1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Next generation nonclassical light sources for gravitational wave detectors Stefan Ast, Christoph Baune, Jan Gniesmer, Axel Schönbeck, Christina Vollmer,
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1st ET General meeting, Pisa, November 2008 The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques Stefan Hild and Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
Laser-interferometer application to broadband observations Akito ARAYA (Earthquake Reseach Inst., Univ. of Tokyo, Japan) Broadband observation …. requires.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Burst noise investigation for cryogenic GW detector Hiroshima U. NAOJ Daisuke TATSUMI 3rd Symposium ‐ New Development in Astrophysics through.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
Quantum Noise Measurements at the ANU Sheon Chua, Michael Stefszky, Conor Mow-Lowry, Sheila Dwyer, Ben Buchler, Ping Koy Lam, Daniel Shaddock, and David.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
Status of LCGT and CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and LCGT, CLIO collaborators TAUP2007 Sendai, Japan 2007/9/12.
Interferometer Topologies and Prepared States of Light – Quantum Noise and Squeezing Convenor: Roman Schnabel.
Experiments towards beating quantum limits Stefan Goßler for the experimental team of The ANU Centre of Gravitational Physics.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Experimental Characterization of Frequency Dependent Squeezed Light R. Schnabel, S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, and K. Danzmann.
Generation and Control of Squeezed Light Fields R. Schnabel  S.  Chelkowski  A.  Franzen  B.  Hage  H.  Vahlbruch  N. Lastzka  M.  Mehmet.
Optomechanical Devices for Improving the Sensitivity of Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunnong Zhao for Australian International Gravitational wave Research.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, the University of Tokyo Cryogenic mirrors: the state of the art in interferometeric gravitational.
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1WG1 Meeting, Birmingham 07/2008.
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
Opto-mechanics with a 50 ng membrane Henning Kaufer, A. Sawadsky, R. Moghadas Nia, D.Friedrich, T. Westphal, K. Yamamoto and R. Schnabel GWADW 2012,
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover.
1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR) the University of Tokyo KAGRA face to face meeting University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan 3 August.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
The Status of Advanced LIGO: Light at the end of the Tunnels Jeffrey S. Kissel, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April APS Meeting, Savannah, GA April.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
QND, LSC / Virgo Collaboration Meeting, 2007, HannoverH. Müller-Ebhardt Entanglement between test masses Helge Müller-Ebhardt, Henning Rehbein, Kentaro.
Vibration measurements at KAGRA site
Performance test of KAGRA cryostat at site
Seismic noise and vibration isolation
Overview of the 20K configuration
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
New directions for terrestrial detectors
Performance test of KAGRA cryostat at site
Overview of quantum noise suppression techniques
The Quantum Limit and Beyond in Gravitational Wave Detectors
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Radiation shield vibration measurement at KAGRA site
Yet another SQL? Tobias Westphal
MIT Corbitt, Goda, Innerhofer, Mikhailov, Ottaway, Pelc, Wipf Caltech
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Vibration measurements at KAGRA site
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen February 2004
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Quantum Optics and Macroscopic Quantum Measurement
Optical Squeezing For Next Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors Michael Stefszky, Sheon Chua, Conor Mow-Lowry, Ben Buchler, Kirk McKenzie,
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques
Presentation transcript:

1 Kazuhiro Yamamoto Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover Fundamental noise of interferometric gravitational wave detector (Seismic noise and Quantum noise) 7 May degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy

2 7 May 2010 (Morning) Thermal noise 7 May 2010 (Morning) Seismic noise, Quantum noise

0.Abstract 3 I would like to explain … (1) Seismic motion Investigation for silent site selection. (2) Quantum noise Reduction of shot noise Observation of radiation pressure noise Beyond Standard Quantum Limit

Contents 1. Seismic noise 2. Quantum noise 3. Summary 4

5 1. Seismic noise Vibration of ground shakes mirrors. Seismic noise limits sensitivity below 10 Hz.

6 1. Seismic noise How can we reduce seismic noise ? (1) Small seismic motion site (2) Good vibration isolation system

7 1. Seismic noise (2) Good vibration isolation system Mirrors are suspended. Slow motion Mirror follows motion of support point. Rapid motion Mirror can not follow motion of support point.

8 1. Seismic noise (2) Good vibration isolation system Transfer function : (Motion of mirror)/(Motion of support)

9 1. Seismic noise (2) Good vibration isolation system Unfortunately, single pendulum does not have enough isolation for gravitational wave detection. We need multi stage isolation system. M. Punturo, GWDAW Rome 2010 VIRGO: Super Attenuator Mirror

10 1. Seismic noise (1) Small seismic motion site Site selection is essential ! How do we measure seismic motion ? It is not easy even if seismic motion is typical one … (a) Excellent (not usual !) commercial accelerometer (b) Sensor made by ourselves … One example : Michelson interferometer A. Araya et al., Review of Scientific Instrument 64 (1993) 1337.

11 1. Seismic noise (1) Small seismic motion site Where is silent sites ?Underground ! BFO (Black Forest Observatory): -162m BRG (Berggieshübel seism Observatory): -36m GRFO (Graefenberg borehole station): -116m Kamioka (Kamioka mine): -1000m Kamioka mine M. Punturo, GWDAW Rome 2010

12 1. Seismic noise (1) Small seismic motion site Where is Kamioka mine ?

13 Location of LCGT LCGT is planed to be built underground at Kamioka, where the prototype CLIO detector is placed. By K. Kuroda (2009 May Fujihara seminar)

14 1. Seismic noise (1) Small seismic motion site Near Kamioka mine (deep snow …) Kamioka mine entrance Kamioka mine road (about 2 km)

15 1. Seismic noise (1) Small seismic motion site There are many scientific apparatus in Kamioka mine. Neutrino physics (Kamiokande : Nobel prize in 2002) Super Kamiokande, Kamland (neutrino oscillation) Dark matter search XMASS Gravitational wave detector CLIO Geophysics Strain meter (100 m), Superconducting gravimeter

16 1. Seismic noise (1) Small seismic motion site Many people measured seismic motion in Kamioka mine. 100 times smaller seismic motion at center of Kamioka mine. However …

17 1. Seismic noise All measurement was at center of mine. Mirror must be far from center !

18 1. Seismic noise Measurement outside of mine and shaft

19 1. Seismic noise Measurement at Atotsu office

20 1. Seismic noise Outside of Mozumi office Exit of Mozumi shaft Mozumi office

21 1. Seismic noise Measurement apparatus

22 1. Seismic noise Truck

23 1. Seismic noise Electric locomotive

24 1. Seismic noise Fixed accelerometer in Mozumi shaft 10 cm

25 1. Seismic noise Outside of mine <1 Hz (Outside of mine) =(Center of mine) >1 Hz (Outside of mine) >(Center of mine) Vertical motion is similar to horizontal one. Results of other locations are similar. (1) Small seismic motion site

26 1. Seismic noise (1) Small seismic motion site Inside of mine > 50 m Silent sufficiently ! Main mirrors 50 m from ground

27 1. Seismic noise Small summary of seismic motion Underground site is excellent. 100 times smaller seismic motion Depth of mirror must be more than 50 m. If not so, seismic motion is not so small even if the site is country side … We need excellent and huge vibration isolation system.

28 2. Quantum noise Quantum noise Quantum amplitude and phase fluctuations of light Limit from quantum mechanics

29 2. Quantum noise What generates quantum fluctuation of light ? Interference between light and vacuum fluctuation Phase and amplitude fluctuation Phase fluctuation : Shot noise Gravitational wave shifts phase of light.

30 How do we reduce shot noise ? 2. Quantum noise Dark fringe No light at photo detector (if gravitational wave does not come) If there is DC power, interference between this DC light and vacuum fluctuation disturbs phase measurement.

31 2. Quantum noise Amplitude fluctuation : Radiation pressure noise Photons come at random (amplitude fluctuation). Back action of photon is also at random. → Radiation pressure noise

32 2. Quantum noise Can amplitude fluctuation generate radiation pressure noise ? Vacuum Common motion of mirrors ?

33 2. Quantum noise Can amplitude fluctuation generate radiation pressure noise ? Vacuum Differential motion of mirrors due to vacuum from output port C.M. Caves, Physical Review Letters 45 (1980) 75.

34 2. Quantum noise How do shot and radiation pressure noise depend on laser power (P)? Shot noise : Gravitational wave signal is proportional to P. Interference between light and vacuum is proportional to P 1/2. Shot noise is inversely proportional to P 1/2. Radiation pressure noise : Interference between light and vacuum is proportional to P 1/2. This is the back action to mirror. Radiation pressure noise is proportional to P 1/2.

35 2. Quantum noise shot noise quantum radiation pressure noise standard quantum limit quantum noise with 100x increased laserpower How do shot and radiation pressure noise depend on laser power (P)? Standard Quantum Limit (SQL) Lower limit of summation of shot noise and radiation pressure noise

36 2. Quantum noise There is an optimal power. However, this value is higher than usual laser power. Development of high power laser (~100 W) is in progress. One example

37 2. Quantum noise Moreover, power recycling Power recycling mirror R.W.P. Drever et al., in Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravity, and Measurement Theory, (Plenum, New York, 1983), p. 503.

38 2. Quantum noise Signal enhancement without high power Signal recycling mirror B. J. Meers, Physical Review D 38 (1988) J. Mizuno et al., Physics Letters A 175 (1993) 273.

39 2. Quantum noise Or squeezing ! Quantum amplitude and phase fluctuations of light Heisenberg uncertainty principle The product of amplitude and phase fluctuation has lower limit. However, phase (or amplitude) fluctuation itself has no lower limit ! Squeezing : smaller phase fluctuation (but larger amplitude fluctuation) C.M. Caves, Physical Review D 23 (1981) 1693.

40 2. Quantum noise C.M. Caves, Physical Review D 23 (1981) 1693.

41 2. Quantum noise Not usual but squeezed vacuum C.M. Caves, Physical Review D 23 (1981) 1693.

42 2. Quantum noise Brief history of squeezing First squeezing : R.E. Slusher et al., Physical Review Letters 55 (1985) Injection to Michelson interferometer : K. McKenzie et al.,, Physical Review Letters 88 (2002) Squeezing in audio band (280 Hz ~) : K. McKenzie et al.,, Physical Review Letters 93 (2004) Strong (10dB) squeezing : H. Vahlbruch et al.,, Physical Review Letters 100 (2008) Injection to suspended interferometer : K. Goda et al.,, Nature physics 4 (2008) 472.

43 H. Vahlbruch et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity 27 (2010) Recent result 2. Quantum noise

44 2. Quantum noise Recent progress H. Vahlbruch et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity 27 (2010) Installation in GEO600

45 2. Quantum noise There is an optimal sensitivity. (Shot noise) ~ (Radiation pressure noise) Current status (Shot noise) >> (Radiation pressure noise) Nobody has observed radiation pressure noise. Observation itself is an interesting topic.

46 2. Quantum noise GEO600LIGO 3 Adv. LIGO 3 Sakata 1 Goßler 2 Corbitt 3 Ours 4 m eff. 1 kg2,5 kg10 kg23 mg0,5g1 g50 ng P [kW] ,20,003200,06 P/m [kW/kg] * *10 3 1,2*10 9  P/m [  kW/kg] 31,32, * N. Mavalvala, Elba conference (2008) 2 C.M. Mow-Lowry et al., Journal of Physics:Congerence Series (2006) 3 T. Corbitt, Elba conference (2008) 4 J.D. Thompson et al., Nature (2008)

47 2. Quantum noise This is only one example (and ours) in progress …. SiN membrane (~50 nm, ~ 100 ng) K. Yamamoto et al., Physical Review A 81 (2010)

48 2. Quantum noise After observation of radiation pressure noise …. Beyond SQL How ? Negative correlation between shot noise and radiation pressure noise Squeezing can make negative correlation.

49 2. Quantum noise Narrow band Wide band : some tricks are necessary. H.J. Kimble et al., Physical Review D 65 (2001)

50 3.Summary Quantum noise Current status (Shot noise) >> (Radiation pressure noise) Reduction of shot noise : High power laser, Recycling, Squeezed vacuum Observation of radiation pressure noise Beyond Standard Quantum Limit

51 Seismic motion Underground site is excellent. 100 times smaller seismic motion Depth of mirror must be more than 50 m. If not so, seismic motion is not so small even if the site is country side … We need excellent and huge vibration isolation system. 3.Summary

52 Thank you for your attention ! Vi ringrazio molto per la vostra attenzione !