Modeling suprathermal proton acceleration by an ICME within 0.5 AU: the May 13, 2005 event K. A. Kozarev 1,5 R. M. Evans 2, M. A. Dayeh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Advertisements

Valbona Kunkel June 18, 2013 Hvar, Croatia NEW THEORITICAL WORK ON FLUX ROPE MODEL AND PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC FIELD.
Plasmas in Space: From the Surface of the Sun to the Orbit of the Earth Steven R. Spangler, University of Iowa Division of Plasma Physics, American Physical.
Inner Source Pickup Ions Pran Mukherjee. Outline Introduction Current theories and work Addition of new velocity components Summary Questions.
Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott,
CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM WORKSHOP 1 Observations Questions.
TOWARDS A REALISTIC, DATA-DRIVEN THERMODYNAMIC MHD MODEL OF THE GLOBAL SOLAR CORONA Cooper Downs, Ilia I. Roussev, Bart van der Holst, Noe Lugaz, Igor.
A General Cone Model Approach to Heliospheric CMEs and SEP Modeling Magnetogram-based quiet corona and solar wind model The SEPs are modeled as a passive.
Center for Space Environment Modeling T. H. Zurbuchen, on behalf of W. Manchester, J. Kota, I. Roussev, T. H. Zurbuchen, N.
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Generation of Solar Energetic Particles (SEP) During May 2, 1998 Eruptive Event Igor V. Sokolov, Ilia I. Roussev, Tamas I. Gombosi (University of Michigan)
Center for Space Environment Modeling Numerical Model of CME Initiation and Shock Development for the 1998 May 2 Event Ilia.
CISM SEP Modeling Background The major SEP events come from the CME-generated coronal and interplanetary shock(s) These “gradual”events can have a “prompt”
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
Merging of coronal and heliospheric numerical two-dimensional MHD models D. Odstrcil, et al., J. Geophys. Res., 107, 年 10 月 14 日 太陽雑誌会 ( 速報.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
Center for Space Environment Modeling W. Manchester 1, I. Roussev, I.V. Sokolov 1, 1 University of Michigan AGU Berkeley March.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
MHD Modeling of the Large Scale Solar Corona & Progress Toward Coupling with the Heliospheric Model.
High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Modeling Coronal Acceleration of Solar Energetic Protons K. A. Kozarev, R. M. Evans, N. A. Schwadron, M. A. Dayeh, M. Opher, K. E. Korreck NESSC Meeting,
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Semi-Empirical MHD Modeling of the Solar Wind Igor V. Sokolov, Ofer Cohen, Tamas I. Gombosi CSEM, University of Michigan Ilia I Roussev, Institute for.
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Lecture 16 Simulating from the Sun to the Mud. Space Weather Modeling Framework – 1 [Tóth et al., 2007] The SWMF allows developers to combine models without.
Three-dimensional MHD simulation of a flux rope driven CME Manchester IV, W.B., Gombosi, T.I., Roussev, I., De Zeeuw, D.L., Sokolov, I.V., Powell, K.G.,
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Solar Energetic Particles: Acceleration and Transport in Realistic Magnetic Fields Igor.
1 SPD Meeting, July 8, 2013 Coronal Mass Ejection Plasma Heating by Alfvén Wave Dissipation Rebekah M. Evans 1,2, Merav Opher 3, and Bart van der Holst.
Validation of the SWMF Coupled Model for Solar Corona – Inner Heliosphere – CME With the Observations of the May 12, 1997 Event Ofer Cohen(1), Igor V.
Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Model N. A. Schwadron, K. Kozarev, L. Townsend, M. Desai, M. A. Dayeh, F. Cucinotta, D. Hassler, H. Spence, M. Pourars,
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
Evolution of Magnetic Fields from the Sun’s Surface to the Heliopause of one Solar Cycle Nathan Schwadron, Boston University.
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Solar Energetic Particles (SEP’s) J. R. Jokipii LPL, University of Arizona Lecture 2.
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
Variability of the Heliospheric Magnetic Flux: ICME effects S. T. Lepri, T. H. Zurbuchen The University of Michigan Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic,
Study of the April 20, 2007 CME-Comet interaction event with an MHD model Y. D. Jia 1, C. T. Russell 1, W. B. Manchester 2, K. C. Hansen 2, A. Vourlidas.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
Data-constrained Simulation of CME Initiation and Propagation Antonia Savcheva ESPM 2014 September 11, 2014 Collaborators: R. Evans, B. van der Holst,
08/4/2009NAS - SHINE-Suprathermal Radial Evolution (1-11 AU) of Pickup Ions and Suprathermal Ions in the Heliosphere N. A. Schwadron Boston University,
Solar energetic particle simulations in SEPServer How to deal with scale separation of thirteen orders of magnitude R. Vainio, A. Afanasiev, J. Pomoell.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations Verónica Ontiveros National University of Mexico, MEXICO George Mason University,USA Angelos Vourlidas Naval.
Southwest Research Institute
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
Elemental Abundance variations of the Suprathermal Heavy Ion Population over solar cycle 23 M. Al Dayeh, J.R. Dwyer, H.K. Rassoul Florida Institute of.
Y. C.-M. Liu, M. Opher, O. Cohen P.C.Liewer and T.I.Gombosi
Progress Toward Measurements of Suprathermal Proton Seed Particle Populations J. Raymond, J. Kohl, A. Panasyuk, L. Gardner, and S. Cranmer Harvard-Smithsonian.
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
3D Modelling of Heavy Ion SEP Propagation
Suprathermal Particle Density Variations over the Solar Cycle
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Modeling the SEP/ESP Event of December 13, 2006
Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Model
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Heliosphere - Lectures 5-7
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
Heavy-Ion Acceleration and Self-Generated Waves in Coronal Shocks
Taiyou Zasshikai on May 17, 2004
Presentation transcript:

Modeling suprathermal proton acceleration by an ICME within 0.5 AU: the May 13, 2005 event K. A. Kozarev 1,5 R. M. Evans 2, M. A. Dayeh 3, N. A. Schwadron 4, M. Opher 2, K. E. Korreck 5, and T. I. Gombosi 6 1 Boston University, Boston, MA; 2 George Mason University, Fairfax, VA; 3 Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX; 4 University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH; 5 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA; 6 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI We modeled the acceleration of suprathermal protons to high energies by a complex traveling plasma structure between AU. We used a global 3D MHD simulation of the May 13, 2005 coronal mass ejection event, and coupled it to a global kinetic code for particle acceleration and propagation. We scaled pre-event suprathermal spectra observed at 1 AU to 2.5 Rs and used them for inner boundary conditions for the kinetic simulation. We find that suprathermal protons can become the seed for solar energetic particles, as they get strongly energized by the enhanced traveling shock and complex plasma structure in the corona and interplanetary space. The kinetic model The Energetic Particles Radiation Environment Module (EPREM; Schwadron et al. 2010, Kozarev et al. 2010) solves numerically the focused transport equation (Kota et al., 2005) on a dynamical grid representing the inner heliosphere, in which nodes are convected outward from the sun according to the underlying solar wind parameters. This parallelized code solves for streaming, adiabatic cooling and focusing, convection, pitch-angle scattering, and stochastic acceleration effects. Energetic particles are accelerated and transported through this grid along magnetic field lines, based on interplanetary conditions. Coupling between kinetic and MHD models We extracted a 3D box (100x100x100 cells) around the expanding CME in the MHD simulation at two-minute increments (shown in Fig. 2). The kinetic code does trilinear interpolation on the BATSRUS box to obtain plasma parameters. Outside the box we extrapolate, assuming a constant solar wind speed, and an inverse square radial dependence of density and magnetic field. Modeling the May 13, 2010 event The EPREM simulation radial domain is between 2.5 Rs and 0.6 AU. We set up a computational grid dense enough close to the sun to resolve the features in the plasma model, that becomes sparse beyond 0.1 AU. The energy range of the injected proton spectra was between MeV. We use a fixed particle mean free path of 0.1 AU, consistent with the particle energies. Following Dayeh et al. (2009), we use quiet time He-4 ion (0.1 – 0.5 MeV/nuc) observations from ACE/ULEIS at L1 to obtain a seed suprathermal proton pre-event spectrum of the form dJ/dE=9.95 x x E We convert the spectrum to protons at 10 Rs assuming: 1) the flux is scaled to 2.5 Rs via an inverse-square dependence; 2) a helium to proton abundance of 10%; 3) the resulting spectral form is valid between Mev. We inject the scaled spectrum uniformly at the inner boundary of the kinetic code. The simulation spans half a day of data time. Summary and Future Work We have combined results from a time-dependent global MHD simulation of the May 13, 2005 coronal mass ejection with a global kinetic code, and modeled proton acceleration and transport between 2.5 solar radii and 0.5 AU, for energies MeV. We used a quiet time suprathermal Helium-4 spectrum observed at 1 AU and scaled to represent protons in the solar corona. We find that the suprathermal particles are easily energized by the transient plasma structure, and could serve as the seed population for solar energetic particles created by strong interplanetary shocks. In future work we will expand our simulations to 1 AU in order to verify our simulations against observations, and further refine them. We are also improving the integration of MHD simulation results in order to cover the entire kinetic code domain. Introduction Coronal Mass Ejection (CME)-driven interplanetary shocks are able to accelerate charged particles to high energies, potentially dangerous to astronauts and spacecraft electronics. This is an important problem in heliospheric physics, space weather forecasting and space operations. Recent modeling work has shown that interplanetary shocks can be very effective in accelerating particles up to several GeV/nuc close to the sun, but are not very efficient as they move outward (Zank et al., 2000; Roussev et al., 2004). We investigate how quiet-time suprathermal protons close to the sun can become the seed population for energetic protons accelerated by a complex traveling plasma structure in the solar corona, and transported in the inner heliosphere. We have simulated the May 13, 2005 CME event with a global 3D MHD and coupled it to a kinetic model. References Altschuler, M. D. & Newkirk, G., 1969, Sol. Phys., 9, 131 Powell, K. G. et al., 1999, J. Comp. Phys., 154, 284 Arge, C. N. & Pizzo, V. J., 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 105, A5 Roussev, I. I. et al., 2004, ApJ., 605, L73 Cohen, O., et al., 2007, ApJ, 654, L163 Schwadron, N. A. et al., 2006, IEEEAC Paper #1001, 6 Cohen, O. et al., 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A03104 Schwadron, N. A. et al., 2010, Space Weather, 8, 10 Dayeh, M. A. et al., 2009, Astrophys. J., 693, 1588 Thompson, B. J. et al., 1998, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 14, 2465 Kota, J. et al., 2005, The Physics of Collisionless shocks, AIP Toth, G. et al., 2005, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A12226 Kozarev, K. et al., 2010, Space Weather, 8, 10 Zank, G. P. et al, 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 105, A11 Fig. 2. EPREM's dynamic grid shown near the origin. Red dots represent grid nodes, streamlines are traced in white. The green box shows the region containing the expanding CME structure. Fig.3 Average shock properties as a function of distance. The shock remained very strong between 2 and 20 solar radii. Fig. 5. Modeled proton fluxes over four hours at 0.5 AU for energies MeV (left) and MeV (right). The time-dependent behavior is caused by the traveling shock and plasma structure. The MHD model We use the Space Weather Modeling Framework (Toth et al. 2005) for modeling the global solar wind and CME. The 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) code Block Adaptive Tree Solar-Wind Roe Upwind Scheme (BATS-R-US) which serves as its core is highly parallelized and includes adaptive mesh refinement. The initial solar magnetic field is calculated with the Potential Field Source Surface model (Altschuler & Newkirk. 1969) and an MDI synoptic magnetogram for CR 2029 (corresponding to April-May 2005.)‏ After steady-state is achieved, grid resolution in the CME region is increased in order to capture the shock and ICME properties. A modified Titov-Demoulin (TD) flux rope (Roussev et al. 2004) is inserted out of equilibrium in an active region near the equator. The ejecta field is poloidal. The flux rope's magnetic field orientation is anti-parallel to the active region magnetic field, and perpendicular to the global coronal field. The initial free energy is 2 x ergs. Fig.1. Density contour plot of the CME and solar magnetic field. The red square shows the approximate size and position of the box extracted from the MHD model, for this particular time step. Fig.4. Event fluence at 0.3 and 0.5 AU, between MeV, compared with the source spectrum at 0.15 AU (black).