Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Open Library June 4, 2004 Informed Consent Process and Federal Regulations That Must Be Met to Waive Informed Consent Tracey Craddock Regulatory Compliance.
RESEARCH COMPLIANCE Agenda 1. No Destruction of local research documents after scanning 2. Training for shipping biological samples/specimens 3. Regulatory.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
IRB Review Mechanics: Looking under the hood IRB Administrators 2012 PRIDE Lucindia Shouse, MS, CIP May 31, 2012.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
OHRP Electronic Access Web Site:
VHA Handbook K. Lynn Cates, M.D. Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Director, PRIDE HRPP 201 March 24, 2011.
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
Renewing An Approved Protocol: IRB Review Process
I T ’ S J UST A L ITTLE C HANGE ; O H AND I T ’ S T IME TO R ENEW ! H OW TO SUBMIT AMENDMENTS AND RENEWALS Human Investigation Committee Human Research.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
IRB Minutes & Records VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
Unlocking the Mystery of General Information Reporting Research Compliance Administration Training Presentation Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Presenter:Heather.
2012 VA IRB Administrators Meeting Stephania H. Griffin, JD, RHIA, CIPP/G VHA Privacy Officer Director, Information Access and Privacy Privacy Officer.
PRESENTING A PROTOCOL AN IRB INFOSHORT FEBRUARY 2013.
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Response to FDA Audit 483 MX-4501N : Nine Category 483 Citations Meetings Minutes: Votes for, against, abstention and reason not recorded;
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 19, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Using Technology to Strengthen Human Subject Protections Patricia Scannell Director, IRB Washington University School of Medicine.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Unanticipated Problems Potentially Involving Risks to Subjects or Others Research Protections Office Serving UVM and FAHC Updated April 2012.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
IRB Board Education Session 6 How Consent Regulations are Implemented in INSPIR Mary Banks Director, Office of the IRB June -July 2005.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
JERI R. BARNEY, JD HRPP COMPLIANCE MANAGER YALE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM DECEMBER 13, 2012 Noncompliance.
VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator HRPP 101, September 2010.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS & BASICS RESEARCH COMPLIANCE.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator Local Accountability Meeting June 2011.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES C. Karen Jeans, MSN COACH Project Analyst.
OHRP’s Compliance Oversight Procedures
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Instructions for New IRB Continuing Review (Progress) Report
Conditional IRB Approval
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (HIPAA)
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
IRB reporting updates.
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one?
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)

Topics IRB and Investigator requirements of continuing review IRB approval dates Requirements when IRB approval expires 2

Continuing Review Research Must be Substantive and Meaningful Includes, but not limited to: Review of the ongoing level of risks and benefits Assessment of the need for special safeguards to protect subjects Review of the adequacy of ongoing protection for potentially vulnerable individuals 3

Considerations for Continuing Review IRB must conduct continuing review of research at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not less than once per year [38 CFR (e)] IRB must have written procedures for determining which projects require review more often than annually (38 CFR (b)(4)(ii)). Review may be by the convened IRB or by expedited review, if appropriate IRB approval criteria must be satisfied 4

Investigator Submits Protocol Summary & Written Status Report Brief summary of the research methodology Number of subjects entered and withdrawn (including reason) for the review period and since the inception Summary of complaints regarding the research since the last IRB review Gender and minority status of those entered into protocol, if appropriate Number of subjects considered to be members of specific vulnerable populations 5

Investigator Submits Protocol Summary & Written Status Report Copy of the current informed consent form(s) and any new proposed informed consent form(s) along with a description of changes in the new form Current HIPAA authorization List of all amendments since last IRB approval Information that may impact on the risk benefit ratio, such as SAEs and complaints regarding the research 6

Investigator Submits Protocol Summary & Written Status Report Summaries, recommendations, or minutes of the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) meetings (if applicable) or findings based on information collected by the data and safety monitoring plan Assurance that all identified unanticipated internal or local SAEs, have been reported as required to the IRB of record Summary of all unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others, and all internal or local SAEs 7

Investigator Submits Protocol Summary & Written Status Report Research findings to date, if available Relevant multi-center trial reports New scientific findings in the literature, or other relevant findings, that may impact on the research PI statement certifying that all subjects on the master list signed an informed consent form prior to undergoing any study interactions or interventions (unless waived by IRB) 8

At Continuing Review All IRB members must receive and review a protocol summary and a status report on the progress of the research At least one voting member of the IRB (i.e., a primary reviewer) needs to receive a copy of the complete protocol, including any modifications previously approved by the IRB. All IRB members have access to the complete IRB protocol file and relevant IRB minutes 9

IRB Ensures Approval criteria are satisfied Informed consent is accurate and complete Informed consent form, HIPAA authorization, and protocol are consistent Significant new findings that may affect the subject’s willingness to continue participation are provided to the subjects 10

Expedited Continuing Review If expedited, IRB Chair or designee should receive and review all documentation and complete protocol Reminder: Determinations and protocol-specific findings justifying those IRB determinations must be documented in either the IRB protocol file or the minutes 11

Master List of Subjects IRB must ensure that the master list of subjects entered into the study contains only those subjects who have signed an informed consent form (unless waived) May rely on assurances from the PI and audits conducted by the RCO 12

13 IRB Approval Date – Convened IRB No Conditions = date of the convened IRB meeting at which approval was granted Minor Conditions = date the study was approved by the convened IRB contingent on minor conditions being addressed (NOT the date that the conditions are verified) Note: Substantive Conditions = defer approval

14 IRB Approval Date – Expedited IRB All conditions met = date the IRB Chair, or experienced IRB voting member(s) designated by the IRB Chair, signs IRB approval to the research study

If Approval Expires Local research office must promptly notifying the investigator Investigator must stop all research activities including, but not limited to Enrollment of new subjects Continuation of research interventions or interactions with currently participating subjects Data analysis. 15

If Approval Expires Investigator must immediately submit to the IRB Chair a list of research subjects who could be harmed by stopping study procedures. IRB Chair, with appropriate consultation with the Chief of Staff, determines if subjects on the list may continue participating in the research interventions or interactions 16

If Approval Expires Once the study approval has expired, IRB re-review and re-approval must occur before the study can resume The IRB cannot retrospectively grant approval to cover a period of lapsed IRB approval 17

“30 Day Rule” When continuing review occurs annually and the IRB performs continuing review within 30 days before the IRB approval period expires, the IRB may retain the anniversary date as the date by which the continuing review must occur. There is no provision for any grace period to extend the conduct of research beyond the expiration date of IRB approval. Therefore, continuing review and re-approval of research must occur on or before the date when IRB approval expires. 18

Timeline Example Convened IRB - No Conditions Convened IRB meets on March 15, 2009 and approves the protocol with no conditions Continuing review and re-approval of research must occur on or before the date when IRB approval expires, or March 15,

Timeline Example Convened IRB - Minor Conditions Convened IRB meets on March 15, 2009 and approves the protocol with minor conditions Investigator completes changes on March 20, 2009 IRB Chair verifies conditions are met on March 25, 2009 Continuing review and re-approval of research must occur on or before the date when IRB approval expires, or March 15,

Timeline Example - Expedited IRB IRB chair reviews protocol on March 15, 2009 and request more information from Principal Investigator Investigator makes additional changes and resubmits protocol on March 20, 2009 IRB Chair reviews final changes and approves protocol on March 25, 2009 Continuing review and re-approval of research must occur on or before the date when IRB approval expires, or March 25,

Timeline Example - “30 Day Rule” IRB approval of a protocol is set to expire on March 25, 2010 The IRB reviews and approves the protocol at a convened meeting on March 15, 2010 Continuing review and re-approval of research must occur on or before the date when IRB approval expires, or March 25,

Key Points Continuing review must be meaningful, substantive, and timely Investigators must submit required information Understand timeline for when continuing review and approval must occur Prevent expiration of IRB approval Understand what to do if IRB approval expires 23

24