Developing Geometric Reasoning Mary Jane Schmitt August 22–24, 2006 Washington, DC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic Splash Quadrilaterals
Advertisements

P.M van Hiele Mathematics Learning Theorist Rebecca Bonk Math 610 Fall 2009.
Geometry.
Agenda. Mathematical Practices 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments.
Chapter 8 Introductory Geometry Section 8.3 Triangles, Quadrilateral and Circles.
Exploring the Math Content of the Iowa Core Curriculum…
from the current ‘Kentucky Program of Studies’ High School Skills and Concepts – Systems of Measurement Students will -make decisions about units and.
HOW MIGHT WE SUPPORT TEACHERS AS THEY DEEPEN THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING AND EXPLORE STUDENT THINKING RELATED TO THE K-6 GEOMETRY PROGRESSION? GINI STIMPSON.
3-D: The Foundation for Developing Geometric Thinking Dr. Jackie Sack RUSMP Spring Networking Conference February 24, 2007.
©2001 CBMS Math Preparation of Teachers Teachers need to study the mathematics of a cluster of grade levels, both to be ready for the various ways in which.
Geometry Theme MAA PREP WORKSHOP Laurie Burton and Maria Fung Western Oregon University July 8 th 2003.
The van Hiele levels MA418 – Spring 2010 McAllister.
VDW Ch 20: Geometric Thinking
Number and Operations Standard Instructional programs from prekindergarten through grade 12 should enable all students to— Understand numbers Understand.
The van Hiele Model of Geometric Thought
1 Geometry and Spatial Reasoning Develop adequate spatial skills Children respond to three dimensional world of shapes Discovery as they play, build and.
Transforming Geometric Instruction Part 1 Understanding the Instructional Shifts in the Iowa Core Mathematics Standards Grades 6-8.
1. An Overview of the Geometry Standards for School Mathematics? 2.
Supporting Teachers. Serving Students Algebra Practice with a Geometry Connection Bob Battinich Pacent Learning Solutions.
Geometric and Spatial Reasoning
Geometric Structure G.1Adevelop and awareness of the structure of a mathematical system, connecting definitions, postulates, logical reasoning and theorems.
Susana Bravo. Why Projects? Project Based Learning is an approach to teaching that involves the use of projects and other hands on tools. It is an alternative.
CHAPTER 8 Geometry Slide 2Copyright 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. 8.1Basic Geometric Figures 8.2Perimeter 8.3Area 8.4Circles 8.5Volume.
Developing Geometric Reasoning K-2 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class March 14, 2011 Paige Richards and Dana Thome.
What in the Heck is Standard 4 (not 5) in Grades K-5?
ALGEBRA 2. EALR 1: The student understands and applies the concepts and procedures of mathematics. Select and Justify equations and equations to model.
Three Dimensional Shapes csm.semo.edu/mcallister/mainpage Cheryl J. McAllister Southeast Missouri State University MCTM – 2012.
Geometry Grades K-2. Goals:  Build an understanding of the mathematical concepts within the Geometry Domain  Analyze how concepts of Geometry progress.
Grade 2 - Unit 1 Lesson 1 I can retell, draw, and solve story problems. I can recognize math as a part of daily life. Lesson 2 I can create story problems.
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
TIPM3 Second and Third Grade Geometry November 3, 2010.
The Geometry of Learning Unit Presentation By Dawn Brander.
Tending the Greenhouse Vertical and Horizontal Connections within the Mathematics Curriculum Kimberly M. Childs Stephen F. Austin State University.
GRADE 8 PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM  Understand and apply the Pythagorean Theorem.  Explain a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem and its converse. Here is one.
An Introduction to Chapter 9: Geometric Figures
Geometry and Measurement ECED 4251 Dr. Jill Drake.
Susana Bravo. Why Projects? Project Based Learning is an approach to teaching that involves the use of projects and other hands on tools. It is an alternative.
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
Standard 4 in Grades 3-5 Eddie Keel Haywood High School
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Understanding Shape in Kindergarten and Grade 1 Common Core.
3.4e: Congruent and Similar Solids p GSE’s Primary Secondary M(G&M)–10–2 Makes and defends conjectures, constructs geometric arguments, uses geometric.
Assessment Mathematics TEKS Refinement Project. Assessment.
Modular Origami From Christmas Crafting to Middle School Math Lessons… Soraya Dangor 4/18 Sequences ✓ Equations ✓ Communication ✓ Spacial Reasoning ✓ Angles.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Principles and Standards for grades pre-K-2.
Geometry EDN 322. NCTM’S STANDARD FOR GEOMETRY  analyze characteristics and properties of two-and three-dimensional geometric objects and develop mathematical.
Tricky Triangles Math Alliance September 28, 2010.
Teaching children to reason mathematically Anne Watson Ironbridge 2014 University of Oxford Dept of Education.
Using GSP in Discovering a New Theory Dr. Mofeed Abu-Mosa This paper 1. Connects Van Hiele theory and its levels of geometric thinking with.
 Van Hiele Levels Math Alliance September 14, 2010 Kevin McLeod Chris Guthrie.
Geometry The Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought.
NC NAEP Project Middle Grades Module 2 – Activity 4 Research Reflections.
Geometry 1 st Grade Geometry Lesson. Content Strand Addressed Geometry Strand Students will: use visualization and spatial reasoning to analyze characteristics.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
TIPM3 March 2, 2011 Kindergarten and First Grade.
CHAPTER 20 Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concepts
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
Copyright 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc.
Creating, Describing, and Comparing Shapes
Levels of Geometric Thinking The van Hiele Levels
Dr. Lee Wai Heng & Dr. Ng Kok Fu
Progression of Geometry
The Geometer’s Sketchpad
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
2009 MATHEMATICS STANDARDS OF LEARNING TRAINING INSTITUTES
Transformations: Dilations
Multiple Transformations
Students proficient in this standard What do the Standards for Mathematical Practice mean in the context of the Conceptual Category: Geometry?
Common Core Vs Kansas Standards
Presentation transcript:

Developing Geometric Reasoning Mary Jane Schmitt August 22–24, 2006 Washington, DC

Slide 2 Geometry “The notion of building understanding in geometry across the grades, from informal to formal thinking, is consistent with the thinking of theorists and researchers.” (NCTM 2000, p. 41)

Slide 3 Geometry and Measurement How does geometric understanding develop? Similarity — a “big idea” How does this apply to the GED?

Slide 4 Geometry and Measurement You have four rectangles. Order them by size of area.

Slide 5 The Van Hiele Theory Level 1:Visualization Level 2: Analysis Level 3: Informal deduction Level 4: Formal deduction Level 5: Rigor

Slide 6 Level 1: Visualization Students can name and recognize shapes by their appearance, but cannot specifically identify properties of shapes. Although they may be able to recognize characteristics, they do not use them for recognition and sorting. Students manipulate physical models, e.g., lay one shape on top of another.

Slide 7 Level 2: Analysis Students begin to identify attributes of shapes and learn to use appropriate vocabulary related to attributes, but do not make connections between different shapes and their properties. In the example of the area of a rectangle, students can count the component square units.

Slide 8 Level 3: Informal Deduction Students are able to recognize relationships between and among properties of shapes or classes of shapes and are able to follow logical arguments using such properties. See the relationship between length, width, and area for all rectangles.

Slide 9 Level 4: Formal Deduction Students can go beyond just identifying characteristics of shapes and are able to construct proofs using postulates or axioms and definitions. A typical high school geometry course should be taught at this level.

Slide 10 Level 5: Rigor Students at this level can work in different geometric or axiomatic systems and would most likely be enrolled in a college-level course in geometry.

Slide 11 Reflections If you were going to teach finding the area of a rectangle to a group of adults in a pre-GED class, how would you start? What activities might help students make the leap and connect from Level 1 to Level 2 to Level 3? How would you include the three levels when finding the areas of other polygons, circles, or irregular shapes?

Slide 12 GED Item Writers’ Manual Relevant Content Area Specifications Geometry and Measurement Model and solve problems using the concepts of perpendicularity, parallelism, congruence and similarity of geometric figures (includes polygons, 3-D figures, and circles). Use spatial visualization to describe and analyze figures. Use the Pythagorean Theorem, similarity, and right triangle trigonometry to model and solve problems. Solve and estimate solutions to problems involving length, perimeter, area, surface area, volume, angle measurement, capacity, weight, and mass. Use rates in problem situations. Read and interpret scales, meters, and gauges. Predict the impact of a change in linear dimension on the perimeter, area, and volume of figures

Slide 13 Similarity One of the “big ideas” of geometry Shows up on the GED and in real life –Making reproductions –Interpreting scale drawings

Slide 14 Final Reflections Can you teach for understanding and teach to pass the GED at the same time? How does an ABE program build a developmental math curriculum?