EarthScope GPS Tutorial PBO Geodetic Instrumentation – GPS Principles, Data Access and Applications Chuck Meertens, David Phillips, Freddy Blume, Mike.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALSM Data Collection Overview Preliminary imagery from GeoEarthScope Northern California LiDAR project. Final data products will be freely available from.
Advertisements

Role of Space Geodesy In GEOSS Timothy H. Dixon University of Miami/RSMAS and Center for Southeastern Advanced Remote Sensing (CSTARS)
The Community Geodetic Model (CGM): What is it and how does it relate to studies of lithospheric rheology? Jessica Murray, David Sandwell, and Rowena Lohman.
The Open Earth Framework (OEF) A Data Integration Environment for Earth Sciences G. Randy Keller - Univ. Oklahoma Matt Fouch - Arizona State Univ. Chris.
March 25, 2002EarthScope CSIT Workshop Data Archiving and IT Issues for PBO Douglas Neuhauser UC Berkeley Seismological Lab Northern California Earthquake.
Introduction to GPS Basics Vince Cronin (Baylor University) & Shelley Olds (UNAVCO) Revisions by Beth Pratt-Sitaula (UNAVCO) Version Dec 20, 2012.
Geodesy and earthquakes
Wells, Nevada Earthquake February 21, 2008 A 6.0 magnitude earthquake strikes the northeastern edge of the Basin and Range.
A Reference Frame for PBO: What do we Have; What do we Need? Geoff Blewitt Nevada Bureau of Mines & Geology, and Seismological Laboratory, University of.
Southern California Integrated GPS Network (SCIGN) Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey This presentation will probably involve audience discussion,
Active and Neotectonic Structures 1) What's the difference
SESAC September 13, “Thoughts on the USGS role in the Intermountain West, in the context of hazard evaluation in extensional settings” John G. Anderson.
Using Geodetic Rates in Seismic Hazard Mapping March 30, Geodetic and Geologic slip rate estimates for earthquake hazard assessment in Southern California.
An Earth science program to explore the 4D structure of the North American continent.
SOPAC's Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model: Yehuda Bock, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Peng Fang, Paul Jamason, Shimon Wdowinski (TAU, UMiami) Scripps Orbit.
SCEC - EarthScope (PBO) a confluence of interests Ken Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey, Pasadena.
Observing Details of Transient Aseismic Slip with Borehole Strainmeters Evelyn Roeloffs U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center.
New Scientific Applications with Existing CGPS Capabilities Earthquakes, Soil Moisture, and Environmental Imaging Andria Bilich Geosciences Research Division.
SISMA Seismic Information System for Monitoring and Alert Galileian Plus Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Milano, Italy Politecnico di.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Overview of the SNARF Working Group, its activities, and accomplishments Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group (SNARF) Chair: Geoff Blewitt.
Shelley Olds, UNAVCO Getting to know EarthScope Plate Boundary Observatory & UNAVCO.
1 EarthScope: Plate Boundary Observatory William Prescott UNAVCO, Inc AAPG Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah 12 May 2003.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Overview of EarthScope 2010 May, 2010 Slides that may be used and modified for presentations involving instrumentation, data, science results, and education.
An Earth science program to explore the 4D structure of the North American continent Kaye Shedlock EarthScope Program Director.
UNAVCO is a non-profit, membership-governed consortium that facilitates geoscience research and education using geodesy. Boulder, Colorado Main Offices.
Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,
Applications for Precision GPS: Seismology, Volcanic Eruptions, Ice Sheet Dynamics, and Soil Moisture Kristine M. Larson Dept. of Aerospace Engineering.
Observing Glacial Rebound Using GPS Giovanni Sella.
Blue – comp red - ext. blue – comp red - ext blue – comp red - ext.
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
First SNARF Workshop: Introduction Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
“Integrated observational system of systems” (~$200 million) SAFOD: 3.1 km borehole into the San Andreas Fault PBO: 1099 geodetic stations; 81 strainmeter/seismic.
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey GPS Products & Services.
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
Borehole Strainmeters: Instruments for Measuring Aseismic Deformation in Subduction Zones Evelyn Roeloffs U.S. Geological Survey, Vancouver, WA.
Real Time Data From the Plate Boundary Observatory Continuous GPS Network Mike JacksonUNAVCO PBO Directorand the PBO Staff AGU Joint Assembly May 26, 2009.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 24 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
An updated Canadian GPS velocity field using NRCan’s Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Software – Plans and preliminary results J. Henton 1, M. Craymer 2,
Jayne Bormann and Bill Hammond sent two velocity fields on a uniform grid constructed from their test exercise using CMM4. Hammond ’ s code.
Using GPS and InSAR to study tectonics, deformation, and earthquakes GPS displacements, velocities (and transients) InSAR displacements.
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
Yuehua Zeng & Wayne Thatcher U. S. Geological Survey
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
Processing and Analysis of GeoEarthscope and Other Community LiDAR Topography Datasets April 30 - May 1, 2008 Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ Christopher.
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
05/12/1005/08/ Lec Lec Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 23 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
EART 118 Seismotectonics MWF D250 9:30-10:40 am; Th D250 2:00-4:00 pm Prof.: Thorne Lay, C382 E&MS, Office Hours 11:00-12:00 MWF TA: Lingling Ye, Office.
Introduction to the modelling of GPS results GPS provides Surface crustal velocities in a global reference frame, or with respect to a block, realized.
Southern California Earthquake Center The Community Geodetic Model (CGM) Jessica Murray, U.S. Geological Survey (SCEC4) Rowena Lohman, Cornell University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,
A New View into Earth A Science and Facilities Program for study of the structure, dynamics and evolution of the North American continent.
How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.
Modeling the Rupture Process of the Tokachi-Oki Earthquake using 1-Hz GPS Kristine M. Larson Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences University of.
August 11, 2009 Using the Data of the EarthScope in Education Susan Eriksson, UNAVCO Director of Education and Outreach.
Overview of EarthScope 2016
Evaluation of transient deformation from continuous GPS time series in Western North America ( ) Yehuda Bock1, Brendan W. Crowell 1, Danan Dong.
Its 15 year mission ( ) to boldly explore the structure and evolution of the North American continent The largest earth science funded project.
Getting to Know UNAVCO & The Plate Boundary Observatory
Velocities in ITRF – not appropriate for interpretation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Wells, Nevada Earthquake February 21, 2008
Archean continental terranes commonly have deep keels, but the whole upper mantle of western North America shows very slow seismic velocities.
Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group
Presentation transcript:

EarthScope GPS Tutorial PBO Geodetic Instrumentation – GPS Principles, Data Access and Applications Chuck Meertens, David Phillips, Freddy Blume, Mike Jackson, and Greg Anderson UNAVCO, Boulder, CO EarthScope in the Northern Rockies Workshop Bozeman, Mt 17 September 2005

Outline Science Introduction GPS – Briefly how it works Achieving High precision GPS results GPS Science Examples PBO Instrumentation and Data GEO-EarthScope

UNAVCO Facility-supported PI science includes plate tectonics, boundary zones, earthquakes and tectonics, volcanoes and active magmatic systems, glacial movements and isostatic adjustment, delta subsidence and precision mapping. GPS Science: Global PI Research Projects

GPS – the global perspective GSRM Model of Kreemer and Holt Observed GPS Velocities Plate Tectonic Model with Deformable Boundaries Model Velocities and Plate Boundary Strain Global Plate Motions and Boundary Zones 5170 geodetic velocities from 86 different studies

24+ satellites 6 orbital planes 55 degrees inclination 20,200 km altitude 4 satellites in each plane 12 hour orbital period 4 satellites visible GPS: The System and How it works Space Segment

Satellite Signal Structure Carrier phaseL1L2 Frequency MHz MHz Wavelength 19cm24cm Code Modulation C/A-codeL2C-Coming… P(Y)-codeP(Y)-codeNAVDATA Carrier C/A-code P-code NAVDATA Received Signal What your Geodetic GPS receiver measures…

Code Range Results Autonomous Position +/- 10 m (30 ft) error (horizontal) +/- 15 m (45 ft) error (vertical) Your location is: 45 o ’ N 111 o ’ W

Carrier Phase Solutions   = First Partial Wavelength N N = Integer Ambiguity D Distance D = N +  For highest precision (mm-level) coordinates use: -Carrier phase to determine ranges -Dual-frequency receivers -Good monuments -Multiple stations -Sophisticated processing software -Collect lots of data PBO Precision ~1 mm horizontal ~ 3-4 mm vertical From daily solutions

Reference Systems Precise Orbits Reference Frames (ITRF and SNARF) Earth orientation parameters Global Plate Motions and other geophysical effects You also need Global Tracking Systems for: NASA Global GPS Network (GGN) Operated by JPL and UNAVCO – get products from the IGS

Reference Frames – ITRF/SNARF Standard North American Reference Frame (SNARF) - UNAVCO SNARF Working Group, Geoff Blewitt, Chair Will provide an improved reference frame that accurately defines the precise coordinates and time evolution of a set of stations representing "stable North America." ITRF 2000 Velocities (left) compared to a N.America-fixed Reference frame (WUSA, SAO, right)

Permanent Stations Why Permanent Stations? 1. Improved precision and ability to assess precision -Longer time series -Tendency to invest in better monuments -Better able to characterize error sources 2. Measure transient phenomena -Earthquakes (co-seismic and high-rate), post- seismic, interseismic -Volcano deformation -Subduction zone aseismic transients -Hydrologic signals -Post-glacial rebound 3. Improved reference frame 4. Essential for orbits and clocks 5. Economy -Processing, data handling automated -Fewer personnel in field 6. Synergism with other applications (e.g. ATM, Surveying)

Global Plate Tectonics Global GPS data are used to construct plate tectonic and strain rate models Example: REVEL-2000 from Sella and others, Other plate motion Models have been determined from geology and seismology (Nuvel1A) and hot spot tracks (HS3). UNAVCO Plate Motion Calculator Also see NGS website for coordinate transformation tool.

Regional Plate Boundary Deformation Finite Element Model Observed GPS Velocity Field Viscosity L. Flesch and B. Holt

Deformation In the Plate Interior Horizontal and Vertical Motions from Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF)

Permanent Stations Tectonic Signals Basin and Range, Yellowstone U. of Utah, Caltech, Harvard SAO Example of fairly linear motions (~2 to 3 mm/year)

Coseismic and Postseismic deformations for Parkfield 2004 earthquake. EarthQuake Transients P067 P278 P576 P526 P295

Non-Tectonic Signals Hydrologic (non-tectonic time-dependent signals) Example from the Salt Lake Basin +- 3 cm vertical annual Signals from spring runoff (U. Utah)

GPS Seismology High rate Kinematic GPS…. 1 hz GPS “seismogram” compared with seismometer, Denali EQ. Bock, Reasons to look at High rate GPS EQs: -GPS directly measures displacement (not velocity or acceleration) -GPS does not clip …but GPS is considerably less sensitive than a seismometer

EarthScope Instrumentation 3.2 km borehole into the San Andreas Fault 875 permanent GPS stations Up to 174 borehole strainmeters 5 laser strainmeters 39 Permanent seismic stations 400 transportable seismic stations occupying 2000 sites 30 magneto-telluric systems 100 campaign GPS stations 2400 campaign seismic stations

PBO Permanent Stations

Rocky Mountain

Permanent GPS Stations Making Stable Monuments – Different options depending on cost, geology, permits

Campaign GPS EarthScope Campaign GPS 28 Portable Campaign GPS instruments and ancillary equipment purchased and ready for deployment. 72 Portable Campaign GPS instruments and ancillary equipment purchased in FY06. Rio Grande Rift 5-year proposal funded through ES science 30 instrument Cascadia ETS Campaign for summer/fall 2005 (underway)

Campaign GPS Come see the new EarthScope/PBO GPS gear in the poster session! Topcon GB-1000 Tech 2000 mast

PBO Campaign – ETS Cascadia Cascadia Episodic Tremor and Slip Event Principal Investigator (PI): Ken Creager, Dan Johnson & Rick Bennett UNAVCO staff: Freddy Blume (PBO Project Manager) & Nicole Feldl Photo Location: Clallam Bay, Washington 30 Portable GPS Systems deployed

EarthScope Operational Status Shown are PBO GPS Stations with data available from the UNAVCO Archive

GPS Data Flow and Access The user will get raw data, Solution time series and velocity vectors

Borehole Strainmeters & Seismometers

Long-baseline Laser Strainmeters

Borehole Strainmeter Data Processing BSM Data Analyst: Kathleen Hodgkinson First Level 0 data: June 2005 Pre-processing: –Decimate, linearize, remove tidal & borehole effects –Determine data edits using initial corrections Processing: –Edit raw data for outliers, offsets, etc. –Remove borehole trends –Generate tidal correction –Compute areal and shear strain –Convert to XML First Level 2 products: Sep 2005 Similar products from LSM (SIO)

Strainmeter Data Flow and Access

GEO-EARTHSCOPE EarthScope Imagery and Geochronology “The EarthScope program invites proposals that include the acquisition of aerial and satellite imagery and geochronology that will examine the strain field beyond the decade time scales available from the PBO geodetic instrumentation. A goal of EarthScope is the improved understanding of the tectonic evolution of the North American continent. Identifying and understanding deformation rates in all tectonic regimes is critical to reaching that goal. Proposals should indicate how the imagery or geochronology will contribute to the success of EarthScope.” 2005 NSF EarthScope Announcement of Opportunity

GEO-EarthScope Possibilities 1.Airborne LiDAR image of the San Andreas fault. Courtesy of Ken Hudnut, USGS. 2.InSAR image of the Hector Mine earthquake. Courtesy of Howard Zebker, Stanford. 3.Ground Control using UNAVCO GPS receiver being deployed on the San Andreas fault to support an airborne LiDAR survey. Photo courtesy of Francine Coloma, NSIDC. 4.Geocronology associated paleoseismology study site on the San Andreas fault near Wrightwood, CA. 5.AMS Lawrence Livermore Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Contact: Dr. David Phillips, UNAVCO/PBO Geo-EarthScope Project Manager

UNAVCO Support UNAVCO Support Requests Permanent Stations Semi-permanent Stations Campaign Surveys GeoEarthScope Come to UNAVCO for help with your project from proposal planning to project implementation!

For more information…