Avoiding Expensive Mistakes: Moving toward learner- centered teaching Nancy S. Shapiro April 9, 2007 University System of Maryland

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT WE HAVE LEARNED ABOUT QUALITY AND COST? The factors that lead to increased student learning and increased student.
Advertisements

Student Success in Mathematics: Guiding Principles
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Supporting Team-Based Learning Dr. Kathryn R. Ross, Indiana University Kokomo Team-Based Learning Conference 2007, Vancouver, Canada Copyright 2007 Kathryn.
Planning and Implementation Workshop 1/8/2013. In general--to position you for implementation of your project Develop an implementation plan and understand.
Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
Matching applicants to the best courses - UCAS Entry Profiles and feedback to students Geoff Ramshaw Policy Executive Policy and Communications Department.
Studying Higher Education Change and Sustainability Efforts in the Context of K-16 Partnerships American Educational Research Association April 12, 2007.
Welcome to the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Advising 1001.
Teaching, Learning, and Assessing Peggy Maki Senior Scholar, Assessing for Learning AAHE
Guidelines and Methods for Assessing Student Learning Karen Bauer, Institutional Research & Planning, Undergraduate Studies; Gabriele Bauer, CTE.
21st Century Learning Summer Conference August 12-14, 2009 Canmore, Alberta Sharon Friesen, PhD.
University of Delaware Presentation at Academy of Lifelong Learning August 29, 2002 Problem-Based Learning: A Student-Centered Approach for Engagement.
Increasing Student Academic Success Through Interactive Learning Presented by: Dr. Barbara M. Montgomery Colorado State University-Pueblo Colorado, USA.
Assessment-rich instructional technology to promote learning-centered and inquiry-oriented pedagogies: Coupling transformation and scalability
University of Delaware PBL Faculty Institute, University of Cincinnati November 1, 2001 An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for Transforming.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
University of Delaware Plenary Presentation at September Institute Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning University of Cincinnati September.
Student-centered learning: principles, benefits, challenges, levels of implementation Pusa Nastase, CEU, Budapest Matyas Szabo, CEU, Budapest PASCL Training.
University of Delaware Experience It Yourself: An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson.
Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
Student Engagement: Promoting Better Learning Rick Vaz Associate Dean Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, Massachusetts,
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
/ 181 InstrutionalMethods. Aim The purpose of this session is to increase the effectiveness of the trainings that are prepared by the participants, by.
Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)
Student Success Factors Faculty In-Service Program Tuesday, August 25.
Turning a Disciplinary Lens to Teaching and Learning Preparing Tomorrow’s Professionals for a Complex World The integrity of the discipline leads to a.
Student Centered Learning
1 Assessment as Learning Presented at the Teaching & Learning Innovations 17 th Annual Conference University of Guelph May 12, 2004 Peggy Maki, Ph.D.
Cabrillo College Emerging Scholars Institute Draft Proposal Update Spring 2008.
IMPROVING GRADES, COMPREHENSION and INTEREST in DEVELOPMENTAL MATH COURSES Paola Di Muro - Brandon University NADE 2009.
17 th January 2010Denise Adams and Sarah Cousins Supporting first year undergraduate students to make smooth transitions to university and apply their.
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Planning and Implementation Workshop 1/19/2012.  Lumina Course Redesign Awardees ◦ 2 Community Colleges ◦ 1 Non-USM Public ◦ 1 Independent Institution.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Research Findings: Good Practices in Student Retention and the First Year Experience Robert D. Reason Assistant Professor and Research Associate Foundations.
National Science Foundation PD Led Workshops – Session B: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Louis Everett Susan Finger Don Millard Russ.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
College of Science and Engineering Learning and Teaching Strategy Planning Meeting Initial Reflections Nick Hulton.
Key Issues in Recruiting and Retaining Underrepresented Students in STEM Pat Marsteller Director, Hughes Science Initiatives Director, Emory Center for.
Faculty Engagement in Partnership Work Nancy S. Shapiro University System of Maryland AACU 2007.
Susan DeMatteo June 13, 2013 Putting EOF on the Map! Mapping Strategies for Assessment Design.
Get To Know FTLA WLAC Tech Fair - May 8, 2014 Lisa Saperston, Arnita Porter, John Bowman.
1 Orientation Session at 2003 Assessment Conference A Richer and More Coherent Set of Assessment Practices Peggy L. Maki Senior Scholar Assessing for Learning.
Susan Elrod, Project Kaleidoscope at AAC&U FIPSE Project Director’s Meeting November 7, 2011 Washington, DC
ID AND LEARNING THEORY Chapter 13
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Learning and Transfer This is Chapter 3 in the very useful book: National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Promote a diverse, inclusive learning environment by recruiting and retaining students, faculty and staff who reflect the demographic changes in our society.
Achieve Personal Success Understand how to achieve employee success.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
STACY WENZEL, PHD LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND MATH EDUCATION Educational Research Useful for College Instructors Using Ballooning.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Student Success in Mathematics: Guiding Principles Shahla Peterman University of Missouri-St. Louis Math Technology Learning Center.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Subject specialist teaching
Adult learning Dr. A. M. Kadri Associate Professor,
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Employee Training & Development
The Heart of Student Success
WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT WE HAVE LEARNED ABOUT QUALITY AND COST? The factors that lead to increased student learning and increased student.
Presentation transcript:

Avoiding Expensive Mistakes: Moving toward learner- centered teaching Nancy S. Shapiro April 9, 2007 University System of Maryland

Why the students we have are not the students we want  Over 25% of freshmen in 4 year college do not return for sophomore year  Over 40% of freshmen in 2 year colleges do not return for sophomore year  60% of high school students say they cheat on tests  90% of high school students say they copied someone’s homework  Most spend less than 4 hours a week on homework.  John Tagg, The Learning Paradigm College, pp

What do we know about learning?  New science of learning Learning with understanding Pre-existing knowledge Active learning  Deep learning vs. surface learning Deep learning is active/surface learning is inert Deep learning is holistic/surface learning is atomistic Deep learning integrates/surface learning externalizes National Academies, How People Learn, p John Tagg, Learning Paradigm College, p. 81.

Implications for teaching and institutional priorities “Deep Learning”  Emphasizes intrinsic goals  High levels of cognitive activity, highest rewards for high cost activities, deep approaches, complex cognition  High ration of feedback to evaluation  Long time horizons; decisions bear consequences in the long run  Strong support community  Institutional behavior consistent, aligned with learning mission. “Surface Learning”  Emphasizes extrinsic goals  Low level of cognitive activity; high rewards for low cost activities; surface approaches, retention  Low ration of feedback to evaluation  Short time horizon: decisions bear consequences in the short run  Weak support community  Institutional behavior aligned with “instruction” mission or misaligned. John Tagg, Learning Paradigm College, p. 101.

Creating conditions for student success in college: DEEP Project  Lay out a path to success—students need to know what to expect (orientation, communication, intro to college courses)  Frontload resources to smooth transition (mentors, tutors, peer groups)  If activities are important, consider requiring certain learning activities (study abroad, service learning, student-faculty research)  Create reward structures congruent with mission and priorities.

Lessons Learned from DEEP continued  Improve performance through frequent feedback  Experiment with engaging pedagogies and active learning  Use electronic technologies to enhance active learning  Create company of peers outside the class through study groups and learning communities  George Kuh, Student Success in College, pp

Principles of Course Redesign  Define the problem to be solved  Analyze, deconstruct and document the resources currently used to teach the course  Redesign the whole course  Encourage active learning  Provide students with individualized assistance  Build in ongoing formative assessment  Ensure sufficient time on task and monitor students National Academic Course Transformation Project,

Why move toward learner-centered teaching?  All learning involves transfer from previous experiences.  Ability to transfer what they have learned to new situations provides an important index of adaptive flexible learning.  Active learning promotes understanding and understanding is more likely to promote transfer than memorizing information.  Transfer of learning is an active process.  Major goal of schooling is to prepare students for flexible adaptation to new problems in new settings.

For Further Reference  Kuh, G. et al. (2005). Student Success in College. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.  National Academies. (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: Author.  Shulman, L. S. (2004). Teaching as Community Property. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.  Tagg, J. (2003). The Learning Paradigm College. Bolton: Ankar Publishing Co.  Twigg, C.A. (2005). Increasing Success for Underserved Students: Redesigning Introductory Courses. Saratoga Springs: National Center for Academic Transformation.