PRIMARY Results of ADVISE ADenosine Vasodilation Independent Stenosis Evaluation Dr Justin Davies MD, PhD Imperial College London on behalf of the ADVISE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Advertisements

Pros and cons of FFR in multivessel disease: from FAME to ACS Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
The BHF FAMOUS NSTEMI Trial For the FAMOUS NSTEMI Investigators ESC Hotline for Myocardial Infarction, 1 Sep 2014 J. Layland, K.G. Oldroyd, N. Curzen,
The BHF FAMOUS NSTEMI Trial For the FAMOUS NSTEMI Investigators ESC Hotline for Myocardial Infarction, 1 Sep 2014 J. Layland, K.G. Oldroyd, N. Curzen,
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions Julinda Mehilli,
DEFER STUDY: 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP A Multicenter Randomized Study
BURZOTTA F. 1, PAN M. 2 (CO-FIRST AUTHOR), TRANI C. 1, MEDINA A. 3, SUÀREZ DE LEZO J. 2, NICCOLI G. 1, ROMERO M. 2, PORTO I. 1, MAZUELOS F. 2, LEONE A.M.
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Baisc Concept and Technique of FFR FuWai Hospital JieQian.
Effect of adult life course blood pressure on cardiac structure in the MRC 1946 birth cohort British Hypertension Society 2011 Dr Arjun K Ghosh MRC Clinical.
The index of microvascular resistance measured acutely predicts infarct severity and left ventricular function at 3 months in patients with ST segment.
Pressure Wire Evaluation of the Left Main Stem Dr Phil MacCarthy Consultant Cardiologist King’s Cardiac Centre Left Main 5+ at AA2007, Jan 24 th, 2007.
PLATFORM: Economic and Quality of Life Outcomes of an FFR CT Diagnostic Strategy in Suspected CAD Mark A Hlatky, Bernard De Bruyne, Gianluca Pontone, Manesh.
PLATFORM: Economic and Quality of Life Outcomes of an FFR CT Diagnostic Strategy in Suspected CAD Mark A Hlatky, Bernard De Bruyne, Gianluca Pontone, Manesh.
Pathophysiology of the coronary circulation: role of FFR Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease: Results from the FAME.
CIT 2016 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial David Liu, MD Subtitle 34 pt Arial Bold Italics.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: TCTAP C-162 Unique Features of Spontaneously Recanalyzed.
Strategies to Improve Inadequate Guide Catheter Support John S Douglas Jr MD S Tanveer Rab MD Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia Sunday.
Effect of Thrombus Aspiration in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Presenting Late After Symptom Onset Steffen Desch, MD Thomas Stiermaier, MD; Suzanne.
Influence of a Pressure Gradient Distal to Implanted Bare-Metal Stent on In-Stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Lisette Okkels Jensen,
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: From Research to Clinical Practice: Current Role.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Development and Validation of a New Adenosine-Independent.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:636–43 Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Does the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Approximate.
Martin B. Leon, MD Key Messages Tryton Pivotal: Randomized Trial and
Simplifying Serial Lesion Assessment
Justin Davies, MBBS, PhD Interventional Cardiologist
COMET A truly innovative system to ease FFR
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Methods for Hyperemic Assessment of FFR
Real-time use of instantaneous wave–free ratio: Results of the ADVISE in-practice: An international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave–free.
FFR DECISION MAKING DURING DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES
Nico H.J. Pijls, William F. Fearon, Peter Jüni, and Bernard De Bruyne
Physiologic Lesion Assessment: Advantages and Pitfalls
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Clinical Usefulness of Post-Stenting FFR
CFR and Coronary Capacity for Prognosis
PCI related in-hospital mortality based on race and gender in the USA
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Lipid-Rich Plaque Study Update
The Starting Point: Translesional Pressure versus Flow
Emerging FFR Non-Wire-based Technology
ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation II
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
9:00 AM-9:05 AM, Tuesday, Oct. 31; Room 201/203
Renal CTA: Can We Determine Who Will Benefit from RAS
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
FAVOR II Europe-Japan FAVOR II E-J
A Pooled Analysis From SYNTAX and BEST Randomized trials
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION: THE TENDYNE GLOBAL FEASIBILITY TRIAL 1 YEAR OUTCOMES David WM Muller, MBBS,
Fractional Flow Reserve Workshop
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Atorvastatin 20 mg (n=25 lesions) Atorvastatin 5 mg (n=25 lesions)
CIT 2018 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
CIT 2018 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
CIT 2017 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
CIT 2018 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
CIT 2017 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
Intravascular imaging and physiologic lesion assessment to define critical coronary stenoses  Luis Gruberg, MD, Gary S Mintz, MD, Lowell F Satler, MD,
CIT 2017 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
(p < for noninferiority)
CIT 2017 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease FFR/IFR
Javier Escaned et al. JCIN 2018;11:
CIT 2018 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity score matched analysis Maurizio Taramasso MD, PhD from.
Presentation transcript:

PRIMARY Results of ADVISE ADenosine Vasodilation Independent Stenosis Evaluation Dr Justin Davies MD, PhD Imperial College London on behalf of the ADVISE investigators

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Research Support/ Intellectual Property Rights Consulting Fees/Honoraria Volcano Corporation Medtronic, Volcano Corporation Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial RelationshipCompany

FFR is established in clinical practice At best it is only used in 6% of PCI in USA 1 One barrier is the current requirement for vasodilator drugs such as adenosine Contraindicated or disliked by patients Adds to procedural time Adds to procedural costs 1 Kleiman NS. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:

When coronary resistance is stable – pressure can be used as as a surrogate for flow to assess a coronary stenosis Time (s) 24 Resistance (mm Hg s/m) Pressure (mm Hg) Velocity (m/s)

If we can identify a period of naturally occurring stable resistance Why do we give drugs such as adenosine to calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR)?

Pa Pd De Bruyne et al. JACC Vol. 22, No.1 July 1993: Marked damping of coronary pressure – necessitated the use of mean pressure in the development of FFR

Pa Pd Marked damping of coronary pressure – necessitated the use of mean pressure in the development of FFR De Bruyne et al. JACC Vol. 22, No.1 July 1993:119-26

Phasic resistance during the cardiac cycle ADVISE study Resistance (mm Hg s/m) Pressure (mm Hg) Velocity (m/s) Time (s) 24

ADVISE study Phasic resistance during the cardiac cycle Resistance (mm Hg s/m) Pressure (mm Hg) Velocity (m/s) Time (s) 24

Resistance (mm Hg s/m) Pressure (mm Hg) Velocity (m/s) Time (s) 24

Fully automated algorithms Identification of naturally low resistance period Uses pressure only Wave-free period Sen S, Escaned J, Davies JE et al. JACC (in press 2011) Davies JE et al. Circulation 2006;113: Davies JE et al. Circulation 2011;124: Identification of wave-free period

Hypothesis 1 Resistance measured at rest during the resting wave- free period is similar to mean resistance during hyperaemia. Hyperaemic mean resistanceResting wave-free resistance ADVISE study

Wave-free period Hypothesis 2 The Pd/Pa ratio (iFR) during the resting wave-free period was similar to FFR. ADVISE study

Resting wave-free resistance vs. mean hyperaemic resistance n=39 Intra-coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements Baseline resistance assessment Resistance assessment under pharmacological vasodilatation iFR vs. FFR n=157 Intra-coronary pressure measurements iFR & FFR assessment ADVISE Study ADenosine Vasodilation Independent Stenosis Evaluation Part 1 Proof of concept Part 2 Validation study

ADVISE study demographics n=156 lesions age = 63 years RISK FACTORS VESSEL CHARACTERISTICS ADVISE study

Test stability and magnitude of resistance during wave-free period in comparison to during adenosine hyperaemia Hypothesis 1

Resting wave-free resistance Hyperaemic mean resistance Stability of resistance is similar over the wave- free period and during hyperaemia Coefficient of Variation of resistance Sen S, Escaned J, Davies JE et al. JACC (in press 2011) ADVISE study

Resting wave-free resistance Hyperaemic mean resistance p=0.96 Stability of resistance is similar over the wave- free period and during hyperaemia Coefficient of Variation of resistance Sen S, Escaned J, Davies JE et al. JACC (in press 2011) ADVISE study

Resting mean resistance Resistance (mm Hg s/m) Magnitude of resistance is similar over the wave-free period and during hyperaemia Resting wave-free resistance Hyperaemic mean resistance ADVISE study

Resting wave-free resistance Hyperaemic mean resistance Resting mean resistance Resistance (mm Hg s/m) p<0.001 p=0.70 Magnitude of resistance is similar over the wave-free period and during hyperaemia ADVISE study

Resistance measured at rest during the wave-free period… Hypothesis 1

Resistance measured at rest during the wave-free period… is similar in both stability and magnitude to values achieved under adenosine hyperaemia. Hypothesis 1

Assess whether iFR was numerically similar to Fractional flow reserve. Hypothesis 2

Definition: Instantaneous pressure gradient, across a stenosis during the wave-free period, when resistance is constant and minimised in the cardiac cycle iFR = instantaneous wave-free ratio Pa Pd Wave-free period

Close relationship between iFR and FFR y=1.022x Regression coefficient FFR iFR Sen S, Escaned J, Davies JE et al. JACC (in press 2011) ADVISE study

Close relationship between iFR and FFR r = 0.90 y=1.022x Regression coefficient FFR iFR Sen S, Escaned J, Davies JE et al. JACC (in press 2011) ADVISE study

Close relationship between iFR and FFR y=1.022x Regression coefficient Left coronary artery Right coronary artery FFR iFR r = 0.90 Sen S, Escaned J, Davies JE et al. JACC (in press 2011) ADVISE study

Magnitude of hyperaemia does not explain the small difference between iFR and FFR Δ Abs Hyperaemic – wave-free resistance (mmHg s/m) ΔFFR - iFR

ADVISE study Diagnostic efficiency of iFR Sen S, Escaned J, Davies JE et al. JACC (in press 2011)

iFR positive iFR negative FFR False (+) False (-) Assessment of diagnostic efficiency of iFR Left coronary artery Right coronary artery Diagnostic accuracy (+) predictive value (-) predictive value Sensitivity Specificity 88% 91% 85% 91% Sen S, Escaned J, Davies JE et al. JACC (in press 2011) ADVISE study

FFR False (+) False (-) 95% CI variability in FFR* Left coronary artery Right coronary artery Assessment of diagnostic efficiency of iFR after adjustment for inherent variability in FFR *De Bruyne B et al. Circulation. 1996;94: Circulation 2006;114; iFR positive iFR negative Diagnostic accuracy (+) predictive value (-) predictive value Sensitivity Specificity 95% 97% 93% 97% 88% 91% 85% 91% Adjusting for variability in FFR ADVISE study

Summary Identified a wave-free period in cardiac cycle when resistance is naturally stabilized and minimal avoiding the need for administration of adenosine Wave-free period

Summary iFR measured during this wave-free period gives a measure of stenosis severity similar to FFR

Clinical implications of iFR Removes barriers to adoption of physiological assessment Increased applicability Improved work-flow in catheter lab Improves patient experience

ADVISE team Hospital Clínico San Carlos Javier Escaned, Rafael Mila Royal Brompton Hospital Carlo Di Mario Imperial College Sayan Sen Iqbal Malik, Jamil Mayet, Alun Hughes, Darrel Francis, Ghada W Mikhail, Rodney A Foale, Jason Tarkin, Ricardo Petraco, Christopher Broyd, Richard Jabbour, Amarjit Sethi, Christopher Baker, Michael Bellamy, Mahmud Al-Bustami, David Hackett, Masood Khan, David Lefroy, and Kim H Parker.

ADVISE team Wave-free period Hospital Clínico San Carlos Javier Escaned, Rafael Mila Royal Brompton Hospital Carlo Di Mario Imperial College Sayan Sen Iqbal Malik, Jamil Mayet, Alun Hughes, Darrel Francis, Ghada W Mikhail, Rodney A Foale, Jason Tarkin, Ricardo Petraco, Christopher Broyd, Richard Jabbour, Amarjit Sethi, Christopher S Baker, Micheal Bellamy, Mahmud Al-Bustami, David Hackett, Masood Khan, David Lefroy, and Kim H Parker. advisestudy.org