What Parents of Students with Disabilities Have to Say About It.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Families InvolvementAction Team FIAT TRAINING March 4, 2010.
Advertisements

Understanding the Six Types of Family Involvement
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Developmentally Appropriate Practice
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Managing Individual Behavior 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Module: IEPs Head Start Center for Inclusion
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Amy A. Peterman ADMS 625 Summer days notice to parents prior to meeting School and parents must agree on time and place of meeting. School can.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Classroom Procedures 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya.
Consequences 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya Hettler—Business.
Regional Autism Advisory Council of Southwest Ohio (RAAC-SWO) RAAC Training Committee 2011 The Basics of Autism Spectrum Disorders Training Series.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Parent and Family Presentation Project
The Role of Assessment in Response to Intervention Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Involving Parents 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya Hettler—Business.
Working with Students with Special Needs in Online Classes DeNeale and Angela
Positive Reinforcement 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya.
Special Education Review & Update for Regular Educators.
East Wayne Head Start Annual Report “The Nationally Accredited team at East Wayne Head Start focuses on improving families by putting families.
School Age Summer Staff Orientation Series. Goal of the Series The school age summer orientation series has been designed to help you understand the basics.
Philosophy of Classroom Management 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator.
Student Diversity 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya Hettler—Business.
1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
Plan “B” 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya Hettler—Business.
Response to Intervention: Empirically Based Instructional Strategies Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Developing Classroom Expectations 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator.
Behavior Management Section II: Changing Behavior.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
PROGRAMS AND SERVICES TO ELL Students District One Schools Special Services Department.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Teaching Students in Inclusive Settings. Getting Started Course Overview Discussion Posts and Rubrics Major Assignments Q & A Dr. Phyllis Schiffer-Simon.
Public School and Home Schooling Your Newly Adopted Child Shelley Bedford and Meredith Cornish.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Behavior Management Section I: Basic Behavior Components 1.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya Hettler—Business Assistant.
Arranging the Classroom 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya.
Response to Intervention: Tier 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators 1.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
Response to Intervention: Introduction Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators 1.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Child & Family Connections #14. What is Child and Family Connections The Early Intervention Program in Illinois State funded program to assist families.
BRIDGEWATER RARITAN HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT SERVICES PRESENTS: Preparing for High School: Parents of Students with IEPs Wednesday January 4,
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Appleton Area School District
ENHANCING PARENT ENGAGEMENT
Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators Classroom Management: Conclusion.
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Consortium of State Organizations for Texas Teacher Education
SPECIAL SCHOOLS DIANA GARZONA Edu
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
The Transition Planning Process
Building Positive Relationships Between Home and School
Exceptional Children’s Program
Presentation transcript:

What Parents of Students with Disabilities Have to Say About It

After viewing this presentation, the learner will be able to better:  Understand challenges parents face  Identify solutions to common issues faced by students with disabilities in the classroom  Respect and understand families’ journey and how to better partner with them  Value parental involvement 2

When parents are involved in their child's education, the following are more likely to occur : ▪Higher grades and test scores ▪Better attitudes and behavior ▪Better school attendance ▪More homework completed ▪Less chance of placement in Special Ed classes ▪Greater likelihood of graduating from High School ▪Better chance of Post Secondary Enrollment America’s Career Resource Network, Parent Involvement = Student Success 3

In 1975, the Special Education “Bill of Rights” was passed to include: 1. FAPE 2. LRE 3. IEP 4. Procedural Due Process 5. Nondiscriminatory assessment 6. Parental Participation The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (Public Law ) 4

Two focus groups were held and included:  Parents from urban and rural settings.  Parents of children with special needs who had experienced success in a general education placement. 5

 17 parents participated, representing 38 children with various disabilities  16 Caucasian and 1 Hispanic  Disabilities represented in order of prevalence were: Autism Down Syndrome Other Disabilities (cerebral palsy, deaf, spina bifida, and other intellectual disabilities) 6

 All children were from medium size urban school districts  Child’s Placement Inclusive Classrooms Content Mastery 7 of the 18 were in Academic Adjustment combined with general education classes Self-Contained  Children represented were mostly male.  Parents participating were mostly female.  Age of parent participants

 Marital Status: Fifteen of the parents were married One parent was widowed One parent was divorced  Support Nine attended some type of support group Eleven belonged to an organization related to the child’s disability  No parents were identified as having a disability. 8

 Academics  Attendance  Behavior  Emotional  Maturity  Other Students  Physical  Safety  Social  Verbal Skills 9

One question was asked of the parent participants: “As you have had your children with special needs in Regular Education classes, what problems have you overcome so that your child can progress with their education and how was the problem solved?” 10

Category Discussed Academics12 Attendance 1 Behavior 10 Emotional 6 Maturity 1 Physical 8 Safety 1 Social 6 Verbal Skills 2 11

Academics TAKS test anxiety  Explain who is being tested  Help student understand the need to do well Likes to read all the time  Use chunking to break up activities Child is very literal  Use complete and concrete explanations  Define terms 12

Academics – continued Child could not read  Think outside the box  Try interventions that target different disabilities Lack of organizational skills  Online communication systems  Daily planner  Occasional personal assistance  Maintain second set of books at home 13

Academics – continued Need to teach and re-teach  Supply text books at beginning of summer Lack of recognition of the disability  Parents meet with teacher to explain the need for specific goals and modifications Perfectionist student  Extra time to work on assignments at home 14

Academics - continued IEP Committee members  Experts attend ARD to advise on modification implementation  All teachers attend ARD meetings Idioms  Pre-teach 15

Academics - continued Reluctance to read  Allow student to chose topics when possible Doesn’t want to attend school  Work closely with administration  “Pick your battles” 16

Attendance Doesn’t want to attend school  Work closely with administration  “Pick your battles” 17

Behavior Frustration  Show compassion  Do not coddle Obsessing over time  Early years: make time his “job”  Later years: remove clocks from classroom 18

Behavior – continued Meltdowns or Throwing fits  Utilize student interests  Allow breaks  Provide break passes Inflexibility  Advance notice of schedule or staff changes Triggers  Teachers and parents communicate triggers 19

Behavior – continued Obstinacy  Parents communicate expectations  Communication book  Behavior addressed at home and school Transitioning  Picture schedule 20

Behavior – continued Starting work  Provide “Start Chart” Progressing with work  Positive Behavior Support Chart  Use school economy system 21

Emotional Low self esteem  Opportunities for small successes  Build on small successes Too much stimulation  Use break card Over reacting  Explain “small deal” versus “big deal” 22

Emotional - continued Carrying objects to school  Allow in pocket Anxiety attack  Refocus on positive thoughts Sensitivity to words/way of speaking  Parents provide list of problems  Desensitize 23

Maturity Sexual Education  Provide material appropriate to student’s level of understanding 24

Bullying Child refused to go to school  The bully can also have special needs  Change seating  Teacher’s awareness heightened 25

Physical Hands hurt during writing  Provide padded pencil grip  Occupational Therapist assessment Can’t fit under my desk  Table with adjustable legs Frequent Urination  Parents communicated this is a physical need  Provide pass 26

Physical – continued Personal hygiene  Teacher signal to visit locker Seating  Consider purpose  Front row not always appropriate Tactile sensitivity  Alternate gloves provided in Science Labs 27

Physical --- continued Overheating during exertion  Allow cool down  Return to activity once regulated Necessary stimulation  Allow fidget 28

Safety Lack of “Stranger Danger”  Parent communicates child is overly trusting  Teacher more aware 29

Social Trouble interacting  Student consider how others see them Finding strengths  Parent communicate strengths  Teacher builds on small student successes Reaction of other students  Parents encouraged teacher to be up front with classmates 30

Social - continued Behind everyone else  Involve Physical Therapist Social skills  Video desired behavior  Allow student time to study video Questions about disability  Parent read age appropriate book to class  Parent answered questions 31

Verbal Skills Low verbal intelligibility  Peers interpret initially  Speech Pathologist created picture book for student’s use  Progressed to writing notes Spontaneous communication  Communication book or  Phone call  Personal visits 32

Other Parent Comments Be flexible  Bad days can be followed by good days Call on me  Parents can be a great resource  Don’t leave out working parents Children are individuals  Children vary despite similar diagnosis 33

 Wisconsin Family Assistance Center for Education Training & Support (WIFACET)  National Coalition for Parent Involvement in Education  Parental Involvement Is as Easy as PIE

 New Skills for New Schools: Preparing Teachers in Family Involvement  The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement  Family Strengthening Policy Center guid={2CB0B52E-E83D-406E-8B8D-4BD1817D9B46} guid={2CB0B52E-E83D-406E-8B8D-4BD1817D9B46} 35

DeAnn Lechtenberger – Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley – Project Coordinator Doug Hamman – Project Evaluator Financial Support for Project IDEAL is provided by the Texas Council for Developmental Disabilities, with Federal funds* made available by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Developmental Disabilities. *$599,247 (74%) DD funds; $218,725 (26%) non-federal resources. The views contained herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the funding agency[s]. No official endorsement should be inferred. 36

DeAnn Lechtenberger, Ph.D. Principle Investigator Tonya Hettler, Grant Manager Webpage: Phone: (806) , ext. 302 The views contained herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the funding agency[s]. No official endorsement should be inferred. 37