Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call 1-866-740-1260 enter access.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Katie A. Agreement Child Welfare and Mental Health working together will provide:  Intensive home and community based mental health services to children.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Common Core 3.0 Update Project Overview and Status Timeline for Completion Evaluation.
A New Practice Model for Child Welfare
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models The Service Array Process National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
DEVELOPMENT OF TRAUMA-INFORMED PRACTICE IN SAN DIEGO Debra Zanders-Willis.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Service Planning Block Stakeholder feedback. Agenda Welcome Orientation Acknowledgements Overview of Common Core 3.0 Overview of Service Planning Block.
ADVANCED LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR SUPERVISORS (ALDS) PROGRAM YEAR 1 IMPLEMENTATION MARCH 2010 – FEBRUARY 2011 PILOT PROGRAM.
Common Core 3.0 Learning Objectives for Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter.
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models Steven Preister, Associate Director National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Outline of Presentation 1.Mission, Vision and Values for Task Force 2.Definition of Engagement 3.Explanation of Research-Informed Framework 4.Characteristics.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
What is a Family Connections Program? An Overview of a New Service Approach Being Developed by the Bay Area Residentially Based Services Consortium.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
COUNTY PARTNERSHIP TO MEET SKILL NEEDS & ENHANCE TRANSFER CLIMATE The Ohio Child Welfare Training Program.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
PowerPoint Presentation for Family Finding: Evaluation.
Making Small but Significant Changes. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this module participants will be able to: Understand how protective factors.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Mental Health Consultation Building capacity to meet the social emotional needs of children and families Presenters: Katie Schlipmann, Margo Camacho, Charice.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
1 Child and Family Teaming Module 2 The Child and Family Team Meeting: Preparation, Facilitation, and Follow-up.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
1 Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
OACCA Residential Transformation Conference
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Office of Children's Services
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview of the California Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM)
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Case Management Pre-Service Curriculum Specialty Track
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Florida’s Child Welfare Practice Model
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Presentation transcript:

Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access code

Contact information Melissa Connelly

Feedback Process Give a brief look at the current training for new social workers Explain why we want to revise core Explain the concept for the revision Briefly review the content Consider resource and capacity implications Give you a link to a survey where you can provide your feedback

Common Core What is it? What does it look like now? How is it working?

Current Common Core Developed 8-10 years ago (rolled out in 2005) 7 topics with standardized curricula and 14 topics with standardized learning objectives Doesn’t really train skill – mostly works on knowledge Topic based Meets federal and state requirements Meets evaluation goals (trainees do learn in class!)

Why Revise Core? Improved flexibilityImproved learning experienceBetter use of technologyBetter reflect practice changes

Principles of the Revision Focus more on the skills beginning social workers need – clear out other content Train in ways that work for more social workers – include classes, on-the-job, and computer training Make sure content works for all counties Meet federal requirements (as outlined in the CFSR and the Program Improvement Plans completed by California in 2004 and 2009)

Common Core 3.0 Concept Link to practice Practice skills in the field Reinforce skills Divide content into practice blocks and link to actual social work activities Give basic content in the classroom or on the computer and then have on- the-job activities to practice new skills Come back after some experience on-the-job to refine skills

Common Core 3.0 Content is divided into 6 blocks Each block has 100 level online trainings and classroom training After the trainee completes the 100 level, there are on-the-job activities to complete for each block After the field activities, there is an additional class in each block called the 200 level

Practice-based training Training centers on 6 key practice blocks Training makes the classroom to field connection Multi-modal Online, classroom, and field learning Uses modality to make best use of training time Logical Sequence Each content block builds on the next Field work linked to classroom content 200 level ties it all together

Resource Implications In developing Common Core 3.0, the revision team identified the following assumptions about the resources that would be required to implement core These assumptions should be considered as implementation will not be possible if they can’t be met

Resource Implications Counties will provide field supports. This may include supervisors acting as field advisors for new staff Field advisors will do the following: –a–arrange specific field experiences for trainees –d–discuss field experiences with trainees –o–observe some field activities –c–complete documentation related to successful completion of field activities The field activities are typical social work activities and likely would be included in typical supervision of new employees. The field advisor will have additional documentation related to field activities for new social workers.

Field advisors (supervisors) will receive training. Prior to serving as a field advisor supervisors (or other staff designated as field advisors) will receive training on the Common Core 3.0 content and on the role of field advisor. This training will include a focus on coaching as a training modality.

Trainees will have time and support to complete non-classroom content. As part of the new social worker training process, trainees will have time designated for completion of approximately 26.5 hours of online modules for Common Core and time in the field to complete 20 field activities.

Counties have capacity for multi-modal delivery (although alternate versions will be available for on-line modules). County leadership, CDSS, and training partners support the use of multi-modal delivery. County leadership, CDSS, and training partners support development and use of systems for tracking completion of online, classroom and field content.

Limited training days County differences Trainee differences Constraints

Practice Blocks FoundationEngagementAssessment Service Planning Monitoring and Adapting Transition

Foundation Block The foundation block focuses on training social workers to recognize laws that govern child welfare in the US and California, it provides some basic training about the computer system and writing and it includes best practices such as teaming and trauma-informed practice that are used in all the practice areas.

Foundation Content Online Values and Ethics (60 min) Federal and State Laws (90 min) Legal Procedures (90 min) Time and Stress Management (60 min) Social Worker Safety (60 min) Intro to CWS Data (60 min) Documentation Practice and Report Writing (120 min) Classroom Orientation to Common Core (1/2 day) Values and Ethics in Practice (1/2 day) Legal Procedures and Responsibilities (1/2 day) Teaming, Collaboration, Trauma, and Transparency (1 day) Fairness and Equity (1/2 day) ICWA and Working with Native American Families and Tribes (1/2 day) Intro to CWS/CMS (1/2 day)

Foundation Content Field Activities Legal Procedures and Responsibilities (4 hrs) Teaming Practice (4 hrs) Advocacy (4 hrs) Social Worker Safety (1 hr) 200 Level Online: ICWA Review and Expert Witness (90 min) Classroom Skill Building (1 day)

Engagement Engagement focuses on training social workers to build strong relationships and partnerships with family members and caregivers to support keeping children safe, improving children’s well-being, and returning children home or making another permanent plan for children.

Engagement Content Online Authority and Courtesy (60 min) Interviewing (90 min) Concurrent Planning (90 min) Classroom Engagement and Interviewing (1 day) Field Activities Interviewing (2 hrs) Engagement (2 hrs) Case Review / Family Finding (1 hr) 200 Level Classroom Skill Building (1 day)

Assessment Assessment focuses on training social workers to gather and assess information about family strengths and needs. This includes looking at important events and underlying causes that may affect the family and their ability to safely care for a child.

Assessment Content Online Investigation and Assessment Overview (120 min) Introduction to Child Development (60 min) Child Maltreatment Identification (120 min) Classroom Critical Thinking and Assessment (1/2 day) Assessment Skills Lab (1 day) Assessing for Key Child Welfare Issues (1 day) Child Maltreatment Identification Skills Practice (1 day)

Field Activities Safety and Risk Assessment in Teams (2 hrs) Completing Assessment Tools (2 hrs) 200 Level Classroom Skill Building (1 day)

Service Planning Service Planning focuses on training social workers to work with families and their supports to build individualized case plans that address safety concerns within the family. We focus on plans that identify and build on family strengths, rely on natural and community supports, consider the history of trauma in the family, and include efforts to ensure child well-being.

Service Planning Content Online Case Planning Basics (90 min) Intentional Visitation (90 min) Classroom Behavioral Objectives (1/2 day) Case Planning and Concurrent Planning in Teams (1/2 day) Field Activities Writing Behavior Based Objectives (1 hr) Team-based Case Planning (1 hr) Engaging Family Members in Case Planning (1 hr) Facilitating Safety Networks (1 hr) 200 Level Classroom Skill Building (1 day)

Monitoring and Adapting Monitoring and Adapting focuses on training social workers to maintain strong relationships and partnerships with family members and caregivers during the life of the case, to be flexible and adapt case plans if they are not working well, and to assess services to make sure families are getting the help they need.

Monitoring and Adapting Content Online Monitoring and Adapting (60 min) Placement (60 min) Classroom Managing the Plan (1/2 day) Placement Safety, Stability, and Well-being (1/2 day) Field Activities Writing Progress Notes on Case Plans (1 hr) Team-based Case Planning (1 hr) Engaging Family Members in Adapting Case Plans (1 hr) Placement Stability (1 hr) 200 level Classroom Skill Building (1 day)

Transition Transition practice focuses on training social workers to work with the family or young adult to move from being supported by the child welfare system to using community and informal support networks.

Transition Content Online Case Closure (60 min) After 18 (60 min) Classroom Transition Practice (1 day) Field Activities Transition in Teams (1 hr) Developing a Transition Plan (1 hr) After 18 Activities (1 hr) 200 Level Classroom Skill Building (1 day)

Contact information Melissa Connelly Next Steps Use the survey link to access the survey and share your feedback

Thank you!!