOs/top executives Fewer active CEOs: 18% vs. 27% in ‘02 More retired CEOs: 24% vs. 18% More active/retired CFOs: 13% vs. 3% More active/retired accountants: 10% vs. 1% >Compensation and nominating committee chairs are most often retired CEOs/top executives CompCo chairs: 38% retired CEOs; 23% active CEOs NomCo chairs: 25% retired CEOs; 22% active CEOs

7 Non-Executive Chairs >35% of boards have separated the CEO/chair roles, up from 32% in ’06 and 25% in ’02 >13% of NECs are independent, up from 10% in ’06 >Independent NEC profile (n=60) 73% are retired; 27% active executives 50% are a former CEO of another company 17% are other retired executives/CFO/COO 10% are investors/involved in private equity 87% were on the board before becoming the chair >Additional compensation is paid to 83% of independent NECs Average additional compensation of $139,000

8 Lead and Presiding Directors >94% of boards have a lead or presiding director >More boards shifting toward lead director designation 40% designate lead director, up from 28% 60% designate presiding director, down from 72% in ‘04 >Fewer boards rotating presiding directors Of boards with a presiding director, 19% rotate the role, down from 27% in ’06 And, for those that still rotate, trend is to rotate annually instead of at every board meeting >Role most often filled by retired or active CEOs/presidents/chairs >Additional compensation is paid to 32% of lead/presiding directors Average additional compensation of $22,600

9 Director Compensation >New disclosure requirements bring transparency to director and top executives’ compensation >Board compensation reflects increased demands on directors All-inclusive average total compensation is $211,000 -Stock awards - 41% -Options - 16% -Cash - 35% -Other – 8% (e.g., insurance premiums, charitable award programs) Average cash retainer of $68,560 is up 8% from ’06 and 73% greater than $39,538 in ‘02 Fewer boards paying meeting fees: 52% vs. 70% But, meeting fees are higher: $2,027 vs. $1,596 More pay equity in addition to retainer: 72% vs. 42% Fewer pay with stock options: 42% vs. 77%

10 Committee Compensation >Committee compensation has increased for chairs and is shifting toward retainers for members Retainers for committee chairs more prevalent and larger -More boards pay: 88% vs. 55% -Average retainer amount has increased 74% to $10,358 from $5,968 in ‘02 Committee meeting fees less common -Fewer boards pay, although still a majority: 54% vs. 64% in ‘02 -Average fees have increased to $1,549 from $1,191 Committee member retainers increasing in popularity -More boards pay: 31% vs. 13% -Average retainer amount has increased to $6,468 from $4,822

11 SSBI Supplemental Survey of Corporate Secretaries >Boards seek more women and minority directors 73% of boards seek to bring on minorities 70% seek to bring on women >Boards seek new skills Financial expertise - 77% Active CEO/COO – 68% Retired CEO/COO – 49% International expertise – 52% Technology expertise – 36% Marketing expertise – 35% Legal expertise – 8% HR expertise – 7% Other (e.g., industry) – 22% Source: 2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Supplemental Survey. 119 corporate secretaries responding.

12 >CEO succession approach varies 25% of boards do not have an emergency succession plan 62% of boards include CEO succession on the agenda annually; 34% more than once a year Primary responsibility for succession planning split between nominating committee (41%) and compensation committee (40%), although many boards now cite that multiple committees or the entire board are responsible 53% of boards use a formal review process to assess potential successors. Of these, 44% benchmark internal candidates against external ones 23% of boards encourage top internal candidates to take on outside public board directorships >Shareholder engagement increasingly prevalent 37% of boards, up from 22% in ’06, report that individual directors had direct contact with shareholders Most frequently raised topics: CEO compensation (28%), majority voting (22%), and other concerns about board composition (17%) Source: 2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Supplemental Survey. 119 corporate secretaries responding. Supplemental Survey of Corporate Secretaries, cont’d

13 >Majority cite limits on outside board service 58% of boards limit outside public board service for their CEOs. -7% allow 0 outside boards -34% allow 1-2 outside boards -17% allow 3-4 outside boards 32% of boards limit outside board service for other senior executives -11% allow 0 outside boards -19% allow 1-2 outside boards -3% allow 3 outside boards >SEC disclosure requirements have impacted compensation committees 82% of boards spent additional time discussing and reviewing executive compensation 46% held more frequent meetings 27% attribute compensation policy changes to the new rules Source: 2007 Spencer Stuart Board Index Supplemental Survey. 119 corporate secretaries responding. Supplemental Survey of Corporate Secretaries, cont’d