ACCOUNTING FOR PROGRESS…… ONE CHILD AT A TIME

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visit Our Website at earlychildhoodohio.org Ohio’s Early Childhood Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
Advertisements

A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
State Prekindergarten Standards, Children with and without Disabilities: We’re ALL on the Same Page 2005 OSEP Early Childhood Conference December 2005.
Kindergarten Assessment August  All kindergarten teachers complete summative first quarter evaluations on all kindergarten students (electronic.
New Era MMSR- Maryland Model for School Readiness ends. Maryland’s Early Learning Framework begins… begins transition:
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Kindergarten Readiness:
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
RtI in Early Childhood Lisa Kelly-Vance, UNO and Kristy Feden, Papillion- LaVista Schools.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Early Childhood Education Dr. Bill Bauer William L. Heward Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education, 8e Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education,
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Diane Paul, PhD, CCC-SLP Director, Clinical Issues In Speech-Language Pathology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Preschool Outcomes Measurement System (POMS) Design and Implementation.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Aligning Child Outcome Measurement to Early Learning Standards NECTAC Outcomes Meeting Monday, August 27, 2007.
1 Using a Statewide Evaluation Tool for Child Outcomes & Program Improvement Terry Harrison, Part C Coordinator Susan Evans, Autism Project Specialist.
All Aboard! Child Outcomes Measurement Across Early Childhood Systems Dawn McGrath ICAN/ISTAR Director Ann Ruhmkorff Indiana GSEG Project Coordinator.
English-Language Development Domain California Preschool Learning Foundations Volume 1 Published by the California Department of Education (2008) English-Language.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
Minnesota’s School Readiness Study 1 Developmental Assessment at Kindergarten Entrance.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Dale.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 3http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Observation and Assessment in Early Childhood Feel free to chat with each other. We will start class at 9:00 PM ET! Seminar Two: Using Standardized Tests.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center New Tools in the Tool Box: What We Need in the Next Generation of Early Childhood Assessments Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI.
Linking the DRDP to Instruction: Using the DRDP (2015) Reports
Good Start, Grow Smart Inter-American Symposium Understanding the State of the Art in Early Childhood Education and Care: The First Three Years of Life.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
CE300-Observation and Assessment in Early Childhood Unit 2 Using Standardized Tests and Authentic Assessments Feel free to chat with each other. We will.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
GETTING KANSAS KIDS READY FOR KINDERGARTEN. KEY IDEAS KINDERGARTEN READINESS  Measuring kindergarten readiness provides a snapshot of where children.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
The Early Education & Support Division presents…
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
Using Formative Assessment
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Preschool Snapshot New Jersey Department of Education
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Presentation transcript:

ACCOUNTING FOR PROGRESS…… ONE CHILD AT A TIME TOPICS ISTAR (Indiana Standards Tool for Alternate Reporting) Assessment System: Purpose, Functions, and Content – Sheron Cochran Technology Demonstration – Dawn McGrath General Supervision Enhancement Grant: Outcome Measurement Tool for Children in First Steps – Dawn Downer Description of Grant Activities - Ann Ruhmkorff

ISTAR OVERVIEW Broad Description of ISTAR Assessment Multiple Purposes of ISTAR Why It Was Selected to Measure Progress for Preschool Children with Disabilities Connection to the Foundations ISTAR Content

WHAT IS ISTAR? It is a web-based standards-referenced assessment system provided free of charge by the Department of Education, Division of Exceptional Learners. It utilizes teacher ratings to measure the progress of students. It is a continuous process. The child does not “take a test”.

ISTAR MULTIPLE PURPOSES Indiana’s Alternate Assessment Component under IDEIA and NCLB for grades 3-10. [Legal Basis] Academic Assessment of Limited English Proficient Students [Legal Basis] Supplemental Assessment May be used to measure progress of any student in relation to grade level expectations. Gifted and Talented Students

ISTAR MULTIPLE PURPOSES Beginning with the 2004-2005 school year, schools must assess all early childhood students with disabilities using ISTAR so that the SEA can carry out its duty to collect information regarding performance goals. [Legal Basis] Indiana’s SPP/APR must address improvement in positive social-emotional skills, acquisition and use of knowledge and skills including early language and communication, early literacy, and use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

Why ISTAR Selected as Indiana’s Early Childhood Assessment Builds on previous work Authentic assessment for ‘ALL’ children On-going assessment Provides parents and teachers with graphic representation of the progress of the child ISTAR indicators are aligned to Foundations for Young Children and Academic Standards Helps guide instruction Can assist the IEP team in forming IEP goals

CONNECTION TO THE FOUNDATIONS AND ACADEMIC STANDARDS ISTAR is a direct derivative of the Foundations for Young Children to the Indiana Academic Standards and the Indiana Academic Standards. Extensions to the Foundations and academic standards have been included to create a continuum of access for all children beginning from birth.

ISTAR CONTENT EXTENSIONS TO STANDARDS Extensions to the academic standards of mathematics and English/language arts have been developed to include four levels of progress prior to kindergarten: Basic 1 (B1) Birth to two years of age Basic 2 (B2) Two to three years of age Foundations 1 (F1) Three to four years of age Foundations 1 (F2) Four to five years of age

Birth through the highest level of performance This is an example of a current summary report adjusted to the highest level of performance in mathematics.

ISTAR CONTENT FUNCTIONAL ACHIEVEMENT SKILLS Functional Achievement Indicators are in 3 categories: Physical Skills Personal Care Skills Social-Emotional Skills ISTAR measures growth throughout life. 100% of skills represents what would be expected of a fully independent adult. It is reasonable to expect low scores for a young child in an early childhood program.

ISTAR CONTENT Separate Speech Interface There is a separate interface designed for speech-language pathologists (SLP). If a child receives speech services from an SLP , the child must be rated on communication skills through the separate interface. The SLP items are grouped into four areas: social interaction, comprehension, expressive communication, and speech intelligibility.

ISTAR CONTENT Separate Speech Interface These areas contain assessment elements in the general “listening and speaking” standard plus additional items that are specific to SLP expertise. Students with communication disorders who receive services solely from the SLP may be rated strictly in these 4 areas.

ISTAR CONTENT PARTICIPATION Assessments should begin as teachers/therapists become familiar with incoming students. ISTAR assessment should be collected naturally and periodically throughout the year. ISTAR is to be completed collaboratively if there is more than one provider.

ISTAR CONTENT SCORING ISTAR is scored through use of a 3-point rubric (See page 30 in Handbook). Educators base these ratings on observation, work samples, portfolios, and other indicators of performance. Scores are used to measure individual and group progress.

ISTAR CONTENT WHEN DOES REPORTING OCCUR? Assessments are to be completed During the quarter of entrance During the quarter of exit During the quarter of each birth month If an exit or entrance assessment is done in the quarter of the birth month, one assessment serves both purposes.

ISTAR DEMONSTRATION DAWN McGrath, Director of ISTAR/ICAN Project View technology Establishing Accounts Maintaining Security Training, technical support, materials www.istar.doe.state.in.us

Outcome Measurement Tool for Children in First Steps First Steps Annual Outcome Study ISTAR

First Steps Annual Outcome Study Entrance Interviews Exit Interviews IFSP Current Level of Performance Crosswalk with SPP/APR Outcomes Limitations

ISTAR Measure attainment of skills linked to state academic standards Basic 1 – birth to two years Basic 2 – two to three years Functional Skills On-line accessibility IFSP Team reporting and review Parent Reports

Early Childhood Assessment Enhancement of Basic 1 and Basic 2 for children birth through three years Include developmental domains (physical, cognitive, communication, social-emotional, and adaptive) in addition to state academic standards

Early Childhood Assessment Appropriate for children with and without developmental delay/disability Part C Child Care, Healthy Families, Children’s Services, Early Head Start Crosswalk with SPP/APR child outcomes

Goal Develop the Early Childhood Assessment (ISTAR Basic 1, Basic 2 and Functional Skills) into a comprehensive system for all children - including those who are “typically developing” as well as those identified with a disability and served in Part C. Develop one assessment tool that could be aligned with all reporting requirements: Indiana Part C Outcomes Indiana’s academic standards SPP/APR child outcomes

Indiana GSEG Proposal Priority A: Outcome Measures Focus Area One: Developing or enhancing Part B State outcomes indicators and methods to collect and analyze Part B outcome indicator Focus Area Two: Developing or enhancing Part C State outcome indicators and methods to collect and analyze Part C outcome indicators

Indiana GSEG Proposal The GSEG project will allow Indiana to develop a comprehensive statewide assessment that will serve multiple accountability purposes: State pre-academic, academic and functional skills standards Part C assessment domains – social-emotional, cognitive, physical, communication and self-help

Indiana GSEG Proposal Serve as Indiana’s accountability measure for reporting State performance Plan (SPP) and Annual Performance Report (APR) requirements: Social-emotional skills Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

ISTAR ISTEP+ Early Childhood Assessment Table 1: Description of Indiana’s Proposed Statewide Assessment System Early Childhood Assessment ISTAR ISTEP+ Current Status  To be aligned, normed, and validated as a result of GSEG Already developed and validated SPP/APR Targets  Social-Emotional Skills, Use of knowledge, and Appropriate Behaviors Meeting AYP Targets Assessment Domains  Social-Emotional, Cognitive, Physical Development, Self-Help and Communication and Literacy English/Language Art, Mathematics, Functional English/Language Art, Mathematics Age Range  Birth-5 Kdgn and Relevant NCLB Grades Kdgn Relevant NCLB Grades Content  Pre-academic, Academic, and Functional skills Academic and Functional skills Academic skills Target Group  Typically Developing and Children with Disabilities Students with Disabilities Typically Developing and Students with Disabilities

Objective 1 - Alignment Activities Identify and align Part C and Part B-619 performance indicators with items and domains of the Early Childhood Assessment within the context of the Indiana academic standards, SPP/APR, and Part C assessment requirements.

Objective 2 - Assessment and Validation Activities Establish norms for typically developing children and children with disabilities. Demonstrate reliability and validity of the Early Childhood Assessment in relation to Part C and Part B-619 performance indicators related to state academic standards and SPP/APR of outcomes.

Objective 2 - Assessment and Validation Activities Focus on addressing SPP/APR performance indicators intended to measure: The extent which schools facilitate parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities (Part B-619) Families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family know rights, effectively communicate their child’s needs, and have helped their children develop and learn

Objective 3 - Reporting Activities Implementation of a web-based reporting system capable of monitoring the progress of infants, toddlers and children with disabilities in critical SPP/APR performance indicator areas as well as within the context of state academic standards and Part C assessment requirements. This objective builds upon the state’s current comprehensive system of web-based monitoring and reporting.

Objective 4 - Training Activities Conduct statewide training and professional development efforts necessary to ensure that project objectives related to alignment, assessment and validation, and reporting activities are implemented and embedded into local improvement and accountability efforts.

Plans for Implementation Assemble Project Advisory Group. Stakeholders representing Part B and C service providers, special education and related services personnel, Part C ICC, state assessment and standardization specialists, Institute of Higher Education, parents of children and youth with disabilities, advocates and others

Plans for Implementation - Alignment Alignment based on the methods of alignment analyses developed by Norman Webb (Webb, 1999)

Table 2: Description of Indiana’s Alignment Activities SPP/APR Requirements   Positive social-emotional skills Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills  Use of appropriate behaviors Indiana Academic Standards   English/Language Arts (Word Recognition, Comprehension, Literacy, Writing, Listening, Speaking)  Mathematics (Number Sense, Computation, Algebra, Geometry, Measurement, Data Analysis, Problem Solving)  Speech (Social Interaction, Comprehension, Expressive Communication, Intelligibility) Part C Assessment Domains   Social/Emotional  Cognitive  Physical Development  Self-Help  Communication and Literacy

Plan of implementation – Assessment & Validation Recruit 30-40 qualified early childhood educators to administer instruments and collect assessment data Stratified sample – 350 typically developing children and 350 infants, toddlers and children with disabilities served in Part c and Part B-619 programs (N=700)

Plan of implementation – Assessment & Validation Administer child assessments (Early Childhood Assessment and others - TBD) Collect NCSEAM Parent Surveys – expected sample size – 1000 families Analysis of data to assess the overall integrity of the Early Childhood Assessment with regard to identifying which items or clusters of items best measure academic standards, Part C developmental domains and SPP/APR performance indicators

Plans for Implementation - Reporting Activities Training activities associated with efforts to report information to various audiences (public reporting, academic standards, SPP/APR) On-line assessments over secure internet Generating graphs and custom reports

Plans for Implementation - Training Part C and Part B-619 provider/educator trainings Assessment training Report Training On-going technical assistance

Evaluation University of Minnesota’s Institute on Community Integration (ICI) to conduct evaluation activities in two key areas Performance Measurement Impact Measurement