Ohio Solid Waste Management Review: Revisiting HB 592 Andrew Booker and Christopher Germain Ohio Solid Waste Management Review: Revisiting HB 592 Andrew.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August, 2012 HB 592 REVIEW Revisiting Ohios Comprehensive Solid Waste Law Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) Phase II Update & Discussion.
Advertisements

Ohio Solid Waste System Review Phase I Overview Solid Waste Advisory Committee May 17 th, 2012.
Research Policy Practice National Dialogue: Phase III The Journey Ahead February 28, 2013.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
Jfkdlsafjkdljflkajfklasjfkldsjflkjflksdjflkdsjfldsjfl kjflkjflkdsajflkdsjflkdsjflkdsjflksjfdlksjfdkslfjkl dsjfkldsjfldksjdsklfjkdlsfjdklsjaflkdjskdjfkdlsjk.
Wake County Experience with Alternative Landfill Land Use Presented by: John Roberson, P.E. Director of Solid Waste Management Division.
Zero Waste Operational Plan Policy & Services Committee 3/13/2007.
Article 41 Wastewater Planning Capacity Study To determine whether the Town will vote to adopt a resolution supporting the Town Manager’s allocation of.
Pinal County Environmental Health Code Christopher Reimus, R.S., DAAS Assistant Director of Public Health Environmental Health Services Pinal County Public.
SWAC 2013 OEPA Recycling Grant Awards June 20, 2013.
November 1, 2012 HB 592 REVIEW Revisiting Ohio’s Comprehensive Solid Waste Law Ohio EPA-SWMD Workgroup.
EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Thomas Russell, P.E. U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Partnership for Peace Conference,
Dangerous Animal Initiative Overview David Whitehurst, Director, Bureau of Wildlife Resources, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Christine.
California Integrated Waste Management Board. 58 Percent Diversion Generated 94 Million Tons Disposed 39.6 Million Tons Diverted 53.5 Million Tons California.
Strategic Plan. April thru November 2011 Strategic Planning Cmmte/Staff Emerging Issues Document Trustee/Staff Meeting Community Listening Campaign SPC/Staff.
November 15, 2012 HB 592 REVIEW Revisiting Ohio’s Comprehensive Solid Waste Law State Solid Waste Management Advisory Council.
OHIO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT REVIEW UPDATE TO SWAC August 15, Ohio Solid Waste Management Review9/7/2015.
Update On 2000 Bureau of State Audits Report Item L; March 10, 2003 Permitting & Enforcement Committee Item J; March 12, 2003 Budget & Administration Committee.
2014 OEPA Grant Opportunities October 3, Agenda 1.Introductions 2.Welcoming Remarks Recycling & Litter Prevention Expectations 4.OEPA Grant.
September 16, SWANA 2005 COLORADO CHARLES JOHNSON SOLID WASTE UNIT LEADER.
California Venue and Event Recycling Legislation Review of AB 2176 Model Ordinance For Waste Reduction at Venues and Events.
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
2011 ITRC Spring Membership Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota April 6, 2011.
RECYCLING RESOURCES ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ACT HB AND TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENT GRANTS SB STAKEHOLDER UPDATE July 2007.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Matthew Udenenwu Waste Permits Division 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Ohio EPA/SWMD Workgroup May 3, 2012 SWMD – Ohio EPA Workgroup Thursday, May 3 rd 2012.
Los Osos Community Services District Basin Management Planning and Proposed Work Program June 5, 2008.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Consolidated Application Schedule.
TURTLE MT BAND OF CHIPPEWA Ray Reed – Brownfield Coordinator EPA-TRP.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
Chapter 16 Waste Generation and Waste Disposal.  Refuse collected by municipalities from households, small businesses, and institutions such as schools,
Air & Waste Management Assoc. August 6, 2008 Region 4 RCRA Division Ken Lapierre, Deputy Director.
Environmental Quality Restricted Account (EQRA) Background Bill Sinclair Acting Executive Director Utah Department of Environmental Quality May 28, 2009.
TEXAS NODAL Board of Directors Austin, Texas July 15, 2003.
California Integrated Waste Management Board November 10, 2008 Item #2 Discussion And Request For Direction Regarding The Board's Fulfillment Of The Requirements.
OHIO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REVIEW: SWAC UPDATE June 20, Ohio Solid Waste Management Review 5/27/2016 Presented to: Ohio Solid Waste Advisory.
Adem.alabama.gov Alabama Land Division Regulatory Update Wm. Gerald Hardy Chief, Land Division 2008 Southern Section A&WMA Annual Conference August 6,
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
SWMD-Ohio EPA Workgroup November 1 st, 2012 Highbanks Metro Park.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
1. Perimeter Approach to Plant Protection Presentation to RCC Stakeholder Dialogue Session January 2014 Canadian Food Inspection Agency Steve Côté
SOLID WASTE REGIONALIZATION MONTANA’S JOURNEY Waste & Underground Tanks Management Bureau Solid Waste Section.
Discussion And Request For Direction Relative To Strategic Directive 8.3 Regulation Reviews For Alternative Daily Cover And Food/Green Waste Composting.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
Smooth Sailing Ahead Partnering With Sustainability and Waste Compliance & Mitigation Fernando Berton, CIWMB.
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
1 CIWMB E-Waste Update CIWMB Working Group December 2001.
A presentation to the Storm Water Roundtable By Richard A. Watson, AICP Richard Watson & Associates, Inc. Duarte, California 16 February 2016 Update on.
Gregory Canyon Landfill San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
2025 Plan Implementation Update 15 th Annual Tennessee Environmental Conference Paula Mitchell, Recovered Materials Manager| 3/16/2016.
TOGETHER, WE WILL MAKE A CHANGE 1. Pillars of Action ▶ Lead by example. ▶ Measure and analyze. ▶ Market development. ▶ Increase access and participation.
March 8, 2016 Presentation of Item CCW – Solid Waste Management Infrastructure Projects – Final Siting Report.
Policy Committee Report Virginia Recycling Association Annual Members Meeting Charlottesville, Virginia November 8, VRA Policy Committee Report1.
Managed Care Common Formulary
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2016 Meeting – Park City, UT
Sustainable Communities Act 2007
Solid Waste Handling Standards
California Resource Recovery Association
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Department of Environmental Quality
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Cooperative Federalism 2
Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.
Utilities Department Solid Waste Business Plan and Tipping Fees
Presentation transcript:

Ohio Solid Waste Management Review: Revisiting HB 592 Andrew Booker and Christopher Germain Ohio Solid Waste Management Review: Revisiting HB 592 Andrew Booker and Christopher Germain Ohio’s Solid Waste and C&DD Program Annual Meeting May 9, 2013

4 Phase Process (Approximately 18 months) – Phase I: Information Gathering – Phase II: Discussion and Consensus Building – Phase III: Formal Proposal – Phase IV: Legislative Initiative 4 Phase Process (Approximately 18 months) – Phase I: Information Gathering – Phase II: Discussion and Consensus Building – Phase III: Formal Proposal – Phase IV: Legislative Initiative

Solid Waste Management Review: The Basics – Ohio EPA maintains our commitment to original HB 592 principles: – Waste management must be protective of human health and the environment – Continue to reduce reliance on landfills for solid waste management – But, we continue this process with very few pre-conceived notions about how to maintain that commitment – Ohio EPA maintains our commitment to original HB 592 principles: – Waste management must be protective of human health and the environment – Continue to reduce reliance on landfills for solid waste management – But, we continue this process with very few pre-conceived notions about how to maintain that commitment

Solid Waste Management Review: Process Phase I: Information Gathering – March 2012 – June 2012 – Informal sit down meetings Ohio EPA invitation All the obvious interested parties Information gathering focus Open invitation to others and individual members Phase I: Information Gathering – March 2012 – June 2012 – Informal sit down meetings Ohio EPA invitation All the obvious interested parties Information gathering focus Open invitation to others and individual members Solid Waste Management Districts County Commissioners Health Departments Environmental Groups Recycling Organizations Ohio Municipal League Ohio Township Association Ohio Chamber Ohio Manufacturers Solid Waste Consultants NSWMA / SWANA Individual Businesses Individual Citizens Planning Organizations Solid Waste Management Districts County Commissioners Health Departments Environmental Groups Recycling Organizations Ohio Municipal League Ohio Township Association Ohio Chamber Ohio Manufacturers Solid Waste Consultants NSWMA / SWANA Individual Businesses Individual Citizens Planning Organizations

Solid Waste Management Review: Process Phase 2: Discussion and Consensus Building – July 2012 – Spring 2013 – Significant resources being directed to research and benchmarking – Various methods of stakeholder engagement depending on issue – Facilitated discussions on certain issues Contracting with professional facilitators Ohio EPA is also encouraging discussion among IPs – Ultimately seeking consensus-based solutions Phase 2: Discussion and Consensus Building – July 2012 – Spring 2013 – Significant resources being directed to research and benchmarking – Various methods of stakeholder engagement depending on issue – Facilitated discussions on certain issues Contracting with professional facilitators Ohio EPA is also encouraging discussion among IPs – Ultimately seeking consensus-based solutions

Solid Waste Law Review: Solutions Framework Guidance, Policies & BMPs Regulatory Changes ‘Parking Lot’ Issue Identification Partnerships & Initiatives Shared Visions and Goals Statutory Changes

Solid Waste Law Review Process: Vision 2035 Final Version (Released March 4, 2013): – “Ohio continues to reduce waste generation. Waste materials that are generated are recognized as important resources that often have significant economic value. These materials are managed in ways that maximize that value and prevent the negative impacts associated with improper management. Ohio will manage waste materials via a competitive and innovative portfolio of best management practices that include recycling, composting, and other beneficial approaches, with disposal as a last resort. These practices are developed and operated by public, private and non-profit stakeholders at all stages of the product life cycle. Landfilling is practiced at an ever decreasing rate, while Ohio strives toward zero landfilling.” Final Version (Released March 4, 2013): – “Ohio continues to reduce waste generation. Waste materials that are generated are recognized as important resources that often have significant economic value. These materials are managed in ways that maximize that value and prevent the negative impacts associated with improper management. Ohio will manage waste materials via a competitive and innovative portfolio of best management practices that include recycling, composting, and other beneficial approaches, with disposal as a last resort. These practices are developed and operated by public, private and non-profit stakeholders at all stages of the product life cycle. Landfilling is practiced at an ever decreasing rate, while Ohio strives toward zero landfilling.”

Solid Waste Management Review: Issue List Nearly 100 issues – all raised from Phase I As of 10/9/2012, Ohio EPA was willing to commit resources to these issues Less than 20 issues were removed between Phase II kick-off meetings and the issuance of this list New update currently in the works.

Solid Waste Management Review: Proposals All draft proposals will be issued in a consistent format Draft Proposals are slated to be released between March and June Currently anticipate between 20 and 24 Posted to website for public comment prior to final proposal

Solid Waste Management Review: Active Issues SWMD Planning Process SWMD Consolidation Flow Control SWMD Authorities Scrap Tires Facility Oversight Post Closure Care Orphan Landfills SWAC/State Plan E-Waste Local Responsibility SWMD Planning Process SWMD Consolidation Flow Control SWMD Authorities Scrap Tires Facility Oversight Post Closure Care Orphan Landfills SWAC/State Plan E-Waste Local Responsibility Registration Requirements Plan Contents Venue Recycling Organics SWMD Structure/Misc Beneficial Reuse C&DD Funding (Fees) Landfill Permitting Landfill Redevelopment Misc.

Solid Waste Management Review: Process Phase 2: Current Status – Over 20 Phase II meetings have been held thus far on various issues: Solid Waste Management District Planning Issues SWMD Flow Control/Designation/Authorities SWMD Consolidation Ohio’s Scrap Tire Program Electronics Recycling Facility Oversight – Proposals on several issues are in the drafting stages, including: Post-Closure Care Abandoned “Orphan” Landfills Landfill Redevelopment Local Involvement and Responsibility – A few issues remain in the queue, ready to be addressed when resources allow Phase 2: Current Status – Over 20 Phase II meetings have been held thus far on various issues: Solid Waste Management District Planning Issues SWMD Flow Control/Designation/Authorities SWMD Consolidation Ohio’s Scrap Tire Program Electronics Recycling Facility Oversight – Proposals on several issues are in the drafting stages, including: Post-Closure Care Abandoned “Orphan” Landfills Landfill Redevelopment Local Involvement and Responsibility – A few issues remain in the queue, ready to be addressed when resources allow

Solid Waste Management Review: Active Issues Facility Oversight – Proposal in research and conceptual stage – Initial webinars (Dec. 10) and meetings (Dec. 17) in 2012 – Internal group of Ohio EPA staff working on ideas and concepts based on comments from earlier meetings – Currently focused on extensive data gathering Health Department funding and activities Internal activities Inspection standard times and costs – Focused engagement efforts with ODH and Local HDs Facility Oversight – Proposal in research and conceptual stage – Initial webinars (Dec. 10) and meetings (Dec. 17) in 2012 – Internal group of Ohio EPA staff working on ideas and concepts based on comments from earlier meetings – Currently focused on extensive data gathering Health Department funding and activities Internal activities Inspection standard times and costs – Focused engagement efforts with ODH and Local HDs

Solid Waste Management Review: Process Phase 3: Formal Proposal – Summer 2013 – Develop and issue draft recommendations for public comment – Discuss final proposals with SWAC – Issue comprehensive proposal Engage in extensive stakeholder outreach and engagement – Finalize and publish final comprehensive proposal Phase 3: Formal Proposal – Summer 2013 – Develop and issue draft recommendations for public comment – Discuss final proposals with SWAC – Issue comprehensive proposal Engage in extensive stakeholder outreach and engagement – Finalize and publish final comprehensive proposal

Solid Waste Management Review: Process Phase 4: Legislative Initiative – Late Summer ? – Goal is to pursue legislative action jointly with other interested parties – Consensus is ideal, but we will pursue changes without it if necessary – We may take two “bites” at the issues: First put forward consensus-based items Continue work on contentious items and return for a 2 nd round Phase 4: Legislative Initiative – Late Summer ? – Goal is to pursue legislative action jointly with other interested parties – Consensus is ideal, but we will pursue changes without it if necessary – We may take two “bites” at the issues: First put forward consensus-based items Continue work on contentious items and return for a 2 nd round

Questions Ohio Solid Waste Management Review Process Project Contact: Christopher Germain (614) Ohio EPA Division of Materials and Waste Management, Attn: Christopher Germain PO Box 1049 Columbus OH