North Country Inservice HS Mathematics Common Core State Standards Mathematics Practice and Content Standards Day 1 Friday, October 19, 2012 Presenter:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Measured Progress ©2012 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom Practices ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session One February.
CCSS Verbs of Math: Habits of a Mathematical Thinker July , 2013.
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
CCSSM National Professional Development Standards for Mathematical Practice Ellen Whitesides Director, Common Core State Standards Projects.
Presented at the CaMSP Learning Network Meeting Sacramento, CA April 4, 2011 Compiled and Presented by Susie W. Håkansson, Ph.D. California.
Developing Number and Operations through Reasoning, Sensemaking and Connections Minnesota Council of Teachers of Mathematics April 27, 2013 Linda Gojak,
An Overview of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Practice for use with the Common Core Essential Elements The present publication was developed.
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
DDI and Assessments in Mathematics: Designing Assessments that Provide Meaningful Data At the 6-12 Level February 4, 2014.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Jefferson County Schools K-5 Math Back to School Conference
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
CCSSM National Professional Development Fraction Domain Sandi Campi, Mississippi Bend AEA Nell Cobb, DePaul University Grade 3.
Effective Math Questioning
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Correlating Go Math & Standards for Mathematical Practices
California Mathematics Council WORKING WITH PARENTS AND FAMILIES TO SUPPORT THE COMMONCORE MATH STANDARDS.
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
Montville Township Public Schools Middle and High School Introduction to Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Monday, October 8, 2012 Presenter:
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
CVEDC CCSSM – HS Session # 1 Focus: Number & Quantity Content Domain and Applications of Practice Standards Monday, October 29, 2012.
North Country Inservice HS Mathematics Common Core State Standards Mathematics Practice and Content Standards Day 1 Friday, October 19, 2012 Presenter:
GV Middle School Mathematics Mrs. Susan Iocco December 10, 2014.
Background Information The CCSSM were a result of a state-led initiative in June 2009 by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
K-1 TIPM3 Dr. Monica Hartman Cathy Melody and Gwen Mitchell November 2, 2011.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
Elementary Math: 2 nd Grade Professional Development January 2012.
NEKSDC CCSSM – HS Session # 1 Focus: Number & Quantity Content Domain and Applications of Practice Standards Tuesday, October 16, 2012 Presenter: Elaine.
K–12 Session 4.2 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 2: Student Dispositions & Teacher Actions Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics What science teachers need to know.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math Wednesday, February 8th- 4pm EST Mathematical Habits of Mind in the Practices: Problem Solving & Attending to.
Vacaville USD October 30, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
M ATHEMATICAL P RACTICES For the Common Core. C ONNECTING THE S TANDARDS FOR M ATHEMATICAL P RACTICE TO THE S TANDARDS FOR M ATHEMATICAL C ONTENT The.
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math Wednesday, March 7th - 4pm Eastern Time Reasoning & Explaining in the Practices Presented by Sara Delano Moore,
Principal's Workshop: Looking for Evidence of the Standards for Mathematical Practice NEKSDC Thursday, October 11, 2012 Presenter: Elaine Watson, Ed.D.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Vacaville USD October 28, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math Wednesday, February 8th- 4pm EST Mathematical Habits of Mind in the Practices: Problem Solving & Attending to.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
$100 $400 $300$200$400 $200$100$100$400 $200$200$500 $500$300 $200$500 $100$300$100$300 $500$300$400$400$500.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
What is Mathematical Argumentation? Madelyn Colonnese (UConn), Sarah Brown (Manchester PS) Megan Staples (UConn) Jillian Cavanna (Michigan State University)
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Curriculum Leadership Council Elementary Mathematics Break-Out Session November 21, 2013.
California Common Core State Standards for School Counselors.
Mathematical Practice Standards
Common Core State Standards
NEKSDC Thursday, October 11, 2012 Presenter: Elaine Watson, Ed.D.
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
Cultivating Math Conversation Through Questioning
Presentation transcript:

North Country Inservice HS Mathematics Common Core State Standards Mathematics Practice and Content Standards Day 1 Friday, October 19, 2012 Presenter: Elaine Watson, Ed.D.

Introductions Share What feeds your soul personally? What is your professional role? What feeds your soul professionally?

Volunteers for Breaks I need volunteers to remind me when we need breaks! Every 20 minutes, we need a 2-minute “movement break” to help our blood circulate to our brains. Every hour we need a 5-minute bathroom break.

Formative Assessment How familiar are you with the CCSSM?

Setting the Stage Dan Meyer’s TED Talk Math Class Needs a Makeover Go to link: watsonmath.com “North Country High School Math Inservice October 19, 2012”

CCSSM Equally Focuses on… Standards for Mathematical Practice Standards for Mathematical Content Same for All Grade Levels Specific to Grade Level

8 Practice Standards Look at the handout SMP Lesson Alignment Template For an electronic copy to use later, go to watsonmath.com “North Country High School Math Inservice October 19, 2012”

Standards for Mathematical Practice Describe ways in which student practitioners of the discipline of mathematics increasingly ought to engage with the subject matter as they grow in mathematical maturity

Standards for Mathematical Practice Provide a balanced combination of Procedure and Understanding Shift the focus to ensure mathematical understanding over computation skills

Standards for Mathematical Practice Students will be able to: 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4.Model with mathematics. 5.Use appropriate tools strategically. 6.Attend to precision. 7.Look for and make use of structure. 8.Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

Video of NYC High School Piloting the CCSS Watch first 5 minutes on Math See link in watsonmath.com

Standards for Mathematical Practice Some of the following slides on the Practice Standards have been adapted from slides presented in several online EdWeb Webinars in February through May 2012 discussing that focused on the Practice Standards by Sara Delano Moore, Ph.D.

The 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice can be divided into 4 Categories Overarching Habits of Mind of a Mathematical Thinker (# 1 and # 6) Reasoning and Explaining (# 2 and # 3) Modeling and Using Tools (# 4 and # 5) Seeing Structure and Generalizing (# 7 and # 8)

The 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice are fluidly connected to each other. One action that a student performs, either internally or externally, when solving a problem can take on characteristics from several of the 8 Practice Standards.

Overarching Habits of Mind of a Mathematical Thinker 1.Make sense of problems & persevere in solving them. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. Construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others. Model with mathematics. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. Look for & make use of structure. Look for & express regularity in repeated reasoning.

Start with Good Problems Characteristics Example from Illustrative Mathematics (F-BF.A.1.a, F-IF.B.4, F-IF.B.5 ) Context relevant to students Incorporates rich mathematics Entry points/solution pathways not readily apparent Mike likes to canoe. He can paddle 150 feet per minute. He is planning a river trip that will take him to a destination about 30,000 feet upstream (that is, against the current). The speed of the current will work against the speed that he can paddle. Let s be the speed of the current in feet per minute. Write an expression for r(s), the speed at which Mike is moving relative to the river bank, in terms of s. Mike wants to know how long it will take him to travel the 30,000 feet upstream. Write an expression for T(s), the time in minutes it will take, in terms of s. What is the vertical intercept of T? What does this point represent in terms of Mike’s canoe trip? At what value of s does the graph have a vertical asymptote? Explain why this makes sense in the situation. For what values of s does T(s) make sense in the context of the problem?

Make Sense of Problems (part I) Mathematically proficient students…  Explain the meaning of the problem to themselves  Look for entry points to the solution  Analyze givens, constraints, relationships, goals

Mike’s Canoe Trip – Explain the meaning of the problem – Entry points – Givens, constraints, relationships, goals Mike likes to canoe. He can paddle 150 feet per minute. He is planning a river trip that will take him to a destination about 30,000 feet upstream (that is, against the current). The speed of the current will work against the speed that he can paddle. Let s be the speed of the current in feet per minute. Write an expression for r(s), the speed at which Mike is moving relative to the river bank, in terms of s. Mike wants to know how long it will take him to travel the 30,000 feet upstream. Write an expression for T(s), the time in minutes it will take, in terms of s. What is the vertical intercept of T? What does this point represent in terms of Mike’s canoe trip? At what value of s does the graph have a vertical asymptote? Explain why this makes sense in the situation. For what values of s does T(s) make sense in the context of the problem?

Persevere in Solving Them Mathematically proficient students….  Plan a solution pathway  Consider analogous cases and alternate forms  Monitor progress and change course if necessary

Persevere in Solving Them “It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer.” - Albert Einstein

Mike’s Canoe Trip – Possible solution pathways/strategies – Consider analogous cases & alternate forms – Monitor progress and change course if needed Mike likes to canoe. He can paddle 150 feet per minute. He is planning a river trip that will take him to a destination about 30,000 feet upstream (that is, against the current). The speed of the current will work against the speed that he can paddle. Let s be the speed of the current in feet per minute. Write an expression for r(s), the speed at which Mike is moving relative to the river bank, in terms of s. Mike wants to know how long it will take him to travel the 30,000 feet upstream. Write an expression for T(s), the time in minutes it will take, in terms of s. What is the vertical intercept of T? What does this point represent in terms of Mike’s canoe trip? At what value of s does the graph have a vertical asymptote? Explain why this makes sense in the situation. For what values of s does T(s) make sense in the context of the problem?

Make Sense of Problems (part II) Mathematically proficient students…  Explain correspondence and search for trends  Check their answers using alternate methods  Continually ask themselves, “Does this make sense?”  Understand the approaches of others

What can teachers do? Select rich mathematical tasks – Connected to rigorous mathematics content Resources for rigorous mathematical tasks can be found on “North Country High School Math Inservice October 19, 2012” Illustrative Mathematics MARS Tasks Inside Mathematics 3 – Act Math Tasks Dan Meyer Andrew Stadel Others

What can teachers do? Ask good questions – Is that true every time? Explain how you know. – Have you found all the possibilities? How can you be sure? – Does anyone have the same answer but a different way to explain it? – Can you explain what you’ve done so far? What else is there to do?

What can teachers do? Communicate to students the final solution to a problem is less important than the skills they develop during the process of finding the solution. The skills developed in working through the process are long-lasting skills that will serve them in other areas of life.

Attend to Precision – In Vocabulary – In Mathematical Symbols – In Computation – In Measurement – In Communication

How is the teacher ensuring that students are making sense of problem and attending to precision? See Video: Discovering Properties of Quadrilaterals on Watsonmath.com

Challenges to Precision Vocabulary – Similar, adjacent Mathematical Symbols –=–= Computation and Measurement – Accurate computation – Estimating when appropriate – Appropriate units of measure Communication – Formulate explanations carefully – Make explicit use of definitions

Mike’s Canoe Trip – Vocabulary – Mathematical Symbols – Computation & Measurement – Communication Mike likes to canoe. He can paddle 150 feet per minute. He is planning a river trip that will take him to a destination about 30,000 feet upstream (that is, against the current). The speed of the current will work against the speed that he can paddle. Let s be the speed of the current in feet per minute. Write an expression for r(s), the speed at which Mike is moving relative to the river bank, in terms of s. Mike wants to know how long it will take him to travel the 30,000 feet upstream. Write an expression for T(s), the time in minutes it will take, in terms of s. What is the vertical intercept of T? What does this point represent in terms of Mike’s canoe trip? At what value of s does the graph have a vertical asymptote? Explain why this makes sense in the situation. For what values of s does T(s) make sense in the context of the problem?

Reasoning and Explaining Make sense of problems & persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments & critique the reasoning of others. Model with mathematics. Use appropriate tools strategically. Attend to precision. Look for & make use of structure. Look for & express regularity in repeated reasoning.

2. Reason abstractly & quantitatively Mathematics in and out of context Working with symbols as abstractions Quantitative reasoning requires number sense Using properties of operations and objects Considering the units involved Attending to the meaning of quantities, not just computation

Construct viable arguments… Understand and use assumptions, definitions, and prior results – Think about precision (MP6) Make conjectures and build logical progressions to support those conjectures – Not just two column proofs in high school Analyze situations by cases – Positive values of X and negative values of X – Two-digit numbers vs three-digit numbers Recognize & use counter-examples – Maximum area problem

How do we help children learn how to reason and explain? Provide rich problems where multiple pathways and solutions are possible Celebrate multiple pathways to the same answer – Monitor students as they work to choose approaches to share with the whole class Provide plenty of opportunities for students to talk to each other Recognize the difference between a viable argument and opinion Provide scaffolds for them…but not too many!

How do we help children learn how to reason and explain? Provide plenty of opportunities for students to talk to each other. Create a classroom culture in which all students feel safe to express their thinking Make sure students recognize the difference between a viable argument and an opinion Create a classroom culture where it’s safe to critique each other in a respectful way Provide scripts (sentence frames)for them to use such as those from Accountable Talk (see resources on watsonmath.com)

Teacher Moves in Group Discussion By scaffolding students' responses and contributions, teachers can quickly make a difference in the level of rigor and productivity in classroom talk. Teachers can bring everyone's attention to a key point By "marking" a student's contribution "that's an important point” By asking the student to repeat the remark—or restating it in their own words—and indicating why the point is important. From ACCOUNTABLE TALK® SOURCEBOOK: FOR CLASSROOM CONVERSATION THAT WORKS Version 3.1 By Sarah Michaels (Clark University), Mary Catherine O’Connor (Boston University), Megan Williams Hall (University of Pittsburgh), with Lauren B. Resnick (University of Pittsburgh)

Teacher Moves in Group Discussion If someone asks a thought-provoking question, the teacher might turn the question back to the group ”Good question, what do you think?” as a way to encourage students to push their own thinking. By citing facts and posing counterexamples, teachers can challenge students to elaborate or clarify their arguments "but what about...?” From ACCOUNTABLE TALK® SOURCEBOOK: FOR CLASSROOM CONVERSATION THAT WORKS Version 3.1 By Sarah Michaels (Clark University), Mary Catherine O’Connor (Boston University), Megan Williams Hall (University of Pittsburgh), with Lauren B. Resnick (University of Pittsburgh)

Teacher Moves in Group Discussion Teacher can model what desirable behaviors and habits of mind look like, ”Here’s what good problem solvers do when they're monitoring their own process." Teachers can focus the group's thinking by recapping or summarizing key points that have been brought up in a discussion. From ACCOUNTABLE TALK® SOURCEBOOK: FOR CLASSROOM CONVERSATION THAT WORKS Version 3.1 By Sarah Michaels (Clark University), Mary Catherine O’Connor (Boston University), Megan Williams Hall (University of Pittsburgh), with Lauren B. Resnick (University of Pittsburgh)

Teacher Moves That Support Accountability to the Learning Community Accountability to the learning community requires that students listen to one another, attending carefully so that they can use and build on one another's ideas. Students and teachers agree and disagree respectfully, challenging a claim, not the person who made it. To support this kind of accountability, teachers must establish a classroom environment where everyone can hear each other, and where everyone knows how important it is to hear and be heard. From ACCOUNTABLE TALK® SOURCEBOOK: FOR CLASSROOM CONVERSATION THAT WORKS Version 3.1 By Sarah Michaels (Clark University), Mary Catherine O’Connor (Boston University), Megan Williams Hall (University of Pittsburgh), with Lauren B. Resnick (University of Pittsburgh)

Teacher Moves That Support Accountability to the Learning Community Keeping the channels open: "Did everyone hear that?" Keeping everyone together: "Who can repeat...?" Linking contributions: "Who wants to add on...?" Verifying and clarifying: "So, are you saying...?”

Teacher Moves That Support Accountability to Accurate Knowledge Pressing for accuracy: "Where can we find that?" Building on prior knowledge: "How does this connect?"

See slides 41 – 80 on HS CCSSM Powerpoint Part II