"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Senate Criminal Justice Committee Interim Charge 1 June 21, 2006.
Chicago Police Department University of Illinois at Chicago
Ontario’s Policy Framework for Child and Youth Mental Health
1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
Disproportionality of WA Juveniles Ages by Race/Ethnicity
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
1 Our priorities for the next three years Close Critical Service Gaps Increase availability of culturally appropriate services and serve more children.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Common Solutions & Success to Reduce DMC Heidi Hsia, OJJDP Please visit often:
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
VA Programs for Justice-Involved Veterans
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Program (CBCAP) 2006 Program Instruction Overview May 2006 Melissa Lim Brodowski Office on Child Abuse and Neglect,
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
Enhancing Health Coverage for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth OJJDP Coordinating Council November 13, 2013 Diane Justice, Senior Program Director National.
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Dennis Mondoro Strategic Community Development Officer Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Addressing the Needs of Multi- System Youth: Strengthening the connections between Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice. DOUGLAS COUNTY CROSSOVER YOUTH PRACTICE.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
1 OAC Principles MHSA Prevention and Early Intervention.
1 Mental Health as a Public Health Issue Daniel Reimer, MPH, Principal Investigator Sherwin Daryani, MPH, Project Director.
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
ENCIRCLE: A COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP FOR OUR YOUTH Led by Center for Learning & Development thanks to a grant from the Office of the Governor Criminal.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections
Onondaga County DMC Final Report December 13, 2011 Center for Community Alternatives Emily NaPier Juanita Gamble Co-Coordinators.
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Joe Vesowate Assistant Commissioner.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Association on American Indian Affairs Juvenile Justice Reform and the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Thomas F. Best Deputy Assistant Commissioner Division for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Department of State Health Services The 84 th Legislature and.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
Innovation in Monroe County Jody Levison-Johnson Director Child & Family Service Quality & System Development Coordinated Care Services, Inc. Technical.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
A Systems Approach to Improving Substance Abuse Treatment for Latino Youth: Latino Caucus of the APHA Annual Meeting November 6, 2006 URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER.
Chittenden County, Vermont 1. Formal partners Local Education - 8 School Districts (41 schools) + 1 Advisory School District (9 schools) Local Mental.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Evidenced Based Practices In Probation Challenges and Considerations Scott MacDonald Chief Probation Officer Santa Cruz County.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
WELCOME PBIS Maryland Coaches & Administrators. Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Presented to the December 2008 State-Wide Coaches.
A LEGISLATIVE UPDATE ON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Mental Health Needs Council by Amanda Jones, J.D. Legislative.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 22 – 23, 2014 Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.
Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services.
Legislative Enhancements to Behavioral Health. Recent Legislation Behavioral Health Enhancements HB 7019/SB 7068 (2015) SB 12/HB 7097 (2016) Housing Assistance.
Developing a Strategic Framework for Early Intervention: Children, Young People and Families Faith Mann Director of Targeted and Early Intervention Services.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
AspireMN Member Meeting
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
Comprehensive Youth Services
Presentation transcript:

"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas" Randy Turner, Director Lyn Willis, Assistant Director Bennie Medlin, Assistant Director Tarrant County Juvenile Services September 9, 2013

Changes in the Texas Juvenile Justice System 2007: Public disclosure of abuses by staff in the state juvenile facilities operated by the Texas Youth Commission (TYC) Law changed to no longer allow youth convicted of misdemeanant offenses to be committed to TYC Began to see an out-cry to reduce the number of youth in TYC secure programs (approx 5,000) with emphasis on community-based interventions Legislature began to provide additional funding for local juvenile probation departments through the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission (TJPC)

Changes in the Texas Juvenile Justice System 2009-2011: Significant issues continued at the TYC State-operated secure juvenile facilities Continuing emphasis for the State to provide funding to the local juvenile probation departments to support community- based services through TJPC Legislative action to combine TYC and TJPC into one juvenile justice agency began in 2009, and culminated in 2011 with the creation of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) On-going decline in referrals to both the local juvenile departments and the State

Changes in the Texas Juvenile Justice System What is going on NOW? Major reduction in the number of youth being committed to the State’s custody; each county is provided with a “target” TJJD has reduced state-operated facilities from 14 to 5 since 2007; population has been reduced from 5,000 to 1,200 Continued emphasis on providing $$$ to local probation departments to better serve youth within the community through family-, community-, and evidence-based services

Tarrant County Juvenile Services

Tarrant County Juvenile Services

Tarrant County Juvenile Services

Tarrant County Juvenile Services

Tarrant County Juvenile Services

Tarrant County Juvenile Services Unlike many other probation agencies across the State and nation, TCJS has historically had a philosophy to work with youth within the context of community and family engagement, with support of and in collaboration with other key stakeholders Continuing current collaborations and creating opportunities for new partnerships will be critical components of our future strategic work Through research and program evaluation, we will learn more effective application of these core principles and values

Tarrant County Juvenile Services Commitment to Principles of Effective Intervention: Assessment to clearly identify youth and family risk and needs; now required by the State prior to all dispositional hearings Training for all staff in motivational interviewing techniques, supported by national research as an evidence-based technique for juvenile offenders Responsivity principle…develop and implement best and evidence- based practices directly related to impacting identified risk/needs Engaged in work to address Disproportionate Minority Contact, including the MHC work on Cultural and Linguistic Competencies Research and Program Evaluation

Tarrant County Juvenile Services New emphasis on Prevention Services Through grant with TJJD, family and school engagement initiative with FWISD/ “INSIGHTS” “Family Engagement Specialist” at the district’s DAEP provides case management services Referral for more intense services with existing District resources & additional contract providers, Support for transition back to the home school and navigation of available resources Crossover Youth Program/”Shared Visions for Success” Collaboration with DFPS/CPS to provide collaborative services for youth with history of CPS involvement upon referral to the juvenile justice system Coordinated assessment, case planning, & case management One Judge hears all cases to provide consistency and reinforcement

Tarrant County Juvenile Services Even though overall referrals are down, continue to address an increased need for mental health services Mental Health Related Services Cooperative agreement with Child Welfare and MHMRTC to provide liaisons that have offices in the Juvenile Justice Center to better address needs of youth/families and assist in coordination of services; Conduct mental health assessment upon intake to detention and with all new referrals (MAYSI-2), with designated protocol to respond to identified needs; Two Full-time Psychologists hired since 2004; Contracted psychiatric services, available in detention on weekly basis; Enhanced referral process for emergent MH services as needed;

Tarrant County Juvenile Services Collaboration with MHMRTC to provide… Special Needs Diversion Program to provide specific mental health intervention 24/7 for specific youth/families, Expanded MH services for youth/families; Involved in community-wide initiatives to develop and implement Trauma-Informed Care, and a deeper understanding of brain development, esp. within the juvenile offender population; Involvement with the State through the MacArthur Foundation’s Model-for-Change initiative to develop a mental health curriculum for juvenile justice personnel

Tarrant County Juvenile Services Questions? THANK YOU!!