Risk and Needs Assessments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Reducing Recidivism Reducing the Rate and Use of Incarceration Reducing Recidivism Reducing the Rate and Use of Incarceration What Works and Best Practices.
Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Individual Risk and Need Assessment in Criminal Justice Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency Criminal Justice Advisory Board Conference State.
Practical Application of the ORAS The Corrections Institute Center for Criminal Justice Research University of Cincinnati.
1 Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Judge.
Classification and Supervision: Techniques of Evidence-Based Practices
Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: What Works with Offenders? Rita Dries July 2006.
Positive Achievement Change Tool (PACT)
Sex Offender Treatment US Probation Central California Presented by Helene Creager, LCSW Supervisor & Mental Health Coordinator US Probation Central District.
Sex offenders: Treatment & risk assessment
Reentry Strategies for Tribal Communities Presented by: Tracy Mullins, Senior Research Associate & Kimberly Cobb, Research Associate American Probation.
Providers of Intensive Transitional Support Pre and Post Release for Men Leaving the Prison System in Southern Tasmania.
Evidence Based Practices and Risk-Need-Responsivity The Problem Solving Court Context Sarah Fritsche, Center for Court Innovation Presented at the 2014.
Sex Offenders. Sex Offenders… Contact Offenders – male victims Contact Offenders – female victims Non-contact Offenders – paraphilia Rapists Child molesters.
GUIDEPOSTS FOR DECISION-MAKING
Forensic Evaluation of Sex Offenders Standards of Practice & Community Safety Hawaii Psychological Association November 9, 2009 Marvin W. Acklin, PhD,
ASSESSMENTS OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS THROUGH EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
JUVENILE SEX OFFENDER ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL J-SOAP II WJCIA ANNUAL CONFERENCE THURSDAY, SEPT STEVENS POINT, WISCONSIN.
THE COALITION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROVIDERS OF NEW JERSEY The Role of Community Resource Centers in Offender Re-entry.
Psychopathy, Violence Risk Assessment, and the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Mark Hastings, Jeff Stuewig, Amy Drapalski, & June Tangney George.
What Works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism with Youthful Offenders: Understanding the Principles of Effective Intervention Presented by: Edward.
Assessment of Risk and Need
Specialized Populations: When is ORAS not enough? The Corrections Institute Center for Criminal Justice Research University of Cincinnati.
Identifying Areas That Need To Be Assessed
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
What Works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: The Principles of Effective Intervention: Presented by: Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. Center for Criminal.
Offender Rehabilitation
The Iowa Delinquency Assessment Tool
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
Improving Reentry Efforts: What Works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism Presented by: Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. School of Criminal Justice University.
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
2 in 5 prison and jail inmates lack a high school diploma or its equivalent. Employment rates and earnings histories of people in prisons and jails are.
CREATING SAFETY Supervision Of Juvenile Sexual Abusers in the Community Risky Business Conference 2015 Brian Nissen--LBSW.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Shaping the Future of Transition Office of Transition Services NC Department of Correction May 2007.
What Works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: A Primer on Evidence Based Practices Presented by: Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. School of Criminal Justice.
TREATMENT OF THE JUVENILE OFFENDER CONCLUSIONS FROM THEORY AND RESEARCH DR. ROBERT D. HOGE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY CARLETON UNIVERSITY OTTAWA, ONTARIO.
True taxon or the end of the continuum
Introduction Overview of the ASUS-R  The Adult Substance Use Survey - Revised (ASUS-R; Wanberg, 2004) is a self-report screening tool intended to:  identify.
Assessment Tools and Community Supervision of Sexual Offenders Robin J. Wilson, PhD, ABPP Chris Thomson, M.A.
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Presented by Sarah Boettner PCC LSW
Offender Risk Management Model Community Forum Teal Maedel Psychologist Vancouver Parole RCMP Behavioural Sciences Group.
Connecticut Department of Correction Parole & Community Services Division Assessments Overview.
Culture of Control. Current culture Current trend in CJ - tougher laws, harsher punishment Garland (2001) states that this trend is the result of the.
How do we know whether criminals will re-offend?.
PERSONAL WELLNESS: Taking Charge of Your Health and Well-being.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
What works: Principles of effective approaches to delinquency prevention and intervention Wisconsin Juvenile Court Intake Association Conference September.
Reducing Recidivism and Promoting Recovery: Implications of National and State Trends for Improving Treatment Programs Alexa Eggleston, J.D. Program Director,
Offender Assessment Utilizing the Risk-Need- Responsivity Model A web presentation for RSAT - T&TA by Roberta C. Churchill -ACJS.
Liam Ennis, Ph.D., R.Psych INTEGRATED THREAT AND RISK ASSESSMENT CENTRE/ ALBERTA LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE TEAMS Using the Principles of Risk, Need, and.
Case 1: Arthur Age 45: Convicted of indecent assault x4 against niece Background Oldest child in family - 2 younger sisters Unhappy childhood: Physically.
What Works in Reducing Recidivism: Some Lessons I have Learned over the Years Evaluating Correctional Programs By: Edward Latessa School of Criminal Justice.
Sex Offender Reentry Amy Bess Offender Rehabilitation – Spring 2015.
Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice
Sexual Offender Treatment (SOT) New Approaches, New Knowledge
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Sexual Offenders Chapter 6.
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
What works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned from Evaluating Correctional Programs By: Edward Latessa School of Criminal Justice.
Sarah L. Desmarais, Ph.D. North Carolina State University
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP
Presentation transcript:

Risk and Needs Assessments Presented by: Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. School of Criminal Justice University of Cincinnati Edward.Latessa@uc.edu www.uc.edu/criminaljustice

Assessment is the engine that drives effective correctional programs Need to meet the risk and need principle Reduces bias Aids decision making Helps better utilize resources Allows you to target dynamic risk factors and measure change

Risk Principle: “Who” to Target with Intensive Programs Target those offender with higher probability of recidivism Provide most intensive treatment to higher risk offenders Intensive treatment for lower risk offender can increase recidivism

Low Risk 1 out of 10 will re-offend You do not know which person will re-offend. Do you treat all 10 the same to make sure no one is missed? $$$$$$$$$ Treatment and Supervision Resources

High Risk 5 out of 10 will re-offend You do not know which person will re-offend. Do you treat all 10 the same to make sure no one is missed? $$$$$$$$$ Treatment and Supervision Resources

The Risk Principle & Correctional Intervention Results from Meta Analysis Dowden & Andrews, 1999

The Need Principle: The “What” to Target Assess & targeting criminogenic needs for change Criminogenic needs are those risk factors that are correlated with criminal conduct and can change Non-Criminogenic needs are those needs that offenders have that are not strongly correlated with criminal conduct, but maybe barriers

Need Principle Criminogenic Anti social attitudes Anti social friends Substance abuse Lack of empathy Impulsive behavior Lack of self-control Non-Criminogenic Housing Anxiety Low self esteem Creative abilities Medical needs Physical conditioning

Major Set of Risk/Need Factors Antisocial/pro-criminal attitudes, values, beliefs and cognitive emotional states Pro-criminal associates and isolation from anticriminal others Temperamental and anti social personality patterns conducive to criminal activity including: Weak socialization Impulsivity Adventurous Restless/aggressive Egocentrism A taste for risk Weak problem-solving/self-regulation & coping skills 4. A history of antisocial behavior

Major Set of Risk/Need Factors Cont. Familial factors that include criminality and a variety of psychological problems in the family of origin including Low levels of affection, caring, and cohesiveness Low levels of personal, educational, vocational, or financial achievement Low levels of involvement in prosocial leisure activities Substance Abuse

To Understand Assessment it is Important to Understand Types of Risk Factors

Dynamic and Static Factors Static Factors are those factors that are related to risk and do not change. Some examples might be number of prior offenses, whether an offender has ever had a drug/alcohol problem. Dynamic factors relate to risk and can change. Some examples are whether an offender is currently unemployed or currently has a drug/alcohol problem.

Family history of heart attacks Gender (males) Age (over 50) According to the American Heart Association, there are a number of risk factors that increase your chances of a first heart attack Family history of heart attacks Gender (males) Age (over 50) Inactive lifestyle Over weight High blood pressure Smoking High Cholesterol level

There are two types of dynamic risk factors Acute – Can change quickly Stable – Take longer to change

Dynamic Risk Factors and Their Importance Also called criminogenic needs Changing these factors changes the probability of recidivism Provide the basis for developing a treatment plan Address factors that will reduce risk Lead to public safety

Classification & Assessment of Offenders Primary measures have been identified Best predictors of criminal behavior: Static factors – past criminal behavior Dynamic factors – crime producing needs Best assessment method is the actuarial (statistical) approach Best practices allow for risk management and risk reduction through effective treatment Latest generation of instruments allow for measurement of change in offender

Some Examples of Assessment Tools

Wisconsin Risk & Need Assessment

Psychopathy Checklist (Hare Psychopathy) Glib/superficial charm Grandiose sense of self Stimulation seeking Pathological lying Conning/manipulation Lack of remorse/guilt Shallow affect Callousness/lack empathy Parasitic lifestyle Poor behavioral control Promiscuous sexual behavior Early behavioral problems Lack of realistic goals Impulsivity Irresponsibility Not accepting responsibility Many marital relationships Juvenile delinquency Conditional release revoked Criminal versatility

One New Non-Proprietary System is the ORAS The Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) consists of several instruments: Pretrial Community Supervision (plus screener) Prison Intake Reentry

ORAS-CST Intake Assessment

Finalized Report Barriers to Service VH High Med Low Low motivation to obtain employment Transportation—No valid license Mental Health—Needs evaluation High

Applying the Risk and Responsivity Principles High Contact Frequency More intensive interventions More targets for change Minimize exposure to low risk Use cost-benefit tools Set long-term goal(s) Motivational Interviewing strategies Help problem solve transportation Make referral/appointment to MH evaluation—making sure plan addresses transportation Barriers to Services Low motivation to change substance abuse behavior Transportation—No valid license Mental Health—Needs evaluation

Applying the Need Principle Disrupt criminal peer networks Increase prosocial contacts Employment readiness – Target attitudes that support employment Target attitudes towards driving w/o license What To Avoid Disrupting/Targeting Minimize conditions associated with these areas Monitor for compliance only Do Not Target with any Treatment Interventions unless circumstances change Increase prosocial attitudes Target Problem Solving Decrease attitudes supporting aggressiveness

Reliability is Very Important Are staff consistent in scoring? Inter-rater reliability Training Experience

Predictive Validity of the LSI-R & Assessor Experience with the Instrument

Some things to consider What do I want to use it for? Length of time needed to complete Training Cost Complexity When will it be done? Where will it be done? Who will do it? Level of staff commitment Is assessment reliable? Is assessment valid?

Build in Policies Around Professional Discretion Also known as the override principle Consider all the information and determine if placements dictated by assessment are the most appropriate Generally should not exceed 10%.

Some things to remember There is no “one size fits all” assessment tool some domains or types of offenders will require specialized assessments (such as sex offenders) use or purpose will vary Actuarial assessment is more accurate than clinical assessment, but no process is perfect Assessment helps guide decisions, doesn’t make them --professional discretion is part of good assessment Reliability is more difficult to achieve with dynamic instruments – requires training of staff and continual monitoring of assessment process