Topic #3 - CRITICAL THINKING Key Evidence 1 Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
Advertisements

SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Dr Ronni Michelle Greenwood Autumn  Introduction  Method  Results  Discussion.
The Essence of Critical Thinking the reasoned identification and evaluation of evidence to guide decision making analysis the form and content of evidence.
Critical Thinking In Every Classroom Teaching Academy: New Faculty Orientation August 11, 2007.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
Minnesota State Community and Technical College Critical Thinking Assignment Example and Assessment.
Critical Thinking in Every Classroom Progress and Plans.
Using Rubrics to Evaluate Assessments Kim Anderson Course Evaluation Subcommittee Chair Summer 2009.
Education 3504 Week 3 reliability & validity observation techniques checklists and rubrics.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
HOW TO EXCEL ON ESSAY EXAMS San José State University Writing Center Dr. Jim Lobdell.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Daniel Fasko, Jr., Ph.D..  Definition of Critical Thinking  Critical Thinking Skills  Critical Thinking Dispositions  Instructional Strategies  Assessment.
The Business Skills Handbook
Assessment of Ethics Jones College of Business MTSU July 29, 2015.
Assessed: 5 Cycles 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013.
-SLO Development Progress -SLO Activity -Assessment Progress -Support Needs.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Lecture 3 THE KEY SKILLS TESTED IN A DISSERTATION.
6/4/2007Admissions General Education At Widener Scott Van Bramer – A&S Sue Greenberg - SBA.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Topic #4 - EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Evidence: PowerPoint of Key Evidence Produced by AC Office of Outcomes Assessments 1.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
1 st Quarter Self- Reflection English I. The Grade Profile The purpose of a grade profile is to give students the opportunity to take responsibility for.
Topic #2 – FIRST-GENERATION Students Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
A Checklist for Reasoning & Questions Using the Elements of Thought
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Critical Thinking in the Classroom FAU Faculty Workshop March 19, 2004 Lynn Appleton, Associate Dean Robin Jordan, Professor of Physics Timothy Lenz, Director,
Researching and Writing Dissertations Roy Horn Researching and Writing Dissertations.
Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness April 25, 2011 QEP DATA ANALYSIS.
1 Orientation 101 General Education Program Student Learning Outcomes.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Unit 5 Seminar D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
BLHC4032 CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING SIX STEPS OF CRITICAL THINKING.
Performance Assessment of Critical Thinking: The Dolphin Dilemma Task Yigal Rosen, Ph.D. Sr. Research Scientist Pearson Knowledge Technologies.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Instructions for Socials 10 Exam JUNE Part 1: Note Taking (Suggested Time 30 Minutes) Using the resource package, prepare comprehensive notes as.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning
IE 102 Lecture 6 Critical Thinking.
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
PD Monday March 14, 2016.
General Education Assessment
General Education Assessment
Director, Institutional Research
The Heart of Student Success
Faculty In-Service Week
AICE General Paper What IS this class?.
Use this AC Library database to practice critical thinking skills
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Use this AC Library database to practice critical thinking skills
Presentation transcript:

Topic #3 - CRITICAL THINKING Key Evidence 1 Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments

Critical Thinking: General Education Competency Amarillo College uses an embedded assessment approach across the college to assess four general education competencies including critical thinking. Instructors from all areas/campuses submit student work for assessment. Target is to assess100 samples of student work per year. 2

Critical Thinking Rubric Standards Upon completion of a minimum of 30 credit hours taken at Amarillo College, a student should be able to demonstrate the successful application of higher order analytical and creative cognitive processes. Benchmark: 60% of students must attain a rubric level of 3 or better Assess the assigned task as: –Exemplary (5) –Excellent (4) –Competent (3) –Needs work (2) –Unacceptable (1) 3

Explanation of Critical Thinking Rubric: 60% will score in 3, 4 or 5 5 (Exemplary) Consistently does all or almost all of the following: Innovative interpretation of evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc. Identifies exceptional arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con. Presents superior explanations of complex analyses and values alternative problem-solving methods. Draws well-supported, logical conclusions which follow a logical chain of thought. Follows the evidence and creatively presents clear, unambiguous conclusions from the evidence and reasons presented. 4 (Excellent) Consistently does all or almost all of the following: Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view. Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons. Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead. 3 (Competent) Does most or many of the following: Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc. Identifies relevant arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con. Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view. Draws warranted, non- fallacious conclusions. Justifies some results or procedures, explains reasons. Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead. 4

Explanation of Critical Thinking Rubric (cont.) 2 (Needs work)Does most or many of the following: Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc. Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Justifies few results or procedures, seldom explains reasons. Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views based on self-interest or preconceptions. 1 (Unacceptable) Consistently does all or almost all of the following: Offers biased interpretations of evidence, statements, graphics, questions, information, or the points of view of others. Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. Argues using fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims. Does not justify results or procedures, nor explain reasons. Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views based on self –interest or preconceptions. Exhibits close-mindedness or rigid thinking. 5

Assessment of General Education Competency: Critical Thinking Findings Goal (Benchmark): –60% of 100 students will score a 3 or higher (“competent”) Results: – (N=91) ** 96% of students scored a 3 or higher –Scoring system was changed mid-year – (N=97) ** 95% of students scored a 3 or higher ** Met goal but no specific strengths or suggestions for improvements provided No specific strengths or suggestions for improvements provided o specific strengths or suggestions for improvements provided 6

Assessment of General Education Competency: Critical Thinking Scores Committee Evaluation Exemplary (5) Excellent (4) Competent (3) Needs Work (2) Unacceptable (1) # Students Assessed Yr: % 63%27%4%0% Yr: % 59%18%4%1% No specific strengths or suggestions for improvements provided 7

Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) 2009 Results for Amarillo College relevant to Critical Thinking 8

CCSSE Faculty/Student Responses StatementFacultyStudents During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize memorizing facts, ideas, or methods so students can repeat them in pretty much the same form Very Little13%8% Some32%30% Quite a bit37%38% Very Much18%25% During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Very Little4%6% Some15%30% Quite a bit49%43% Very Much32%20% During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways Very Little4%9% Some25%35% Quite a bit41%38% Very Much30%18% How often do students in your selected course section work on a paper that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources Never29%21% Sometimes29%34% Often23%32% Very Often19%13% 9

CCSSE Faculty/Student Responses (cont.) StatementFacultyStudent During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods Very Little11%17% Some29%36% Quite a bit38%33% Very Much22%14% During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Very Little4%12% Some26%36% Quite a bit35%36% Very Much35%17% During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize having students use information they have read or heard to perform a new skill Very Little10%8% Some23%34% Quite a bit34%37% Very Much34%21% 10

CCSSE Faculty/Student Responses (cont’d) StatementFacultyStudent To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in thinking critically and analytically None1% 0% Very little3%4% Some9%22% Quite a bit39%43% Very much48%31% To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in solving numerical problems None20% 0% Very little25%7% Some17%21% Quite a bit13%39% Very much25%32% 11

CCSSE AC Students to Large Colleges and all CCSSE Cohorts Statement ACLarge Colleges CCSSE Cohort How often do students in your selected course section work on a paper that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources Never21.1%11.1%11.2% Sometimes33.9%28.3%28.7% Often32.2%37.2% Very often12.9%23.4%23.0% During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Very little6.2%4.8%5.0% Some30.3%27.5%28.4% Quite a bit43.5%43.3%43.1% Very much20.1%24.4%23.5% During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways Very little9.2%7.8%7.5% Some35.1%33.0%33.5% Quite a bit37.5%38.4%38.7% Very much18.2%20.8%20.4% During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods Very little16.7%12.7%12.4% Some35.9%36.0%36.5% Quite a bit33.3%34.0%34.1% Very much14.1%17.4%17.0% 12

CCSSE AC Students to Large Colleges and all CCSSE Cohorts Statement ACLarge Colleges CCSSE Cohort During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize having students use information they have read or heard to perform a new skill Very little8.1%9.7%8.9% Some33.9%30.8%30.5% Quite a bit 36.8%35.6%36.1% Very much 21.2%23.9%24.5% To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in thinking critically and analytically Very little3.5%7.0%6.4% Some21.8%25.8%25.2% Quite a bit 43.4%41.1%41.8% Very much 31.2%26.1%26.6% To what extent do students' experiences in your selected course section contribute to their knowledge, skills, and personal development in solving numerical problems Very little7.2%17.0%16.1% Some21.0%29.4%29.3% Quite a bit 39.4%33.0%33.7% Very much 32.4%20.7%20.9% During the current school year, how much does the coursework in your selected course section emphasize applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Very little11.5%10.4%10.0% Some36.4%34.0%34.2% Quite a bit 35.5%35.4%35.8% Very much 16.6%20.2%20.0% 13

Mean Scores Compared to Large Colleges * AC average score was significantly different when compared to other large colleges. 14 StatementAC Mean Large College Sig* During the current school year, how much has your coursework at this college emphasized the following mental activities? (1=Very Little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much) Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your courses and readings so you can repeat them in pretty much the same form Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill How much has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? (1=Very little, 2=Some, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much) Thinking critically and analytically Solving numerical problems *

Questions Kara Larkan-Skinner Director of Outcomes Assessments Copyright Amarillo College 2009