© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
Advertisements

Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Academically Productive Talk in Mathematics: A Means of Making Sense.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Algebra and the Mathematical Practices Google Image.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
A Look at Standards for Mathematical Practice, Grades K-2
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Common Core Mathematics Scope and Sequence State-wide Conference Christina Foran and Rebecca Candino, TSD.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number System Standards via a Set of Tasks Tennessee.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
A Common Sense Approach to the Common Core Math Math teaches us more than just content Standards for Mathematical Practice Make sense of problems and.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Expressions and Equations Standards via a Set.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Expressions and Equations Standards via a Set.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
Review of a few Common Core Standard Math Strategies for Operations and Algebraic Thinking, Grade 1 Graphics licensed through: Buttons licensed through.
The Common Core State Standards August Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on Final Standards released June.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K-5: Focus on Content Standards.
A GENDA D AY -3 Do Now Gallery Walk-Progressions Let’s Go to the Videotape Reflections.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Sunnyside School District
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number System Standards via a Set of Tasks Tennessee.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Mathematical Structures: Addition and Subtraction Word Problem Types Tennessee.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Sunnyside School District Math Training Module 6 Conceptual Lessons.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Teachers in Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting on Mathematics Instruction.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics CCSS Standards of Mathematical Practice: Reasoning and Explaining The Common Core State Standards Illustrating.
Vacaville USD October 28, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Seeing Structure and Generalizing The National Council.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Transitioning to the Common Core State Standards – Mathematics 1 st Grade Session 3 Pam Hutchison
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Strategies for Scaffolding.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Mathematical practices: What do they look like in instruction? Deborah Schifter Mathematical Sciences Research Institute March 22, 2012.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
An Overview of The First Grade Math Common Core Standards Presented by: Winnebago School’s First Grade Team February 2013.
Parent University First Grade Math. Common Core State Standards  Math Content Standards  Organized by grade level math topic  Guide instruction, serve.
Lesson Modification Project: “Cover-Up” Brandi R. Teran TTE 316: Math & Technology December 9, 2015.
Kindergarten Math November 19, Math Content Standards Organized by grade level math topic These primarily guide instruction Math Practice Standards.
Faster Isn’t Smarter Message 17: Constructive Struggling
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education Elementary School Mathematics Grade 1 The Instructional Tasks Matter: Analyzing the Demand of Instructional Tasks

Rationale – Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks Tasks form the basis for students’ opportunities to learn what mathematics is and how one does it, yet not all tasks afford the same levels and opportunities for student thinking. [They] are central to students’ learning, shaping not only their opportunity to learn but also their view of the subject matter. Adding It Up, National Research Council, p. 335, 2001 By analyzing two tasks that are mathematically similar, teachers will begin to differentiate between tasks that require thinking and reasoning and those that require the application of previously learned rules and procedures. 2

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Learning Goals and Activities Participants will: compare mathematical tasks to determine the demand of the tasks; and identify the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice addressed by each of the tasks. 3

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Comparing the Cognitive Demand of Two Mathematical Tasks What are the similarities and differences between the two tasks? Counting Houses Task Nine Plus a Number Task 4

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Counting Houses Task Mary, Nick, and Jean are collecting donations to support homeless people. Each student starts on a different path. The houses are side-by-side. Which student will visit the most houses and how do you know? Write an equation that describes each part of the students’ paths and explain which student visited the most houses and how you know. Mary claims she sees a pattern in the Counting Houses Task that she can use to solve the tasks below = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ 10 + __ = __ = 15 What pattern do you see? ____________________________________________ 5 Mary Nick Jean

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Nine Plus a Number Task Solve each addition problem. Use the blocks when solving each problem = ___ = ____ = ___ Solve the problems below = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ 6

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER The Common Core State Standards Examine the CCSS − for Mathematical Content − for Mathematical Practice Will first grade students have opportunities to use the standards within the domain of Operations and Algebraic Thinking? What kind of student engagement will be possible with each task? Which Standards for Mathematical Practice will students have opportunities to use? 7

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1 Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction. 1.OA.A.1 Use addition and subtraction within 20 to solve word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem. 1.OA.A.2 Solve word problems that call for addition of three whole numbers whose sum is less than or equal to 20, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem. 8 Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1 Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA Understand and apply properties of operations and the relationship between addition and subtraction. 1.OA.B.3 Apply properties of operations as strategies to add and subtract. Examples: If = 11 is known, then = 11 is also known. (Commutative property of addition.) To add , the second two numbers can be added to make a ten, so = = 12. (Associative property of addition.) 1.OA.B.4 Understand subtraction as an unknown-addend problem. For example, subtract 10 – 8 by finding the number that makes 10 when added to 8. 9 Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1 Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA Add and subtract within OA.C.5 Relate counting to addition and subtraction (e.g., by counting on 2 to add 2). 1.OA.C.6 Add and subtract within 20, demonstrating fluency for addition and subtraction within 10. Use strategies such as counting on; making ten (e.g., = = = 14); decomposing a number leading to a ten (e.g., 13 – 4 = 13 – 3 – 1 = 10 – 1 = 9); using the relationship between addition and subtraction (e.g., knowing that = 12, one knows 12 – 8 = 4); and creating equivalent but easier or known sums (e.g., adding by creating the known equivalent = = 13). 10 Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1 Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA Work with addition and subtraction equations. 1.OA.D.7 Understand the meaning of the equal sign, and determine if equations involving addition and subtraction are true or false. For example, which of the following equations are true and which are false? 6 = 6, 7 = 8 – 1, = 2 + 5, = OA.D.8 Determine the unknown whole number in an addition or subtraction equation relating three whole numbers. For example, determine the unknown number that makes the equation true in each of the equations 8 + ? = 11, 5 = ? – 3, = ?. 11 Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO

The CCSS for Mathematical Practice 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4.Model with mathematics. 5.Use appropriate tools strategically. 6.Attend to precision. 7.Look for and make use of structure. 8.Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. 12 Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 6-8, NGA Center/CCSSO

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks How do the differences between the Counting Houses Task and the Nine Plus a Number Task impact students’ opportunities to learn the Standards for Mathematical Content and to use the Standards for Mathematical Practice? 13

Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project …Not all tasks are created equal - different tasks will provoke different levels and kinds of student thinking. Stein M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development, p. 3. New York: Teachers College Press 14

Linking to Research/Literature There is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn and on their perceptions about what mathematics is than the selection or creation of the tasks with which the teacher engages students in studying mathematics. Lappan & Briars,

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Instructional Tasks: The Cognitive Demand of Tasks Matters 16

Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project The Mathematical Tasks Framework TASKS as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS as set up by the teachers TASKS as implemented by students Student Learning Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4 17

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project (continued) Low-Level Tasks –Nine Plus a Number Task High-Level Tasks –Counting Houses Task 18

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project (continued) Low-Level Tasks –Memorization –Procedures Without Connections (e.g., Nine Plus a Number Task) High-Level Tasks –Doing Mathematics (e.g., Counting Houses Task) –Procedures With Connections 19

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER The Mathematical Task Analysis Guide Research has identified characteristics related to each of the categories on the Mathematical Task Analysis Guide (TAG). How do the characteristics that we identified when discussing the Counting Houses Task relate to those on the TAG? Which characteristics describe the Nine Plus a Number Task? 20

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER The Cognitive Demand of Tasks (Small Group Work) Working individually, use the TAG to determine if tasks A – L are high- or low-level tasks. Identify and record the characteristics on the TAG that best describe the cognitive demand of each task. Identify the CCSS for Mathematical Practice that the written task requires students to use. Share your categorization in pairs or trios. Be prepared to justify your conclusions using the TAG and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. 21

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Identifying High-level Tasks (Whole Group Discussion) Compare and contrast the four tasks. Which of the four tasks are considered to have a high level of cognitive demand and why? 22

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Relating the Cognitive Demand of Tasks to the Standards for Mathematical Practice What relationships do you notice between the cognitive demand of the written tasks and the Standards for Mathematical Practice? 23

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Addition Task A Determine the sum of each addition problem = ___ = ____ = ___ = ____ = ___ = ____ = ___ = ____ = ___ = ____ = ___ = ____ = ___ = ____ 24

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Addition Task B Tell if the scale will balance or tilt. If the scale does not balance, write which side will tilt down and why and indicate what would have to change to make the scale balance (5 + 9)

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Addition Task C Use your solution to one problem to solve the second problem. The first problem is given as an example = = ___ Solve each set of problems by using the first problem to solve the second problem = ____ = ____ = ___ = ____ = ____ = ___ The problems below work in the opposite way as the ones above. How can you use the first problem to solve the second problem in each set of problems? = ____ = ____ = ___ = ____ = ____ = ___ 26

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Addition Task D Manipulatives/Tools available: Counters, cubes, grid paper, base ten blocks Write a word problem for the number sentence = ___ Ask a question with your story problem so we know what we are supposed to figure out. Write a word problem for the number sentence. 14 – 5 = ___ Ask a question with your story problem so we know what we are supposed to figure out. Compare the two word problems. How do they differ from each other? 27

Subtraction Task E Manipulatives/Tools available: base ten blocks Solve this problem in two different ways: After each way, write about how you did it. Be sure to include: what materials, if any, you used to solve this problem; how you solved it; and an explanation of your thinking as you solved it. First Way: Second Way: Adapted from Investigations in Number, Data, and Space, Dale Seymour, Menlo Park, CA,

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Subtraction Task F Manipulatives/Tools available: base ten blocks Use base ten blocks to model the situations below. Write a number sentence for each problem. 1.Jim has 23 red pencils and 8 pencils are not sharpened. How many pencils are sharpened? 2.Jamie has 48 cookies and some of them are chocolate and some are vanilla. 26 cookies are chocolate. How many cookies are vanilla? 3.32 cookies are in the box and you ate some of them. Now there are 26 cookies left. How many cookies did you eat? Explain how the problems are similar to each other. Explain how the problems differ from each other. 29

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Subtraction Task G Manipulatives/Tools available: none Solve the subtraction number sentences. 14 – 7 = ____ 16 – 8 = ___ 12 – 8 = ____ 18 – 9 = ___ 14 – 7 = ____ 16 – 8 = ___ 12 – 8 = ____ 18 – 9 = ___ 14 – 7 = ____ 16 – 8 = ___ 12 – 8 = ____ 18 – 9 = ___ 30

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Subtraction Task H Manipulatives/Tools available: none Study the strategy of rounding the subtrahend in order to subtract all of the ones available and doing mental subtraction. 65 – 26 = ___ 83 – 37 = ___ 65 – 25 = – 33 = – 1 = – 4 = – 26 = ____62 – 28 = ____ 31

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Place Value Task I Manipulatives/Tools available: base ten blocks Order the amounts from smallest to largest Order the amounts from smallest to largest

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Place Value Task J Manipulatives/Tools available: base ten blocks Identify the number of tens possible in each of the amounts. 236__________________ 368__________________ 589__________________ 2389_________________ 3458_________________ 33

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Place Value Task K Manipulatives/Tools available: base ten blocks Study each set of addition problems and write about what keeps changing with each sum = ______________ = ______________ = ______________ = ______________ Which numbers stayed the same? Which numbers changed? Explain why only one number kept changing. 34

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Place Value Task L Manipulatives/Tools available: base ten blocks Circle the number in the ones place in each of the numbers below Circle the number in the tens place in each of the numbers below Circle the number in the hundreds place in each of the numbers below. 3, ,679 3,457 2,349 35

The CCSS for Mathematical Practice 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4.Model with mathematics. 5.Use appropriate tools strategically. 6.Attend to precision. 7.Look for and make use of structure. 8.Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Common Core State Standards,

Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project If we want students to develop the capacity to think, reason, and problem-solve then we need to start with high-level, cognitively complex tasks. Stein, M. K. & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2 (4),

Linking to Research/Literature Tasks are central to students’ learning, shaping not only their opportunity to learn but also their view of the subject matter. Adding It Up, National Research Council, p. 335,