Cody Cox Wayde Morse, Christopher Anderson, and Luke Marzen Auburn University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
Advertisements

Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Snohomish County Parks and Recreation Lord Hill Regional Park Trail Mapping Aaron Bailey Alex Commerer Joe Nguyen.
Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
The Use of Remote Sensing in Habitat Management for Wildlife Helen Holdsworth EES 5053 University of Texas at San Antonio December 2,
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
University of Vermont, School of Business Administration, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.
AIACC Regional Study AS07 Southeast Asia Regional Vulnerability to Changing Water Resources and Extreme Hydrological due to Climate Change.
Introduction to Tampa Bay
1 Management of Fresh Water Wetlands in Bangladesh: Issues and Strategy Presented by Ainun Nishat IUCN-Bangladesh ---- Coastal and Wetland Biodiversity.
Tradeoffs of Ecosystem Services from Wetlands in the Houston Region L. James Lester 1, Gregory R. Biddinger 1 and Lisa A. Gonzalez 1 1 HARC, The Woodlands,
Agricultural Economics Program Review Survey Research Center Public Opinion Survey Report Mississippi River Regional Planning Commission David Trechter,
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Changes in River - Land Uses and Management: Implications for Salmonid Habitat Restoration in the Cedar River, Washington Changes in River - Land Uses.
Regional River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment University of.
Watershed Management in MA The Deerfield River Watershed Action Plan Kate Crawford, River Corridor Management, October 10, 2005
Remote Sensing Analysis of Urban Sprawl in Birmingham, Alabama: Introduction In the realm of urban studies, urban sprawl is a topic drawing.
The Working Waterfront: A Baseline GIS Inventory of Water Dependent Businesses in South Mobile County Introduction The Mobile metropolitan area is experiencing.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
An Overview of Three Aquatic Education Programs in Missouri Janice Schnake Greene Southwest Missouri State University.
Estuaries Payton Collins December 1 st, The Basics and Terminology  An estuary is the area in which rivers meet the sea.  One of the most productive.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
Northeast Landscape Plan Update Trends Exploration University of Minnesota Boreal Forest and Community Resilience Project June 12, 2012.
Outline of Presentation   Introduction   Overview of AS21   Social science methodologies for integrated climate change assessment   Challenges.
Benjamin Blandford, PhD University of Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Center Michael Shouse, PhD University of Southern Illinois.
Tim Osborn NOAA Office of Coast Survey Gulf of Mexico Marine Debris Mapping Project Presented to Center for Ocean Sciences Education Excellence: Central.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® The RESTORE ACT and other Economic Opportunities 4 September 2013 Alabama Section American.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Building the Digital Coast. Priority Coastal Issues Land use planning (growth management) Coastal conservation Hazards (flooding/inundation/storm surge)
Robinwood Project Hydrogeology Report for Wales Tim Pagella, Brian Reynolds, David Norris, Morag McDonald and Fergus Sinclair.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Research Workshop “Enhancing Research for Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic.
LaDon Swann and Tracie Sempier Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium February 24, 2010.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Finding out what people want: a case study of preference elicitation using a multi- criteria methodology David Whitmarsh and Maria Giovanna Palmieri CEMARE,
An Overview of Barnegat Bay New Jersey Habitats of the Barnegat Bay Ecosystem OCC 2012.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Welcome to the Roadmap for Adapting to Coastal Risk Virtual Training! The call-in number is (877) Password: Please be sure to mute your.
Alabama Gulf Coast CVB Regional Tourism Initiatives Herbert J. Malone, Jr. President/CEO Alabama Gulf Coast CVB.
Integrated Stakeholder Participation and Watershed Assessment in the River Njoro Watershed, Kenya W. Shivoga 1, F. Lelo 1, C. Maina-Gichaba 1, M.W. Jenkins.
Watershed Council June 25, DWR Funding and Bay Area IRWMP Project Selection Background Regional Acceptance Process (RAP) Regional Projects North.
Taunton River Wild & Scenic Study A Partnership Effort on Behalf of The Taunton River.
Community Vulnerability and Climate Change Dr. Shawn Dalton, Director, ESDRC, UNB, Fredericton Prativa Pradhan, MPHIL in Policy Studies, ESDRC, UNB, Fredericton.
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Making Community Connections Research Projects With ALLARM Partner Groups.
A Collaborative Approach to Assessing Watershed Conditions in Coastal National Parks Kristen Keteles, Cliff McCreedy, Jim Tilmant and Mark Flora.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Community Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Towards Water Resources Within the Upper Stroubles Creek Watershed Charlotte Brown 1 and Jerod Myers 2 NSF-REU.
Streamside forests reduce nutrient pollution of aquatic ecosystems Donald E. Weller, Thomas E. Jordan, and Matthew E. Baker Smithsonian Environmental Research.
Do anglers living near the coast really fish more? A GIS-based analysis of angler characteristics Diane Kuehn Emily Johnson Eddie Bevilacqua Mike Bullock.
Households as ecological agents: Integrating household survey information in a spatially-explicit, dynamic urban watershed model. Neely L. Law, UNC-CH.
CriteriaYesNoEffectiveness of CVC 1. Continuity of Participation4100% 2. Representation and Access3175% 3. Self Efficacy4100% 4. Information Exchange and.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Module 5: Solutions – Sustainable Urban Communities MPP 655: Policy Making for Sustainable Urban Communities 1MPP Module 5.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
SFS Sacramento May 23, 2016 Special Session Introduction: Traits-Based Vulnerability Assessment and Monitoring Under Climate Change Britta Bierwagen (EPA/ORD),
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
GEOGRAPHY TOOLS PROJECT 01 - LESSON 01. WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF TOOLS GEOGRAPHERS USE? Geographers use all sorts of tools to help them investigate.
Land of Fun and Sun…. and Water Karen Hamilton PhD, RN Alice Godfrey MPH, RN, BC This project is supported by funds from the Division of Nursing (DN),
Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) Supported Assessment Tools Gulf of Mexico Alliance Tools Café June 2016 Southeast Aquatic Connectivity Assessment.
Sean D. Rafferty Research Director and Associate Director
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Noah El-Naboulsi & Shannon Rogers
P. Khadka (Center for Social Development and Research, Nepal), S
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
WWT Water Scotland Conference talk 2018
Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools
Presentation transcript:

Cody Cox Wayde Morse, Christopher Anderson, and Luke Marzen Auburn University

Background Shift in natural resource management philosophy from expert driven to collaborative approach Need for research on participatory decision making Need to capture and incorporate spatial data on stakeholder management preferences for comparison with other spatial data

Introduction to PPGIS Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) Developed in 1996 Captures local values, knowledge, and preferences Used to spatially identify important places for stakeholders

Project Objectives Determine whether a representative sample of the general public can spatially conceptualize and identify places of ecosystem service provisioning for specific services Assess the spatial accuracy of these PPGIS results to understand how this information can be used to inform decision making Identify threats to places of ecosystem service provisioning from water pollution

Study Area Mobile Bay, AL (Baldwin and Mobile counties) 4,600 square miles Mixed urban and rural landscape Variety of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems Mobile Fairhope Bay Minette Orange Beach Gulf Shores Dauphin Island Bayou La Batre Citronelle Mobile Bay Mobile Co. Baldwin Co.

Survey Methodology Dillman method: 1.Pre-notice letter 2.Survey packet 3.Reminder postcard 4.Reminder letter 988 survey packets sent to randomly selected residents 274 received (27.7% response rate)

Questionnaire 6 parts 1.Bay knowledge and length of residence 2.Participation in outdoor recreation activities 3.Opinions on a range of wildlife, water, and development issues 4.Satisfaction with a range of regional characteristics 5.A PPGIS mapping activity 6.Demographic information

PPGIS Implementation Participants used color- coded 0.25 inch stickers to identify places on a map of the study area that they think are important for a range of natural resource management topics, including places that provide watershed services

Mapping Components

PPGIS Mapping Exercise Example completed map 87 possible points 24 x 36 in. True color aerial imagery Scale: 1:150,000

PPGIS Mapping Results Results from 242 respondents (88% of survey respondents) 11,391 points Mean: points per respondent

Ecosystem Service Choice Rationale Ecosystem services are any benefits that humans derive from ecosystems Services provided by watersheds General enough to be understood by public Spatially explicit Provided by large portions of study area Regularly impact residents of the Mobile Bay region

Watershed Services Fish Nursery Storm Protection Flood Protection Water Quality Protection Image courtesy of NOAA

Watershed Service Results Watershed service Number of dots used Percent of dots used Hotspot area Fish Nursery %85.04 mi 2 Storm Protection %82.14 mi 2 Flood Protection %8.78 mi 2 Water Quality Protection %36.00 mi 2

Kernel Density Analysis: Fish Nursery

Kernel Density Analysis: Storm Protection

Kernel Density Analysis: Flood Protection

Kernel Density Analysis: Water Quality Protection

Accuracy Assessment: Fish Nursery Total Area Providing Service km 2 Percent of PPGIS Points in Total Accurate Area 52.58% Percent of Total Accurate Area in Hotspot 25.90% Percent of Hotspot Identifying Accurate Land Cover 54.37%

Accuracy Assessment: Storm Protection Total Area Providing Service km 2 Percent of PPGIS Points in Total Accurate Area 41.00% Percent of Total Accurate Area in Hotspot 7.74% Percent of Hotspot Identifying Accurate Land Cover 20.34%

Accuracy Assessment: Flood Protection Total Area Providing Service 5, km 2 Percent of PPGIS Points in Total Accurate Area 78.37% Percent of Total Accurate Area in Hotspot 0.30% Percent of Hotspot Identifying Accurate Land Cover 74.43%

Accuracy Assessment: Water Quality Protection Total Area Providing Service 5, km 2 Percent of PPGIS Points in Total Accurate Area 73.45% Percent of Total Accurate Area in Hotspot 1.49% Percent of Hotspot Identifying Accurate Land Cover 89.88%

Water Pollution 664 points identified Hotspot area: mi 2

Water Pollution Perceptions PPGIS hotspots located around listed polluted streams Except for Dog River, which should be further investigated by managers

Water Pollution Threats Area of overlap: 1.54 mi 2

Management Implications PPGIS is a useful tool for natural resource management Highlights places with strong stakeholder support for protection Helps identify knowledge gaps for outreach education efforts PPGIS should be used in conjunction with other data to create a more well-rounded decision; it does not replace them Data from this study are being used by the Mobile Bay National Estuary Program

Acknowledgements Funding for this project was generously provided by Mobile Bay National Estuary Program U.S. Forest Service