Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Advertisements

Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr

Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University March 2015.
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
What you need to know about the Saint Leo IRB review process.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
 The WP IRB is concerned with Social- Behavioral and Biomedical research that is: A systematic investigation Designed to develop or contribute to generalizable.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro Protecting Research Participants.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
“ Research with human subjects ” SUA IRB Committee OrientationIRB Committee.
Human Subject Research View from the IRB Anthony J. Filipovitch Minnesota State University Mankato.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Adam Mills Human Subjects Office September 18, 2015 IRB Basics.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Getting Your Research Through IRB (UCHS) Review Elaine Wethington, Chair Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects (Ithaca)
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
The IRB Process Southern New Hampshire University.
Senta Baker Sharon Moran IU Human Subjects Office Human Subjects Office IRB Submissions and KC Demostration School of Music November 13, 2015.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
 Empowered by the University to insure we are in compliance with Federal regulations  Guided by the standards in the Belmont Report and regulations.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
CSBS Faculty Workshop: The IRB – Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects PRESENTED BY: FRANCES SOLANO WITH SPECIAL GUEST: DR. DANIEL.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
5/26/2018 Human Subject Research at William Paterson University February
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
2/23/2019 Human Subject Research at William Paterson University February
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Presentation transcript:

Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011

2 Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research  Empowered by the University to insure we are in compliance with Federal regulations  Committee of faculty, staff and an outside, unassociated member  Guided by the standards in the Belmont Report and regulations in The Common Rule (45 CFR Part 46)  Main focus is faculty research

3

4  The IRB is concerned with: u Research involving living human subjects that results in the advancement and dissemination of generalizable knowledge.  That is conducted by: u Faculty and Staff u Undergraduate and Graduate Students  Ethical Basis (Belmont Report): u Respect for Persons  Autonomous individuals entitled to be protected u Beneficence  Do no harm; maximize benefits and minimize risks u Justice  Burdens and benefits are appropriately distributed between subjects and beneficiaries

5 What the IRB reviews  Biomedical or social/behavioral research  WPU policy specifically excludes:  classroom demonstrations, exercises and/or experiments designed for the exclusive purpose of education.  Pedagogical research done in the investigator’s own classroom.  Oral history interviews done for historical research purposes and some sociological and anthropological purposes but not any social/behavioral or biomedical purposes.  Research conducted by the University (or parts thereof) concerning its activities and with its own constituencies.

6  Student research is reviewed when: u The research involves a vulnerable population u The research collects identifying information on the research subject u The research goes beyond what is normally expected for the course u The research concerns a highly sensitive subject u The research plan has potential serious physical or psychological risk for the subject or the researcher  Faculty or Research Mentors u Decide what student work needs review u Supervise their students and are responsible for what their students do u Must complete and provide IRB with Certification of Training

7 Vulnerable populations: Federal Regulations  Federal guidelines define vulnerable populations as those people who do not have the ability or capacity to freely choose to participate in the proposed research.  Specifically Identifies & Protects: u children and minors u prisoners u fetuses u pregnant women  Other Covered Populations: u persons with diminished capacity u English language limitations

8  WPUNJ expanded specifically identified groups to include respondents who may perceive that their responses may have an impact on them, such as: u residents of nursing homes u patients in hospitals u students in classes of the researcher u employees of businesses Vulnerable populations: WPUNJ

9 Student Research  Student develops research plan, including data collection instruments and informed consent statements, which is approved by professor or research supervisor  Student prepares the Student Research Protocol Review Request and obtains faculty signature  Student delivers the Protocol to the IRB with attached copies of the data collection instrument(s) and proposed Informed Consent Statement  IRB completes review unless there are questions or issues to resolve

10 Protocol Review Request  Investigator provides answers to questions concerning the research plan and subjects. u Hypothesis u Research Plan/Methodology u Human Subjects u Outcomes, Risks and Benefits u Schedule  Must be signed by investigator and his/her professor/advisor.  Available online in Word and.PDF at:

11 Protocol Review Request  Professor/advisor decides whether or not to forward protocol to the IRB.  The IRB looks at how the research will be carried out and what impact it will have subjects  The IRB does not review or approve the subject matter or research topic, this is agreed to by the student and their professor/advisor, but the IRB can ask about it as it relates to subjects and proposed research plan.

12

13

14 Data Collection Tools  Survey or questionnaire u Original u Acquired  Purchased  Available  Interview Questions  Observation sheet  Other

15 Informed Consent  An Informed Consent Statement must provide enough information to insure that subjects… u Have the freedom to choose whether or not to participate in the research, u May leave the study at any time without penalty, u Understand and agree to do what is expected to participate in the research, u Understand and agree to the risks and benefits associated with participating, u Understand how their participation is kept confidential, u Understand whether or not their participation will be anonymous and who will know their identity if it is not, u Understand who to contact with questions or concerns about the research project or the way it is conducted

16  The format of an Informed Consent Statement is based on the amount of detail required by the research plan and the extent of contact with subjects: u Invitation to participate u Spoken formula u Short statement at top of page u Separate sheet without signature u Separate sheet with signature u First page online  Minors must have opportunity to assent to participate, even with parental consent  Permission to use a site does not provide consent for the subjects at that site  Observation of public behavior does not require informed consent by subjects

17  There are two types of Informed Consent Statements used at WPUNJ  Passive consent or agreement  Participation is subject’s statement of consent to participate in the research  Limited to anonymous surveys  Active consent or agreement  Signature required prior to participation  For interviews and physical contact with subjects, collection of personally identifying information, and ongoing contact with subject  For young children and minors, will include their assent along with parent/guardian consent  Witnesses are only needed when the subject is unable to provide effective informed consent

18  Names cannot be connected directly to data tools or instruments.  Use a coding system that connects data tools or connects data to subjects without revealing subject identity.  Maintain data and code key separately.  The WPU IRB provides samples of Passive and Active Informed Consent Statements u DO NO NOT USE AS IS! u DO NOT SIGN!

19

20

21 Questions...  Contact --Betty Kollia Chair, WPUNJ IRB Asso. Professor, Comm. Disorders --Martin Williams IRB Administrator Director, Office of Sponsored Programs --Beth Ann Bates Program Assistant, Office of Sponsored Programs Phone: Location: Raubinger Hall, Room 107 Website: All Forms Available On Website!