Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUROPEAN INITIATIVES IN THE FIELD OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW LEGAL MECHANISM FOR CREATING AN AREA OF FREEDOM,
Advertisements

Article 54 CISA and the ECJ/CGEU case law
International Cooperation in Law enforcement: Mutual Legal Assistance TAIEX Training Workshop Ankara, May, 2012 Jaganathan SARAVANASAMY Assistant.
Slide 1/31 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.
NEW EXISTING TOOLS FOR ENHANCING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION Towards a new generation of mutual legal assistance mechanisms.
Double jeopardy and Mutual Legal Assistance
Slide 1/32 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
The Law of the Lisbon Treaty. Our emerging European Criminal Process ? Professor Dermot P.J. Walsh School of Law University of Limerick.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Slide 1/15 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
European Arrest Warrant
1 Substantive criminal law and mutual recognition Hans G. NILSSON, Jur Dr h.c. Head of Division Criminal justice Council of the European Union.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice.
The transition to surrender procedures based on a European Arrest Warrant Wouter van Ballegooij LLM TMC Asser Instituut The Hague.
Privacy and security: Is Europe going banana? Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem Head of Unit « Liberties in the information society » CRID – University.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN TAX MATTERS ECHR cases Jussila v. Finland and Ruotsalainen v. Finland 32E29000 European and International.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Migration Law Schengen Information System by Konrad Wilk.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
European arrest warrant and equality of treatment of EU citizens: Croatian example Elizabeta Ivičević Karas University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Combatting Transnational Organized Crime through EXTRADITION
Digitalization of courts in the context of mutual assistance in criminal matters Dr Arkadiusz Lach Department of Criminal Procedure University of Nicolaus.
Welcome to Maastricht University. Faculty of Law Oral v. written evidence in the European Union Prof. André Klip Maastricht University, Ravenna 14 May.
Division for Treaty Affairs Aims and Structure of Convention Preventive Measures International Cooperation Asset Recovery Technical Assistance Information.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Chapter IV. International Cooperation. 2 2 International Cooperation Mandatory Offences Optional Offences Narrow Dual Criminality Requirements In MLAs.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Executing Environmental Judgments in Criminal Proceedings.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TUTOR: JOSÉ MIGUEL GARCÍA MORENO Red Europea.
Living in an area of freedom, security and justice European CommissionDirectorate-General Justice and Home affairs.
European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges
Mutual recognition of restraint and confiscation orders in the EU David Trovato CPS Proceeds of Crime ECLA & IALS Seminar 7 December 2015.
Slide 1/39 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the European Union Version : 3.0 Last updated:
IOAN DURNESCU UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK DECISIONS 947 & 829.
Prof. Dr. Gert Vermeulen t f Practitioners’ expectations regarding mutual recognition Mutual.
Criminal Law Lecture 5 Sources  Criminal Code (CAP 154) – Includes all major offences and criminal responsibility  Criminal Procedure Law (CAP 155)
OTHER COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTIONS INTRODUCTION.
Experience of Slovenia in implementation of European Arrest Warrant
Reform of the European Arrest Warrant Libby McVeigh.
PRINCIPLE NE BIS IN IDEM IN EUROPEAN UNION CRIMINAL LAW Zoran Burić, PhD University of Zagreb – Faculty of Law Department for Criminal Procedural Law
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
1 European Evidence Warrant Mutual recognition and judicial co- operation in criminal matters in the EU Jarlath Spellman Irish National Member Eurojust.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW. Ahmed T. Ghandour.. HUMAN RIGHTS IN EUROPE I.
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency General presentation on the Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 Providing an overview of the main.
TAIEX SEMINAR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS: TWENTY YEARS OF SHARING EU EXPERTISE 3 June, 2016 Dr. Anna Fiodorova Working group II EaP session.
Workshop on strengthening international legal cooperation among OSCE Member States to combat transnational organized crime (Vienna, 7-9 April 2008) Extradition.
The fundamental rights of LGBT citizens in Europe – EU legislation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE EU
International cooperation in criminal matters legal framework and examples from practice - Macedonian experiences Ohrid
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Directive 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings Steven Cras Political Administrator, General Secretariat.
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
Daniel BERNARD Federal Prosecutor of Belgium CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR
The Rule of Law & Mutual Recognition Can the EU live up to its own expectations? Nele Audenaert 05/09/2018.
European arrest warrant – in theory
Gozotuk and Brugge case
European Arrest Warrant
PROCURA DELLA REPUBBLICA v. M.
Presentation transcript:

Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer

Mutual Recognition Fundamentals – Cornerstone of cooperation in criminal matters between the MS – Starting point: European Council Tampere 1999 – Main Meaning: Decision of one MS has to be recognized (accepted) in each other MS without formal obstacles Presumptions – Compliance of the decisions with the principle of legality – Mutual trust of the MS in their criminal justice systems

Mutual Recognition Fundamentals – Legal Origin Single European Market Principle Free marketability of goods = mutual recognition of judgments in criminal law matters – Purpose Overcoming the time consuming “old” system of legal assistance and extradition in the EU Effective and fast transnational prosecution in the EU Part of real “European legal area”

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) General Purpose – Eliminating the current extradition system within the EU – Based on the principle of Mutual Recognition of decisions in criminal matters Legal Basis – FWD 2002 – All MS have transformed the EAW into national law

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Definition – Judicial Decision issued by a MS = issuing MS – General Intention: arrest and surrender a suspect by another MS = executing MS – Special Purposes Conducting a criminal prosecution Executing a custodial sentence Executing a detention order

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) System – Executing MS in principle has the duty to accept requests for the surrender of a suspect – Replacement of the former texts concerning extradition law European Extradition Convention (1957): Council of Europe Convention on extradition 1996: EU Relevant provisions of the Schengen Agreement

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Prerequisites for issuing an EAW – Offences punishable by imprisonment of 1 year or more – Final sentence of imprisonment for a period of at least 4 months – Listed offences Without verification of double criminality Punishable by imprisonment of 3 years or more Examples: terrorism, murder, racism, rape … – Non-Listed offences: Double Criminality

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Form – Standard blank – Has to consist relevant information (identity, offence, penalty, issuing court …)

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Procedures – Purely judicial proceeding Only judicial authorities involved No political impacts (anymore) – Direct transmission of the EAW from the issuing judicial authority to the executing judicial authority – Assisted by Eurojust and the EJN

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Procedures – Executing state may take coercive measures – Rights of the arrested person Information Lawyer and interpreter Right to be heard – Time limit Final decision on the EAW in the executing state no later than 60 days after arrest – Simplified Procedure Consent to the surrender by the suspect Final decision within 10 days after the consent

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Grounds for refusal of an EAW – Mandatory Grounds Ne bis in idem > Final judgment in a MS in respect of the same offence > Execution of the judgment Amnesty Minors

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Grounds for refusal of an EAW – Optional Grounds Territorial jurisdiction of the executing MS > Prosecution for the same act > Decision not to prosecute Ne bis in idem > Final judgment in a MS in respect of the same offence > Not yet executed

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Grounds for refusal of an EAW – Optional Grounds Ne bis in idem: Final judgment of a Third State in respect of the same act Limitation of time (according to the law of the executing MS) Prohibition of prosecution (according to the law of the executing MS)

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Confiscation of property – Evidence – Result of the offence (absorption of enrichment) Austrian Law on the EAW – EU-JZG (2004) – Surrender of Austrian nationals Listed offence Committed in the issuing MS No punishability under Austrian Law

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Arrest Warrant (EAW) Austrian Law on the EAW – Execution of an EAW is bound to the catalogue of human rights provided in the ECHR – Possibility of an appeal against the execution of the EAW (to the High Court of Appeal) – National implementation corresponds to the FWD – Rather conservative

Mutual Recognition Examples – Execution of orders freezing property or evidence Legal Basis: FWD (2003) Purpose – Extension of the principle of mutual recognition to pre-trial orders freezing property or evidence – Executing MS has to recognize and execute an order coming from the Issuing MS Definitions – Freezing Order: preventing destruction, transformation or displacement of property – Evidence: relevant material in criminal proceedings

Mutual Recognition Examples – Execution of orders freezing property or evidence Listed Offences – Decisions executed without double criminality-check – Punishable in the issuing MS by imprisonment of 3 years or more Non Listed Offences – Double Criminality-Check

Mutual Recognition Examples – Execution of orders freezing property or evidence Procedures – Certificate – Transmission from the issuing judicial authority to the executing authority – Recognition in the executing MS without any further formality Grounds for non-recognition (e.g.) – Incomplete Certificate – Ne bis in idem – Immunity under the law of the executing MS Remedies – Against freezing order – Any interested party – No suspensive effect

Mutual Recognition Examples – Financial Penalties Legal Basis: FWD (2005) Purpose: Extension of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties Definition of Financial Penalty – Sum of money on conviction of an offence – Compensation for victims – Costs of court proceedings – Sum of money to a public fund/victim support organiz.

Mutual Recognition Examples – Financial Penalties Listed Offences – No double criminality check – List also covers road traffic offences Non-Listed Offences – Double criminality check Against natural persons or a legal person Judicial or administrative penalties Decision must be final

Mutual Recognition Examples – Financial Penalties Procedures – Certificate – Transmission from the issuing judicial authority to the executing authority – Recognition in the executing MS without any further formality

Mutual Recognition Examples – Financial Penalties Grounds for non-recognition (e.g.) – Below 70 € – Incomplete Certificate – Ne bis in idem – Immunity under the law of the executing MS – Minors

Mutual Recognition Examples – European Evidence Warrant Legal Basis: FWD 2008 Purpose: Extension of the principle of mutual recognition to European Evidence Warrants Evidence – Objects, documents and data – For use in criminal proceedings

Mutual Recognition Examples – Probation Decisions and Alternative Sanctions Legal Basis: FWD 2008 Purpose: mutual recognition and supervision of – Conditional sentences – Alternative sanctions – Conditional release – Confiscation Orders Legal Basis: FWD 2006 Purpose: mutual recognition of orders to confiscate property