Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Problem solving skills
Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
A Guide to Implementation
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
How can we collect relevant evidence of student understanding?
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Aligning Assessments to Ohio Social Studies Standards Teaching American History Grant Presentation.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Lesson Planning Educ 3100.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
COMPONENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE WRITING PROGRAM
Orientation to the Civic Studies 11 Integrated Resource Package (IRP) 2005.
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
Session Materials  Wiki
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
BASED ON THE WORK OF HEIDI HAYES JACOBS, PH.D AND SUSAN UDELHOFEN, PH.D CURRICULUM MAPPING OVERVIEW Revised by Lisa Cohen June 2014.
Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School of Education Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School.
Reading and Writing National Standards workshop phase 2 Term
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
The Areas of Interaction are…
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Welcome Back!. ACS Curriculum Guides Wednesday, June 17, 2009 Day 3.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Parent Learning Morning November 6th 2007 October 2009.
Assessments Matching Assessments to Standards. Agenda ● Welcome ● What do you think of assessment? ● Overview of all types of evidence ● Performance Tasks.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Learning Targets January 21, 2008 Londa Richter & Jo Hartmann TIE.
MakingConnections Unit planning.
Research and Inquiry Information Studies K – 12 Curriculum for Schools and School Libraries.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
NCEES & Social Studies Through the Lens of Standards 3 and 4.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 2 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CTE Standards 1 Next Steps.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 1 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Re-Cap NGSS. Assessment, Evaluation, and Alignment.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Learning AP ILD November 8, 2012 Planning and Monitoring for Learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Presentation transcript:

Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers

Overview Part 1: Components of Program Development Part 2: Goals and Types of Evaluation Part 3: Creating an Effective Evaluation Plan Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan

PARK Teachers PART 3: Creating an Effective Evaluation Plan

PARK Teachers Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan Identify Program Goals Create an Evaluation Matrix Use variety of Assessment Techniques Select Assessment Strategies Pilot and Revise Assessments

PARK Teachers “What are the three key ideas or messages that I want all participants to know when they complete the program?” “What overarching question or statement brings all of your goals together?” Identify the program goals and essential question

PARK Teachers The PARK program goals focused on pre-service teachers being able to: Improve their geology content knowledge, Engage in quality instructional practices, Experience national park as a research education site, Learn about educational resources in national parks, Transfer their knowledge to their local community. The essential question was, “How do you recognize evidence of geologic change in your environment?” Identify the program goals and essential question

PARK Teachers Check for Understanding Task 3: Outcomes Part 1: Using your group’s essential question and program goals, write your group’s outcomes on a piece of poster paper. Part 2: Share your group’s outcomes with the whole group.

PARK Teachers Create an evaluation matrix based on program goals An evaluation matrix is an outline of the evaluation plan. The matrix includes the: Program Outcomes, Task to achieve the outcomes, and Assessment strategies to measure the outcomes. Let’s look at some specific examples from the PARK program on the next two slides.

PARK Teachers Educational OutcomeTasksMeasurement Develop a model for creating a partnership to focus on pre-service education -Develop observation protocol and procedures for tracking decision- making process. -Make observations and record decisions made at the partnership meetings. Document the formation and continuation of the partnership between constituents. Design a pre-service teacher graduate course module on geology Evaluating content of curriculum using a specific set of criteria such as: -Identify explicitly stated goals for curriculum -Alignment of goals with best practice in scientific community on topic of geology -Identify key teaching strategies to teach geology with an inquiry focus. -Examine transitions within and between topics in the curriculum -Examine assessment strategies -Identify connections to home communities Evaluate each component of the geology curriculum based on the criteria and make suggestions for revision to curriculum developers. Sample of PARK Program Evaluation Matrix

PARK Teachers Educational OutcomeTasksMeasurement Enhance teachers’ knowledge of geology content related to the natural setting provided by GGNRA - Create instruments to assess geology content - Pilot instruments & revise assessments - Administer tests - Analyze data / Write report Pre and post content tests to determine change in pre- service teachers’ knowledge of geology. - Develop teachers’ awareness of informal science education resources, particularly at National Parks, available to supplement and enhance science instruction - Develop teachers’ ability to use National Parks as labs for innovative, relevant place-based science instruction, including collaborating with informal educators - Create survey instruments to assess NPS informal science resources - Pilot survey instruments & revise - Administer surveys - Analyze data / Write report - Pre and post surveys to determine whether participants’ learned about informal science resources and how they might incorporate them into their teaching. -Interviews with sub samples of pre-service teachers about how they might use NP as a part of their curriculum in the future. (depends on funding) Sample of PARK Program Evaluation Matrix

PARK Teachers Check for Understanding Task 4: Evaluation Matrix Part 1: Complete your group’s evaluation matrix for your project A. Break down each program outcome and generate a list of tasks that need to be completed to achieve the specific outcome. B: Identify how you plan to measure or evaluate if you have achieved the outcome. Part 2: Present your evaluation matrix to the whole group.

PARK Teachers Select the Appropriate Assessment Strategies It is imperative that you select the appropriate assessment strategy when developing your evaluation plan. The type of assessment used must match the: program outcomes and type of knowledge being evaluated.

13 PARK Teachers Assessing Different Types of Knowledge Essential to select the appropriate assessment instrument to evaluate different types of knowledge. Most programs focus on a combination of content and performance-based knowledge. Content Knowledge Performance or Skill Knowledge

PARK Teachers Part 1: Select the Appropriate Assessments A. Identify how you plan to measure or evaluate if you have achieved the outcome. B: Think about the desired outcome and the type of knowledge being evaluated when selecting the assessment instrument. Part 2: Present your assessment selection to the whole group. Check for Understanding Task 5: Selecting Assessments

PARK Teachers Pilot and Revise Assessment Instruments Piloting and Revising the Assessment Instruments is Essential! The revision process helps you to: clarify what you are trying to assess, make revisions to other program components (content, instructional activities, or course planning)