Conservation Planning: What’s New?. Topics for Today’s Webinar Revised NPPH Proposed NRCS Land Uses Resource Concerns Planning criteria.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
Advertisements

Project L.O.F.T. Report May 2007 through October 2007 Creating a design to meet stakeholder desires and dissolve our current set of interacting problems.
Reducing the Environmental Risks of Pest Management Joseph K. Bagdon Pest Management Specialist NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
 Is extremely important  Need to use specific methods to identify and define target behavior  Also need to identify relevant factors that may inform.
State Resource Assessment (SRA) Peter Bautista WATCAC January 2012.
Sustainable Construction
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Baraboo River Watershed RCPP
Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
Looking at Agricultural Sustainability
Focusing on stewardship for long-term sustainability Developed by: Cinda Williams, University of Idaho Extension Kevin Laughlin, University of Idaho Extension.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Chapter 1: An Overview of Program Evaluation Presenter: Stephanie Peterson.
INITIATIVES & STRATEGIES
Conservation Delivery Streamlining Initiative October 2011 Dave White Chief, USDA-NRCS Streamlining Delivery of Conservation Assistance For more information:
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Pest Management for NRCS Conservation Planning Barbara Stewart, State Agronomist, NRCS.
Chapter 2 Flashcards.
Role of the Conservation Plan  To provide a written framework to help the client:  understand their SWAPA resources & concerns,  think holistically.
P Index Development and Implementation The Iowa Experience Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University.
LIVELIHOODS ASSET STATUS TRACKING (Group members: Heny, Rehana, Lulu, Kenneth, Rupleka and Evelyn)
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
a judgment of what constitutes good or bad Audit a systematic and critical examination to examine or verify.
Agroforestry Assistance §History §Technical §Financial.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Looking at Agricultural Sustainability Sustainable Small Farming & Ranching Understanding “Sustainability” and “Whole Farm” Concepts.
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Grazing – Our Most Commonly Used Conservation Practices.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Educating For The Future Of Our Rangelands Jessica Davis Montana State University EDUCATION GOALS After completing this curriculum students will: Recognize.
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
1 Adapted from T. De Lopez (2004) Second Regional Workshop Capacity Development for the Clean Development Mechanism (CD4CDM) 23 March 2004 Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Nutrient Management Planning Canada-Manitoba Farm Stewardship Program Steve Sager, P.Ag. Soil Resource Specialist Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada-PFRA.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Green Payments Now—What’s Missing? WWF Workshop Building the Scientific Basis for Green Payments April 14-15, 2005.
United States Department of Agriculture Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative Illinois River and Eucha-Spavinaw Watershed Initiative Bayou.
The Targeting Outcomes of Programs (TOP) framework.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Environmental auditing
Our Mission Helping people help the land. NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service Our Vision Productive Lands ---- Healthy Environment.
Why Sustainable Construction?  Social progress, which recognises the needs of everyone  Effective protection of the environment  Prudent use of natural.
Schools Property Planning Competition 2013 “Waitara”
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
2 2 State Component The intent of the State Component is to provide flexibility to NRCS State Conservationists to target CIG funds to individual producers.
Implementation and follow up Critically important but relatively neglected stages of EIA process Surveillance, monitoring, auditing, evaluation and other.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service “Helping people help the land"
Quality Management Systems FIETA Providers Herman Letoka ETQA MANAGER.
National Forest System Grazing Objectives 1.Manage range vegetation to protect basic soil and water resources, provide for ecological diversity, improve.
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
Soil & Water Conservation Districts HELPING LAND OWNERS PROTECT, MAINTAIN, AND ENHANCE THEIR NATURAL RESOURCES.
Local Working Group Meetings.  Local Working Groups have an opportunity to provide NRCS with recommendations on how to focus program funds in their local.
NRCS Update Interagency Nutrient Management Conference 2015.
Planning Riparian Buffer Practices in FY16 Rachel Maggi NRCS West Area Biologist.
Resource Management Goal “Use every acre of land within its capability and treat it according to its needs” Hugh Hammond Bennett Founder Soil Conservation.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) Edwards Aquifer State Resource Concern (EA SRC) Jim.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Natural Resource Conservation Service
Uses and Guidance BLM Evaluate status of Standards for Rangeland Health Guidance provided in Washington Office Instruction Memorandum No In BLM.
Sustainable Agriculture
Assessing Administrative and Educational support units
NCPP Perspective From Field Staff
Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan Concept
Power and Decision Making In INRM
Presentation transcript:

Conservation Planning: What’s New?

Topics for Today’s Webinar Revised NPPH Proposed NRCS Land Uses Resource Concerns Planning criteria

Conservation Delivery Streamlining Initiative (CDSI) Conservation Delivery Streamlining Initiative (CDSI) Simplify conservation delivery: Easier for employees and customers Increase staff time in the field with clients Streamline business processes Ensure science-based conservation assistance Enhance financial management and accountability More Conservation on the ground!

NPPH Amendment 5

The conservation planning process has not changed!

CDSI Land Use Changes

Unclear or competing land use designations have been removed. Introduces Land Use “modifiers” to more accurately define the land’s actual use and management. (adverbs) CDSI Land Use changesCDSI Land Use changes

SLI DE 8 Modifiers Modifiers provide a level of specificity and help describe how the land is actually managed. Irrigated – applied when an operational system is present and managed to supply water Wildlife – applied when the client is actively managing for wildlife, and management is reflected in the conservation plan through the application of practices beneficial to wildlife Grazed – applied when grazing animals impact how land is managed and influence the conservation plan

CDSI Change: Resource Concerns and Planning Criteria

What are Resource Concerns? “An expected degradation of the soil, water, air, plant, or animal resource base to the extent that the sustainability or intended use the resource is impaired” Note: human and energy resources are components of the resource base NRCS’ National Planning Procedures Handbook (NPPH)

Why Revise the NRCS Resource Concerns List? Enhance the technical credibility of NRCS conservation planning Support the more integrated delivery of technical and financial assistance Facilitate a more efficient, streamlined conservation assistance business model.

Each of the resource concerns are described in the NPPH

What are Quality Criteria? “ a descriptive statement of desired resource condition and management, representing a level of use that is sustainable over the long term” NRCS’ National Planning Procedures Handbook (NPPH)

Why are we not using QC? Resource concerns and associated quality criteria do not meet the needs of NRCS planners in the field, and do not facilitate the desired science-based planning process as intended. Planners cannot objectively determine when quality criteria are met. The establishment of quality criteria for all resource concerns is an elusive goal

15 Planning Criteria Planning Criteria “ A quantitative or qualitative statement of a treatment level required to achieve a minimum level of treatment for a given resource concern” 2 Levels – Screening & Assessment

16 Simple true-false statements of easily observable conditions planners can use to identify sites that have little or no probability of needing additional treatment. Screening

17 The assessment criteria are used when a site does not pass the screening question(s), or when no screening criteria are defined. Where possible, assessment tools are provided In some cases Screening/Assessment of designated Resource Concerns will be required. Assessment

Assessment Methods Procedural: planners use well-defined procedures to acquire data used to determine the resource condition (Pasture Condition Score) Predictive: planners use models to predict the probability of an outcome. (RUSLE2 or WEPS) Observation: planners rely on direct observation or information provided by the client through an interview (Classic gully) Deduction: planners rely on reason to deduce the status of a resource. The deductive approach is often related to treatment standards. (Dissolved nutrients in ground water: If a client utilizes all reasonable nutrient management techniques and has significantly modified the rate, timing, or both of nutrients applied to a field, the planner may deduce that the field in question is no longer a significant source of nutrients entering the groundwater.)

Resource Concern Checklists Checklists available for: Cropland Pasture Range Farmstead/Other Forest Landscape

Cropland

Wildlife, Air Quality and Energy: Use Landscape Checklist

Questions? me!