Trial Design in the CDISC World Albert Chau 26 July 2011 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principal Statistical Programmer Accovion GmbH, Marburg, Germany
Advertisements

ADaM Implementation Guide: It’s Almost Here. Are You Ready?
Jason Rock Study Design Jason Rock
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Elke Sennewald, 22 September 2011 Trial Design Introduction.
CDISC SDTM-BRIDG Mapping
UC5:Assigning of Epoch after treatment discontinuation (NS)
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
1 QOL in oncology clinical trials: Now that we have the data what do we do?
EDRN’s Validation Study Information Management System Developed for EDRN by the DMCC Cancer Biomarkers Group Division of Cancer Prevention Jet Propulsion.
1 Health and Disease in Populations 2002 Week 9 – 2/5/02 Randomised controlled trials 2 Dr Jenny Kurinczuk.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Standardisation of Trial Design Definitions in CDW at Novo Nordisk
Turning Questions into Trials: Innovation in Surgical Oncology Jennifer E. Rosen MD FACS Assistant Professor of Surgery and Molecular Medicine Boston University.
The role of economic modelling – a brief introduction Francis Ruiz NICE International © NICE 2014.
Biostatistics ~ Types of Studies. Research classifications Observational vs. Experimental Observational – researcher collects info on attributes or measurements.
Clinical Trials Hanyan Yang
An Approach-Creating Trial Design Models
Selection of Data Sources for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Gregory Steffens Novartis Associate Director, Programming NJ CDISC Users’ Group 17 April 2014 Supplemental Qualifiers.
Accredited Member of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, USA Tips on clinical trials Maha Al-Farhan B.Sc, M.Phil., M.B.A., D.I.C.
23 August 2015Michael Knoessl1 PhUSE 2008 Manchester / Michael Knoessl Implementing CDISC at Boehringer Ingelheim.
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL Title: Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer (PABC); Prospective Data Registry in Saudi Arabia Sponsor: Oncology Department, King.
CBER CDISC Test Submission Dieter Boß CSL Behring, Marburg 20-Mar-2012.
© 2011 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this document are confidential and proprietary to Octagon Research Solutions,
Intervention Studies Principles of Epidemiology Lecture 10 Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH, FACE.
Databases From A to Boyce Codd. What is a database? It depends on your point of view. For Manovich, a database is a means of structuring information in.
Lecture 16 (Oct 28, 2004)1 Lecture 16: Introduction to the randomized trial Introduction to intervention studies The research question: Efficacy vs effectiveness.
Study design P.Olliaro Nov04. Study designs: observational vs. experimental studies What happened?  Case-control study What’s happening?  Cross-sectional.
Lessons Learned from Opioid Addiction Trials
More Designs Section 4.2B. Block Group of experimental units or subjects that are known before the experiment to be similar in some way that is expected.
RCRIM Projects: Protocol Representation and CDISC Message(s) January 2007.
1 Statistics in Drug Development Mark Rothmann, Ph. D.* Division of Biometrics I Food and Drug Administration * The views expressed here are those of the.
RevMan for Registrars Paul Glue, Psychological Medicine What is EBM? What is EBM? Different approaches/tools Different approaches/tools Systematic reviews.
Practical Study Management IWRS
Analysis of Two-Way tables Ch 9
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Older People’s Services The Single Assessment Process.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
1 Health and Disease in Populations 2002 Session 8 – 21/03/02 Randomised controlled trials 1 Dr Jenny Kurinczuk.
A: Daley BM, Shuster S. Effect of aspirin on pruritus. BMJ 1986;293:907 1.Identify the criteria for patient selection. It is unclear how they were selected,
DBMS ER model-2 Week 6-7.
Subject Screening, Recruitment, and Retention
To Find the Cancer Staging Tool, click on “Go To” and then chose “Cancer Staging”
UC3: Complications Related to Unscheduled performed instead scheduled (TK) Raw visit numberVISITNUMLBDYLBDTC 2missing VISITVISITNUMSVDYSVDTCSVUPDES.
18 Week Pathway Discussion about potential IM&T issues.
How good is your SEND data? Timothy Kropp FDA/CDER/OCS 1.
How Good is Your SDTM Data? Perspectives from JumpStart Mary Doi, M.D., M.S. Office of Computational Science Office of Translational Sciences Center for.
CDISC SDS Oncology Domains: An Orientation to Aid Review & Feedback Barrie Nelson CDISC SDS Oncology Sub Team Lead
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
Clinical database management: From raw data through study tabulations to analysis datasets Thank you for your kind introduction, and the opportunity to.
Study Design, Study Participation Retrieve Protocol for Executation
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Adastra v3 Reporting & National Quality Requirements
ADSCaN A Randomised Phase II study of Accelerated, Dose escalated, Sequential Chemo-radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Rationale: Lung cancer.
The DEPression in Visual Impairment Trial:
EDRN’s Validation Study Information Management System
Secondary Uses Primary Use EHR and other Auhortities Clinical Trial
Why use CDISC for trials not submitted to regulators?
It’s about Time! (to Event)
SDTMs in Medical Devices A First Attempt
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSAL.
HOW TO ENTER END OF TRIAL DATA
Visualizing Subject Level Data in Clinical Trial Data
SDTM and ADaM Implementation FAQ
Cindy Murray NP Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Screening Epoch Disposition eCRF
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL
Design and Analysis of Survival Trials with Treatment Crossover, delayed treatment effect and treatment dilution Presenter: Xiaodong Luo– R&D-SANOFI US.
How Should We Select and Define Trial Estimands
Presentation transcript:

Trial Design in the CDISC World Albert Chau 26 July

Agenda How to construct Trial Design datasets o Relationships with other SDTM domains Challenges for new users o Confusion of definitions/terms o Granularity Case study in oncology 2

Trial Design Domains Information about study design o No subject data Describe the overall trial design and plan via data representation 3

Trial Design Datasets Trial Arms (TA) Trial Elements (TE) Trial Visits (TV) Trial Inclusion /Exclusion (TI) Trial Summary (TS) Start thinking about this before you start the other SDTM datasets! 4

Trial Summary (TS) Dataset Summary of trial information No link to subject-level data in SDTM Common questions: o What need to be included? o Why are we generating this? 5

Trial Inclusion/Exclusion (TI) Not subject-oriented Link to IE domain o STUDYID, IECAT, IETESTCD, IETEST o Best to create TI first, before you tackle IE Common questions: o How to truncate if >200 characters? o Protocol amendment: do we need to add to TI only the changed criteria or all criteria? o Local amendment 6

TA / TE / TV datasets A data representation on the different epochs, arms and visit structure in the study Where to start? Is there a systematic approach? 7

Example 1 – Trial Design Schema 8 Screen Drug A Drug B Follow-up

Epoch 9 Screen Drug A Drug B Follow-up Screening Treatment Follow-up EPOCH

Arm / Treatment Strategy 10 Screen Drug A Drug B Follow-up Screening Treatment Follow-up ARM (Treatment Strategy) 1 2

Arm / Treatment Strategy 11 Screen Drug A Drug B Follow-up Screening Treatment Follow-up Study Cell 1 2 Screen Drug A Drug B Follow-up

Trial Design Matrix 12 Screening Treatment Follow-up A B Screen Drug A Drug B Follow-up

TE (Trial Elements) What are the elements? o Unique study cell values (=ELEMENT) 13 Screen Drug A Drug B Follow-up

TE (Trial Elements) Assign an element code (ETCD) to each value, define the start of each element (TESTRL) and end of each element (TEENRL or TEDUR) 14 Screen Drug A Drug B Follow-up SCRN A B FU Informed Consent First dose of drug A First dose of drug B 1 week after last dose of drug ETCDELEMENTTESTRL

Trial Arms (TA) Dataset Go back to the Trial Design Matrix 1 study cell = 1 row of record in TA So in our example we expect 6 rows of record ARM / ARMCD o = Treatment Strategy o Not necessarily the same as the actual drug names/codes ETCD / ELEMENT o Must match up with the values in TE 15

TE -> SE (Subject Elements) Shows the trial progress of each subject o Whether a subject passes through each element o Timing of each element 16

Trial Visit (TV) Dataset Describe the planned visits in a trial VISITNUM and TRSTRL is required ARMCD expected VISIT and VISITDY permissible 1 record per planned visit per arm o A “visit” may span over several days (eg screening visit) 17

TV -> SV (Subject Visits) Shows the actual visits of each subject o Compare against the scheduled/planned visits or assessments in TV o Include unscheduled visits Designation of VISITNUM becomes crucial o Whole number for planned visits o Decimals for unscheduled visits in SV – and slot into right place 18

Challenges in 1 oncology study Leukemia o Drug X (Days 1-4) is the current standard of treatment o Drug A (Days 1-7) is the experimental treatment Patients to receive: o Drug A+X vs Drug X (1 course of treatment) o If patients on drug X not responding, then option to “crossover” to drug A+X (1 further course) Follow-up o Responders: Efficacy follow-up (+ post-remission therapies where applicable) o Non-responders and relapse: Survival follow-up 19

Study schema 20 Screen Drug A + X Drug X Drug A + X Efficacy FU (q 1 months) Survival FU (q 3 months)

Question 1 – what are the epochs? 1 Treatment epoch or separate into 2? 1 Follow-up epoch or separate into 2? 21 Screen Drug A + X Drug X Drug A + X Efficacy FU (q 1 months) Survival FU (q 3 months) Screening TreatmentEfficacy FUSurvival FU

Question 2 – How many arms? For the patients on Drug X and then rollover to Drug A+X – should this considered as a separate “arm”? 22 Screen Drug A + X Drug X Drug A + X Efficacy FU (q 1 months) Survival FU (q 3 months)

Question 3 – Granularity of Elements Do we model using “Treatment”+”Rest” or simply “Treatment” (which includes rest period)? Length of “Rest” differs between patients Do we need to distinguish between “Treatment” and “Rest”? 23 Treatment (Day 1 - 7) Rest (Day 8 – ??) Treatment (Day )

Question 4 – Describing Trial Visits How to number the visits, when you don’t know how many visits there are up-front? Don’t have to be consecutive numbers Example: o 1 st course of treatment: Start with VISITNUM=11 o Cross-over: Start with VISITNUM=51 o Efficacy follow-up: Start with VISITNUM=201 o Survival follow-up: Start with VISITNUM=501 24

Question 5 – Varying Trial Visits During Efficacy Follow-up, patients can receive “post-remission therapies”. “Reset” follow-up clock from post-remission therapies How to model Trial Elements and Visits? 25

Question 5 – Varying Trial Visits Suggestion: o Start with VISITNUM=201 for Efficacy Follow-up o Trial Element: Up to the next post-remission therapy o 1 st Post-Remission therapy: VISITNUM=250 o 2 nd Post-Remission therapy: VISITNUM=300 o etc 26

Question 6 – Post-remission therapies For post-remission therapies in efficacy follow-up, the choice is down to the treating physician Can potentially be Drug X or any other therapies Should we create Trial Elements for the different therapies? 27

Question 7 – Randomised but not treated Randomisation usually starts 1-2 days before start of treatment due to logistic reason What is the start and end of “Screen” and “Drug A”/”Drug A+X” trial elements in TE? How to capture these patients in SE? Should randomisation be a separate visit in TV/SV? 28

Question 8 – When is a visit no longer “planned” Planned visits for lab assessments: Day 15, Day 21 A patient had lab taken on Day 17 and Day 22 instead Should these be put into planned visits of Day 15 and Day 21, or unscheduled visits? 29

Other challenges in oncology studies Post-remission therapy will be given and patients will be followed up “according to institution’s standard treatment practice” Dose escalation studies – how many arms? Legacy studies: Do we need to provide trial design datasets? 30

Summary Construction of TA/TE/TV o Study Schema  Epoch  Arm  Study Cells o Unique study cells = rows in TE o All study cells = rows in TA o If all arms have same visits, then 1 set of visits for all arms. Otherwise 1 set of visits for each arm. Complex study designs o Systematic approach will make life easier o Think at protocol/CRF design stage – don’t wait till the end o Details vs ease of use 31

Thank you! Tel: +44 (0) Web: 32