 Do non-majors learn genetics at a different rate than majors?  What factors affect how students think about and learn difficult genetics concepts? Jenny.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AP Biology Classroom Rules/Grading Policy.
Advertisements

How to Succeed in Mathematics WOU Mathematics Department
What is a Survey? A scientific social research method that involves
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
College Algebra Course Redesign Southeast Missouri State University.
Measurement Reliability and Validity
Interactive Learning with Classroom Response System in Biomaterials Education Spencer W. Crowder and Rucha V. Joshi Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Surveys and Questionnaires. How Many People Should I Ask? Ask a lot of people many short questions: Yes/No Likert Scale Ask a smaller number.
Impact of Career Services Retention, Graduation, Confidence, SLOs & SDOs.
Methodology Student Course Performance with Objectives Based Assessment Todd A Zimmerman, Gabriel Hanna - University of Wisconsin-Stout Question: Does.
STAT 250.3: Introduction to Biostatistics Instructor: Efi Antoniou Introduction.
How do we evaluate how effective we are in helping our students master course material? In promoting our broader educational agendas? -Prelim and final.
Scholarship of Teaching: An Introduction New Fellows Orientation April 17, 2008 SoTL Fellows
Project Design and Data Collection Methods: A quick and dirty introduction to classroom research Margaret Waterman September 21, 2005 SoTL Fellows
Cottrell Meeting (July/13/01): Pg 1 Check it out at: Can Students Learn Concept-Based Problem Solving on.
Test Preparation Strategies
Penelope Lyman Leveraging a Manual Accounting Cycle Project in Principles of Accounting Courses Joe Salamon Effects of Post-Lecture Metacognitive Notes.
Higher Biology Unit 1: Cell biology Unit 2: Genetics & Adaptations
PHYS 214: The Nature of Physics Physics 214: The Nature of PhysicsSpring 2004 Lecturer:Professor D. Koltick Office:Room 335 Physics Building Phone:
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
Developing Evaluation Instruments
Business and Management Research
Welcome to Accelerated Analysis Room 261 Michele Gooding Marking Period Interim Reports End of MP Report Card Distribution #110/3/1411/6/1411/20/14.
Using cases in UG Lectures Retail Marketing John Pal MBS
Using Questioning Strategies The First Step toward Common Core.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Understanding of the fundamentals ◦ By the end of the class, 70% of the students will be able to:  Correctly draw freebody diagrams of 2D truss structures.
The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for genetics Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, and Jennifer K. Knight Science Education Initiative.
Welcome to Honors Analysis Room 261 Michele Gooding Marking Period Interim Reports End of MP Report Card Distribution #110/3/1411/6/1411/20/14.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: Students are not adequately.
Adventures in flipping a cell biology course Dr. Katie Shannon Biological Sciences Missouri S&T Flipped Fridays.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
AAEC 3315 Agricultural Price Theory Summer II, 2015 Instructor: Shaikh M Rahman Telephone: (806)
The Mechanical Vibrations Quiz An example of formative assessment Ines Lopez Arteaga 19th March 2012.
Evaluation of Multimedia Software and a Workbook Designed to Improve 3-D Spatial Skills of Engineering Students Sheryl A. Sorby & Thomas Drummer Michigan.
How do these groups of students think about and learn genetics?
Dr. Sande Caton. Assessments Why do we assess our students? Individually, write at least three ideas you have about assessments With one or two colleagues.
Assessment of Student Learning Faculty Development Workshop October 31, 2013 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology & Biochemistry.
California Educational Research Association Annual Meeting Rancho Mirage, CA – December 5, 2008 Hoky Min, Gregory K. W. K. Chung, Rebecca Buschang, Lianna.
Student Preferences For Learning College Algebra in a Web Enhanced Environment Dr. Laura J. Pyzdrowski, Pre-Collegiate Mathematics Coordinator Institute.
Studying for Tests Before the Test Be sure to find out ahead of time. –what material the test will cover –what type of test it will be (multiple choice,
College Students ’ Conception of Volume Do-Yong Park Tiffany Lawler.
Evaluation & Assessment 10/31/06 10/31/06. Typical Point Breakdown COURSE GRADES: Grades will be assigned on the basis of 450 points, distributed as follows:
Learning Gains, Student Attitudes, and impacts on LA’s in Phys 1110 (Sp ‘03) S. Pollock With NSF/STEM-TP support.
Welcome to PHY2049 Physics for Engineers and Scientists II Dr. Bindell SPRING 2009 Dr. J. B. Bindell.
GATEWAY INITIATIVE Hillsborough Community College Fall 2007 Preliminary Results A Formative Evaluation.
Welcome to PHY2049 Physics for Engineers and Scientists II Dr. Bindell.
Diagnostic Testing David E. Meltzer University of Washington.
SoTL Institute Presentation Samantha Elliott Kerry July 18, 2008.
Distance Learning Quiz. Is Distance Learning For Me? Let this short quiz help you decide. For each question, choose one answer. Scoring instructions will.
Learning Assessment Loop Closing Activity in the Biology Department Vivian Navas Biology Department Assessment Coordinator May 2006.
Standards Based Grading. How is it different? Traditional Grade for each assignment Grade may accidentally be focused more on one concept than another,
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Why do we keep asking you all these questions?. What we want Prepare you for the workplace. Offer you meaningful educational experiences. Support your.
Research Problem Part of learning is learning from mistakes, but there is no “safe” mechanism for attempt->failure->reattempt built into most courses where.
Wendy Heck Grillo North Carolina Central University Dept. of Biology Biology Scholars 2009.
Innovative Applications of Formative Assessments in Higher Education Beyond Exams Dan Thompson M.S. & Brandy Close M.S. Oklahoma State University Center.
Overview of Types of Measures Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
Adventures in flipping a cell biology course Dr. Katie Shannon Biological Sciences Missouri S&T How do online videos and textbook reading engage students.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Clickers in a Biology Lab
Preliminary Data Analyses
Honors Analysis COURSE DESCRIPTION
What’s Happening With Millennials In Community College Geosciences
Standards Based Grading
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
Honors Analysis COURSE DESCRIPTION
A Guide for International Students Presented by - Mahitha Rao
EDUC 2130 Quiz #10 W. Huitt.
KATHY ZOGHBY University of Richmond Richmond, Virginia
Presentation transcript:

 Do non-majors learn genetics at a different rate than majors?  What factors affect how students think about and learn difficult genetics concepts? Jenny Knight and Michelle Smith 11/12/08 MCDB Science Education Initiative ASM Biology Scholars Research Residency Program Learning Genetics: comparing student learning in non-majors and majors genetics courses

The two courses, Fall 2008 formatLearning goals yeargenderMajor MCDB 1041 Non-majors (61 students reporting) LAs Clicker s Homework 3 exams Final Group activities Shares 7 content learning goals with majors 72.1% fresh/soph 62.7% female 6.7% Bio MCDB 2150 Majors (138 students reporting) LAs Clicker s Homework 3 exams Final Optional group activities 9 content learning goals 37.6% fresh/soph 58.7% female 55% Bio 13% Engineer/ Chem

Non majors pre: 34% post: 70% normalized gain: 54% n=61 Majors pre: 40% post: 78% normalized gain: 63% n=107 Are these students really different? Performance on the Genetics Concept Assessment (GCA) in Fall 2007 was not dramatically different Fall 2007 The GCA is a 25 question validated assessment tool that tests conceptual understanding of fundamental genetics concepts

Experimental Design: Rate of learning genetics: measure performance at 4 points during the semester 1. PRE ASSESSMENT : Administer the multiple choice GCA on the first day of class in both courses 2. WHAT THEY KNOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTRUCTION : Administer shared short multiple choice quiz after we address each topic already identified as a misconception area 3. WHAT THEY KNOW AFTER STUDYING : Administer shared multiple choice exam questions and a few short answer questions at each of 3 midterm exams 4. POST ASSESSMENT : Administer the multiple choice GCA as part of the final exam in both courses : This was interesting, but not enough data to make conclusions about learning genetics. So:

Pilot study (Fall 2007): Designed common quiz and exam questions for each common learning goal Observed: A trend towards increasing understanding (higher performance) with each measure, for each learning goal Majors were usually ahead of non-majors, but often by only a little What we still needed: – Better coordination--material was not introduced at the same time to both groups – more questions per learning goal to feel confident of comparisons Current study: Fall questions per learning goal per quiz or exam material introduced in same order, quizzes and exams over same material (topics introduced within 1 week of each other)

Fall 2008 Score on genetics content pre-assessment (GCA): Average score % (±SE) number of students Non-majors (1.7)70 Majors: (1.1) 148 LA’s 80.2(6.1)6 TA’s: 69.7 (7.2) 7

Performance on shared exam questions * * * Significantly different, Tukey post-hoc test p<.05 Exam 1Exam 2 * % students answering correctly

What factors affect how students think about and learn difficult genetics concepts? (characterizing the way students work and how they feel) 1. PERCEPTION : How do students feel about genetics and science? What is their motivation to succeed? 2. PROCESS and TIME: How do students study? How much time do students spend studying and how often do they study? How do they prefer to work (alone or in groups)? How do they approach solving difficult genetics problems (what resources do they use)? 3. PRIORITY : How much importance do students place on the class in relationship to their other classes? Experimental Design part 2 SURVEYS and INTERVIEWS

InterestGenetics background Reason for taking course Intimidatio n level of material Motivation Non majors (n=61) 49% high 25% never taken any genetics 70.5 science distribution requirement 16% for med school 26.2% high83.6% highly motivated to study Majors (n=138) 87% high 7.2% never taken any genetics 71.7 required for major 54.5% for med school 34% high 97% highly motivated to study Starting points: comparing the demographics of the two courses, Fall 2008

Starting points that might affect their perception of genetics InterestGenetics background Reason for taking course Intimidation level of material Motivation Non majors (n=61) 49% high 25% never taken any genetics 70.5 science distribution requirement 16% for med school 26.2% high83.6% highly motivated to study Majors (n=138) 87% high 7.2% never taken any genetics 71.7 required for major 54.5% for med school 34% high 97% highly motivated to study

What factors affect how students think about and learn difficult genetics concepts?

Survey questions: TIME How much do they study for exams? Exam 1Exam 2 % of students Hours studying

Survey questions (midsemester): PROCESS How do students study? I rework homework/ clicker questions/ activities in preparation for the exams: 1 (never) ……. 3 (sometimes)………5 (always) homeworkclicker questionsactivities

Survey questions (midsemester): PROCESS “culture” of group work You are working on a Friday activity and your classmate Chris, who is doing well in the course, answers a question. What are you most likely to do next? a. I will write the answer down and not really think about what Chris just said b. I will pause to think about what Chris said, but I will likely write down what s/he says c. I will probably write down a different answer, but I will not say anything to Chris d. I will ask Chris questions and point out any flaws in his/her answer before writing an answer down Majors: 29% B; 63.8%D Non-majors: 3% A, 45% B,31% D You are working on a Friday activity and your classmate Alex, who is struggling in the course, answers a question. What are you most likely to do next? a. I will write the answer down and not really think about what Alex just said b. I will pause to think about what Alex said, but I will likely write down what s/he says c. I will probably write down a different answer, but I will not say anything to Alex d. I will ask Alex questions and point out any flaws in his/her answer before writing an answer down Majors: 89.8% D Non-majors: 13.8% C, 78% D CJ and Sam are working through an activity. CJ says something that Sam thinks is wrong. What do you think is the most appropriate thing for Sam to do? a. Not say anything b. Ask an LA or course instructor to decide who is correct c. Point out errors in CJ’s thinking and offer an alternative view Majors: 42% B; 58% C Non-majors: 41.4% B, 58.6% C

Survey questions (midsemester): PRIORITY How many courses are you taking this semester? (number) Rank studying genetics compared to other courses Rank importance of genetics compared to other courses Rank interest level in genetics compared to other courses Divide rank by number of classes for each student, in each category, take average: LOW number (closer to 0 = highest studying, importance and interest) Avg # courses studyingimportance to future interest Non majors Majors

Conclusions so far… When compared to students in the non-majors course, students in the majors course: 1.Begin the course with slightly higher content knowledge and have had more exposure to genetics 2.Perform better on common exam questions 3.Feel a genetics course is more important to their future career and begin the course with a higher interest 4.Less likely to blindly trust a peer they perceive as knowledgeable 5. Study more for exams and spend more time reworking problems

What other questions would be useful to ask?