Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Equivalence Tests in Clinical Trials
Advertisements

Design of Bioequivalence Studies Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD
Regulation documentation requirements
Bioequivalence Studies Anoop Agarwal
III. Drug Metabolism  The aim of drug metabolism is to convert lipid soluble (non polar) drugs to polar metabolites easily excreted in urine.  The liver.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
Pharmacokinetics of Drug Absorption
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Regulatory Requirements.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Hanoi, WORKSHOP ON PREQUALIFICATION OF ARV: BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence Study Design and Conduct Presented.
Artemisinin combined medicines, Kampala, February |1 | Training workshop on regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin based combined.
WHO Prequalification Program Workshop, Kiev, Ukraine, June 25-27,2007.
Recommendations on integrated safety summaries from Phase 1 studies
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
FDA Nasal BA/BE Guidance Overview
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
1 MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PRODUCTS: A MANUAL FOR DRUG REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy
OVERVIEW OF DACA BIOEQUIVALENCE REPORT EVALUATION Presented by Solomon Shiferaw 31Augst 2010.
Clinical Pharmacy Part 2
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Case studies Saila Antila, PhD WHO consultant Training workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence, Kiev
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
ACPS Meeting, October 19-20, 2004 BioINequivalence: Concept and Definition Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER,
1 Axcan Public Presentation for the FDA Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2008.
SYSTEMIC ABSORPTION AS THE MOST ACCURATE AND SENSITIVE METHOD OF DETERMINING BIOEQUIVALENCE OF GENERIC TOPICAL PRODUCTS Chris Hendy Ph.D. Novum Pharmaceutical.
Bioavailability Dr Mohammad Issa.
Issues in Generic Substitution: Safety/Efficacy, Cost Savings and Supply Robert J. Herman, MD, FRCPC Professor, Department of Medicine University of Calgary.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Artemisinin-based Products Dr. Henrike Potthast
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Statistical considerations Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course Bioequivalence & Bioavailability Michael A. Swit, Esq. Vice President.
Drug Administration Pharmacokinetic Phase (Time course of ADME processes) Absorption Distribution Pharmaceutical Phase Disintegration of the Dosage Form.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
CHEE 4401 Definitions drug - any substance that affects the structure or functioning of an organism pharmaceutics - the area of study concerned with the.
Rivaroxaban Has Predictable Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) When Given Once or Twice Daily for the Treatment of Acute, Proximal Deep Vein.
Bioequivalence Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Bioavailability Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Department of Pharmaceutics Faculty of Pharmacy Omer Al-Mukhtar University Tobruk, Libya.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
INTRODUCTION CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS
BIOPHARMACEUTICS.
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Examples of deficiencies in submitted data Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October.
Malaysia, EVALUTION OF DOSSIERS IN WHO- PREQUALIFICATION PROJECT MULTISOURCE TB-DRUGS Evaluation of bioavailability/bioequivalence data Based,
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence L 10,11.  Bioavailability is a measurement of the rate and extent (amount) to which the active ingredient or active.
Milan Smid, MD, PhD Tutorial: WHO Prequalification Programme for Priority Medicines, Beijing, March, 2010 Demonstration of Bioequivalence.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation The key principles of pharmacology.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Statistical Considerations.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Definitions and Concepts
The process of drug development. Drug development 0,8 – 1 mld. USD.
Tanzania, August 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Bioequivalence dossier requirements for the prequalification project WHO Training Workshop.
Chapter 8 BIOAVAILABILITY & BIOEQUIVALENCE
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
1 Concentration-time curve
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring chapter 1 part 1
Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology
Presentation transcript:

Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009

Bioequivalence studies are usually done to compare pharmacokinetic parameters of generic drug products with those of a marketed formulation, typically an innovator drug product.

Bioequivalence = Comparative bioavailability

BIOAVAILABILITY: “Bioavailability means the rate and extent to which the active pharmaceutical ingredient or active moiety is absorbed from a pharmaceutical form and becomes available at the site of action.” (FDA, EU CPMP, MCC)

BIOEQUIVALENCE: “The absence of a significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active pharmaceutical ingredient or active moiety in pharmaceutical equivalents or pharmaceutical alternatives become available at the site of action (bioavailability) when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions in an appropriately designed study.” (FDA)

THERAPEUTIC EQUIVALENCE: Clinical (therapeutic) trials can be done to prove that safety and efficacy of two pharmaceutical products are essentially the same, at the same dose. These studies are usually avoided because they are time-consuming, expensive and exposed to difficulties. Clinical outcomes or pharmacodynamic parameters may be involved.

Proof of bioequivalence normally implies clinical / therapeutic equivalence and interchangeable use of pharmaceutical products.

Comparative bioavailability studies (bioequivalence testing): This is the cost-effective gold standard to predict clinical equivalence of like products.

Bioequivalence studies: Designed to obtain comparative in vivo pharmacokinetic data = plasma drug concentration versus time data Appropriate statistical analysis Interpretation of results according to guidelines produced by regulatory authorities

PK parameters used: AUC: Area Under the Curve Describes the total amount of drug present in the plasma, thus indicator of the extent of drug absorption.

PK parameters used: C max : the peak plasma drug concentration (this, together with t max, are indicators of rate of drug absorption.)

AUC and C max are regarded as PRIMARY pk parameters in bioequivalence studies

SECONDARY pk parameters include: t max : the time (from dosing) to reach C max. t½: terminal elimination half-life. This indicates the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half (50%).

Typical Study Design (two formulations): Two period Randomized and balanced Cross-over Single dose Laboratory-blind

Study subjects: Number of subjects: Must be sufficient to provide 80% of power for meeting and passing the acceptance criteria. Can be determined from published literature. Normally sample size is calculated by a biostatistician.

Selection of subjects: Usually healthy volunteers, with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria (age, BMI etc.) Enroll a few more to provide for drop-outs Seldom patients (only when risks/adverse events are unacceptable to healthy volunteers).

Study Standardisation: Fasting: dosing only on empty stomach (for most studies) Dosing: same time of day for each subject Fluid intake at dosing: critical to use same volume, e.g. 200ml

Study Standardisation (2): Food and fluid intake: standardised and supervised. Posture and activity: controlled and supervised No concomitant medicines, alcohol, caffeine or certain fruit juices allowed.

Blood sampling: Venous blood collected in heparinised or EDTA tubes at predetermined intervals over predetermined time. Sampling frequency depends on expected t max.

Blood sampling (2): Sampling duration depends on the expected t½ of the drug and the sensitivity of the bio-analytical method used. Usually blood samples are collected for 5 x t½ Minimum required by MCC is 3 x t½ (providing 80% of AUC 0-∞ )

Blood sampling (3): Blood volume withdrawal limitations usually means that a total of about 20 samples per period are allowed. Sampling points should be chosen carefully, to result in adequate profiles allowing accurate estimation of relevant pk parameters.

Other Issues: Informed consent (comprehensive). Allow an adequate washout period between profiles (>5 x t½). Steady-state (Css) studies (= multiple doses) are sometimes required. Usually single-dose studies are sufficient.

Fed vs Fasting: 1.Immediate release dosage forms: usually studied whilst fasting, unless pronounced food effects known. 2.Modified release dosage forms: - to check for any effects of food, studies are required under both fed and fasting conditions. - dosing occurs immediately after a high fat meal.

Bioanalysis: GLP, GCP, QC and SOPs. Only validated, reliable chromatographic methods with sufficient sensitivity to be used. Sometimes necessary to measure active metabolite(s) as well as parent compound. Adverse events documented

Acceptance range for pk parameters: AUC: 90% confidence intervals should usually be within 0,80-1,25 (80%-125%). C max : 90% confidence intervals should usually be within 0,75-1,33 (75%-133%). (In some cases 80%-125%). These are calculated using log-transformed data. Must be stated up-front in the protocol and may not be changed / added retrospectively.

Generic vs proprietary prescribing or dispensing in South Africa: Registration of generic products by MCC will not compromise safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapeutic regimens.

AddClin Research Phase 1 unit

CONTACT DETAILS: Phase 1 / BE Studies AddClin Research Phase 2-4 and Therapeutic Clinical Equivalence Studies Synexus SA Managing DirectorLaetitia Crause Dr Sanet AspinallBusiness Development Tel: (012)