Pharmacophore and FTrees

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scientific & technical presentation Structure Visualization with MarvinSpace Oct 2006.
Advertisements

ChemAxon in 3D Gábor Imre, Adrián Kalászi and Miklós Vargyas Solutions for Cheminformatics.
Analysis of High-Throughput Screening Data C371 Fall 2004.
1 Sequential Screening S. Stanley Young NISS HTS Workshop October 25, 2002.
3D Molecular Structures C371 Fall Morgan Algorithm (Leach & Gillet, p. 8)
Ch 16 Amines Homework problems: 16.9, 16.10, 16.21, 16.25, 16.39,
Chapter 1 Part 2. Nucleus Cytoplasm Plasma membrane Phospholipid bilayer.
Chiral HPLC.
PharmaMiner: Geometric Mining of Pharmacophores 1.
FORCES GOVERNING BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. Electronic structure of atoms Negatively charged electrons revolve around positively charged nucleus. Atom.
Computer-Chemie-CentrumUniversität Erlangen-Nürnberg Virtual screening and modelling: must it be atoms? Tim Clark Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Image Indexing and Retrieval using Moment Invariants Imran Ahmad School of Computer Science University of Windsor – Canada.
Geometric Algorithms for Conformational Analysis of Long Protein Loops J. Cortess, T. Simeon, M. Remaud- Simeon, V. Tran.
1 PharmID: A New Algorithm for Pharmacophore Identification Stan Young Jun Feng and Ashish Sanil NISSMPDM 3 June 2005.
Two Examples of Docking Algorithms With thanks to Maria Teresa Gil Lucientes.
Summary Molecular surfaces QM properties presented on surface Compound screening Pattern matching on surfaces Martin Swain Critical features Dave Whitley.
M. Wagener 3D Database Searching and Scaffold Hopping Markus Wagener NV Organon.
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) Gijs Schaftenaar.
FLEX* - REVIEW.
Bioinformatics IV Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) and Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) Martin Ott.
BL5203: Molecular Recognition & Interaction Lecture 5: Drug Design Methods Ligand-Protein Docking (Part I) Prof. Chen Yu Zong Tel:
Pharmacophore-based Molecular Docking Bert E. Thomas, Diane Joseph- McCarthy, Juan C.Avarez.
Structural biology and drug design: An overview Olivier Taboureau Assitant professor Chemoinformatics group-CBS-DTU
Automated Drawing of 2D chemical structures Kees Visser.
RAPID: Randomized Pharmacophore Identification for Drug Design PW Finn, LE Kavraki, JC Latombe, R Motwani, C Shelton, S Venkatasubramanian, A Yao Presented.
Inverse Kinematics for Molecular World Sadia Malik April 18, 2002 CS 395T U.T. Austin.
Module 2: Structure Based Ph4 Design
Molecular Descriptors
Topological Summaries: Using Graphs for Chemical Searching and Mining Graphs are a flexible & unifying model Scalable similarity searches through novel.
Similarity Methods C371 Fall 2004.
8 th Grade Chemistry in Review Take this quiz and look at your score. Reflect. Take the quiz again as may times as you need to in order to feel good about.
Optimizing Target Interactions
Introduction to Chemoinformatics Irene Kouskoumvekaki Associate Professor December 12th, 2012 Biological Sequence Analysis course.
An Efficient Approach to Clustering in Large Multimedia Databases with Noise Alexander Hinneburg and Daniel A. Keim.
Use of Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics Irene Kouskoumvekaki Associate Professor December 12th, 2012 Biological Sequence Analysis course.
3D- QSAR. QSAR A QSAR is a mathematical relationship between a biological activity of a molecular system and its physicochemical parameters. QSAR attempts.
In silico discovery of inhibitors using structure-based approaches Jasmita Gill Structural and Computational Biology Group, ICGEB, New Delhi Nov 2005.
Ligand-based drug discovery No a priori knowledge of the receptor What information can we get from a few active compounds.
 Receptors are mostly membrane-bound proteins that selectively bind small molecules called ligands which results in physiological response.  They are.
Virtual Screening C371 Fall INTRODUCTION Virtual screening – Computational or in silico analog of biological screening –Score, rank, and/or filter.
1 © Patrick An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 3/e Chapter 10 DRUG DESIGN: OPTIMIZING TARGET INTERACTIONS Part 1: Section 10.1 (SAR)
MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 3. Empirical classical PES and typical procedures of optimization Classical potentials.
Structural Models Lecture 11. Structural Models: Introduction Structural models display relationships among entities and have a variety of uses, such.
PROTEIN PATTERN DATABASES. PROTEIN SEQUENCES SUPERFAMILY FAMILY DOMAIN MOTIF SITE RESIDUE.
Selecting Diverse Sets of Compounds C371 Fall 2004.
PharmaMiner: Geometric Mining of Pharmacophores 1.
Time-Efficient Flexible Superposition of Medium-sized Molecules Presented by Tamar Sharir (Lemmen & Lengauer)
Introduction to Chemoinformatics and Drug Discovery Irene Kouskoumvekaki Associate Professor February 15 th, 2013.
FlexWeb Nassim Sohaee. FlexWeb 2 Proteins The ability of proteins to change their conformation is important to their function as biological machines.
Use of Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics
Surflex: Fully Automatic Flexible Molecular Docking Using a Molecular Similarity-Based Search Engine Ajay N. Jain UCSF Cancer Research Institute and Comprehensive.
Topics in bioinformatics CS697 Spring 2011 Class 12 – Mar Molecular distance measurements Molecular transformations.
Computational Approach for Combinatorial Library Design Journal club-1 Sushil Kumar Singh IBAB, Bangalore.
Molecular mechanics Classical physics, treats atoms as spheres Calculations are rapid, even for large molecules Useful for studying conformations Cannot.
We propose an accurate potential which combines useful features HP, HH and PP interactions among the amino acids Sequence based accessibility obtained.
EBI is an Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. A web based integrated search service to understand ligand binding and secondary structure.
HP-SEE In the search of the HDAC-1 inhibitors. The preliminary results of ligand based virtual screening Ilija N. Cvijetić, Ivan O. Juranić,
Jump to first page Relational Data. Jump to first page Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) n Can use ILP to find a set of rules capturing a property that.
DRUG DESIGN: OPTIMIZING TARGET INTERACTIONS
Intermolecular binding forces
Simplified picture of the principles used for multiple copy simultaneous search (MCSS) and for computational combinatorial ligand design (CCLD). Simplified.
Molecular Docking Profacgen. The interactions between proteins and other molecules play important roles in various biological processes, including gene.
Building Hypotheses and Searching Databases
Daylight and Discovery
Virtual Screening.
Patrick: An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 6e
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Mr.Halavath Ramesh 16-MCH-001 Dept. of Chemistry Loyola College University of Madras-Chennai.
Presentation transcript:

Pharmacophore and FTrees Abhik Seal

Pharmacophore IUPAC Definition: “An ensemble of steric and electronic features that is necessary to ensure the optimal supramolecular interactions with a specific biological target and to trigger (or block) its biological response“ H HBD HBA R In drug design, the term 'pharmacophore‘ refers to a set of features that is common to a series of active molecules Hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors, positively and negatively charged groups, and hydrophobic regions are typical features We will refer to such features as 'pharmacophoric groups'

Bioisosteres Bioisosteres, which are atoms, functional groups or molecules with similar physical and chemical properties such that they produce generally similar biological properties . A chemical group can be mimicked by a similar group with similar biological activity –another example of similarity for example in a. Size b. Shape (bond angles, hybridization) c. Electronic distribution (Polarizability, inductive effects, charge, dipoles) e. Lipid solubility f. pKa g. Chemical reactivity (including likelihood of metabolism) h. Hydrogen bonding capacity

3D Pharmacophores A three-dimensional pharmacophore specifies the spatial relation-ships between the groups Expressed as distance ranges,angles and planes A commonly used 3D pharmacophore for antihistamines contains two aromatic rings and a tertiary nitrogen Tak Taken from Laak etal. J.Med Chem1995,38(17)

Example of ACE inhibitors.. Angiotension-converting enzyme (ACE), which is involved in regulating blood pressure . H bonds to a hydrogen-bond donor in enzyme Pharmacophore Interacts with an Arg residue of enzyme a zinc-binding group Captopril 4 points 5 distances

Detection of Pharmacophores: SBP and LBP A pharmacophore software detects the elements which is responsible for pharmacophoric properties. For Ligand based pharmacophore pharmacophoric points. Aromacity detection or ring detection HBD point is normaly bsaed on topological information .Every atom is checked for the following conditions: Only nitrogen or oxygen atoms; Formal charge is not negative; At least 1 attached hydrogen atom. c) The generation of hydrogen bond acceptor points needs to fulfill four conditions: Formal charge not positive; At least one available lone pair; Atom is ‘accessible’. d) For the generation of charge center pharmacophore points, the formal charges on the atoms of the molecule are used. Atoms with a positive formal charge will correspond with a positive charge center pharmacophore point

Structure based pharmacophore Distance Constraints represent the relation between two points, one located on the ligand side, one on the macromolecular side.The following table shows LigandScout's default distance constraint settings: Aromatic interaction with positive ionizable 3.5 - 5.5 Å Aromatic interaction with ring (parallel) 2.8 - 4.5 Å Aromatic interaction with ring (orthogonal) H-Bond interaction 2.2 - 3.8 Å Hydrophobic interaction 1.0 - 5.9 Å Iron binding location 1.3 - 3.5 Å Magnesium binding location 1.5 - 3.8 Å Negative ionizable interaction 1.5 - 5.5 Å Positive ionizable interaction with negative ionizable Positive ionizable interaction with aromatic ring 1.0 - 10.0 Å Zinc binding location 1.0 - 4.0 Å

Merging and aligning Pharmacophores The quantification of the similarity between two pharmacophores can be computed from the overlap volume of the Gaussian volumes of the respective pharmacophores. The procedure to compute the volume overlap between two pharmacophores is implemented in two steps. a) a list of all feasible combinations of overlapping pharmacophore points is generated. b) then corresponding features are aligned with each other using an optimization algorithm. The combination of features that gives the maximal volume overlap is retained to give the matching score Each pharmacophore point is modeled as a 3-dimensional spherical Gaussian volume represented by its center (coordinate) and spread (a). The definition of the Gaussian volume is given as follows: Vp being the Gaussian volume, p being normalization constant to scale the total volume to a level that is in relation to atomic volumes, m being the center of the Gaussian, and r being the distance variable that is integrated.  that defines the volume of the point in space.  is chosen inverse proportional to the square root of the radius.

3D database searching 3D Database Eg : Clique detection. 6 - 8 Å 2 - 3 Å 4 - 7.2 Å 6 - 8 Å The first stage employs some form of rapid screen to eliminate molecules that could not match the query. For eg: One way to develop is to encode information of the distances in the form of Bit strings. Where each bit position would correspond to a range of distance between specific pair of atoms. For initialization at first the bit string is set to 0 at all bit positions and then for each molecular conformation the bit string positions are set to 1. Then the final Encoded bit string is searched against a database to look for similar molecules. The second stage uses a graph-matching procedure to identify those structures that do truly match the query. Eg : Clique detection. 3D Database

Clique Detection methods When many pharmacophoric groups are present in the molecule it may be very difficult to identify all possible combinations of the functional groups Clique is defined as a 'maximal completely connected subgraph' Clique detection algorithms can be applied to a set of pre-calculated conformations of the molecules Cliques are based upon the graph-theoretical approach to molecular structure . similar pattern

Ftrees

Descriptors Molecular descriptors are used for retrieval of compounds and also for clustering and and property prediction. Most descriptors use today are in linear format such as the properties are stored in the form of a vector. The alignment free approach of comparison is extremely fast but it has disadvantages i.e the relative arragnment of funtional groups on the molecular surface cannot be determined and its weakly described in linear descriptors. On the other hand 3D model can be itself considered as descriptor and they are aligned in 3D space , but its is difficult due to conformational flexibility and it might miss the right alignment.

Feature Trees Mixed 2D and 3D ligand-based approach Alignment based but conformation independent descriptor. A feature tree represents a molecule by a tree such that the tree should capture the major Building blocks of the molecule in addition to the overall alignment. In this way lead hopping between Chemical classes with compounds Sharing the same wanted biological activity is supported.

Ftrees The nodes of the Ftrees represents the fragments of the molecule. Each atom of the molecule is associated with with at least one node. Two nodes which have atoms in common or which contain atoms connected in the molecular graph are connected. The feature tree nodes are marked with labels describing the shape and chemical properrties of the bulding block. Taken from Rarey etal JCADD 1998

Descriptors in Ftrees The shape descriptors has two components i.e the number of atoms and the approximated vander wall’s volume. Chemical features is used to describe the interaction pattern the Building Ftree can form The FlexX interaction pattern is used which is represented . All the features taken are additive Taken from Rarey etal JCADD 1998

Comparison algorithm The comparison algorithm of two feature trees is based on matching the trees i.e a subtree of one feature to that of another. a,b is the number of atoms of the compared fragments.i th entry describes the ability of a Fragment to form interaction of type i. On comparing the full Ftree we just add all the features and apply the eq. such a Comparison is level -o For comparing feature Trees split search and match Search algorithms are used .These algorithms match based on the topology I,e it maintains the topology.

Scaffold hopping example The Ftrees can identify actives from decoys Of H4R receptor proteins. Score:0.839 Score:0.875 Score 0.835

Thank you.