June 25, 2013 System Preservation Guide. June 25, 2013 Study Purpose and Goals 1.Analyze existing road conditions 2.Comparison of funding versus road.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services in Fairfax County Board Transportation Committee Meeting March 1, 2011 Department.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
Guidebook for Risk Analysis Tools and Management Practices to Control Transportation Project Costs Keith R. Molenaar, PhD Stuart D. Anderson, PhD, PE Transportation.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Jeff Scheick –Northwest Region Manager –Highway.
1 State Transportation Issues Florida Association of Counties Webinar February 19, 2010 Kathy Neill Director, Office of Policy Planning Florida Department.
House Bill 2 and P3 Update Aubrey Layne Secretary of Transportation December 17, 2014.
1 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program ( ) Kit Baker, Chair ( Citizen’s Transportation Advisory Committee ) Desiree’ Winkler, P.E. ( Transportation.
OHIO AVIATION ASSOCIATION April 22, WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Dave Dennis – Aviation Planner, ODOT Office of Aviation; Project Manager for Focus.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Capital Planning Update 1 Senate Fiscal Committee/COPE Presentation January 3, 2012.
Management 11e John Schermerhorn
N EW Y ORK S TATE O FFICE OF E MERGENCY M ANAGEMENT Director Bill Davis.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 3, 2013.
June 25, 2013 System Preservation Guide. June 25, 2013 Study Purpose and Goals 1.Analyze existing road conditions 2.Comparison of funding versus road.
Moving Research into Practice.  Implementation is the routine use of a SHRP 2 product by users in their regular way of doing business.  Users can include.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
2015 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Background & Overview January 2015: Citizen Survey Results March 2015: 2014 Annual Progress Report Delivered.
WVDOT/MPO/FHWA Transportation Planning Conference WVDOT Traffic Data Collection, Processing and Analysis Handbook Presented to September 16, 2015 Presented.
AASHTO SCOHTS SUB COMMITTEE ON SAFETY MANAGEMENT STATUS UPDATE APRIL 29, 2009 Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Manage by Measure: Just Do It AASHTO SCOPM Annual Meeting October 23, 2009 Steve Simmons TxDOT Deputy Executive Director.
Dkl D. Kerry Laycock, CMC  Organizational Consultant  dklaycock.com Kent County, Michigan Citizens Committee Meeting November 14, 2011 Multi-Jurisdictional.
INDOT Access Management Study _________________________ Long Range Transportation Planning Section Division of Environment, Planning and Engineering INDIANA.
Regional Water Council Planning Update Dargan “Scott” Cole Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. 191 Peachtree Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Development of the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan June 20, 2012 Item #12 National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Metropolitan Washington.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Jean Wallace January 15, SP&R Part II Funding Distribution – FY2014.
1 Asset Management Steering Committee Briefing on Senate Bill 408 (Access Management) August 2013 Harold Lasley, P.E. Access Management Program.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN CRTPA Board Meeting May 17, 2010.
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Tim G. Schulte, P.E. Richland County Engineer.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
Materials, Pavements & Transportation Operations CONCEPTS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Stuart Anderson Gerald Ullman Making.
3/17/2008AMATS: Anchorage Metropolitan Transportation Solutions AMATS Air Quality Advisory Committee Informational Update March18, 2008.
Weather Information for Surface Transportation: AASHTO Activities June 13, 2006 WIST Workshop Presented by Leland D. Smithson AASHTO SICOP Coordinator.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments ITS Partnership Meeting February 2, 2005.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
The South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s Third Thursday Web Forum The SALCC Strategic Plan and What It Means Thursday, April 19, 2012.
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
History Group of transportation supporters gathered to discuss ideas to address Missouri’s transportation infrastructure investment Reviewed efforts and.
Creating Dynamic Value: Program Marketing and Two-Tiered Solicitation and Selection TRB Representatives / Annual RAC Meeting July 22-26, 2012.
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
Capital Plan Update FMCB Meeting February 26, 2016 Pre-Decisional – Draft for discussion only.
KING COUNTY BRIDGES AND ROADS TASK FORCE Roads Services Division Financial Review September 16, 2015.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Evergreen Highway Corridor Update Planning Commission Workshop March 22, 2016 Jennifer Campos, Senior Planner.
Fundamentals of Planning
21 Elements Meeting Ken Cole Director, San Mateo County Department of Housing August 18, 2016.
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Update on the South Dakota Digital Cadastral Initiative
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

June 25, 2013 System Preservation Guide

June 25, 2013 Study Purpose and Goals 1.Analyze existing road conditions 2.Comparison of funding versus road conditions 3.Make new tools available  Analysis and planning  Communications 4.Develop customized solutions for future needs 5.Promote awareness of best practices

June 25, 2013 Study Sponsorship & Participation Project Partners LRRB MnDOT SRF Pilot Counties Otter Tail Stearns Anoka Freeborn Dakota

June 25, 2013 Project Schedule

June 25, 2013 Sketch Tool

June 25, 2013 GAP Analysis - Example Otter Tail County Annual Roadway Need - $15.2 million/yr. Otter Tail County Annual Roadway Need - $15.2 million/yr. Current Expenditure (2011) $3.4 million/yr. Current Expenditure (2011) $3.4 million/yr. Year 1 Funding Gap $11.8 million/yr. Year 1 Funding Gap $11.8 million/yr. Note: This GAP Analysis is for pavement preservation and does not include reconstruction.

June 25, 2013 Potential Options to Address “Gap”  Adopt New Planning Strategies  Change Size of Road System  Consider Different Sources of Revenue  Consider New Maintenance Methods

June 25, 2013 Strategies 1.Interjurisdictional Transfers 2.Tiered Classification of County Roads (Different Maintenance Standards and Schedules) 3.Unpave Low Volume Roads 4.Transportation Plan 5.Performance Measures/Standards 6.Project Prioritization 7.Revenue Enhancements 8.New Maintenance Techniques 9.Decision Making Tools for Resource Allocation

June 25, 2013 Selected Strategies Selected System Preservation StrategiesAnoka StearnsFreeborn Otter Tail Dakota Jurisdictional Transfers Tiered Classification of County Roads Unpave Low Volume Roads Transportation Plans Preservation Performance Measures Project Prioritization Revenue Enhancements New Maintenance Techniques Decision Making Tools New – Public Outreach

June 25, 2013 Otter Tail County Approach Decision Points April 2014: County considers input, adopts new strategies Fall 2014 Begin new strategies Public Outreach Activities January 8, 2014 Fergus Falls January 9, 2014 Pelican Rapids January 28, 2014 Perham January 30, 2014 Henning April 2014 Meetings Same locations

June 25, 2013 Completed Tasks TasksDeliverables 1.Identify Funding Gap  Sketch Tool  Gap Analysis  State of the County Reports  Outreach & Marketing Materials 2.Compile Resources  Resource Guide (primer of existing tools) ­ FWD, PCI Asset Management, Traffic data/ forecasting, MnDOT Needs, GIS, MnCMAT, Transportation Plans, NCHRP 688 Determining Highway Maintenance Costs, NCHRP 743 Communicating the Value of Preservation – A Playbook 3.Develop Prioritization Methods and System Recommendations  Strategy Resource User Guide  Ongoing 4.Develop System  Ongoing 5.Develop Implementation Products (Statewide) 6.Draft Report 7.Final Report

June 25, 2013 Next Steps  Continue working with pilot counties to employ their selected strategies  Present findings from the selected system preservation strategies to county boards  Develop system plans and recommendations  Develop implementation products (statewide)  Prepare final plan

June 25, 2013 Feedback from Pilot Counties Anoka, Freeborn, Otter Tail  Project is going very well and has been the catalyst for us to begin the process of looking at our system in a long range vision framed by the question: “What do the citizens of Otter Tail County want our highway system to look like in 25 years?”  This project allowed Anoka County to dig into a few areas of that had not previously been a priority: refining our jurisdictional transfer priorities and creating a more comprehensive project prioritization process…a dynamic tool we will continue to use.  We now refer to this (Gap Analysis) as part of every CIP presentation to discuss the ever increasing gap in needed funding versus available revenue. It is the baseline for our Board of Commissioners on the state of the Freeborn County Highway System.

June 25, 2013 Questions? System Preservation Guide A Planning Process for Local Government Management of Transportation Networks