The New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Alignment Study December 5, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 What Is The Next Step? - A review of the alignment results Liru Zhang, Katia Forêt & Darlene Bolig Delaware Department of Education 2004 CCSSO Large-Scale.
Advertisements

Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Assessment Literacy Series
Benchmark Assessment Item Bank Test Chairpersons Orientation Meeting October 8, 2007 Miami-Dade County Public Schools Best Practices When Constructing.
Mathematics in the MYP.
1 Alignment of Alternate Assessments to Grade-level Content Standards Brian Gong National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Claudia.
Overview of the CCSSO Criteria– Content Alignment in English Language Arts/Literacy Student Achievement Partners June 2014.
MCAS-Alt: Alternate Assessment in Massachusetts Technical Challenges and Approaches to Validity Daniel J. Wiener, Administrator of Inclusive Assessment.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Mathematics Grade Level Considerations for Grades 6-8.
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Welcome to Common Core State Standards (CCSS) overview please sign in.
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
A professional development seminar presented by: Michele Mailhot and Susan Smith March 21, 2012
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Steve Williams DESE Fine Arts Consultant Presented at: Missouri Music Educators Association January 30,
Everett Public Schools DOK to Unit Planning LMS Department August 28, 2014.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Ensuring State Assessments Match the Rigor, Depth and Breadth of College- and Career- Ready Standards Student Achievement Partners Spring 2014.
 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.
Common Core Update – Opening March 11, Common Core Standards  What are the Common Core Standards?  How do the Common Core Standards compare to.
1 Alignment of Standards, Large-scale Assessments, and Curriculum: A Review of the Methodological and Empirical Literature Meagan Karvonen Western Carolina.
Alignment Powerful Tool for Focusing Instruction, Curricula, and Assessment.
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 6- Quality Assurance & Form Reviews.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
Common Assessments Social Studies. Objectives: Create common assessments that measure student learning and determine the effectiveness of the Parkway.
CURRICULUM CONSTRUCTION II AMANDA SKELTON & GINA NAAS.
Quality Instruction The ♥ of the matter is the depth of knowledge.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
ASFMS Mathematics Overview. Grade Level Expectations- Mathematics Strands Number and Operation Geometry and Measurement Functions and Algebra Data, Statistics,
February 2005Introduction to the GLEs & NECAP1 Grade Level Expectations (K-8) Grade Span Expectations (9-12) New England Common Assessment Program.
1 Alignment of Alternate Assessments to Grade-level Content Standards Brian Gong National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Claudia.
Overview Criteria Item Examples.  Create a sense of “measured urgency” ◦ Timeline is not immediate, but close ◦ Urgency in you and your teachers ◦ Difference.
CEDAR RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 15, 2015 acos2010.wikispaces.com.
Guide to Test Interpretation Using DC CAS Score Reports to Guide Decisions and Planning District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Issues Related to Judging the Alignment of Curriculum Standards and Assessments Norman L. Webb Wisconsin Center for Education Research University of Wisconsin-Madison.
An Analysis of Three States Alignment Between Language Arts and Math Standards and Alternate Assessments Claudia Flowers Diane Browder* Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
Acos2010.wikispaces.com. ACT Provides the Following:  a standards-based system of assessments to monitor progress toward college and career readiness.
Standards-Based Instruction Implementation: Badge 4-Analyzing Standards.
Crossing the Bridge Day 3 Heidi Elmoustakim & Eileen Hartwell Secondary Literacy Specialists.
The Redesigned SAT January 20, About the Redesigned SAT.
Content Analysis Workshop John L. Smithson, Director, Measures of the Enacted Curriculum Alissa Minor, Projects Manager, Measures of the Enacted Curriculum.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Depth of Knowledge: Secondary Math Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Maria Gross.
The Constructed Response Assessment The Journey Continues.
Balancing on Three Legs: The Tension Between Aligning to Standards, Predicting High-Stakes Outcomes, and Being Sensitive to Growth Julie Alonzo, Joe Nese,
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Materials FCAT Achievement Levels Test Content and Format, pg. 12 (FCAT Skills Assessed) Examples of Reading Activities Across Cognitive Complexity Levels,
Smarter Balanced Scores & Reports. The new assessment, Smarter Balanced, replaces our previous statewide assessment, the New England Common Assessment.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. DEVELOPING AND USING TESTS – Chapter 11 –
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Claudia Flowers, Diane Browder, & Shawnee Wakeman UNC Charlotte
Preplanning Presentation
Innovative Approaches for Examining Alignment
Claudia Flowers, Diane Browder, & Shawnee Wakeman UNC Charlotte
Presentation transcript:

The New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Alignment Study December 5, 2006

What is alignment? … the extent of agreement, overlap, or intersection among standards (GLEs), instruction, and assessments. Accurate inferences about student achievement and growth over time can only be made when there is alignment between the standards (GLEs) and assessments.

NCLB: Alignment ensures that the assessments: Cover the full range of content specified in the GLEs Measure the content and process related to the GLEs Reflect the same degree and pattern of emphasis in the GLEs Reflect the full range of cognitive complexity and level of difficulty as the GLEs and Yield results that represent all achievement levels specified in the GLEs

NECAP Alignment Study based on Norman Webb 1. Categorical Concurrence- do test items assess the GLEs that they say they assess? 2. Depth-of-Knowledge Consistency- does the cognitive demand of the test item match the DOK level coded for the item? 3. Range of Knowledge- Does the span of knowledge expected in the GLEs match the span of knowledge needed to answer test items corrrectly? 4. Balance of Representation- Are the items distributed across the GLEs and according to the test specifications?

Today’s Alignment Focus Our work today is to focus on- Categorical Concurrence- Do the test items align to the GLE? AND Depth-of-Knowledge-Does the item require the DOK level we think it does? A consultant will work on the final two alignment categories after receiving today’s work from RI, NH, and VT

Alignment is planned for from the start of test design. Distribution of Emphasis Depth-of-Knowledge Ceilings Items are written to align with GLEs Item Review Committees DOE Content Specialists Review Test Forms

Alignment- Distribution of Emphasis The NECAP tests are designed to reflect the Distribution of Emphasis that was developed as part of the test specifications. The distribution communicates which GLEs are given more emphasis at each grade level.

Distribution of Emphasis for Reading Reading Content Clusters Distribution of Emphasis 2 (3)3 (4)4 (5)5 (6)6 (7)7 (8) Word Identification20% Vocabulary20%20 Init. Understanding Literary 20%20 15 Init. Understanding Informational 20%20 Analysis and Interpretation Literary 10% Analysis and Interpretation Informational 10%1020 TOTALS100%100

* 2 (3) indicates end of grade 2 GLEs are tested at the beginning of grade 3 Mathematics Content Strands Distribution of Emphasis 2 (3)*3(4)4(5)5(6)6(7)7(8) Number and Operations 55% Geometry and Measurement 15%20 25 Algebra and Functions 15% Data, Statistics, & Probability 15%15 Total100%100 Distribution of Emphasis for Mathematics

Alignment- Depth of Knowledge Level 1- Recall and Reproduction Level 2- Skills and Concepts Level 3- Problem Solving and Strategic Thinking Level 4- Extended Thinking Based on the work of Norman Webb

Alignment- Item Review Committees Every item is reviewed by a panel of teachers representing the three states. The teacher panels evaluate each item against a rubric that considers GLE alignment, depth of knowledge, universal design issues, correctness, and language.

NECAP Item Review Committee Item Review Criteria 1. Grade Level Expectations Alignment- ▪ Is the test item aligned to the appropriate GLE? ▪ If not, which GLE or grade level is more relevant? 2. Correctness- ▪ Are the questions and distracters correct with respect to content, accuracy and developmental appropriateness? ▪ Do the distracters represent plausible misunderstandings about the GLE content? ▪ Are the scoring guides consistent with GLE wording and developmental appropriateness? ▪ Do the scoring guides focus on important aspects of the GLE content and/or process?

NECAP Item Review Committee Item Review Criteria cont. 3. Depth of Knowledge- ▪ Is the test coded to the appropriate Depth of Knowledge: ▪ Or, if consensus cannot be reached, is there clarity around why the item might be on the border of two levels? 4. Language- ▪ Is the language clear? ▪ Is the language accurate (syntax, grammar, conventions)? 5. Universal Design- ▪ Is there an appropriate use of simplified language? ▪ Are charts, tables and diagrams necessary to the item? ▪ Are charts, tables and diagrams easy to read? ▪ Are instructions easy to follow? ▪ Is the item amenable to accommodations- Braille, read aloud?

Part 1 of the Alignment Study Today’s Task Review all of the common items on the 2005 and 2006 NECAP tests Independently complete review sheet for each item Discuss findings Review and possibly revise findings based on discussions

Part 2 of the Alignment Study Next Steps Individual ratings will be summarized by grade and given to an external consultant Consultant will summarize findings from all 3 states and review alignment against all four components of alignment and write report Report will be sent to USDE and posted on RIDE’s website by April 2007

Alignment Review Questions Does the test item align to the GLE to which it is coded? YES YES- but it also is aligned to GLE: ________________________________ NO- a more appropriate GLE is: ________________________________

Alignment Review Question Is the test item coded to the appropriate Depth of Knowledge level? YES NO- it is more similar to level __ because______________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________

Table Level Discussions Table discussions should begin only when everyone at your table has completed an independent review Begin with Item 1- discuss only when someone at the table feels that either the GLE or DOK has not been coded accurately. After all items have been discussed, go back and individually review ratings. If you feel that you missed something in considering your rating of an item or if someone has provided a viewpoint that causes you to want to change your rating, please make those adjustments. Make any changes you feel are needed based on your discussions. It is not necessary to reach consensus!

Practice Item Itemnumber: Contract: 1363 Year: Test: Assessment Usegrade: 3 Notes: CE Subject: Language Arts Location(s): Internal Codes: Rpt Cat(s): Item Type: MC Key: A Cluster: Stand Alone Seq#: designates the GLE and the 1 is the DOK Level

Practice Item 1. Which word rhymes with eight? A. gate B. hat C. fight D. bite