Newspaper Creative Benchmarking AUGUST 2011. Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l. All Newspaper NormsOptus Ad size: FPC Appeared: July.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report GE July 2011.
Advertisements

Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report BMW July 2011.
Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of (Re)Appraisal.
Skoda Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Agenda Background & methodology Sponsorship details Impact on key brand metrics Shifts in brand positioning & perceptions Insights from the behavioural.
February 2012 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Masterfoods.
March 2012 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Oral B.
February 2012 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Diet Coke.
December 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Australian Grown.
March 2012 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Leggo’s.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Medibank Private Pet Insurance June 2011.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Skoda March 2012.
Brand Engagement Study - Retail. Brand Engagement Studies To demonstrate the ability of internet advertising to drive engagement To measure the effects.
October 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Dulux.
December 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Bupa.
November 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Praise.
November 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Purina.
It’s a component of the Newspaper Effectiveness Metric which is run by the newspaper industry marketing body, The Newspaper Works. A monthly study designed;
December 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report eBay.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Breaking Up with Banks March 2011.
Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of Extension.
It’s a component of the Newspaper Effectiveness Metric which is run by the newspaper industry marketing body, The Newspaper Works. A monthly study designed;
Brand Engagement Study Conducted by Carat Insight for the IAB Presented by: James Galpin, Carat Insight.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Toyota July 2011.
The Newspaper Effectiveness Metric. Content Why create a Newspaper Effectiveness Metric? The Newspaper Effectiveness Metric in summary Validation of the.
February 2012 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Channel Ten.
March 2012 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report MLA.
Newspaper Creative Benchmarking AUGUST Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l. All Newspaper NormsARCBS Ad size: FPC Appeared: July.
How Brand Advertising in Newspapers works best December 2009 BONDS Update!
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Shoe Super Store June 2011.
February 2012 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Coles.
 How Brand Advertising in Newspapers works best Bonds September 2009.
Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of Call to Action.
Put the gloss on your campaign New research shows that inserting catalogues and brochures into newspapers can deliver strong campaign results for advertisers.
BMW Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of Affinity.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Jetstar / Tourism Tasmania April 2011.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Whiskas May 2011.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Toyota Sept 2011.
September 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Challenger.
Suzuki Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Citroen Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
December 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report David Jones.
ANDVERTISING & INTEGRATED MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS (IMC) Pertemuan 3 & 4 Mata kuliah: O INTEGRATED MARKETING COMMUNICATION Tahun: 2009/2010.
October 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Virgin Australia.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report McCafe July 2011.
Newspaper ads that demonstrate the strategic role of Conveying Information.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Tourism WA June 2011.
Mitsubishi Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Chevron July 2011.
October 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Nicorette.
July 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report ‘Bread Wars’
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Subaru March 2012.
Mazda Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report ING Direct November 2010.
Established in 2006 by the major Australian newspaper publishers: – News Limited – Fairfax Media (including Rural Press) – APN News and Media – West Australian.
September 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Qantas.
 How Brand Advertising in Newspapers works best BPAY November 2009.
Newspaper Creative Benchmarking AUGUST Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l. All Newspaper Norms Heart Foundation Ad size: HPC Appeared:
February 2012 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Sun Rice.
December 2011 Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Qantas.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Dan Murphy’s February 2011.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Flight Centre March 2011.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Shell July 2011.
A Snapshot Review of Long Copy Ads 27 th April 2011 (Revised July 13 th 2011)
Territory Discoveries
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report
4 How Brand Advertising in Newspapers works best   AAMI   June 2009.
Presentation transcript:

Newspaper Creative Benchmarking AUGUST 2011

Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l. All Newspaper NormsOptus Ad size: FPC Appeared: July 2011 Position: Good Weekend Ads tested: Three in total, Sydney Research Sample: n=109, P16+ Benchmark: Newspaper Norm Methodology Executive Summary RoleMap™ The Optus ‘Tomorrow’s Stars’ ad has achieved significantly strong results in delivering to Affinity and also demonstrates differentiation from competitors. Creatively, the imagery is well received however the messaging and brand attribution is not as clear as Optus might have wanted. A number of respondents found the ad confusing based on their experience of Optus, and were looking for the offer. The likely actions taken as a result of this advertising are ‘long tail’ actions that relate to the strong Affinity results. These are good results as typically respondents judge Telecommunications ads harshly and miscomprehension of messages is often a problem in this category. The Optus ad has performed significantly well against the role of Affinity and delivers a strong result against (Re)Appraisal. 1 This ad is now our #1 Affinity result against twelve ads tested within the Telecommunications category.

General recurring themes were: Positive about the imagery used ‘Animals’ Not sure what they are trying to sell me The ad has done very well against most positive measures and the imagery used is well received. However, respondents struggled to be clear on the key message of the advertising, reflected by the score against “Makes it easy to see what is on offer”. 42% of respondents were generally correct in identifying key messages (i.e. calling for nominations for small sided football awards). However 58% struggled nominating more generic concepts like ‘football’, with 25% choosing ‘don’t know’. “Seeking funding for training of younger sports stars?” “Sponsorship of young sport award initiative” “Nominate a young sports star for a prize” “Entry into some competition?” Diagnostics Main Message “Optus sponsors junior soccer” “I don't care about soccer...it would be better if they just gave me a cheaper price on phone calls than worry about soccer” “It is doing something to promote sport amongst our children” “Great photo but no information on what Optus is selling.” “Optus ads are more interesting because they always feature animals” Opinion of the ad “Optus does more than being a telco”

Results for these measures were within statistical tolerances. Brand Linkage respondents n=11 so these results should be viewed with caution. Recognition and Linkage can also be affected by the timing of research and weight of the campaign. This ad has scored a significantly high results for differentiation from competitors. The other measures are within statistical tolerances for norms. The main actions driven from the ad are Word of Mouth, and Search. This along with ‘Remember for Later’ are typical responses to brand ads such as this one (and is reflected in the high Affinity score seen in Role Map) Topline Measures Brand Equity Impact ActionMap ™

Optus Benchmark Comparisons Newspaper Norms The ‘Bananas’ iPhone ad (tested Aug ‘10) achieved good scores for Extension and Affinity, while meeting Norms for Call to Action. The ‘First 3 Months’ ad (tested Aug ‘08) remains the category #1 for driving a Call to Action. It also performed significantly well against Extension and delivered well on Information.

Ranking Affinity Scores for Telco Ads Tested Since 2008 Optus ads are the #1 and #2 ads for Affinity for Telcos within our database, although typically, this category struggles to achieve high scores for Affinity For more information on this ad and others in our Creative Benchmarking series, please contact Rachael Lonergan on (02) or Ranking Differentiation Scores for Telco Ads Tested Since 2008 Optus holds the #4 and #5 spots for differentiating within the Telco category Newspaper Creative Benchmarking is a component of the Newspaper Effectiveness Metric, which is run by industry marketing body, The Newspaper Works. As at June 2011, we have tested over 320 ads, across many categories. To learn more about who we are, our testing methodology and to access further information, please visit us at