Drafting Rate Case Orders Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Of Appeals Documents
Advertisements

NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
Rate Setting in New York Case Study: Con Edison Electric Rate Proceeding Thomas Dvorsky Director, Office of Electric, Gas and Water New York State Public.
Power Notes Chapter F11 Corporations: Organization, Capital Stock, Dividends Learning Objectives 1. Nature of a Corporation 2. Stockholders’ Equity 3.
1 PG&E Bankruptcy Proposed Settlement Todd Edmister Staff Counsel Public Utilities Commission September 3, 2003.
ACC 424 Financial Reporting II Lecture 5 Introduction to consolidations.
Corporations: Organization, Stock Transactions & Dividends
Appeal Practice Before Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Overview of tariff revision process under Regulatory Commission Prayas - EGI Skill-share workshop for Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan Delegates November 16-18,
Michigan Tax Reform Proposal. Overall Tax and Budget Plan $1.5 billion in spending cuts and structural reforms $400 million to finally start addressing.
The New Mediation Regulation October 16, 2012 Commissioner Derrick L. Williams.
1 Procedural Issues: Adoption, Amendment, Enforcement, and Appeals.
13 Investments and Fair Value Accounting
Chapter 12 Review.
Copyright © 2007 Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved 1 Corporations: Paid-in Capital and the Balance Sheet Chapter 13.
Financial Reporting and Analysis – Chapter 4
The Balance Sheet and Notes to the Financial Statements.
Chapter 21: managing payroll and inventory
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
File & Suspend Rate Cases Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
WEEK 12: ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS BUSN 102 – Özge Can.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
Processing Rate Cases Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
1 of 27 Tariff Development I: Overview of Rate Regulation and Basic Ratemaking Process Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18,
Financial Management Financial Planning
CENTURY 21 ACCOUNTING © Thomson/South-Western LESSON 18-1 Understanding Cash Flow Analysis.
Chapter 16-1 CHAPTER 16 INVESTMENTS Accounting Principles, Eighth Edition.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
1 of 19 Development of Industry Standards Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Ikechukwu N. Nwabueze, Ph.D. Director,
Apply procedures for preparing corporate financial statements.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The FERC Regulatory Process Dennis H. Melvin, Esq. Director – Legal Division (OAL) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
The Financial Statements Presentations for Chapter 2 by Glenn Owen.
Low Income Programs and Consumer Protections Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
School Budget (Draft)
Ratepayer and Customer Rights Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
Using Financial Information and Accounting Chapter 14.
Financial Accounting, Seventh Edition
Overview of a Water Action Plan: California Public Utilities Commission Paul G. Townsley, President Arizona American Water January 18, 2011.
Lecture 28. Chapter 17 Understanding the Principles of Accounting.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
MPSC Licensing Issues Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
Public Service and Education Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
Smart Bet? Illinois Courts and Smart Meters Orijit Ghoshal Energy Law 2010.
Lecture 1.  Accounting is “the language of business.”  More precisely, accounting is a system of maintaining records of a company’s operations and communicating.
October 6, 2015San Antonio, Texas 2015 Attorneys Section Meeting IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS Lonette L. Turner, CEO IFTA, Inc.
Financial Statements for a Corporation Making Accounting Relevant Public corporations often offer Web sites where they provide financial data. Making Accounting.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
Auditing Issues David Baker, MPA, PPS Director Local Government Division North Carolina Department of Revenue.
Changes to Contested Case Hearing Requirements and Procedures Janis Hudson Environmental Law Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
PROCEDURE FOR CONSOLIDATION A Discussion STATE BOUNDARY COMMISSION Office of Land Survey & Remonumentation Bureau of Construction Codes Department of Licensing.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
CHAPTER 7 ACCOUNTING FOR AND PRESENTATION OF LIABILITIES McGraw-Hill/Irwin©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002.
Prepared by: C. Douglas Cloud Professor Emeritus of Accounting Pepperdine University Chapter 11 Corporations: Organization, Stock Transactions, and Dividends.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1 Overview of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Roland W. Wentworth Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates.
1 Regulatory Participation & Communication Workshop General Overview: The Regulator’s Public Information Process Steve Gaw Commissioner Missouri Public.
C Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
Prepared by: C. Douglas Cloud Professor Emeritus of Accounting Pepperdine University © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied,
2013 Annual True-Up Meeting
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Partnership between: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO (PUCO)
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Lecture 12 Financial Issues
10 Accounting for Sales and Cash Receipts. 10 Accounting for Sales and Cash Receipts.
Financial Statements for a Corporation
Setoff Debt Collection Program
The Balance Sheet and Notes to the Financial Statements
1 Accounting in Action Learning Objectives
2018 Annual Attachment O Stakeholder Meeting Ameren Missouri
OKLAHOMA INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS (OIEC)
Presentation transcript:

Drafting Rate Case Orders Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres

The participants Regulated Energy Division – a party in the case and the technical advisor to the Commission. Regulatory Affairs Division – the legal advisor to the Commission. The Commissioners – the ultimate decisionmakers.

The Starting Point -- PFD Normally, RAD does not become involved until the ALJ issues the Proposal for Decision (PFD). The PFD is electronically sent to Director of RAD when it is issued. I review it and assign it to an attorney to act as the lead attorney.

Exceptions When the ALJ issues the PFD, the parties are notified of the date y which their objections (exceptions) must be filed. This is normally 3-4 weeks for a rate case. During this time, the RAD attorneys will be reviewing the PFD, attempting to determine the contested issues, and drafting the preliminary portion of the final order, which describes the procedural history of the case.

Identification of issues When the exceptions are filed (there are always exceptions in a contested rate case) the RAD attorneys review them and identify all contested issues. The attorneys start drafting the arguments of the parties. Ideally, the attorneys and the Commissioners begin meeting to discuss the issues and the position of the Commission.

Replies to exceptions Ordinarily, the parties have 1-2 weeks after the exceptions before the replies to exceptions are due. RAD attorneys use the 1-2 week period to review the testimony and exhibits cited in the arguments section of the draft order. Upon the filing of the replies to exceptions, the case is formally submitted to the Commission.

Deliberations Phase Commissioners provide general guidance. RAD attorneys address specific questions. RED staff ceases acting as a party and switches to role as technical advisors to RAD attorneys and the Commissioners. –Responsible for calculating all changes in revenue deficiency/sufficiency based on proposals drafted by the RAD attorneys or proposed by a Commissioner.

Order Circulation Phase Once all of the major factors are resolved, RAD prepares a draft order that is circulated to all Commissioners and the RED staff. Commissioners review the draft order and make comments in writing. RED staff checks the accuracy of the calculations. RED staff prepares exhibits (tariff sheets).

Nearing the end Once the exact size of the revenue deficiency/sufficiency is determined, the Commission must determine how the change in rates is to be apportioned amongst the rate classes. Tariff sheets are finalized. Copies of the final order are shared with Commission’s in-house press relations and legislative staffers. A press release is prepared. A Commission meeting is scheduled. An agenda for the Commission meeting is posted at least 18 hours before the Commission meeting.

The End In a meeting open to the public, the Commissioners vote by roll call vote to support or oppose the order, which must be in writing. At least two of the three Commissioners must agree for the order to be issued. All of the Commissioners may issue a concurring or dissenting order. A press release is issued. The revised rates take effect the day after the order is issued, due to notice issues.

Rehearings Any party may seek reheaqring before the Commission. Grounds for rehearings: –Legal error –Factual error –Unintended consequence –Newly discovered evidence –Clarification needed

Appeals After the final Commission order and rehearings, if any, any aggrieved person may file an appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. Unless stayed, the order remains in effect during the appeal. If an aggrieved person is still aggrieved after the Court of Appeals decision, an appeal may be taken to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Order in which the issues are discussed in a rate case Procedural history of the case. Test year – [2008] Rate base – [$5,013,880,000] –Net utility plant [$4,848,102,000] –DOE liability [$117,678,000] –Working capital [$48,100,000] –Ludington land sales proceeds [moot]

Issues, continued: Overall rate of return –Capital structure –Cost rates Common equity [10.7%] Long-term debt [5.62%] Short-term debt [5.68%] & preferred stock [4.46%] Deferred income tax credit [0.00%] Deferred investment tax credit [0.00%] Deferred federal income tax [0.00%]

Issues, continued Adjusted Net Operating Income [$376,926,000] –Jurisdictional revenues [$3,047,948,000] –Fuel & purchased and net interchanged power [$1,488,745,000] –Discount fees on accounts receivables –Employee Incentive Compensation Plan –Dues and Lobbying expenses –Billing system cost subsidy –Tree trimming costs and tracker –Pension costs and OPEB tracker –Incremental environmental compliance costs –Pro-forma tax adjustment

Calculation of Base Rate Sufficiency Rate Base$5,013,880,000 Rate of Return6.93% Income Required $347,462,000 Adjusted NOI $379,926,000 Income excess $29,464,000 Revenue multiplier Revenue excess $46,208,400

Issues, continued Other Revenue Issues –Zeeland plant revenue issues Interim relief order granted $69.5 million to be collect via a surcharge, not through base rates Final order approved an additional $4.177 million Palisades transaction costs Palisades refund to Rate E-1 customers Energy Efficiency Proposal Electric Choice Incentive Mechanism Low-income energy efficiency fund Nuclear legacy costs REVENUE DEFICIENCY -- $27,468,000

The End