Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

All you always wanted to know about Assurances Office of Research Protections (ORP) U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) Fort Detrick,
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Research Involving Humans! OHRP- Office For Human Subject Protections
Multisite Human Subjects Research CUNY HRPP Coordinator Training October 19, 2012.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
1 Involvement of Non-VCU Institutions in VCU Human Subjects Research Prepared for the 5 th Thursday for Human Subjects Protection Program 3/07.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
Cooperative Research IRB Brownbag, 3/4/08. ISU Policy Cooperative research projects are those projects which involve more than one institution. The official.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting IRB Frequently Asked Questions October 11, 2005.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Research Office (HSRO) University of Miami and Affiliated Institutions.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
New IRB Guideline Changes and Converting to eIRB - Suggestions for Maintaining Compliance. Ramesh Ghodgaonkar, BPHARM, MSITS, MSB, MBA Betsy Johnson, BA.
Help us Help you: IRB Policy Updates Susan Bankowski, MS, JD IRB Chair.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
Experience and innovation in ethical review. ® An Update and Overview of the US Common Rule Regulations David Borasky, MPH, CIP Copernicus Group IRB CAREB.
H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
CCAS Annual Conference: New Orleans, LA November 11, 2010 The Role of Deans: Regulatory & Administrative Responsibilities Michelle Feige, MSW Public Health.
UMBC POLICY ON ESH MANAGEMENT & ENFORCEMENT UMBC Policy #VI
VHA Handbook What’s new. General Requirements for Informed Consent A Legally Authorized Representative may not always qualify as a ‘personal representative’
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
SACHRP PANEL: HOLDING EXTERNAL IRBS ACCOUNTABLE David L. Wynes, Ph.D. Vice President for Research Administration Emory University July 21, 2009.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Office for Research Subjects (ORS) & Research Administration (ORA) In-Sync to Help Make your Research Happen Stephanie Gaudreau, Sr.Research Subjects Specialist,
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
OHRP’s Compliance Oversight Procedures
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SLIDE 0 New Requirements for VA ORD Investigators: Implementation of Data Management and Access Plans.
Non-compliance with Human Subjects Research Regulations J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP November 2014 Continuing Education for IRB Members.
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
1 Vereniging van Compliance Officers The Compliance Function in Banks Amsterdam, 10 June 2004 Marc Pickeur CBFA CBFA.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) 1
Conditional IRB Approval
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
University of Charleston’s
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Multisite Human Subjects Research
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
2/1/2019 3:33 PM Tennessee State University Institutional Review Board
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Everything You Wanted to Know about UOPX IRB
HHS Reporting Requirements and Adverse Events
IRB Harmonization 2016 Review
CTSA27 So you want COMIRB to be your sIRB: What you need to know.
Presentation transcript:

Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members

Per DHHS 45 CFR Part : Each institution that is engaged in Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) supported or conducted human subject research must obtain a Federalwide Assurance (FWA) from the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP).

UCI’s Federalwide Assurance FWA#  Initially approved January 31, 2003  Entities covered by FWA UCI CampusUCI Campus UCI Medical CenterUCI Medical Center UCI Health Centers:UCI Health Centers: Anaheim and Santa Ana

Terms in the FWA Binding agreement between OHRP and UCIBinding agreement between OHRP and UCI Updated and renegotiable every three years; UCI’s current FWA remains in effect through January 13, 2013, unless otherwise notifiedUpdated and renegotiable every three years; UCI’s current FWA remains in effect through January 13, 2013, unless otherwise notified Assures that all of UCI’s activities related to human subject research, regardless of funding source, will be guided by the ethical principles in the Belmont Report and will comply with 45 CFR Part 46 and all of its Subparts (A-D)Assures that all of UCI’s activities related to human subject research, regardless of funding source, will be guided by the ethical principles in the Belmont Report and will comply with 45 CFR Part 46 and all of its Subparts (A-D)

Engagement in HS Research An institution becomes “engaged” in human subjects research when:An institution becomes “engaged” in human subjects research when:  its employees, agents (e.g., faculty, student, and staff), and their collaborating institutions (i) intervene or interact with living individuals for research purposes; or (ii) obtain individually identifiable private information for research purposes  its employees, agents (e.g., faculty, student, and staff), and their collaborating institutions (i) intervene or interact with living individuals for research purposes; or (ii) obtain individually identifiable private information for research purposes [45 CFR (d),(f)].[45 CFR (d),(f)].  it receives a direct DHHS award to support such research. In such cases, the PI’s institution bears ultimate responsibility for protecting human subjects under the award even when all activities are carried out by a subcontractor or collaborator. The PI is also responsible for ensuring that all collaborating institutions engaged in the research hold an OHRP-approved Assurance prior to their initiation in research.  See OHRP Guidance on Institutions Engagement in

Requirements in the FWA Written ProceduresWritten Procedures Responsibilities and Scope of IRBResponsibilities and Scope of IRB Informed ConsentInformed Consent Collaborating Institutions/InvestigatorsCollaborating Institutions/Investigators Written Agreements with non-Affiliated InvestigatorsWritten Agreements with non-Affiliated Investigators Institutional SupportInstitutional Support Compliance with TermsCompliance with Terms Assurance TrainingAssurance Training Educational TrainingEducational Training Renewal of AssuranceRenewal of Assurance

Written Procedures - I UCI should establish, and provide to OHRP upon request, written procedures for: ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB, appropriate institutional officials, the relevant Department or Agency Head, any applicable regulatory body, and OHRP of any: (i) unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others, (ii) serious or continuing noncompliance with the Federal Regulations or IRB requirements, and (iii) suspension or termination of IRB approval.ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB, appropriate institutional officials, the relevant Department or Agency Head, any applicable regulatory body, and OHRP of any: (i) unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others, (ii) serious or continuing noncompliance with the Federal Regulations or IRB requirements, and (iii) suspension or termination of IRB approval. verifying, by a qualified person or persons other than the investigator or research team, whether proposed human subject research activities qualify for exemption from the requirements of the Common Rule.verifying, by a qualified person or persons other than the investigator or research team, whether proposed human subject research activities qualify for exemption from the requirements of the Common Rule.

Written Procedures - II UCI IRB has established, and will provide a copy to OHRP upon request, written procedures for: 1)Conducting IRB initial and continuing review (not less than once per year), approving research, and reporting IRB findings to the investigator and the Institution; 2)Determining which projects require review more often than annually and which projects need verification from sources other than the investigator that no material changes have occurred since the previous IRB review; 3)Ensuring that changes in approved research protocols are reported promptly and are not initiated without IRB review and approval, except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subject.

Responsibilities and Scope of IRB All human subject research* will be reviewed, prospectively approved, and subject to continuing oversight and review at least annually by the designated IRBs. The IRBs will have authority to approve, require modifications in, or disapprove the covered human subject research. *Except for research exempted or waived in accordance with Sections 101(b) or 101(i) of the Common Rule of the Common Rule

Informed Consent Requirements Informed consent will be: a) sought from each prospective subject or the subject's legally authorized representative, in accordance with, and to the extent required by Section 116 of the Common Rule; b) appropriately documented, in accordance with, and to the extent required by Section 117 of the Common Rule. c) except for research exempted or waived in accordance with Sections 101(b) or 101(i) of the Common Rule c) except for research exempted or waived in accordance with Sections 101(b) or 101(i) of the Common Rule

Requirement for Assurances for Collaborating Institutions/Investigators UCI is responsible for ensuring that all institutions and investigators engaged in its U.S. federally- supported human subject research operate under an appropriate OHRP or other federally-approved Assurance for the protection of human subjects. In some cases, one institution may operate under an Assurance issued to another institution with the approval of the supporting Department or Agency and the institution holding the Assurance.

Written Agreements with Non-Affiliated Investigators The engagement in human research activities of each independent investigators who is not an employee or agent of UCI may be covered under UCI’s FWA only in accordance with a formal, written agreement of commitment to relevant human subject protection policies and IRB oversight. Institutions must maintain commitment agreements on file and provide copies to OHRP upon request.

Institutional Support for the IRB The Institution will provide the IRB that it operates with resources and professional and support staff sufficient to carry out their responsibilities under the Assurance effectively.

Compliance with the Terms of Assurance The Institution accepts and will follow the items above and is responsible for ensuring that: (a)the IRBs designated under the Assurance agree to comply with these terms; and (b)the IRBs possesses appropriate knowledge of the local research context for all research covered under the Assurance Any designation under this Assurance of another Institution's IRB or an independent IRB must be documented by a written agreement between the Institution and the IRB organization outlining their relationship and include a commitment that the designated IRB will adhere to the requirements of this Assurance. Any agreement should be kept on file at both organizations and made available to OHRP upon request.

Assurance Training OHRP Assurance Training Modules describe the major responsibilities of the Institutional Signatory Official, the Human Protection Administrator, and the IRB Chairs that must be fulfilled under the Assurance.OHRP Assurance Training Modules describe the major responsibilities of the Institutional Signatory Official, the Human Protection Administrator, and the IRB Chairs that must be fulfilled under the Assurance. OHRP strongly recommends that the Institutional Signatory Official, the Human Protections staff, and the IRB Chairs personally complete the relevant OHRP Assurance Training Modules, or comparable training that includes the content of these modules, prior to submitting the Assurance.OHRP strongly recommends that the Institutional Signatory Official, the Human Protections staff, and the IRB Chairs personally complete the relevant OHRP Assurance Training Modules, or comparable training that includes the content of these modules, prior to submitting the Assurance.

Educational Training OHRP strongly recommends that the Institution and the designated IRBs establish educational training and oversight mechanisms (appropriate to the nature and volume of its research) to ensure that research investigators, IRB members and staff, and other appropriate personnel maintain continuing knowledge of, and comply with, relevant ethical principles, relevant Federal Regulations, OHRP guidance, other applicable guidance, state and local laws, and institutional policies for the protection of human subjects.OHRP strongly recommends that the Institution and the designated IRBs establish educational training and oversight mechanisms (appropriate to the nature and volume of its research) to ensure that research investigators, IRB members and staff, and other appropriate personnel maintain continuing knowledge of, and comply with, relevant ethical principles, relevant Federal Regulations, OHRP guidance, other applicable guidance, state and local laws, and institutional policies for the protection of human subjects. Furthermore, OHRP recommends that:Furthermore, OHRP recommends that: a) IRB members and staff complete relevant educational training before reviewing human subject research; and b) research investigators complete appropriate institutional educational training before conducting human subject research.

Renewal of Assurance Renewal of Assurance All information provided under this Assurance must be updated at least every 36 months (3 years), even if no changes have occurred, in order to maintain an active Assurance. Failure to update this information may result in restriction, suspension, or termination of the Institution's FWA for the protection of human subjects.

OHRP Compliance Oversight OHRP’s Division of Compliance Oversight (DCO) evaluates all written substantive allegations or indications of noncompliance with DHHS regulations. If complaints or concerns arise regarding an institution's human subject protection practices, OHRP opens a formal evaluation and, if necessary, requires corrective action by the institution.OHRP’s Division of Compliance Oversight (DCO) evaluates all written substantive allegations or indications of noncompliance with DHHS regulations. If complaints or concerns arise regarding an institution's human subject protection practices, OHRP opens a formal evaluation and, if necessary, requires corrective action by the institution. During the course of an evaluation DCO issues findings of noncompliance in the form of determination letters. OHRP makes these determination letters available on their website, either 10 days after the letter is issued or when the first Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request is made, requesting that letter. The publicly available determination letters are edited to remove those portions that relate to issues still under discussion with the institution.During the course of an evaluation DCO issues findings of noncompliance in the form of determination letters. OHRP makes these determination letters available on their website, either 10 days after the letter is issued or when the first Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request is made, requesting that letter. The publicly available determination letters are edited to remove those portions that relate to issues still under discussion with the institution. To view recent Determination letters or for a list of common OHRP Compliance Oversight finding go to: view recent Determination letters or for a list of common OHRP Compliance Oversight finding go to:

Questions? Please contact:  Karen Allen Director of Research or